Former McKinsey partner jailed for deleting emails on US opioid work
McKinsey
has been sentenced to six months in prison for deleting documents on the consulting firm's work for opioids manufacturer
Purdue Pharma
.
Martin Elling pleaded guilty in January to a single charge of obstruction of justice, admitting he erased more than 100 computer files related to his work for Purdue after prosecutors began investigating the drugmaker's role in an epidemic of opioid addiction ravaging the US.
Elling was on a team of McKinsey consultants who advised Purdue, the maker of OxyContin, on how to 'turbocharge' sales of the painkiller. Purdue had hired McKinsey in 2013 to help revive sales of the painkiller, and Elling helped win the business and lead the team that devised the strategy, which involved aggressive marketing to doctors who liberally prescribed the drug, according to federal prosecutors.
In August 2018, after news reports that US authorities were investigating the company, Elling emailed himself a to-do list with the subject line 'When home' that included the item 'delete old pur [Purdue Pharma] documents from laptop', according to court filings.
READ MORE
A forensic analysis showed that a folder named 'Purdue' disappeared along with more than 100 documents. Prosecutors said the deletions were intended to shield evidence about his and McKinsey's role in the US public health crisis stemming from opioid addiction, which has led to nearly 1 million deaths since the turn of the century.
McKinsey has paid about $1.6bn to settle an array of legal claims that its work for opioid manufacturers contributed to the addiction crisis, including a $650 million deferred prosecution agreement with the US justice department in December.
The firm has said its opioid work was a source of 'profound regret' and that it has since revamped risk management processes.
Elling was on Thursday sentenced to six months in prison plus 1,000 hours of community service over two years of supervised release, according to a spokesperson for his lawyers.
'Martin fully accepts responsibility for his conduct, for which he is extremely sorry,' his legal team said in a statement. 'He intends to spend the remainder of his life seeking to regain the trust of those whom he disappointed with his conduct.'
Prosecutors had argued for a 12-month sentence, 'to send a message to white-collar defendants that they are not above the law, and to deter others from attempting to evade responsibility by destroying evidence'.
Elling's attorney, Thomas Bondurant, wrote in a filing ahead of sentencing that his client 'sincerely regrets his actions, he understands their severity, and he fully accepts their consequences', and that he had 'already paid a great price for his actions'.
Elling was fired by McKinsey in 2021 after the disclosure of an internal email in which Elling discussed deleting documents. Bondurant said that a prison term would mean Elling could not return to Thailand, where he has been living since 2019.
Some of the firm's most senior former executives weighed in as character witnesses, including former managing partner Kevin Sneader, and Elling's attorneys called his actions 'an extraordinary aberration' in a 30-year McKinsey career.
Sneader, who led McKinsey as its global managing partner from 2018 to 2021 and is now an executive at Goldman Sachs, called Elling 'generous; knowledgeable; well travelled; insightful' in a character reference submitted to Judge Robert Ballou of the US District Court for the Western District of Virginia.
'Martin was seen as a truly valued coach to 100s of colleagues who benefited from his generosity of time even though there were many more financially rewarding ways in which he could have spent the countless hours to which he devoted himself to help others succeed,' Sneader wrote.
Elling also attracted character references from Michael Silber, McKinsey's former chief financial officer, and Katy George, its former chief people officer who is now at Microsoft, among 39 written submissions ahead of the hearing.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
10 hours ago
- The Journal
No prosecutions for the illegal modification of electric scooters a year on from legislation
NOBODY HAS BEEN prosecuted for the illegal modification of e-scooters, a Fine Gael TD has said, as he calls for greater enforcement on the issue. The legislation prohibiting various modifications to e-scooters was brought in last May in the Road Traffic (Electric Scooters) Regulations 2024. Within the legislation, it sets out that a person may not modify an electric scooter in a manner that compromises the safe use of the vehicle; so that the characteristics no longer correspond to the manufacturer's design specifications and information on the manufacturer's plate; or in a manner that enables the driver to alter upwards the maximum design speed, net power, or continuous rated pow. Fine Gael TD Barry Ward raised concerns about the lack of prosecutions in relation to illegal modifications on the vehicles with Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan in a parliamentary question. In response, O'Callaghan said that no prosecutions have been recorded for the offence. Advertisement Dún Laoghaire TD Barry Ward, who describes himself as a regular e-scooter user, said that anyone who had spent time walking in their local area or in Dublin city centre 'will have seen countless examples of the use of e-scooters and e-bikes in an anti-social and dangerous way, many of which have been modified to be used at greater speeds'. He said that O'Callaghan's confirmation that there have been no prosecutions shows that enforcement in the area has not caught up to the regulations. Last year's regulations state that if a person uses an electric scooter in a public place that does not comply with the regulations, the owner of the scooter is prescribed under the Road Traffic Act 1961 as committing an offence of non-compliance. A pilot scheme established by gardaí has begun to utilise a speed testing kit to establish whether an electric scooter in use in public is compliant with the speed limit of 20 km/h . Gardaí confirmed that they were planning on purchasing 'a lot more' e-scooter and e-bike speed testing kits , which will be distributed to garda stations across the country. There has been a surge in seizures of electric scooters that do not meet Irish regulations in recent months, but there appears to be a disconnect between seizures and prosecutions. Ward added that the modification of electric scooters is not only dangerous for the operator but for other road users and pedestrians. 'If it is proven that the device has been modified, this needs to be prosecuted.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
Noraid: ‘They started to run it down from the early 1990s – They said I had an image as an IRA supporter'
Ernie O'Malley's pub on East 27th Street in Manhattan, between Lexington and Third, is where those of Irish birth or lineage gather to watch GAA matches from a place many still call 'home'. Next Wednesday, July 9th, however, the pub will be crowded not to watch GAA, but for RTE's latest documentary, Noraid : Irish America and the IRA, the story of Republican fundraising in the United States during the Troubles. Now ageing, the group will include Martin Galvin, Noraid's public face for decades; New York cab-driver, newspaper editor and radio presenter John McDonagh; and Father Pat Moloney, jailed for four years for a 1993 Brinks Mat heist, which he still denies. The documentary, directed by Kevin Brannigan, evocatively captures New York in the 1970s and 1980s, and the controversies surrounding an organisation blamed by the Irish and British governments, and by Washington, for raising money for IRA weapons. READ MORE Throughout the two-part documentary, the organisation's members agree on a few points – the proper title of the organisation was never Noraid but, rather, Irish Northern Aid and it never bought IRA guns. Irish-American members of Noraid protesting in New York in the 1980s Few outside the organisation have ever, or will ever, call it Irish Northern Aid, however, while few among two generations of Irish, British and US police and intelligence figures will ever accept its denials about weapons. Galvin adamantly rejects the allegations, however, pointing out that it was investigated repeatedly by the FBI and others: 'I would have been put in jail, if that was the case,' he tells The Irish Times. Equally, British intelligence had its own eyes inside Noraid since Sinn Féin figure, Denis Donaldson, outed nearly two decades later as a British informer, worked with it in New York in the early 1990s. Martin Galvin in New York in 2024. Photograph: Faolan Carey '[He] had our books open. If we were sending money back, or it was being diverted to IRA, that would have been passed on,' Galvin goes on, insisting that the money raised went, as it always said it did, to families of those affected by the Troubles. IRA figures involved in buying US weaponry, such as Gabriel Megahey or John 'The Yank' Crawley – who was later jailed for the foiled 1984 arms smuggling attempt on board the Marita Ann trawler – agree. If anything, they were told to stay away from Noraid because it would bring them to attention. Donaldson, killed later at a cottage in Donegal by people unknown, features frequently in conversation with Galvin: 'I complained about him. I could see even then that he was an informer. But I was told he had impeccable credentials.' Galvin had quickly suspected him: 'He told people I was a particular target. Then, he'd disappear for a few days and try to undermine anybody associated with me. Then, he was seen drinking with FBI people.' The first episode traces how 1920s anti-Treaty IRA men who quit, or fled, Ireland after the Civil War infused New York's Irish-American community with strong Republican feelings brought to life later with The Troubles. Remembering people such as Michael Flannery, who fought in 1916, John McDonagh says: 'Their hatred of the Free State knew no bounds. It was always, 'Free State', and 'bastards' wasn't long after it.' The second episode traces the impact of the 1981 hunger-strikes and Noraid-organised visits of Irish-Americans to Northern Ireland in the mid-1980s that radicalised opinion across Irish-America. Graphic for RTE documentary on Noraid It tracks, too, Sinn Féin's entry into the top strata of US politics, including White House visits – a process that was first pressed by Noraid calls for a Northern special envoy and a visa for then party leader Gerry Adams. It also maps the volleys of criticism from Garret FitzGerald, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and others on both side of the Atlantic and in the press, with Noraid supporters often labelled as misguided, deluded or simply supporting evil. 'We always got a fair shot from The Irish Times and [the newspaper's Washington Correspondent until 1992] Sean Cronin [who was the IRA's Chief of Staff during part of the 1950s Border Campaign],' Galvin says. Today, Noraid is a pale shadow of its former self. People still give it 'money in their wills', says Galvin, which is used for a few student bursaries and to help anyone 'being victimised today because of their involvement in the struggle'. Blacklisted for years, Galvin and others now get invited to official Irish Government events hosted by the Irish Consulate-General in Manhattan and get briefings from the Department of Foreign Affairs. [ Irish unification would cost €152m annually to give Northern Irish civil servants pay parity, report says Opens in new window ] If, however, relations with 'official' Ireland have warmed, ties with Sinn Féin have gone in the other direction – with Noraid pushed into the background and replaced by its New York-headquartered Friends of Sinn Féin. Galvin tries not to sound hurt but it is clear that he is: 'They started to run it down from the early 1990s. I was told that I was to stand back. 'We want to go in a different direction,' they said. 'They told me that I had an image as a supporter of the IRA, which I had, and that they wanted to go in a different direction,' he says. 'It was actually more difficult to step back than it had been to step forward. 'No individual is that important,' he says, with a shrug. Looking back, one senses regret in Galvin, not in his interest in Northern Ireland, his support for the IRA or his involvement in Noraid since the 1970s but, rather, at the cost it inflicted on his own life. He had joined Noraid hoping that he would not attract 'a lot of publicity' because he was then 'an assistant district attorney, a prosecutor, if you will'. He goes on: 'That was a path to a judgeship. That's what I wanted to do.' If Galvin is diplomatic, John McDonagh is not. For years, he interviewed Sinn Féin figures on his New York radio show when they were not allowed on the airwaves in the Republic of Ireland or the UK, along with editing The Irish People newspaper. One of the first signs of changing winds from Ireland came, he says, when Sinn Féin ordered an Irish pipe band in Philadelphia who had long worn berets, black ties and black jackets that they could not 'dress like that any more'. 'Sinn Féin came over, shut down everything. They traded in Irish Republicans in New York for Wall Street Republicans. They're the only Republicans that Sinn Féin want to hear about. They don't want to hear about Irish Republicans.' People who had 'carried the movement during good and hard times in New York were just jettisoned right off the bat', says McDonagh, who speaks with humour in his voice but the bitterness underneath is palpable. Neither is convinced that a United Ireland is coming soon or, perhaps, at all. Galvin wants a referendum but not one in 2030, while the British now just 'smile indulgently as if this is something that is never going to happen'. If it does, Galvin is not convinced that it would be fairly fought, believing that nationalist voters would be threatened with the loss of pension benefits and other losses if they vote for unity. Typically, McDonagh is blunter. [ 'People don't care that much': Frustrated sighs audible as students asked the 'British or Irish' question Opens in new window ] 'Listen, I've been listening to bulls**t in New York since the 1990s. Joe Cahill [the late IRA chief of staff] told me personally: 'We're getting the prisoners out and we're going to have a united Ireland in about five, 10 years.' He came and went. 'Then, Martin McGuinness said: 'We're going to have it in the next 10 years.' That went nowhere. Then, Gerry Adams said it would be in 2016, on the 100th anniversary of the Rising. That didn't happen. 'Now, we've Mary Lou coming out. Now, it's not a United Ireland because the tone has changed. It's a shared or an agreed Ireland. That's the semantics and the wording now. Everything's getting very fuzzy. 'The one thing I have found out is you can't defeat human nature. The people who get into power turn exactly into the people they just turfed out.' So, would he do it all again if he had the chance to roll the clock back 50 years? Just for a moment, he pauses, before recalling a conversation with senior IRA bomber and hunger-striker, the late Brendan 'Dark' Hughes. 'I asked him the same question as you have. 'Brendan, would you have got involved knowing how it ended?' He said, 'I wouldn't have got out of bed'. 'There are a lot of people who feel that way,' he goes on. Do Noraid people meet up now? 'At a freaking funeral home on Queens Boulevard, when they die. They're the only meetings you're going to get,' he replies, drily. Bar Ernie O'Malley's on Wednesday. Noraid: Irish America & the IRA begins Wednesday, July 9th, 9.35pm on RTÉ One
Irish Times
20 hours ago
- Irish Times
Musk announces forming of ‘America Party' in further break from Trump
The dispute between US president Donald Trump and his main campaign financier Elon Musk took another fractious turn on Saturday when the space and automotive billionaire announced the formation of a new political party, saying Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill would bankrupt the US. A day after asking his followers on his X platform whether a new US political party should be created, Mr Musk said in a post on Saturday that 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' he wrote. The announcement from Mr Musk comes after Mr Trump signed his self-styled 'big, beautiful' tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday , which Musk fiercely opposed. READ MORE [ Musk fumes as Trump tax bill cuts electric vehicle credits Opens in new window ] Mr Musk, who became the word's richest man thanks to his Tesla car company and his SpaceX satellite firm, spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term, aimed at slashing government spending. The first sign of investor dissatisfaction with Mr Musk's announcement followed later in the day. Investment firm Azoria Partners will postpone the listing of a Tesla exchange-traded fund, Azoria chief executive James Fishback said in a post on X. Mr Fishback is asking Tesla's board to clarify Mr Musk's political ambitions and said the new party undermines the confidence shareholders had that he would be focusing more on the company after leaving government service in May. Mr Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill. Mr Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Mr Musk's companies receive from the federal government. Republicans have expressed concern that Mr Musk's on-again, off-again feud with r MTrump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. Asked on X what was the one thing that made him go from loving Mr Trump to attacking him, Mr Musk said: 'Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T [trillion] under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country.' There was no immediate comment from Mr Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. The feud with Mr Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price. The stock soared after Mr Trump's November reelection and hit a high of more than $488 in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing last week out at $315.35. Despite Mr Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years, while Mr Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40 per cent, despite often divisive policies. - Reuters
