
Why Scotland must press on with abortion law reform
Yet that risk had existed for more than 160 years. Underpinned by the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 – a law passed by an all-male parliament before women had the right to vote – having an 'illegal' abortion outside of tightly controlled circumstances was a crime that carried with it a maximum life sentence. Despite decades of progress in both abortion provision and public opinion, the threat of prosecution remained.
Last week's vote in Westminster is welcome progress, but as abortion law is devolved in Scotland, the change will only apply to women in England and Wales. This means that Scotland now stands as the only nation in the UK that has not moved to remove abortion from the criminal law. That must change.
Read more:
No qualified surgeons on panel to advise Scottish Government
Minister criticised for backtracking on abortion care comments
'Only one Scottish doctor is trained in surgical care to legal limit'
When I co-founded Back Off Scotland in 2020 to end protests outside abortion facilities, I was struck to learn how out-of-step our laws were with how abortion care is actually provided. Despite important innovations in abortion provision – such as the introduction of telemedical abortion – Scotland's legal framework remains stuck in the 20th Century.
Our abortion law – the Abortion Act 1967 – is now almost 60 years old. Whilst this was revolutionary piece of legislation in the sixties, it is now no longer fit for purpose.
Under this law, all abortions still require two doctors' signatures, and women must meet specific legal criteria to qualify for an abortion. In practice, this means that simply not wanting to be pregnant is not a valid reason to have an abortion.
Despite this, Scotland has taken bold steps to improve abortion access in the past: for example, through the introduction of telemedicine during the pandemic.
Introduced at pace by the Scottish Government to reduce the spread of the Coronavirus and ensure that those who needed an abortion were still able to access one during the pandemic, the temporary introduction of Early Medical Abortion at Home (EMAH) in March 2020 meant that women under 12 weeks' gestation were able to take both abortion medications – mifepristone and misoprostol – at home if strict criteria were met following a remote teleconsultation.
Off the back of calls from various medical bodies and women's rights groups, as well as evidence from the largest study on telemedical abortion in the world which found this method of care to be 'safe, effective, and improves care', provisions were made permanent in Scotland in 2022.
Whilst Scotland led the way in some areas, in others we've fallen far behind. Perhaps most notably in sending women to England for abortion beyond 20 weeks' gestation. One woman every four days has to travel from Scotland to a BPAS clinic in England to access abortion care because no health board provides care up to the legal limit of 24 weeks' gestation – a shameful stain on our pro-choice country.
The reasons that women seek abortion after 20 weeks are complex and varied, but often involve devastating life changes, medical diagnoses, and delayed recognition of pregnancy. Yet the NHS in Scotland abandons these women, and over the years, thousands have had to make this journey despite being legally entitled to receive this care in Scotland.
In 2014, government-commissioned research into Scottish womens' experiences of travelling to England for care was published. The findings were bleak and improving solutions to access these abortions were described by researchers as a 'necessity'.
Despite warm words and countless commitments from the Scottish Government, this status-quo has gone unchanged for decades and caused untold levels of harm to the women who have had to make this journey.
In 2023 when Humza Yousaf was standing to become leader of the SNP, Back Off Scotland wrote to him asking him to make three key pledges: to implement buffer zones, to stop the practice of sending women to England for abortion care by ensuring services can be accessed within Scotland, and to decriminalise abortion. He pledged to deliver all three, but only the first has been achieved.
When Humza committed to decriminalising abortion, we seized the moment. Together with 18 pro-choice partners, such as Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Engender, and the Humanist Society Scotland, we wrote to him calling for a full review of abortion law in Scotland, with a view to modernising it in the coming years.
The government responded, and established an Expert Group in 2024. That group is now at work and is expected to deliver its findings and recommendations in the coming months.
This review will bring much needed clarity to the status of abortion law in Scotland. As abortion in Scotland is governed by common law, there is widespread confusion and uncertainty over whether a woman could be prosecuted as they have been in England.
This uncertainty was further exacerbated following the recent publication of guidance from the UK National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC), which suggested that women experiencing pregnancy loss should have their homes and digital devices checked, as well as their medical records and reproductive tracking devices investigated to see if any laws had been broken.
Whilst there was rightly national outcry about this, it remains unclear whether the guidance applies to Scotland and whether Police Scotland would be prepared to use similar tactics to those used by English police forces who have criminalised women under abortion offences.
A review into abortion law has never been more pressing or urgent. With public backing, political will, and expert consensus behind abortion law reform, the momentum is undeniable. After last week's historic vote in Westminster, the time for Scotland to reform our outdated abortion law is now.
Lucy Grieve is Co-Founder of Back Off Scotland, and Policy and Engagement Manager at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edinburgh Live
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Edinburgh Book Festival awarded £300k in taxpayer cash after Nicola Sturgeon ex-aide hired
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info The Edinburgh International Book Festival received £300,000 of taxpayer cash weeks after Nicola Sturgeon's ex-chief of staff was appointed as director. The former first minister, who is among the headliners for the event, will be promoting her new memoir - Frankly. Her former top adviser, Liz Lloyd, was hired as director of the festival in May, reports the Daily Record. A 'one-off' lifeline for the festival of £300,000 was announced by the Scottish Government in June. The event lost its chief sponsor Baillie Gifford last year, after campaigning from eco activists over fossil fuel ties. Lothian Tory MSP Sue Webber said: 'Taxpayers will be asking questions about how the SNP suddenly found this money a matter of weeks after Nicola Sturgeon's most senior former adviser was appointed a director of the festival. 'While the book festival is ultimately crucial for Scotland's culture and Edinburgh's economy, many will be thinking this is not a mere coincidence. The SNP was only scrambling to find this funding because Baillie Gifford was hounded out from its long-held sponsorship by climate activists. Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox "SNP ministers should come clean on how this funding was awarded and if there was any lobbying from former colleagues who were once at the heart of the nationalist government." Lloyd worked for the Scottish Government for nearly a decade as Sturgeon's top aide, working closely with current FM Swinney who was then deputy FM. Lloyd was Sturgeon's chief of staff from 2014 until 2021 then a strategic adviser until the ex-FM quit in 2023, when Lloyd also left her post. The book festival said it would be 'spurious' and 'misleading' to suggest any link between Lloyd's appointment and the announcement of the cash, which it said had been planned for months. The event's government funding has more than doubled in the past year to a record £820,000. Announcing the £300,000 grant on Wednesday, SNP Business Minister Richard Lochhead said it would help schoolkids continue to access free literary events. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. The book festival had previously warned its ability to deliver a successful event had been 'severely compromised' by the ending of its relationship with finance firm Baillie Gifford. The deal was cancelled after activists with the Fossil Free Books campaign targeted book festivals across Britain. The Scottish Government said: 'The Edinburgh International Book Festival is one the country's most significant cultural institutions. Its schools programme has been crucial in fostering literacy and cultural engagement among young people. 'Supported by the increase in funding for festivals announced in the 2025-26 Scottish Budget, this funding secures those benefits for young readers across Edinburgh, helping schools that might otherwise struggle with travel costs' Glasgow's Aye Write literary festival had to cancel last year's event after its bid for funding from government quango Creative Scotland was turned down. It is set to be revived.


Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
Defence Scotland: SNP told to urgently rethink 'mad' strategy as internal fears grow
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As governments across the globe grapple with the most dangerous international landscape in a generation, John Swinney is under pressure to allow the SNP to have its first proper debate on where it stands on defence in more than a decade. The alternative risk is of his party 'falling behind' and Scotland potentially missing out on crucial investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The defence, aerospace and security industry is estimated to be worth around £3.2 billion to Scotland. The Ministry of Defence spends more than £2bn each year with Scottish industry. The forward section of Type 26 Frigate HMS Cardiff is rolled out from the SBOH at BAE Systems Shipyard in Govan, Scotland. Picture: John Linton/BAE Systems/Royal Navy | John Linton Despite conflict still raging on the European continent and the situation in the Middle East still resulting in lives, including children, being lost every day, the SNP has not had a proper debate about where it stands on defence policy since 2012. Instead a position to block investments perceived to be linked to munitions and an unassailable opposition to the Trident nuclear weapons system, located on the Clyde, are the SNP's flagship defence policies. UK to boost defence spending With Sir Keir Starmer's UK government committing to spend 5 per cent of its GDP on defence by 2035, the SNP has come under intense pressure to shift its long-held opposition to spending public funds on the 'manufacture of weapons or munitions', with a perception Scottish ministers are turning their back on the wider defence industry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is understood Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, who also holds the economy brief, is keen for a rethink on her government's and her party's position. The Prime Minister visited the BAE shipyard in Govan earlier this month to announce his strategic defence review, with an ambition to 'build a fighting force that is more integrated, more ready, more lethal than ever' and 'innovate and accelerate innovation to a wartime pace'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaks during a visit to BAE Systems in Govan, Glasgow, to launch the strategic defence review. Picture: Andy Buchanan/PA Wire Sir Keir also stressed he was 'using this moment to drive jobs and investment', including six new munitions factories and 1,000 new jobs. The Faslane submarine facility on the Clyde will receive £250m of investment as part of a UK government boost announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review. Row over welding investment Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last month, it emerged the economic development agency, Scottish Enterprise, refused to support plans for a new specialist welding centre over fears it could be used to support the building of Royal Navy submarines. Ferguson Marine, which SNP ministers nationalised in 2019, has taken on contracts to construct Royal Navy vessels. The Scottish National Investment Bank, set up by SNP ministers in 2020, 'does not invest in organisations that are primarily engaged in the manufacture of munitions or weapons'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Former SNP MP Stewart McDonald, who spent almost five years as the party's defence spokesperson at Westminster from 2017 to 2022, has warned 'the party needs to have a defence debate again'. Speaking to The Scotsman, he said: 'It hasn't had a proper defence debate since 2012 when we changed the policy on Nato. 'All of this is moving at such pace. The entire international picture is moving at such a rapid pace and if we are a party that seeks to be an independent state - and an independent state in Nato and the EU - then we should have stuff to say on this.' Former SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald Mr McDonald warned 'there is a risk the party falls behind in that debate'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said: 'That's a debate that is going on in capitals all across Europe. And although Edinburgh is not a state capital, the Scottish Government has a role to play as a domestic partner. SNP's 'awkward' defence stance 'We have an industry in Scotland worth many billions of pounds, employs somewhere between 33,000 and 35,000 people and it has a very awkward relationship with the Scottish Government - it has done so for a very long time.' Mr McDonald has suggested Mr Swinney should gather the major and smaller defence employers in Scotland, 'get the defence procurement minister up from London and say 'how do I marshal the resources of the government, spending, policy, legislative, to better support this industry?'.' READ MORE: BAE Systems funding provides 300 jobs boost for Scottish shipyards Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The former SNP MP added: 'At a time of heightened international conflict, Scotland's defence industry has a part to play. 'I understand there's a bit of political balancing to be done here, but I think that can be over-thought and over-egged. We do live in much more dangerous times and there's a risk we are just saying the same stuff we've been saying for a long time - and that just would not be credible to stand still politically as the entire world changes around you.' Mr McDonald branded the Scottish Enterprise ban on investments relating to munitions 'a stupid policy' and hit out at the restrictions in place for the Scottish National Investment Bank. He said: 'Defence is the one industry that has enormous growth happening in it right now and that's not likely to end time soon. So why should our National Investment Bank not invest in it? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It's entirely normal in every other country in Europe or the world for your national institutions to support your national interests, including your national security interests. So why is the Scottish National Investment Bank not doing that? I think that's mad.' Vanguard-class submarine HMS Vigilant, one of the UK's four nuclear warhead-carrying submarines, at HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane | PA Asked whether the SNP needs to revisit whether it opposes Trident, Mr McDonald warned opening up that debate 'would just be self-indulgent' and 'would just say the same thing it's always said'. He said: 'I think it could better focus its attention on other parts of the defence discussion. The reality is it can't move Trident off the Clyde. 'There are areas they can focus on and have genuine positive consequences - working with industry around development of skills. The defence industry really felt that after Brexit.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour Glasgow MSP Paul Sweeney, who before entering politics was an arm reservist and Clyde shipbuilder, has branded the SNP's position "really frustrating'. Mr Sweeney first came up against a brick wall trying to encourage Rolls Royce to use Scotland to manufacture small modular nuclear reactors. There was opposition to such a move, even if the reactors weren't being used in Scotland where there is a de-facto ban on nuclear power stations being built due to the SNP's hostility to the technology. 'Bizarre' SNP position Mr Sweeney acknowledged the Scottish Government had previously supported defence industries in Scotland. But he has been left aghast at the decision to block investment in the welding facility. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said: 'I found the decision of Scottish Enterprise to indicate to Rolls Royce that they would not be able to support grant funding for the naval welding facility extremely bizarre. Labour MSP Paul Sweeney | Supplied 'It's clearly on the back of pressure over comments made by the former first minister Humza Yousaf. There was a recent debate at the Scottish Parliament by the Greens on this stuff.' Mr Sweeney added: 'It's a misnomer to conflate foreign policy issues with domestic security and defence requirements. 'There is a logical absurdity of suggesting that this is about defence exports to unsavoury regimes, when it's primarily about our domestic national security and defence in the context of a pretty fraught geopolitical situation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'I find the context of this somewhat delusional and frustrating. I think it's fair to say there's certainly a split within the SNP about this.' The MSP insisted that BAE Systems on the Clyde, where he previously worked, 'has no involvement with any regime suspected of human rights abuses', adding 'there's no association with the Israel-Palestine issue'. Protesters form a blockade outside BAE Systems in Govan Picture: Jane Barlow/PA Wire Mr Sweeney said: 'They do not issue vessels for export to those territories - they never have. There is no obvious connection. 'It's also deeply reckless rhetoric in the context of the need to expand the Royal Navy and expand our domestic shipbuilding programme.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Glasgow MSP warned the Scottish Government's opposition 'creates a problem for investment in Scotland that doesn't exist anywhere else in the UK'. He said: 'There's a nervousness about Scotland - there's a more volatile risk of being caught on the horns of a political argument.' Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Jamie Greene has penned a letter to the Deputy First Minister, Ms Forbes, insisting 'the Scottish Government must also play its part in realising that economic potential' of the defence sector. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes | PA He added: 'That means creating the right environment for jobs and investment as well as tackling obstacles that could otherwise dampen those opportunities. At the moment there are worrying gaps in Scotland's skills pipeline.' Norwegian potential Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad BAE Systems are building Type 26 frigates for the Royal Navy including HMS Belfast and HMS Birmingham in Govan. More investment could be on its way to the Govan shipyard, with the Norwegian government reportedly keen to purchase Type 26 frigates. Defence Secretary John Healey has told MPs he has 'been working hard to persuade the Norwegians' about taking on the frigates. In response to parliamentary questions, Ms Forbes, in an apparent acknowledgment of the benefits to the economy, has stressed the 'potential industrial and employment opportunities for Scotland are significant' if Norway does press ahead with Clyde-built frigates. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She said: 'Officials from the UK and Scottish governments have held constructive informal discussions around how the bid might be best supported.' A Scottish Government source suggested SNP ministers 'want to move on it', but are wrestling with how to 'manage it within the party'. The insider added: 'Some people find it exasperating and peculiar. It's just a bit out of place now in the new reality we are in.' When the Scottish Enterprise row emerged earlier this month, Mr Swinney told journalists he was sticking to his guns. He said: 'We have a policy position on the use of Scottish public expenditure for the manufacture of munitions. We apply that consistently and that remains the Government's position.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But speaking on the Holyrood Sources podcast this week, he opened the door to a change of heart, stating that 'issues can be reconsidered'.


Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
SNP's policy of 'unarmed' Armed Forces is sheer madness
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As the UK yesterday marked Armed Forces Day – described as 'a chance to show your support' for the men and women in the military – SNP ministers will hopefully have been reflecting on their spectacularly bizarre stance on defence spending. While the nationalists have long opposed nuclear weapons, they are not a pacifist party. They support membership of Nato, pledging an independent Scotland would be a 'reliable and dedicated international partner' like Denmark and Norway. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad They also say our domestic defence industry 'will not just be welcome in an independent Scotland but will be a vital part of our ability to have a defence capability that matches an Independent Scotland's needs and threats' and criticise the UK Government for 'a failure to meet Scotland's specific defence needs'. Ukraine needs munitions and so does the British Army (Picture: Sergey Shestak) | AFP via Getty Images 'Russian threat is very real' So it is all the more difficult to understand why it is a 'long-standing position' of the SNP that government funding should not be provided for the 'direct manufacture of munitions'. So, for example, Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish National Investment Bank do not invest in companies that make weapons. Former SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald has now rightly criticised the ban as 'a stupid policy' and called for a new debate. His comments followed a hint by John Swinney that the party's stance could change as 'we are living in a very different context today' and 'the Russian threat is very real'. However a Scottish Government source explained ministers were struggling with how to 'manage' the issue within the party. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, with the UK set to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, now is not the time to tip-toe around the subject. Not only is the manufacturing of munitions and weapons vital to defend this country and to help Ukraine fight off the Russian invasion, it is also a major economic opportunity.