
These Samsung home screens are weird, funny, and interesting at the same time
Below, we've gathered some of the best examples that we've spotted so far. If you want to try making one yourself — and you will want to — we've also included a quick how-to guide at the end.
The coolest and weirdest One UI 7 home screens
These examples are a mashup of chaotic sticker dumps and icon art, but the only common theme is Samsung users letting their imaginations run wild. Here are some of our favorite creations, grouped loosely by vibe.
There are some good examples here of people not holding back with stickers. Naturally, cats dominate, with the middle example offering a different kitty for every icon.
A striking aspect of this customization is that not only do the icons no longer need to be in grid form, but they don't even need to be the right way up.
Some more chaotic examples above, based on different-sized icons, loads of self-made stickers, and a cool retro Windows 95 revival in pixel art.
The Formula One example here is one of our favorites from a creative point of view. The other two show a sharp contrast between how cluttered or how minimal you can decide to go with your new home screen.
Have you tried customizing your home screen on One UI 7?
0 votes
Yes, I tried it.
NaN %
Not yet, but I'm going to now.
NaN %
No, it looks too chaotic.
NaN %
I don't have a Samsung or One UI 7.
NaN %
How to make your own customized One UI 7 home screen
If you're ready to get fully weird with your Galaxy phone, you'll first need to download Good Lock and Home Up. Here are the steps.
1. Open the Galaxy Store (not the Play Store!) and install Good Lock.
2. Inside the app, find the Home Up module and install it.
3. Go to Good Lock > Home Up, and toggle it On.
4. Tap on Home Screen and toggle on DIY Home screen on the next menu. You'll see a red Beta logo next to it.
5. Return to your phone's home screen, and long-press on a blank part.
6. Tap DIY Home in the top-right corner. This opens up Samsung's customization toolbox.
You're now ready to get creative with your Samsung home screens. You should have the following options: Move icons anywhere on the screen, even overlapping them.
Resize and rotate widgets, or layer them on top of each other.
Add stickers, emojis, and decorative elements.
Hide app labels, change icon sizes, or go completely gridless.
Use the alignment guide if you want a bit of order in the chaos.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
7 minutes ago
- Forbes
Silicon Valley Is Nearing A Breaking Point
American comedian Gallagher (born Leo Gallagher Jr) moving fast and breaking things at the Rosemont ... More Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, July 10, 1981. (Photo by) The current mood in Silicon Valley seems to be dominated by this sentiment, originally popularized by Facebook. And for many leaders in the tech center of the universe, Silicon Valley, it has spread beyond just information technology innovation and into a sense of how to reinvent all walks of life, all industries, and even politics. For many of the giants in today's tech and innovation sector, technology is by itself the solution to everything. It is Schumpeterian thinking dialed up to eleven. It is quasi-religious, in that there is a sense that a great technology flood will wash over the economy and society and wash clean the ills, leaving behind efficient, reinvented new industries, regulations (if even needed at all) and personal behavior. Some of this is a byproduct of ideology and an independent streak – an understandable frustration that today's systems are antiquated and in many cases broken, giving the idea of starting from scratch a romantic appeal. These are brilliant people who think big and so aren't tethered to old 'this is how it's done because this is how it's always been done' thinking. Some of this is a byproduct of naivety and not ideology – I once sat in a meeting while a very successful individual from Silicon Valley lamented how hard it was to change Sacramento… and concluded that his next step was therefore to go fix Washington, DC. Because of course changing Washington DC would be easier than changing a state government. Sure. This combination of ideology and naivety has recently impacted how some of the most powerful in Silicon Valley view the climate change challenge, among other 'non-tech' issues. For some of these titans, there is a sense that the people most in need of innovative solutions around issues like climate have rejected them personally, so the heck with those issues, no need to care about all that fluffery anymore. For others, there is a sense that what is needed isn't to try to improve the current infrastructure over time, but simply to effectively start over. For example: Working with today's utilities on energy efficiency is a waste of time, go invent commercially-viable fusion-based nuclear power and the rest (ie, who will finance those plants, who will build those plants, who will maintain those plants, who will distribute the power from those plants) will simply sort itself out. These sentiments may seem in opposition to each other, but in reality they are simply two sides of the same techno-superiority coin. So, moving fast and breaking things (either ignoring petty issues like a rapidly degrading global climate or undermined political-economic foundations, or assuming they'll be addressed by unnamed others because, you know, 'Innovation') is pretty much how many of the leaders in Silicon Valley are setting their agendas these days. But here's the thing – they would never think to do this with data center construction. Nor with IT networks or microchips or any of the other hardware and infrastructure that they know they fully depend upon for their own innovations to work. These giants of the tech industry know full well that they can't 'move fast and break things' when it comes to building out and maintaining the infrastructure that is core to their own operations. They employ huge teams of project developers who are tasked with definitely not being sloppy and letting things break. They pay for the careful maintenance of decades-old communications infrastructure. Unlike fuzzy concepts like climate change and politics, these are very concrete systems that must be built the right way, not just assumed to be built by someone else unnamed, and (of course!) incorporating a lot of 'old tech' alongside innovations rather than replacing it. This infrastructure is very real to these tech leaders, and thus given the respect and investment it deserves. As a rapidly degrading global climate and increasingly undermined political-economic foundations come to the fore, they will also start to become very real to these same leaders. Natural disasters are already affecting the tech sector's customers, workforces, and infrastructure. Political-economic uncertainty will begin impacting revenues and costs (see Exhibit A: Tariff uncertainty, and Exhibit B: Unforecasted and significant costs recently incurred by various universities, law firms and media companies – will the tech industry be next?). As these risks start to directly impact the day to day business of these tech leaders, they will no longer be able to consider them some distant concepts to be treated academically. They will have to invest into clean energy, climate adaptation and resiliency, clean water, and stable politics. Or their companies, industries and personal wealth will suddenly start to directly suffer the consequences. The good news is that Silicon Valley has a long and proven history of building great infrastructure. When push comes to shove, 'move fast and break things' quickly gets put aside in favor of professional, thorough, critical infrastructure investments. All that needs to happen is for their definition of 'critical infrastructure' to be broadened to include the planet they live on and the social and economic foundations that they depend upon. Silicon Valley may soon be at this breaking point, if not already there. Not abandoning techno-centric viewpoints and big bold ideas. Just no longer naively leaving these other crucial underpinnings like the environment, the economy and society to someone else to deal with. And when that happens, when the technology Great Flood assumption is abandoned and these brilliant minds are put to work actually pragmatically addressing this 'infrastructure' broadly defined… we will see an amazing resurgence of actual investments and scalable solutions for these mounting challenges. The innovative power of Silicon Valley is one of the most powerful forces humanity has ever built, and harnessed correctly accomplishes amazing things. Just as when a fever breaks, when Silicon Valley finally reaches this breaking point it will be a very good thing.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
G-Shock Reworked Its Original Watch Using a 1,200-Year-Old Japanese Craft
The toughest name in time just found a new way to showcase its signature shock resistance. Every product is carefully selected by our editors. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more G-Shock's new watch may revisit its oldest design from the 1980s. But the technique used for its unique bezel and bracelet actually dates back more than a millennium. Tsuiki, believed to have originated in the Heian period (794 to 1185 AD), refers to the Japanese craft of hammering sheets of metal into three-dimensional objects. Over the years, it's been used to shape armor, cookware and, now, digital watches, with G-Shock's 5000 series serving as the latest canvas to showcase tsuiki's stunning, handmade effect. Hammer time As the name implies, the brand-new MRG-B5000HT slots into the brand's catalog by way of the MR-G luxury sub-division. Yet even by those lofty standards, the watch standard apart as a one-of-a-kind offering from the toughest name in timekeeping. According to G-Shock, only 500 examples will be available worldwide, each one hand-hammered by master artisan Kazuya Watanabe — a nod to G-Shock's signature shock resistance. Both the bezel and bracelet are made from DAT55G, a titanium alloy that G-Shock claims is three times harder than pure titanium, and colored with a DLC coating designed to mimic traditional sword design. Otherwise, in true G-Shock fashion, the watch features Tough Solar power, Multi-Band 6, Bluetooth, sapphire glass, an LED backlight and 200 meters of water resistance. Availability and pricing Already breaking cover overseas, the MRG-B5000HT will cost 935,000 Japanese yen (roughly $6,400) when it releases in August. Casio has yet to confirm US pricing and availability, but, as stated, only 500 examples exist due to the artisanal nature of the watch. G-Shock MRG-B5000HT Learn More Jack Seemer is the executive editor at Gear Patrol, with over a decade of experience in product journalism. He currently reports on a wide range of topics, including footwear, watches, EDC, cookware and more.


Digital Trends
an hour ago
- Digital Trends
More AI is coming to Samsung phones, but from unexpected places
Samsung was one of the first smartphone makers to go all-in with AI, thanks to the Galaxy AI stack. The Galaxy flagships didn't only ship the usual Gemini features, but also delivered their own unique AI experiences with tools like Now Bar, Now Brief, and Interpreter, among others. The company has no plans of stopping there. On the contrary, Samsung is eyeing deals with more AI companies to serve their AI tools atop Galaxy smartphones — at the cost of stealing some spotlight away from Google's Gemini. According to a report by Bloomberg, Perplexity and ChatGPT-maker OpenAI are two of those potential candidates. Why does this matter? 'We are talking to multiple vendors. As long as these AI agents are competitive and can provide the best user experiences, we are open to any AI agent out there,' Won-joon Choi, Chief Operating Officer (COO) of Samsung's MX Business, was quoted as saying. The shift is pretty interesting and something that is going to worry Google for multiple reasons. Recommended Videos As part of the Justice Department's antitrust case, it was reported that Google was paying an 'enormous' sum to Samsung. The fee was paid as a revenue share for onboarding paid subscribers, and also on a monthly basis for each Galaxy device that came pre-installed with the Gemini app. Interestingly, Samsung was also approached by other companies with similar offers, a list that includes names such as Meta, Microsoft, and OpenAI. How soon Samsung phones integrate AI products from other companies remains to be seen, but it would certainly be a big blow to Google. Over the past few years, Google executives have appeared on the launch stage for flagship Samsung devices. Moreover, as recently as its I/O event in May, Google heavily showcased Samsung's phones to reveal its upcoming Android and AI features. Samsung's status as the biggest name in the smartphone world is definitely a key part of the equation here. What's next for Google and Gemini? Google's Pixel phones are the best showcase of what AI (read: Gemini) can accomplish on a phone. But Google's smartphones are nowhere near as popular in terms of market reception and sales volumes are Samsung's Galaxy phones. That's why finding a prominent place for Gemini on Galaxy phones was such a big deal. But the challenge has already started right in the Android ecosystem. Perplexity, which offers a product that aims to compete with Google Search and Gemini, inked a deal with Nothing last year to offer its Pro subscription for free. Earlier this year, another deal with Motorola ensured that Perplexity would come pre-installed on Motorola devices. The company has also revealed that its AI-focused browser called Comet will soon land on Apple and Android smartphones. Perplexity was also rumored to be on Apple's potential list of partners as the company struggles to push Siri in the same league as ChatGPT and Gemini. As a stopgap solution, Apple inked a deal with OpenAI that allows Siri to seamlessly work with ChatGPT for advanced queries. With Samsung also exploring rival AI products for Galaxy smartphones, it would be interesting to see how aggressive Google gets at pushing Gemini on mobile devices.