
Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel peace prize at White House meeting expected to focus on Gaza
Trump was expected to press Netanyahu to agree to a ceasefire in Israel's 21-month-old war against Hamas in Gaza amid an outcry over the humanitarian cost of an offensive that has led to nearly 60,000 deaths, most of them Palestinian.
Israeli and Hamas negotiators met for indirect talks for the first time in six weeks in Qatar on Monday. While both sides have spoken positively about the prospects for a ceasefire, a number of crucial negotiating points remain including guarantees from the Israeli side that the war would not continue and Netanyahu's insistence that Hamas be banished from Gaza for good.
Before a dinner in the Blue Room at the White House, Trump was asked whether he believed that Palestinians should be forcibly removed from Gaza, amid reports that Israel has laid out plans to force all Palestinians in Gaza into a camp on the ruins of Rafah – a plan that has been criticised as a blueprint for ethnic cleansing. Trump directed Netanyahu to answer the question.
'It's called free choice,' said Netanyahu, who is wanted by the international criminal court for alleged war crimes relating to the Gaza war. 'You know, if people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave.'
At the beginning of the meeting, Netanyahu presented Trump with a letter that he said he had sent to a committee for the Nobel peace prize commending Trump's efforts to end conflicts in the Middle East.
'I want to express the appreciation and admiration not only of all Israelis, but of the Jewish people,' Netanyahu said before presenting the letter. 'You deserve it,' Netanyahu added.
'Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful,' Trump said.
It was the second high-profile nomination for the president: last month Pakistan said it would recommend Trump for the prize.
Asked about Russia's war in Ukraine, Trump suggested that he would resume weapons shipments to the Ukrainian army, although the White House had recently confirmed it had halted some weapons deliveries due to a Pentagon review of dwindling US munitions stocks.
'We're going to send some more weapons,' he said. 'We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. They're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons.'
Trump claimed during the meeting that Hamas 'want to meet and they want to have that ceasefire.' But he did not share any additional details on preparations for a ceasefire, and when asked about a two-state solution with the Palestinians, directed the question to Netanyahu, who repeated Israeli insistences that they would maintain a 'security guarantee' over territories like the Gaza Strip.
'I think the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us,' Netanyahu said. 'And that means that certain powers like overall security will always remain in our hands.'
Before departing for Washington on Sunday, Netanyahu said he was confident a deal could be achieved and that Israeli negotiators had been given clear instructions to achieve a ceasefire – but only with conditions that Israel has already agreed.
Sources in the prime minister's entourage described the talks in Qatar as positive, according to Israel's military radio station and an Israeli official quoted by Reuters. Palestinian officials were more downbeat and said initial meetings on Sunday had ended inconclusively.
Netanyahu had met with Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and secretary of state Marco Rubio earlier on Monday. He is expected to remain in Washington to meet with vice-president JD Vance and senior officials, including house speaker Mike Johnson.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tucker Carlson's jaw-dropping theory on why Trump is burying the Epstein list
Tucker Carlson said he believes the government is 'covering up' the Epstein files to protect US and Israeli intelligence services. Tucker - who has long claimed Jeffrey Epstein was tied to the Israeli Mossad espionage service - is leading a MAGA backlash against the Trump administration's promises to release Epstein's anticipated 'client list.' In a major U-turn, Attorney General Pam Bondi released a memo this week re-affirming the Justice Department's ruling that Epstein's 2019 death was a suicide, and that he had no 'client list.' Tucker said it was 'obvious' that Bondi was 'covering up crimes'. Amid mounting scrutiny over Trump's handling of the controversy, Carlson said he is not convinced that the president was covering his own alleged ties to Epstein, and felt the reason is hinged on espionage. 'I don't think he's that guy, actually,' Carlson said of Trump. 'I don't think he likes creepy sex stuff.' Rather, Carlson floated a more sinister plot to protect the US and Israeli intelligence agencies was driving Trump's response. 'The only other explanation that I can think of... is that intel services are at the very center of this story, U.S. and Israeli, and they're being protected,' he said. 'I think that seems like the most obvious.' Carlson waded into the controversy hours after Elon Musk launched into another attack on MAGA world by claiming that former Trump advisor Steve Bannon is implicated in the Epstein files. Musk also alleged weeks ago that Trump is in the Epstein files, saying that 'is the real reason they have not been made public.' But on Carlson's show, his guest Sagaar Enjeti, the host of Breaking Points, agreed that intelligence services likely had a role in the growing scandal over the release of the files. Enjeti pointed to reports in 2021 that alleged that federal prosecutors had chosen not to prosecute pedophilia cases within the CIA. 'There have been multiple documented cases of pedophilia inside of the CIA perpetrated by CIA officers,' he said. 'This was a BuzzFeed News piece years back where the CIA specifically did not want to prosecute those individuals in federal court for fear that they would reveal sources and methods if they were pulled into open court and they basically just made it go away. 'The only time they actually prosecuted somebody for child pornography was whenever he'd already been prosecuted for mishandling classified information.' Carlson joked in response: 'Well, when they want to crush you, they put kiddie porn on your computer. It's why I don't have a computer!' The issue of Trump's handling of the Epstein files led the president to snap at a reporter on Tuesday when they asked Bondi about the Justice Department's internal review of the documents. Trump brushed off fury from his MAGA base over the abrupt conclusion of the Epstein probe this week, and accused the reporter who quizzed Bondi of 'desecrating' the deadly Texas flood tragedy. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' Trump lamented to reporters present for his six-month Cabinet meeting. 'This guy's been talked about for years.' He said that the media needs to move on from 'this creep' Epstein and focus more on the tragedy in Texas and ongoing wars in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine. In the past, Trump has riled up his base with theories over Epstein's death, and in his 2024 campaign he vowed to release all the government's secrets, along with documents from the much-scrutinized assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. Trump, however, is now ready to move on from the Epstein files. 'Do you want to waste the time – do you feel like answering?' Trump asked his Attorney General, who was just one seat away from the president with Secretary of State Marco Rubio between them during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. Bondi said she didn't mind answering the question, but Trump continued his tirade against the Post reporter. 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this where we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. 'It just seems like a desecration, but you go ahead,' he said to his embattled attorney general. Bondi then sought to clarify her past remarks about having Epstein's 'client list' on her desk, saying she never admitted there was a 'client list' and that she was actually referencing the complete paperwork related to the investigation into Epstein's child sex trafficking crimes. She then said that the reason more evidence was not released is because it contained child pornography. 'They turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein,' Bondi said. 'Never going to be released, never going to see the light of day.'


Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
US issues expedited permit for proposed Tennessee coal mine
July 8 (Reuters) - The Trump administration said it permitted a proposed coal mine in Claiborne County, Tennessee on Tuesday under an expedited process aimed at accelerating federal environmental reviews of energy projects. In a statement, the Department of the Interior said it granted approval for Hurricane Creek Mining LLC to mine coal on Bryson Mountain in Claiborne County, Tennessee. The mine will produce up to 1.8 million tons of coal over the next decade, the agency said. The site was previously mined at various times between the 1950s and 2010. The rushed permit is aligned with President Donald Trump's goal to increase coal mining as part of his energy dominance agenda. The project is on private land but under federal law must be permitted by Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. Hurricane Creek Mining could not immediately be reached for comment. In April, Interior said it would implement an emergency permitting process for energy and mining projects, slashing approval times that typically take months or years to 28 days. The department took another action this week to support coal. Interior's Bureau of Land Management on Monday said it is taking public comment on opening up coal leasing on public lands in the Powder River Basin in Montana and Wyoming. Comments will be taken through August 7 on opening up lands that former President Joe Biden put off-limits to leasing.


NBC News
33 minutes ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court allows Trump to move forward with mass firings at federal agencies
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed President Donald Trump at least temporarily to move ahead with plans to impose reductions in force and reorganize various government agencies. The court imposed an administrative stay in the case at the request of the Trump administration. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only justice to provide a written dissenting opinion. At issue is a ruling by California-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, who ruled in May that while the president can seek to make changes, there are limits when done wholesale. "Agencies may not conduct large-scale reorganizations and reductions in force in blatant disregard of Congress's mandates, and a President may not initiate large-scale executive branch reorganization without partnering with Congress," she wrote. The justices made clear Tuesday that their order is not about the legality of any individual agency reduction in force or reorganization plan, only the legality of Trump's executive order and an administration memo related to workforce plans. In her dissenting opinion, Jackson wrote, "this decision is not only truly unfortunate but also hubristic and senseless.' The decision affects 19 federal agencies as well as the White House-adjacent Office of Management and Budget, Office of Personnel Management and U.S. DOGE Service. Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in court papers that Illston's ruling is based on the "indefensible premise" that the presidents needs permission from Congress to carry out his duties as delineated in Article II of the Constitution. "Controlling the personnel of federal agencies lies at the heartland of this authority," he wrote. "The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the President does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers." The legal challenge was brought by various unions and nonprofit groups, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, as well as certain local jurisdictions including the cities of Chicago and Baltimore. Their lawyers said that if the court granted Trump's request "statutorily required and authorized programs, offices, and functions across the federal government will be abolished" with some departments "radically downsized." As such, they urged that the court allow the litigation to conclude before deciding whether Trump can implement his plan.