logo
National Dialogue is a distraction from failure to achieve meaningful transformation

National Dialogue is a distraction from failure to achieve meaningful transformation

Eyewitness News13-06-2025
Malaika Mahlatsi 13 June 2025 | 10:10 national dialogue
Cyril Ramaphosa
African National Congress (ANC)
President Cyril Ramaphosa announces a National Dialogue for 2025. Image: @CyrilRamaphosa
On 10 June 2025, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced developments on the National Dialogue that he proposed just over a year ago. These developments include the establishment of a team of 'eminent persons' whose role will be to 'guide and champion' the dialogue.
These 'eminent persons' are influential individuals in government (current and former), the private sector, academia and broader civil society (to some extent).
According to the president, the dialogue aims to discuss the challenges facing South Africa and to 'forge a path into the future in dialogue with one another'. Ramaphosa likened this National Dialogue to the discussions that occurred during apartheid. He stated: 'Through dialogue, we were able to deal with the challenges that the apartheid system caused in our country and achieved peace and overcame violence. We established a democracy and ended apartheid. Following the negotiations process, we used dialogue to start building a united nation where once there had only been conflict and division. We achieved all this because we came together in dialogue to discuss our difficulties, our concerns, our hopes and our aspirations as a people'.
On the surface, a National Dialogue seems like a good idea. South Africa is increasingly becoming polarised, with divisions occurring along racial, class, ideological, ethnic and gender lines. There is no question that ours is a deeply divided society, and that dialogue has a place in healing a divided people.
I understood this a few years ago when I attended a march against the ZANU-PF's authoritarian reign in Zimbabwe, held in Pretoria by the Zimbabwean diaspora. What was supposed to be a protest against the brutality of the regime exposed deeply concerning divisions that made it clear that the issues in Zimbabwe are deeper than the reality that the ZANU-PF government enjoys a monopoly of violence and governs with a margin of terror. Scores of protestors held posters calling for cessation, arguing that Matabeleland should break away from the Republic of Zimbabwe, using regressive arguments rooted in ethnic chauvinism. But at the heart of this thinking is the unacknowledged trauma of Gukurahundi, a genocide that ripped through Matabeleland between 1983 and 1987, where tens of thousands of Ndebele people were slaughtered by the Fifth Brigade under the instruction of Robert Mugabe's government.
The lack of dialogue about Gukurahundi in Zimbabwe has not only made victims of the genocide invisible but has cemented unimaginable generational trauma. There is a necessity for dialogue in Zimbabwe, just as there is in many parts of the continent where traumas have gone unacknowledged. So, as a principle, I do support national dialogues. I value their significance.
But scratch beneath the surface of the proposed National Dialogue in South Africa, and you realise that here, it is nothing more than a distraction from the failure of the democratic government to achieve meaningful transformation. Unlike in Zimbabwe, where injustice has not even been acknowledged, in our country, the issue is not about a lack of dialogue but rather, lack of action. Furthermore, the president's likening of the dialogue to negotiations that 'ended' apartheid is manipulative and a distortion of history. The Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA), the negotiating forum established in 1991 after the National Peace Accord, which aimed at transitioning South Africa from apartheid to a democratic government, may have provided a platform for dialogue, but it did not 'end' apartheid. The power of mass action, both domestically and internationally, coupled with the economic and political unsustainability of apartheid, led to its end. By the time the negotiations happened, the apartheid regime was so isolated globally that the economic logic and incentive for apartheid was no longer sustainable.
It was the people of South Africa and our allies across the world who made apartheid unworkable and made negotiations a logical conclusion. Insisting that CODESA 'ended' apartheid is a form of erasure of the role that South Africans played in their liberation, and historical revisionism that has come to define the narrative of struggle in the democratic dispensation.
The issues that the president wants to see addressed by the National Dialogue are not unknown. The government is fully aware what the issues in our country are. Its own research institutions such as the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), the Gauteng City Region Observatory (GCRO), government departments, think tanks, learning institutions, the media, and all manner of institutions and platforms have repeatedly communicated what the issues in South Africa are and what they have been since the dawn of democracy.Ramaphosa and the government know exactly what ails us and what solutions are needed to alleviate the struggles that we confront. There is nothing that a consultative process will bring to light that protesting communities, activists, scholars and people on the margins (including women, the LGBTQI+ community, migrants, persons with disabilities, Khoisan people, etc) have not already expressed. Even more, the root of the problem for which symptoms have been protested over, analysed and commented on by South Africans across all walks of life, is known.
The government of our country knows that unless the nucleus of racial capitalism, from whence the chromatin network of landlessness, poverty, inequalities, and all forms of structural violence emerges, is addressed, meaningful transformation will not happen. No matter how much ignorance it feigns, the government knows.
For this reason, I am in full agreement with Sinawo Tambo, the spokesperson of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), who posits that Ramaphosa is attempting to make South Africans take collective responsibility for the failures of the party he leads and seeks to mask this scapegoating with the sentimentality of a National Dialogue. The dialogue gives an illusion of a government that listens when in reality, the South African government, and certainly, the African National Congress (ANC), has proven impervious to listening. Ramaphosa wants to keep South Africa in an endless cycle of dialogue to distract us from the fact that the government is failing to facilitate the radical reform that is needed to redress the injustices of the country's amoral past. He wants us to dialogue because he does not have the guts to make demands on those who remain resistant to change – the unrepentant White minority that has become emboldened by the inertia of his government and has opted out of participating in the process of nation-building without consequence. Instead, the oppressed are expected to beg for justice and to negotiate for humanisation. Instead of dedicating taxpayers' resources to a performative consultative process, the government should be channelling those resources towards programmes/initiatives aimed at addressing gender-based violence, structural reform, economic and spatial justice, and service delivery. These are some key issues that South Africans have already expressed as needing urgent intervention. These are issues the country has already communicated through dialogues in communities, through the media and on platforms.
To want to have South Africans repeat them for the purpose of symbolism is callous. President Ramaphosa must reflect deeply on the sentiments expressed in Karl Marx's 11th thesis in the Theses on Feuerbach , who, in his critique of the traditional role of philosophy, which he saw as primarily theoretical, contends that: 'Philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it'.
In the context of South Africa, the people have dialogued in various ways; the point for the government is to muster the political will to act.
Malaika, a bestselling and award-winning author, is a geographer and researcher at the Institute for Pan African Thought and Conversation. She is a PhD in Geography candidate at the University of Bayreuth in Germany.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sekhukhune community demands action on TUT campus project amid escalating tensions
Sekhukhune community demands action on TUT campus project amid escalating tensions

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Sekhukhune community demands action on TUT campus project amid escalating tensions

Bapedi Nation Prime Minister Ngoako Ramatlhodi says negotiations are ongoing. Image: Phill Magakoe / Archive The controversy surrounding the Tshwane University of Technology (TUT) Sekhukhune campus has reached a boiling point, with the ANC in Sekhukhune threatening to take to the streets if the promised university campus is not built soon. The dispute centers around allegations that TUT Vice-Chancellor Professor Tinyiko Maluleke diverted the project from Sekhukhune to Giyani, sparking outrage among the local community. In 2021, TUT signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Sekhukhune Royal Kingdom to establish a campus in the area, focusing on mining and agriculture. However, nearly five years later, the project remains stalled, with the community accusing Maluleke of hijacking the initiative and redirecting it to Giyani, allegedly his hometown. This alleged sabotage has led to widespread frustration and feelings of betrayal among the Bapedi nation of Sekhukhune in Limpopo. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading ANC Sekhukhune Regional Secretary Tala Mathope warned that if the university campus is not built soon, the community will take to the streets in protest if their demands are not met. "Build us the university campus that was promised or we will take to the streets," Mathope demanded. He emphasised that the community believes the project has been hijacked and that someone somewhere has misdirected it to Giyani. "We are not saying the Giyani university project should stop... We are saying that somebody, somewhere has misdirected the project that was supposed to come to Sekhukhune to Giyani. It was hijacked. This is an emotional issue," Mathope said. He appealed to the university, Limpopo premier Phophi Ramathuba, and the Ministry of Higher Education under the newly appointed minister Buti Manamela to act appropriately, or face street protests. New TUT vice-chancellor and principal, Professor Tinyiko Maluleke is being taken to court over TUT Sekhukhune campus delays. Image: Supplied 'We have taken offense that five years later there has still not been any project was at an advanced stage and it suddenly stopped and the Giyani one started…We also want to know who is frustrating us," Mathope asked. 'Build us the university campus that was promised,' Mathope said. Newly-appointed Bapedi Nation Prime Minister Ngoako Ramathlodi weighed in with a more cautious approach to the matter saying the kingdom has been in talks with the university. 'We are aware that TUT commissioned a study to create a technical university given the minerals study was concluded and an MOU is to be implemented. 'This happened during the late King Thulare's funeral [where] even the president (Cyril Ramaphosa) announced that there would be a university in Sekhukhune. 'We have been in talks with the university…Protocols should be followed properly. We are engaging the university, then the education sector and maybe the president as a last resort. We have already raised the issue with the premier,' the former Limpopo premier said. Bapedi Kingdom head of education, William Maphutha, has taken legal action against TUT, claiming that the university project was stolen by a sophisticated syndicate led by Maluleke. Maphutha confirmed that the community is mobilising to march to the Ministry of Higher Education in protest. "The legal process has started, our lawyers are busy finalizing documents. We have a strong, watertight case and proof that the Sekhukhune TUT University project was stolen," Maphutha said. When the department was contacted they redirected inquiries to TUT, the institution's spokesperson, Phaphama Tshisikhawe, who did not respond to the questions she received.

US legislators advance bill that could sanction SA over its foreign policy
US legislators advance bill that could sanction SA over its foreign policy

The Herald

timean hour ago

  • The Herald

US legislators advance bill that could sanction SA over its foreign policy

US legislators have voted to advance a bill that proposes reviewing the US relationship with South Africa due to objections over its foreign policy and potentially imposing sanctions on South African officials. The US House foreign affairs committee voted 34-16 on Tuesday to send the US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act to the full House of Representatives, where it could be subject to a vote, according to a video of the proceedings. The measure would need to pass the House and the Senate before it could be signed into law. Many bills at this stage never go to a vote. However, the committee's approval took the bill a step further and underscored tensions between Washington and Pretoria as South Africa seeks to fend off a looming 30% US tariff and counter false claims of white 'genocide' made by President Donald Trump. South Africa's foreign ministry and a spokesperson for President Cyril Ramaphosa declined to comment. The bill was introduced in April by Ronny Jackson, a Republican congressman from Texas who cheered the move on X, writing: 'South Africa made its choice when they abandoned America and our allies and sided with communists and terrorists.' The bill accuses South Africa of undermining US interests by maintaining close relationships with Russia and China, which are among its allies and trading partners. It also accuses South Africa of backing Palestinian militant group Hamas that is at war in Gaza with Israel, which South Africa has denied. South Africa has long been a supporter of the Palestinian cause and filed a case accusing Israel of genocide at the International Court of Justice in 2023, which is mentioned in the bill as one of its concerns. The bill proposes 'a full review of the bilateral relationship' and to 'identify South African government officials and ANC leaders eligible for the imposition of sanctions'. It says these would be people determined by Trump to have engaged in corruption or human rights abuses. No individuals are named. South Africa's relationship with the US has sharply deteriorated during Trump's second term, during which he has accused the government of anti-white racism and started a refugee programme for Afrikaners. Reuters

Parliament forms Ad Hoc Committee to investigate serious allegations by KZN police commissioner
Parliament forms Ad Hoc Committee to investigate serious allegations by KZN police commissioner

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Parliament forms Ad Hoc Committee to investigate serious allegations by KZN police commissioner

The 11-member Ad Hoc Committee mandated to investigate the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, has three months to conduct its work and report to the National Assembly by not later than October 31. Image: Thobile Mathonsi / Independent Newspapers The National Assembly on Wednesday night unanimously agreed to form an Ad Hoc Committee tasked with investigating the serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. This decision comes after the adoption of a report from the portfolio committees on Police and Justice and Constitutional Development, which were requested to consider the appropriate approach to deal with the allegations. ANC chief whip Mdumiseni Ntuli announced that the 11-member committee will consist of four members from the ANC, two each from the DA and the MK Party, one member from the EFF, and two representatives to be recommended by other parties. Ntuli said the committee will report to the National Assembly by not later than October 31. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He said the committee's terms of reference included the alleged unlawful decision by Police Minister Senzo Mchunu to disband the Political Killings Task Team, the alleged unlawful removal of 121 case dockets from the Political Killings Task Team on the direction of Deputy National Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, and the alleged moratorium by Mchunu on filling vacancies within the SAPS Crime Intelligence Unit. Others are the nature and implications of the relationship between SAPS senior leadership and certain members of the public, whether the award of the R360 million contract to Vusumuzi Matlala's company for the provision of healthcare services to SAPS was irregular. The committee will also look into the alleged interference by the Investigative Directorate Against Corruption in police matters, including judicial issues, and also consider the need for legislative policy and institutional reform to restore public confidence in the criminal justice system. Parties have thrown their weight behind the Ad Hoc Committee. ANC MP Samuel Moela said the allegations made by Mkhwanazi cannot be left unexamined. 'General Mkhwanazi's assertion, if accurate, paints a disturbing picture of how certain elements might be undermining the integrity of law enforcement institutions for political or personal gain. 'Parliament has both the responsibility and the authority to get to the bottom of these claims, not for political point scoring, but to protect the democratic institutions so many South Africans fought to build,' Moela said. DA deputy spokesperson on police, Lisa Schickerling, said the evidence Mkhwanazi presented raised the greatest questions about the conduct of Mchunu, Sibiya, senior police officers, and even members of the judiciary. 'The National Assembly must hold the executive to account, even in the face of parallel investigations. We welcome the urgency with which this House has resolved to independently oversee the political and institutional dimensions of this crisis,' said Schickerling. MK Party's Sibonelo Nomvalo saluted Mkhwanazi for taking on the perceived untouchables by exposing criminal syndicates within the criminal justice system. 'Our clarion call is that Lieutenant-General Mkhwanazi must appear before the Ad Hoc Committee in Parliament and expose all the police officers, prosecutors, judges, Members of Parliament, and all officials in the Department of Police who are in cahoots with criminals," he said. 'An allegation by Lieutenant-General Mkhwanazi against judges justifies our valid call for a lifestyle audit against judges. It is our firm belief that judges are human beings. They are not a paragon of morality, and therefore are corruptible honourable members,' Nomvalo said. EFF MP Rebecca Mohlala said the SAPS was a seriously compromised service, and its top brass enabled the capture of the institution for nefarious reasons. Mohlala said Parliament should get to the bottom of the allegations and reassert its role in providing oversight to the executive. 'We support the recommendation of the report for the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee to conduct an inquiry to get to the bottom of corruption,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store