EU Accuses Online Giant Temu Over Sale Of 'Illegal' Products
EU regulators believe Temu is not doing enough to protect European consumers from dangerous products and that it may not be acting sufficiently to mitigate risks to users.
"Evidence showed that there is a high risk for consumers in the EU to encounter illegal products on the platform," the European Commission said in its preliminary finding.
It pointed to a mystery shopping exercise that found consumers were "very likely to find non-compliant products among the offer, such as baby toys and small electronics".
Temu said only it would "continue to cooperate fully with the commission".
Wildly popular in the European Union despite only having entered the continent's market in 2023, Temu has 93.7 million average monthly active users in the 27-country bloc.
The EU said Temu's October 2024 risk assessment was "inaccurate and relying on general industry information rather than on specific details about its own marketplace".
Temu is under investigation as part of a mammoth law known as the Digital Services Act (DSA) that forces the world's largest tech firms to do more to protect European consumers online and better police content online.
Temu will now be able to respond to the EU regulators' findings and defend itself, but there is no time limit on how long an investigation may last.
If confirmed to be in breach, the EU can slap a fine on Temu.
Fines under the DSA can go as high as six percent of a company's total worldwide annual turnover and force it to make changes to address violations.
Launched in October, the EU probe continues to investigate other suspected breaches including the use of addictive design features that could hurt users' physical and mental well-being and how Temu's systems recommend content and products.
The DSA is part of the EU's reinforced legal weaponry to curb the excesses of Big Tech, with stricter rules for the world's biggest platforms.
It has faced criticism from the US administration under President Donald Trump.
The Republican-dominated judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives described the DSA in a scathing report as a "foreign censorship threat" on Friday.
Staunch President Donald Trump ally Jim Jordan, committee chair, met EU tech sovereignty chief Henna Virkkunen in Brussels as part of a bipartisan delegation on Monday.
"We had a constructive discussion on how to promote digital innovation, AI and regulate this field smartly," she said on X after the meeting.
There are currently other DSA probes into Chinese online retailer AliExpress, social media platforms Facebook and Instagram and X as well as TikTok.
The EU also wants to crack down on cheap packages that flood into the bloc each year, with a proposal under discussion for a two-euro flat fee per parcel.
Last year, 4.6 billion such packages entered the EU -- more than 145 per second -- with 91 percent originating in China. The EU expects the numbers to increase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Trump's EPA to roll back cornerstone of climate action – DW – 07/31/2025
The US Environmental Protection Agency under President Donald Trump is pushing to reverse a 2009 landmark declaration that deemed CO2 and other greenhouse gases harmful to people's health. What's at stake? US President Donald Trump's administration is forging ahead with a plan to revoke a scientific finding that's long been the cornerstone of US climate action. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin unveiled the move at a car dealership in the US state of Indiana, hailing it as "the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States" and the "death of the Green New Scam." At the heart of the rollback is the Obama-era 2009 endangerment finding, grounded in the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. EPA. That ruling established the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants — a legal foundation for US efforts to curb emissions. If the endangerment finding is thrown out, the EPA would lose its ability to use the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases, a move experts warn would represent a "radical pivot in American climate and energy policy." "It represents a complete US step away from renewable energy and energy efficiency in favor of full embrace of expanded production and use of fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas," Barry Rabe, environmental and public policy professor at the University of Michigan, told DW. The second Trump administration is acting more aggressively in just about everything than the first, Michael Gerrard, professor at Columbia Law School, told DW. It is closely following the blueprint of Project 2025, a roadmap developed by conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation. The 900-page document suggested an "update" of the endangerment finding. The finding is the basis for rules regulating climate pollution established under the Obama and Biden administrations. Rules on power plants, vehicles, airplanes, and landfills could now be repealed, said Jason Rylander, legal director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute. At the same time, climate change continues to intensify across the US, fueling extreme heat, wildfires, floods, and billion-dollar weather disasters. "Climate change isn't going away. We are rapidly accelerating past 1.5 degrees. There will be additional public health and environmental harms that will result from that," Rylander said. The EPA has formally drawn up a proposal, which is now open for public comment until September. The agency will then review and respond to the feedback before issuing a final ruling, expected by the end of the year. There will then likely be lawsuits. "Groups like mine will certainly sue," Rylander said. The cases will first go to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and could then be appealed to the US Supreme Court. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It could take years for the case to reach the Supreme Court. But once the EPA issues its final decision, the endangerment finding will be revoked, Gerrard explained. "It stays revoked unless a court overturns it." The endangerment finding is based on decades of scientific conclusions from credible global sources about the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and public health. Rylander said the EPA was "slicing and dicing the statute to try to come up with some sort of loopholes," and that none of the arguments brought forward "really passed the laugh test." Still, with a six-to-three conservative majority, the US Supreme Court has repeatedly chipped away at federal climate regulations in recent years. "So, it is possible that the Supreme Court will uphold this," said Gerrard, who is also director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video One argument the agency is using to reverse the finding is that its economic and political significance is so great that it requires explicit authorization from Congress. And while the EPA under Obama and Biden assumed it was enough to show that greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans endanger the climate, the Trump administration wants to evaluate each gas individually and by sector. "And they are saying each chunk, like carbon dioxide from US power plants alone, has to endanger the climate," Gerrard said, adding that this is much harder to establish. "So, a court that is hostile to climate regulation might follow that approach and agree with the Trump EPA and say that the endangerment finding is not valid." The EPA proposal also argues the 2009 finding failed to consider the benefits of CO2 emissions alongside their costs. Rylander called this "a fallacious argument," comparing it to deciding whether a species is endangered under the Endangered Species Act. "That's not an economic decision. It's a question of science," he said, adding that it's the same with pollutants, like CO2. "Do they cause public health harm or do they not?" Rabe said a reversal would cause "a chilling effect on many existing federal policies for greenhouse gas emissions." Still, the EPA would retain authority to regulate other pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, mercury, and coal ash from coal-fired power plants. "And many states are working to address pollution from cars and power plants, and they would do that under state law," said Rylander, adding that "US efforts to decarbonize will still continue." However, Gerrard said, "the best tool they have would be gone."
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
China: Telegram group sparks outrage over voyeur videos – DW – 07/31/2025
Men shared videos of women, including family members and children, without their knowledge or consent in a group of over 100,000 men. China regularly removes pornographic content from its tightly controlled internet. A shady Telegram group has sparked outrage in China after sexually exploitative images of Chinese women were shared in a group chat with hundreds of thousands of users. A Chinese-language Telegram chat group named "MaskPark tree hole forum" shared images of women secretly taken or filmed in different locations. The Chinese state-run newspaper first reported on the group in mid-September, with the story being picked up outside of China in recent days. The group chat has more than 100,000 anonymous users in China and overseas, all of them are men, the newspaper said. Some users shared private images of their current or ex-girlfriends and female family members, including mothers and daughters. Some of the videos that had been secretly recorded with pinhole cameras in public spaces were being sold in the chat groups, the local reported. "My ex-boyfriend secretly took photos of me during sex, posted my private photos to the group without my permission and publicised my social media accounts," Reuters quoted an unnamed female victim, citing the . Chatroom users also sold the tools, such as incense holders fitted with pinhole cameras, used to secretly film women, according to chat records published in the report. Footage appeared to have been taken in a range of locations, including ultrasound rooms, public restrooms, subways and shopping malls, according to the The paper said that the main group had been closed down by Sunday, but another group selling hidden cameras was still running. reported that hashtags connected to the scandal had been viewed over 11 million times on the social media app Weibo by Thursday. It appeared that some of the content was being censored. Telegram is blocked by the Chinese government in China so users require a VPN to access the platform. China also has strict laws and regularly deletes pornographic content from its heavily government-controlled internet, so the scale of the image sharing has shocked many in China. "This has heightened the concerns of many women, as voyeuristic incidents seem to be ubiquitous," said Huang Simin, a Chinese lawyer who specializes in sexual violence cases. Secret filming and photography offenses carry relatively light penalties if the content isn't considered obscene, with fines up to 500 yuan (€61, $69.68) and up to 10 days of administrative detention for serious cases, she added. It is challenging for Chinese police to punish offenders over MaskPark because Telegram is encrypted and hosted overseas, said a Chinese legal researcher who requested anonymity. "Criminal cases require a high evidence threshold, so disseminating intimate images often remains difficult to prosecute due to insufficient evidence," they said. "There are no specific regulations regarding the dissemination of intimate images of adult women," they concluded. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
End Of $800 Duty-Free Rule Sends Shockwaves Through US Small Businesses
President Donald Trump on Tuesday unleashed a new wave of tariffs targeting countries that have failed to finalize bilateral trade deals with the U.S., signaling a dramatic escalation of his second-term trade agenda. The White House announced a sweeping series of import duties, some taking effect as early as Aug. 1, that are expected to hit key sectors like manufacturing, electronics and retail. Among the most consequential measures is the end of the de minimis exemption, a long-standing rule that allows goods valued under $800 to enter the US duty-free. According to Wired, the exemption will be fully revoked for all countries starting Aug. 29, dealing a blow to small businesses and e-commerce platforms that rely on low-cost international shipments. "This is going to hit every small importer hard -- from Etsy resellers to small-scale manufacturers," said a compliance officer with a major logistics firm, as reported by Reuters. The move is widely expected to increase shipping costs, customs delays and administrative burdens for U.S. retailers and consumers alike. In addition, the Trump administration announced new 50% tariffs on copper and copper alloy products, citing national security concerns under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. The tariffs will apply to imports from major producers including China, Brazil and South Korea. These metals are crucial for U.S. construction, electrical systems, and green energy technologies. According to AP News, more than a dozen countries -- including India, Turkey and Vietnam -- will now face tariffs between 25% and 30%, after failing to sign new bilateral trade agreements with the U.S. by the administration's Aug. 1 deadline. Trump's trade team framed the actions as part of a broader campaign to reset the global trading system. In a press release, Treasury Secretary Jacob Bessent said the U.S. is "enforcing fair trade standards globally" and warned that "countries that want access to the U.S. market must play by our rules," as quoted by Barron's. The crackdown is also targeting a practice known as transshipment, in which exporters route goods through third-party countries to disguise their true origin and evade tariffs. According to The Washington Post, the administration has announced new enforcement rules requiring enhanced origin verification for any product deemed at risk of transshipment abuse. Those rules go into effect in mid-August. Trade experts warn that the cumulative effect of these new measures could be severe. According to the Tax Foundation, the total volume of U.S. tariffs under Trump's second term is now on track to exceed those imposed during the height of the 2018–2019 trade war. A Yale Budget Lab analysis released in mid-July described the current U.S. tariff regime as "the most economically consequential and legally aggressive" in decades. Notably, a separate set of tariffs imposed earlier this year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) was recently struck down by a federal court, which ruled that the president had exceeded his authority. According to Wikipedia, oral arguments in the appeal of V.O.S. Selections v. United States were scheduled for July 31, with a final ruling expected later this summer. If upheld, the decision could sharply limit the administration's ability to unilaterally impose future duties. Congress is also weighing its response. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are backing the Trade Review Act of 2025, which would require Congressional approval for any new tariff that remains in effect for more than 60 days. The bill has drawn support from small business groups, though the White House has threatened a veto. Details on the proposed law can be found on Wikipedia. Some signs of diplomatic progress have emerged. As reported by Investor's Business Daily, the U.S. and China reached a limited trade truce in June that included Chinese commitments on rare earth exports and opioid enforcement. However, the agreement expires Aug. 12, and the next round of negotiations remains uncertain. Back on Main Street, the latest moves have stoked anxiety among small business owners already struggling with inflation, supply chain instability, and rising borrowing costs. Industry groups have been quick to sound the alarm. The National Retail Federation warned that revoking the de minimis exemption will "punish U.S. consumers and small businesses," adding that the policy change amounts to a hidden tax on everyday goods, as reported by Reuters. Meanwhile, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has urged the administration to "reconsider actions that risk destabilizing global supply chains." Whether the strategy succeeds in bringing trade partners to the table—or plunges the country into another prolonged trade war—will likely depend on what happens in the next few weeks.
