logo
Year above 1.5C suggests world is reaching long term warming threshold

Year above 1.5C suggests world is reaching long term warming threshold

Yahoo10-02-2025
A year with temperatures more than 1.5C above pre-industrial levels mean it is likely the world is reaching the key long-term warming threshold, studies suggest.
Under the global Paris climate treaty secured in 2015, countries agreed to limit global warming to 'well below' 2C and to pursue efforts to curb temperature rises to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels to avoid the worst impacts of extreme storms, floods, heatwaves, rising seas and the collapse of natural systems.
But global datasets of temperatures have found a record hot 2024 saw temperatures exceed 1.5C over the year for the first time.
Scientists caution that one year above 1.5C over pre-industrial levels does not mean the long-term threshold, measured over multiple decades, has been breached.
But two studies published in the journal Nature Climate Change have found it is likely the year at 1.5C means the world is in the 20-year period where the long term threshold will be exceeded – or even that we have already crossed it.
Scientists said the findings showed how urgently the world needed to act to cut the greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels, industrial processes and cutting down forests that are driving climate change.
In his study, Alex Cannon, from the Climate Research Division of Environment and Climate Change Canada, said that a few months or couple of years warmer than 1.5C does not 'automatically mean the goal has been exceeded'.
But analysis of climate model projections show that 12 consecutive months above 1.5C indicates the Paris Agreement threshold is likely to have already been crossed, he said.
While an El Nino weather pattern in the tropical Pacific, which pushes up global temperatures, contributed to 2024's record heat, the analysis shows that 1.5C for 12 consecutive months – regardless of El Nino conditions – usually occurs after the long-term threshold has been reached in simulations, he said.
He added that whether the findings signalled an earlier than expected crossing of the threshold in the real world depended on whether unaccounted-for factors, which are not considered in archived climate model simulations, played a large role in recent warming.
In a second paper, scientists from Germany looked at real-world observations of already-reached warming levels and climate models, and showed that the first single year exceeding each threshold have consistently fallen with the first 20 year period which averaged the same level of warming.
They found that 'unless ambitious emissions cuts are implemented', the world's first year at 1.5C warming is 'virtually certain' to fall within the 20-year period that reaches the 1.5C warming level.
They said it was very unlikely for the temperature of a single year to largely exceed the long term average, and 2024's record heat signals that 'most probably' Earth has already entered a 20-year period at 1.5C warming, they said.
Entering into the 20-year period in which temperatures averaged 1.5C did not mean that the world was already at long term warming of that level as that would fall in the mid point of the era, 10 years later, they added.
And they said that by rapidly slowing down the warming rate, stringent near-term action to curb climate change has the potential to substantially reduce risks of exceeding 1.5C of warming soon after the first year of heat at that level has occurred.
And rapid, urgent emissions action is needed to limit peak warming, which is also required to hold climate change below 2C if the 1.5 target is missed.
'A year above 1.5C is not the time for despair, but a call to action,' they said.
Responding to the findings, Dr Alan Kennedy-Asser, senior research associate at the University of Bristol Cabot Institute for the Environment, described them as 'sadly unsurprising' which suggested 'we may be already living in the 1.5C world the Paris Agreement referred to'.
'However, even though the planet may be in a period that is at or exceeds 1.5C, there is great value in taking rapid action to slow further warming, as the rate of change matters and every tenth of a degree matters,' he said.
Dr Vikki Thompson, scientist at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, said: 'These studies use data from both observational sources and multiple climate models to show we should now expect to exceed the Paris Agreement within the next 20 years, much sooner than climate projections had suggested.
'The rate we have reached these levels is terrifying and shows, yet again, how urgently we need to act.
'Without adaptation and mitigation we will continue to feel the impacts of the accelerating warming with more and more extreme weather events,' she said.
Professor Stephen Belcher, Met Office chief scientist, said a single year exceeding 1.5C 'does not break the guardrail of the Paris Agreement'.
'However, it does highlight that the headroom to stay below 1.5C is now wafer thin,' he said, warning that a recent paper by Met Office scientists calculated current global warming at 1.3C and its forecast for carbon dioxide for the coming year is now inconsistent with pathways keeping to 1.5C.
'This suggests that only rapid and strong measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions will keep us from passing the first line of defence within the Paris Agreement,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When Betelgeuse Explodes, It's Going to Take Out Another Star
When Betelgeuse Explodes, It's Going to Take Out Another Star

New York Times

time2 days ago

  • New York Times

When Betelgeuse Explodes, It's Going to Take Out Another Star

Betelgeuse, a colossal tangerine-red star, is barreling toward annihilation. The stellar body is pronounced 'Beetlejuice,' like the guy in the afterlife whose name you're not supposed to say thrice. And at some point soon, in galactic terms, it is expected to explode as a supernova, setting the night sky ablaze. Despite its self-destructive proclivities, the irritable giant has managed to make, and keep, a friend. On Monday, a team of astronomers announced that they had spotted another star hewing extremely close to Betelgeuse. So close, in fact, that the second star plows through the tenuous outer atmosphere of the red supergiant. The two objects make for a strange pair. Unlike Betelgeuse, which is approaching the end of its life, the blue-white companion (or Betelbuddy) has yet to start burning hydrogen in its core. In other words, the star hasn't entered the chapter of its life known as the main sequence — one that characterizes many stars, including our own. 'You have a star that is about to die, and it's being orbited by a star that's not fully born,' said Miguel Montargès, an astronomer at the Paris Observatory who was not involved with the new research. 'Isn't that crazy?' said Steve B. Howell, a scientist at NASA Ames Research Center in California and one of the discoverers of the companion star. 'It's kind of crazy.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

We're within 3 years of reaching a critical climate threshold. Can we reverse course?
We're within 3 years of reaching a critical climate threshold. Can we reverse course?

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

We're within 3 years of reaching a critical climate threshold. Can we reverse course?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. In June, more than 60 climate scientists warned that the remaining "carbon budget" to stay below a dire warming threshold will be exhausted in as little as three years at the current rate of emissions. But if we pass that critical 1.5-degree-Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) warming threshold, is a climate catastrophe inevitable? And can we do anything to reverse that temperature rise? Although crossing the 1.5 C threshold will lead to problems, particularly for island nations, and raise the risk of ecosystems permanently transforming, the planet won't nosedive into an apocalypse. And once we rein in emissions, there are ways to slowly bring temperatures down if we wind up crossing that 1.5 C threshold, experts told Live Science. Still, that doesn't mean we should stop trying to curb emissions now, which is cheaper, easier and more effective than reversing a temperature rise that has already happened, Michael Mann, a leading climate scientist and director of the Center for Science, Sustainability and the Media at the University of Pennsylvania, told Live Science in an email. "Every fraction of a degree of warming that we prevent makes us better off," Mann said. Delayed response A report released June 19 found that the world has only 143 billion tons (130 billion metric tons) of carbon dioxide (CO2) left to emit before we likely cross the 1.5 C target set in the Paris Agreement, which was signed by 195 countries to tackle climate change. We currently emit around 46 billion tons (42 billion metric tons) of CO2 per year, according to the World Meteorological Organization. The world is currently 1.2 C (2.2 F) warmer than the preindustrial average, with almost all of this increase in temperature due to human activities, according to the report. But our emissions may have had an even bigger warming impact that has so far been masked, because the ocean has soaked up a lot of excess heat. The ocean will release this extra heat over the next few decades via evaporation and direct heat transfer regardless of whether we curb emissions, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This means that even if carbon emissions dropped to zero today, global temperatures would continue to rise for a few decades, with experts predicting an extra 0.5 C (0.9 F) of warming from oceans alone. However, temperatures would eventually stabilize as heat radiated out to space. And over several thousand years, Earth would dial temperatures back down to preindustrial levels via natural carbon sinks, such as trees and soils absorbing CO2, according to NOAA. Why 1.5 C? Climate scientists see 1.5 C as a critical threshold: Beyond this limit, levels of warming are unsafe for people living in economically developing countries, and particularly in island nations, said Kirsten Zickfeld, a professor of climate science at Simon Fraser University in Canada. The 1.5 C limit is "an indicator of a state of the climate system where we feel we can still manage the consequences," Zickfeld told Live Science. A huge amount of additional heat could be baked into the ocean and later released if we exceed 1.5 C, which is another reason why scientists are worried about crossing this threshold. Speeding past 1.5 C also increases the risk of passing climate tipping points, which are elements of the Earth system that can quickly switch into a dramatically different state. For example, the Greenland Ice Sheet could suddenly tumble into the ocean, and the Amazon rainforest could transform into a dry savanna. Reversing temperature rise Although it's best to reduce emissions as quickly as we can, it may still be possible to reverse a temperature rise of 1.5 C or more if we pass that critical threshold. The technology needed isn't quite developed yet, so there is a lot of uncertainty about what is feasible. If we do start to bring temperatures down again, it would not undo the effects of passing climate tipping points. For example, it would not refreeze ice sheets or cause sea levels to fall after they've already risen. But it would significantly reduce risks for ecosystems that respond more quickly to temperature change, such as permafrost-covered tundras. Reversing temperature rise requires not just net zero emissions, but net negative emissions, Zickfeld said. Net zero would mean we sequester as much CO2 via natural carbon sinks and negative emissions technologies as we emit. Negative emissions would require systems that suck carbon out of the atmosphere and then bury it underground — often known as carbon capture and storage. Net zero may halt warming. But if we want to reverse warming, we must remove more carbon from the atmosphere than we emit, Zickfield said. Scientists estimate that 0.1 C (0.2 F) of warming is equivalent to 243 billion tons (220 billion metric tons) of CO2, which is a "massive amount," Zickfeld said. "Let's say if we go to 1.6 C [2.9 F] and we want to drop down to 1.5 C — we need to remove around 220 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide." Currently, nature-based carbon-removal techniques, such as planting trees, sequester around 2.2 billion tons (2 billion metric tons) of CO2 each year. "So we need to scale that up by a factor of 100 to drop us down by 0.1 C" in one year, Zickfeld said. Due to competing demands for land, it is highly unlikely that we could plant enough forests or restore enough peatland to meaningfully reverse temperature change, Zickfeld said. This means we will definitely need negative emissions technologies, she said. However, most negative emissions technologies are still being tested, so it's difficult to say how effective they would be, Zickfeld said. These technologies are also extremely expensive and will likely remain so for a long time, Robin Lamboll, a climate researcher at Imperial College London and a co-author of the recent report, told Live Science in an email. "In practice we will be doing quite well if we find that the rollout of these technologies does any more than bring us to net zero," Lamboll said. There is some uncertainty about how Earth might respond to net zero, and it's possible that the planet might cool at that point. "If we cool at all, we do so very slowly. In a very optimistic case we might go down by 0.3 C [0.5 F] in 50 years," Lamboll said. RELATED STORIES —2 billion people could face chaotic and 'irreversible' shift in rainfall patterns if warming continues —Climate wars are approaching — and they will redefine global conflict —Kids born today are going to grow up in a hellscape, grim climate study finds There is no requirement under the Paris Agreement for countries to roll out negative emissions technologies. But the goal of the agreement to stay well below 2 C (3.6 F) means that governments may decide to ramp up these technologies once we pass 1.5 C, Lamboll said. Figures from the recent report indicate that at the current rate of emissions, the remaining carbon budgets to stay below 1.6 C, 1.7 C (3.1 F) and 2 C could be used up within seven, 12 and 25 years, respectively. "If we do pass 1.5 C, 1.6 C is a whole lot better than 1.7 C, and 1.7 C is a whole lot better than 1.8 C [3.2 F]," Mann said in an interview with BBC World News America in June. "At this point, the challenge is to reduce carbon emissions as quickly as we can to avert ever-worse impacts." It's worth noting that the world is making progress with emission cuts, Mann added in the interview. "Let's recognize that we're starting to turn the corner," he said. Solve the daily Crossword

Yo-Yo Dieting May Trigger Long-Lasting Changes in Gut Bacteria
Yo-Yo Dieting May Trigger Long-Lasting Changes in Gut Bacteria

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

Yo-Yo Dieting May Trigger Long-Lasting Changes in Gut Bacteria

One challenge of dieting is maintaining healthy eating habits, avoiding the so-called 'yo-yo dieting' effect. Now a new study suggests that effect might be closely linked to the bacteria living in our guts. A team led by researchers from the University of Rennes and Paris-Saclay University in France ran a series of experiments on mice, measuring their reactions to rotating shifts in diet across several weeks. The animals' food regimes alternated between a standard diet and a high-fat, high-sugar diet intended to stand in for unhealthy Western diets. This yo-yo dieting simulation triggered signs of binge eating in the mice as soon as they returned to a less healthy diet. What's more, there were long-lasting changes in the mice's gut bacteria, changing their internal metabolism. Crucially, when the altered gut bacteria were implanted in mice that hadn't been dieting, they showed the same binge eating behavior. It's as if dieting creates shifts in the gut microbiome that then bring on unhealthy eating patterns. Related: "We showed that alternation between high-energy and standard diet durably remodels the gut microbiota toward a profile that is associated with an increase in hedonic appetite and weight gain," write the researchers in their published paper. By carefully analysing the brain patterns of the mice on the dieting schedule, the researchers could see that they were probably eating for pleasure rather than because they were hungry – as if the brain's reward mechanism had been rewired. While we can't be sure this applies to humans, the results strongly suggest diet cycles could bring on certain shifts in the mix of bacteria in the gut that make it harder to maintain a healthy diet. The unique make-up of bacteria in our guts has a substantial impact on our health, affecting our brain activity and risk of disease, for example. This microbiome can in turn be influenced by disease, diet, and our environment. "Weight maintenance during restrictive yo-yo dieting might be impeded not only by metabolic adaptations but also by modified food reward-related processes," write the researchers. By improving our understanding of yo-yo dieting and the disordered eating patterns that can come with it, the hope is that we can improve therapies for tackling obesity and promoting healthy eating – perhaps by targeting particular types of gut bacteria. One way to extend the research may be to closely examine the types of bacteria changes that are triggered by yo-yo dieting, and the biological mechanisms those microbiome shifts affect that make binge eating more likely. This also needs to be documented in human trials too, of course. "More work is definitely needed to fully understand the mechanisms at play in this model, especially regarding the gut microbiota to brain transduction pathways involved in this weight cycling-induced altered eating behavior," write the researchers. The research has been published in Advanced Science. Related News 11 Everyday Items That We Forget Are Nasty Hotspots For Bacteria Dementia Linked With Treatment For Chronic Lower Back Pain 8 Babies Born in UK Using Radical 'Three Parent' IVF Technique Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store