Jharkhand ATS makes 5th arrest in terror-link case
Ammar Yashar, 33, was detained from Shamsher Nagar under provisions of UAPA, IPC and the Explosives Act.
According to an ATS official, Yashar's name came up during questioning of four persons arrested in Dhanbad on April 26. Police claim Yashar, who had been arrested in 2014 over alleged ties with Indian Mujahideen, was granted bail in May last year after spending nearly a decade in prison.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Girl turns hostile & no evidence: Gurgaon man accused of rape walks free
Gurgaon: A man accused of raping a 10-year-old girl in Nov 2022 walked free as the girl and other witnesses turned hostile. The medical report and forensic evidence did not support allegations of rape. While acquitting the accused, a city court observed that "A person is presumed to be innocent until guilt is proved against him beyond all reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused." A case was registered in Nov 2022 on the complaint of the minor's mother, alleging her daughter was sexually assaulted by the accused when they were out for work. In the complaint, the woman stated that the girl, along with her siblings, was returning home from the park when a man lured her by promising to give her a melon. 'The accused took her inside a room while her siblings were standing outside. You Can Also Check: Gurgaon AQI | Weather in Gurgaon | Bank Holidays in Gurgaon | Public Holidays in Gurgaon The man was arrested within days of the registration of the FIR, and a chargesheet was filed in Jan 2023 against the accused under section 6 (sexual assault) of the POCSO Act and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC. However, during the trial, the mother of the victim changed her statement and said the minor was playing in the park when some unknown person misbehaved with her, and they ran away when she raised an alarm. She told the court that the man never committed any sexual act with the minor. The minor also changed her statement, as did the father of the minor. Sanjoy Mondal, a security guard at the park of Sector 17-A, said police had taken his signature on a blank paper, and he was not aware of any sexual assault. Manish Shandilya, counsel for the accused, said the accused never committed any sexual assault upon the victim. The allegations were in no way sustainable in court and were found to be vague during the trial. "The court rightly acquitted the accused, hence justice to the accused and his family, who suffered badly during the period of the case registration and trial," said Shandilya. Additional sessions judge of the fast-track special court under the POCSO Act, Gurgaon, Jasmine Sharma, in her order issued earlier this week, said the child victim, her parents, and Sanjay Mandal have not supported the prosecution version. All four witnesses in unison denied any offence by the accused and have stated that the accused never committed sexual assault upon the victim at any point in time. "An accused is presumed to be an innocent person unless and until guilt is proved against him beyond all the shadow of reasonable doubt," the court observed. "The prosecution has miserably failed to bring home the guilt of the accused," said the court and acquitted the accused of all the charges levelled against him.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Intention to ‘teach a lesson': HC commutes murder sentence of cops in custodial death
Raipur: In a custodial death case, the Chhattisgarh High Court has altered a murder case against four police personnel to a case of culpable homicide not amounting to murder with an observation that the intention of the police was to "teach a lesson" to the deceased and not necessarily to cause his death. With this observation, the high court has sentenced these four police personnel, including a station house officer (SHO), to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment in connection with the custodial death of one Satish Norge in Janjgir-Champa. The court altered the conviction from murder (Section 302 of the IPC) to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304 Part II of the IPC). A Division Bench comprising Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari and Justice Sanjay K Agrawal observed, "In light of the legal principles, to constitute culpable homicide, the act must be done with the intention to cause death, to cause bodily injury likely to result in death, or with the knowledge that it is likely to cause death. In this case, the accused —SHO, constables, and sainik— were aware that assaulting the deceased could result in death. Their intent was to punish him for creating a nuisance at the electric sub-section, which led to multiple injuries." Norge was taken into police custody on Sept 17, 2016, near the electric sub-station in Nariyara. Medical examination at 1.55 pm by Dr Rashmi Dahire at Community Health Centre, Pamgarh, confirmed he was intoxicated but had no injuries. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These 11 Everyday Foods Might Be the Key to Knee Pain Relief Undo He was arrested at the Mulmula police station at 2.35 pm. Around 3.15 pm, Norge's health deteriorated. He began vomiting and was taken back to Pamgarh hospital at 5 pm, where Dr Dahire declared him dead on arrival. The post-mortem report, conducted on Sept 18, 2016, by Dr K K Dahire and two other doctors, revealed 26 injuries on Norge's body. The cause of death was attributed to multiple contusion injuries, leading to liver rupture and cardio-respiratory arrest. '12 Incriminating Circumstances Identified' The trial court had identified 12 incriminating circumstances, concluding that Norge's death was homicidal. Key among these were the absence of injuries when he was taken into custody, the rapid deterioration of his health while in police custody, and the presence of numerous injuries found during the post-mortem. Witness testimonies supported the prosecution's case. The high court observed that police officials are uniquely positioned to explain circumstances surrounding a custodial death, and the absence of such explanation weighs heavily against them. The court referenced Supreme Court rulings in Shyamsunder Trivedi, Munshi Singh Gautam, and K H Shekarappa cases, which highlight the rarity of direct evidence in custodial torture cases and the onus on police to explain deaths in their custody. The court noted that the accused, being police officers, failed to explain the 26 injuries found on Norge's body, especially since he had no injuries when initially examined. This reinforced the conclusion that Norge died due to police torture. Partially Upholds Order By Trial Court While upholding the trial court's findings on the homicidal nature of death and the established incriminating circumstances, the high court determined that the intention of the police was to "teach a lesson," not necessarily to cause death. Thus, the offence fell under Section 304 Part II of the IPC, which deals with acts done with the knowledge that they are likely to cause death, but without the direct intention of causing death. 'No Evidence To Prove Offense Committed Knowing That Deceased Belonged To SC Community' The appeal filed by Usha Devi Norge, Satish Norge's widow, challenging the acquittal of Jitendra Singh Rajput under Sections 3(1)(j) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, was dismissed. The court found no admissible evidence to prove that the offence was committed with the knowledge that the deceased belonged to a Scheduled Caste community. HC directed that a certified copy of the judgment and the original record be sent to the concerned trial court and the superintendent of jail where the appellants are currently lodged.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Couple gets 14-yr-jail for selling minor in Delhi
Gumla: A human trafficker couple has been sentenced to 14 years in prison and slapped a fine of Rs 51,000 each on them by the Simdega court of additional district and sessions judge I Naranjan Singh on Friday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The case was related to the couple selling a minor PVTG girl in Delhi. The convicts are identified as Sangeeta Devi alias Manki and her husband Dilip Nayak, both residents of Keriya Dhumatarn village under the Thethaitangar police station of Simdega. "Both have been booked under sections ( 6)363/ 370( 4)/34 of the IPC and under sections 75/82 of the Juvenile Justice ( JJ) Act for under the anti human trafficking unit ( AHTU) police station's case no 11/ 21 dated 18 May 2018 additional public prosecutor ( APP) Nishi Kachhap said. According to the case, the father of the minor filed a complaint against two convicts for selling his 12-year-old daughter in Delhi under the pretence of getting her a job at the national capital.
