Musk announces forming of ‘America Party' in further break from Trump
US
president
Donald Trump
and his main campaign financier
Elon Musk
took another fractious turn on Saturday when the space and automotive billionaire announced the formation of a new political party, saying Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill would bankrupt the US.
A day after asking his followers on his X platform whether a new US political party should be created, Mr Musk said in a post on Saturday that 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.'
'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' he wrote.
The announcement from Mr Musk comes after Mr Trump signed his self-styled
'big, beautiful' tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday
, which Musk fiercely opposed.
READ MORE
[
Musk fumes as Trump tax bill cuts electric vehicle credits
Opens in new window
]
Mr Musk, who became the word's richest man thanks to his Tesla car company and his SpaceX satellite firm, spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term, aimed at slashing government spending.
The first sign of investor dissatisfaction with Mr Musk's announcement followed later in the day. Investment firm Azoria Partners will postpone the listing of a Tesla exchange-traded fund, Azoria chief executive James Fishback said in a post on X.
Mr Fishback is asking Tesla's board to clarify Mr Musk's political ambitions and said the new party undermines the confidence shareholders had that he would be focusing more on the company after leaving government service in May.
Mr Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill. Mr Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Mr Musk's companies receive from the federal government. Republicans have expressed concern that Mr Musk's on-again, off-again feud with r MTrump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections.
Asked on X what was the one thing that made him go from loving Mr Trump to attacking him, Mr Musk said: 'Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T [trillion] under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country.'
There was no immediate comment from Mr Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement.
The feud with Mr Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price. The stock soared after Mr Trump's November reelection and hit a high of more than $488 in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing last week out at $315.35.
Despite Mr Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years, while Mr Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40 per cent, despite often divisive policies. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump tariffs: 'No sign of shock to Irish property market'
A much-feared economic shock to Ireland's property market by Donald Trump's tariff policies has failed to materialise. Earlier this year, MyHome had warned the speed at which house prices are increasing could be slowed by the prospect of a tariff war between the US and the EU. MyHome warned the economic fallout from such a 'war' could seriously dampen house sales because Ireland's housing market has become too heavily dependent on 'high-income earners working in multinational sectors'. However, MyHome's latest e report states there is 'no sign of any Donald Trump hangover in Ireland's housing market'. 'Clearly uncertainty following [US] president Trump's 'Liberation day' tariffs hasn't been sufficient to dent Ireland's housing market. There is little sign of uncertainty relating to president Donald Trump's tariff policies holding back demand from prospective homebuyers. It instead points out that vendors felt sufficiently confident in April, May, and June to raise their prices regardless of the expected tariff war by a further 4%, or by €20,000 on the quarter. It said typical transactions are being settled 7.5% above the asking price. One in six properties are being sold by 20% or more over. 'Competition for homes remains fierce,' the report states. It found that the average approval in April was €337,700, up 7.8% on the year, reflecting the current pace of average pay growth at 5%-6%. The report states: We now know the average first-time-buyer borrowed 3.4 times their income in 2024, up from a 3.2x multiple in 2022. MyHome managing director Joanne Geary. The firm's latest report states that the average first-time-buyer borrowed 3.4 times their income in 2024, up from a 3.2x multiple in 2022. Picture: Tom Honan 'This change has pushed up house prices by €15,000-€20,000.' MyHome managing director Joanne Geary said: 'When MyHome released our property report for Q1 last April, there was considerable concern about the effect of a potential trade war on the property market. 'Now, after months of speculation, threats, and uncertainty, we can see that the potential of punitive tariffs has had a limited impact on the housing market, with strong demand still in evidence.' She said annual asking price inflation around the country is now running at 7%, compared with 8% at the end of the first quarter. Dublin has seen an increase of 5.1% in asking prices over the year while, outside the capital, asking prices have risen by 7.9%. The median price in Cork was €325,000 in the second quarter of the year, with inflation at 10.2% and Cork City prices up even more sharply by 11.7% to €335,000. 'Average mortgage approval values and volumes have soared to record highs,' she said. The most recent Banking & Payments Federation Ireland data for May shows total mortgage approval values are up by a staggering 17.8% over the year, while the number of approvals has risen by 10.5%. 'Competition for homes is still intense, with an average time to sale agreed of just 2.6 months and the average home selling for 7.5% over the asking price.' She added: 'As has been the case for some time, we have yet to see a significant uptick in supply. 'At end-June 2025 there were 12,563 properties listed for sale on MyHome, up by just 1% compared with the same period of 2024. 'This stagnant level of growth is unhelpful and will give no solace to a Government in desperate need of home completions.' She said that while there will be "some improvement" in the number of completed houses in 2025, the numbers will "fall well short" of the 50-60,000 units required in 2025.
Irish Daily Star
4 hours ago
- Irish Daily Star
Donald Trump issues blistering three-word attack on 'train wreck' Elon Musk
President Donald Trump has issued a blistering rant on Truth Social against former DOGE head Elon Musk on Sunday, calling him a "train wreck" and "off the rails." Trump's savage post comes days after Musk announced the creation of the "America Party." "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump said . "He even wants to start a Third Political Party , despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States - The System seems not designed for them." "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds," continued Trump. "Republicans, on the other hand, are a smooth running 'machine,' that just passed the biggest Bill of its kind in the History of our Country." Read More Related Articles Fresh Donald Trump health fear after huge bruise spotted on hand amid warning Read More Related Articles Pilot's final nine words as Air France plane plummeted into Atlantic killing 228 people "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump said in his post. (Image: AFP via Getty Images) "It is a Great Bill, but, unfortunately for Elon, it eliminates the ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate, which would have forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time," added Trump. "I have been strongly opposed to that from the very beginning." "People are now allowed to buy whatever they want - Gasoline Powered, Hybrids (which are doing very well), or New Technologies as they come about - No more EV Mandate," wrote the president. "I have campaigned on this for two years and, quite honestly, when Elon gave me his total and unquestioned Endorsement, I asked him whether or not he knew that I was going to terminate the EV Mandate - It was in every speech I made, and in every conversation I had." According to Trump, Musk said "had no problems with that." (Image: Getty Images) According to Trump, Musk said "had no problems with that," which allegedly surprised him. "Additionally, Elon asked that one of his close friends run NASA and, while I thought his friend was very good, I was surprised to learn that he was a blue-blooded Democrat who had never contributed to a Republican before," Trump added. "Elon probably was, also," Trump remarked. "I also thought it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the Space Business, run NASA, when NASA is such a big part of Elon's corporate life." According to Trump, Musk said "had no problems with that." (Image: AFP via Getty Images) Trump closed out the post by saying, "My Number One charge is to protect the American Public!" The rant comes after Musk announced that his party would enter the political ring during the 2026 midterms. "The way we're going to crack the uniparty system is by using a variant of how Epaminondas shattered the myth of Spartan invincibility at Leuctra," wrote Musk on X. "Extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield." The rant comes after Musk announced that his party would enter the political ring during the 2026 midterms. (Image: AFP via Getty Images) It was then that someone asked Musk whether the party would appear in 2028 or the midterms. "Next year," the tech mogul replied. Musk's announcement comes one day after the Tesla CEO doubled down on comments about forming a new political party. Earlier this week, Musk announced that he planned to form the 'America party', which could result in a White House run at the next election . It comes amid his row with Donald Trump over the president's spending policy bill, which Musk has dubbed as "utterly insane" and "destructive." The tech billionaire has now asked his followers on X whether he should move forward with creating the party and also outlined how its creation could transform the American political system. "Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system," he wrote. He added: 'Should we create the America Party?' Must later described how US politics could be overhauled to make way for the party, saying: "One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts.' "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people," he added. While sharing the results, which tallied 65.4% in the positive and 34.5% in the negative, Musk announced the official creation of the party. "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it," Musk said. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," he added. "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom."
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Perception trumps reality: Did the US really destroy Iran's nuclear programme?
Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has contradicted US president Donald Trump's contention that the Iranian nuclear programme was destroyed by the US air attack on Iran on the night of June 22-23. Grossi has also assessed that Iran still has the technical knowhow to produce enriched uranium within months. In an Irish Examiner article last week, Iranian response in Doha was only a carefully choreographed demonstration it was pointed out that the Iranians will recover quickly and would have backup teams of nuclear scientists to continue their work. In the world of geopolitics, perception is often more important than reality. Seeking the truth Seeking the truth can be a frustrating experience in a time of mass communication, when conflicting messages are flashing by in sound bites. Logic teaches us some coping mechanisms. Let us start with the concept of perspectivism, which, to summarise, means that no one statement holds absolute truth. Truth, instead, is the sum total of many statements. For example, you are sitting in a Cork cafe. It's a beautiful morning and you are in good company. The waft of freshly-brewed coffee completes a precious moment of bliss. You open the Irish Examiner. You see the front page, but your companion sees only the back page, which somehow always manages to have a really interesting story. You both have different perspectives, but neither of you has the overall truth. The truth slowly reveals itself, page by page. The aftermath of the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities presents a similar dilemma. Did the Americans destroy Iran's programme to produce nuclear weapons or not? Before you even ask yourself the question, let's be honest, what is the answer you want to hear? Essentially, which side are you on? Most probably, your basic platform of information is what you have read or watched on TV and cinema over your lifetime. Taking sides My generation was keenly aware of the Holocaust. It was captivated by the film Exodus and identified Israel's struggle to survive with Ireland's fight for freedom. We abhorred the PLO aircraft hijackings and the murder of Israeli athletes in Munich in 1972. It took two generations to change that view and see the present leadership in Israel as the bad guys that turned Gaza into a human slaughterhouse. Whatever side you are on, let's consider the US intervention in Iran as objectively as possible. Within hours of the US bombing, selected leaking from a preliminary US intelligence report, to CNN, sensationally contradicted Trump's claim that the Iranian nuclear complexes were obliterated. The main contentious point of the leaked report was that Iran's nuclear programme was only set back for a few months. The Trump administration's overreaction to this report actually heightened the public perception that the US air attacks were not successful. Moreover, that caused more problems for the Israelis, whose stated war objective was the removal of the Iranian nuclear threat, not just its delay. The Israelis continued attacking targets in Iran even though Trump and defence secretary Pete Hegseth were claiming that the Iranian nuclear facilities were obliterated. The joint press conference held by Hegseth and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, was unprecedented. Hegseth went ballistic in his criticism of the media, blaming them for being unpatriotic. Caine gave a calm, measured presentation on the operation and explained why it would be several weeks before the full extent of damage to the facilities was known. We must remember that this mission had been planned in detail for the past 15 years at least. Over that period of time, both US and Israeli intelligence assets in Iran would have been compiling a mass of data. The bombs used in the attack, the massive ordnance penetrators, were designed with these specific targets in mind. The great Arthur C Clarke, engineer and science fiction writer, stated:"If an eminent scientist tells you something is possible, believe him. If he tells you something is impossible, don't believe him. The US Army Corps of Engineers has a simple motto, which explains its outlook on taking on tough tasks. It says: 'The very difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer.' Bearing in mind both comments, we must also not forget that it was the Americans that pulled off the greatest engineering feat of all time, landing men on the Moon and bringing them back alive. In early 1972, I remember being in Cape Kennedy watching astronauts in training for a Moon flight. On one wall the planning and preparation sequence for the Apollo Project was laid out using a concept called systems engineering. The air operation in Iran had the benefit of the most advanced technology available in the world today. Conducted in one non-stop 36-hour round trip from the US to Iran, involving air refuelling, the final run to the targets was carried out in complete darkness. In the Irish Military College, cadets and officers are always advised to keep their plans as simple as possible, to consider and anticipate every contingency, to rehearse as much as possible and allow for backup personnel and equipment. The more complicated the plan, the more likely something will go wrong. Disasters can happen. The US learned a lot from the 1980 failed rescue operation in Iran, during which eight US servicemen were killed in a helicopter crash, when Delta Force tried to free the captured US Embassy staff. The big question now is if the 400kg of enriched uranium stockpiled by the Iranians was in the Fordow facility. The Iranians say they had removed it to a safe location. US observers think it would have been too difficult to move in time, but the Iranians must have known that Fordow was a prime target. A satellite picture of Iran's underground nuclear enrichment site at Fordow in March. Picture: Planet Labs PBC/AP Iran foresees the day when its oil runs out and it will require a reliable energy source. Nuclear energy is a viable alternative and Iran should be allowed to develop a peaceful nuclear energy programme. However, it should accept international control over any enriched uranium. Trump was asked at the recent Nato meeting in the Hague about US-Iran talks. His immediate reaction was that he saw no reason for talks. Since then he has changed his mind and behind the scenes, efforts are being made to get the Iranians back to the negotiating table. Latest reports are that the US and Iran are set to resume nuclear talks in Oslo. Iran is reported to want a US guarantee before talks begin that it will not be attacked. To use an Americanism, the 'game' is not over until the fat lady sings. Dorcha Lee is a retired army colonel and defence analyst. Read More Unreliability of Donald Trump's US means a cascade of nuclear armament is on the way
