
I'm a personal trainer and I think it's time people faced the truth about weight-loss jabs
I certainly don't hide away from the fact that my weight has always been something I'm hugely conscious of and something that I have struggled with over the years. The childhood trauma brought on by bullying for being 'the fat kid' still haunts me and that inspired me to do what I do to this day.
When I was 15, I started to become more self-conscious about my size. I knew something needed to change, so I took small steps to eat better and move more. Rugby, in particular, became my outlet and it not only helped me physically but also taught me the power of perseverance.
There's no greater feeling than proving others wrong through hard work and dedication. That's been my life motto, and it's shaped everything I do. Losing weight was a personal victory for me, but the real reward came when I could use my own journey to help others find their strength and confidence too.
Don't get me wrong, it's still a battle. But it's a battle worth fighting, especially with my family's history of strokes and heart disease. It's something I carry with me every day, driving me to make healthier choices for myself and inspiring others to do the same.
So when talk of a jab that essentially helps you lose weight began, I could hear the chunky young lad inside of me whispering 'this could have stopped years of bullying'.
But while these jabs might look like a miracle on the outside, I've seen too much to believe that's the whole story. I'm not naive enough to say it's impossible, but I can confidently say that none of my current team have ever considered using a weight-loss jab. The relationships we've built in this studio are rooted in trust. My clients know they can be open with me, and more importantly, they know that when they walk through our doors, we're focused on sustainable lifestyle changes, diet, movement, and mindset, not shortcuts.
I'm not sure every personal trainer will agree with me when I say that I'm not 100 per cent against them. If someone is severely obese and facing serious health risks, and this helps them avoid surgery, I can see where the potential value in a (closely monitored) jab lies.
I train many incredible nurses who work within the NHS. Over the last five years, these nurses have told me the increase in obesity- led health issues has risen exponentially. The strain on the NHS is incredibly real. So if the potential to cut obesity leads to a reduction in waiting lists (and not just for obesity-led issues), then again, of course, there is a value for these drugs.
As a personal trainer, I understand that many people think we're all about aesthetics with our clients, but that's not true. I've seen obesity wreck people physically, emotionally, and mentally. It's not just 'extra weight' – it's the raft of potentially life-changing and threatening issues that can follow.
There are numerous health risks linked to obesity. From increased risks of heart disease, diabetes and cancer, to infertility and pregnancy complications, not to mention the impact being overweight can have on your mental health, with links to depression, anxiety and social isolation.
I've witnessed first-hand the incredible impact that losing weight can have on someone's energy levels and confidence. It's nothing short of life-changing. When someone starts shedding the weight, they often experience a newfound sense of vitality, both physically and mentally. Their energy levels soar, allowing them to be more active, more present, and more engaged in everyday life.
They start to feel more comfortable in their own skin, and that confidence radiates outward, positively affecting every aspect of their life from their relationships and career to their overall outlook on the world. It's truly transformative, and I've seen it time and time again.
So, if someone offers a jab that promises a guaranteed fix, I can totally understand how tempting it would be. A young, naive and green version of myself would have thought wow! But as with everything in life, nothing is ever that simple or straightforward.
In June, I asked 31 members at my studio to share their progress. These are real people, men and women, young and old, with busy lives and real struggles. Collectively, they've lost over 1,200lbs. No drugs. No injections. Just education, support, consistency, and graft.
They didn't just lose inches either. By putting in the work, they became stronger, fitter and ultimately understood the real benefit of a consistent and sustainable lifestyle change. They started showing up differently in every part of their lives. Their energy levels and productivity at work rose, their moods lifted and more importantly, many issues with health improved dramatically. High blood pressure lowered, pre -diabetes was reversed and all without a 'miracle jab'.
The idea that you can lose weight without exercising could lead more people to think they don't need to move anymore. And it's this shift in mindset that concerns me, especially when we see photos of people who've used these jabs and notice things like a gaunt or hollow face. Sure, rapid weight loss can cause these effects, but it's hard to say for sure whether it's from the jab or just the pace of the weight loss itself.
In any weight-loss journey, whether through diet, exercise, or medication, some muscle loss is pretty common. But these jabs work by mimicking a hormone that controls appetite, which helps you eat less and lose weight. The downside is that this rapid weight loss doesn't just target fat; it can also take away lean muscle mass.
Muscle is critical for strength, mobility, and metabolism. Losing too much muscle can make it harder to maintain your weight loss long term and even lead to conditions like sarcopenia, where muscle mass and function decrease, affecting your quality of life. To minimise muscle loss, it's important to focus on getting enough protein and incorporating strength training into your routine. Protein helps your muscles recover and grow, while strength training helps preserve the muscle mass you've got. It's also important to eat. You can't just stop – essential nutrients will be missing from your diet. That's not healthy.
Whether someone uses medication or not doesn't change my job. I'm here to guide. To support. That part is important. To help them build habits that actually last long term. That is the battle. But these jabs won't educate you in the fundamentals of nutrition. The real basics. Nor will it help you deal with why you eat when you're not hungry or make you stronger or more body confident.
That for me is a very dangerous message. Especially for the younger generation. If they grow up thinking health comes in a syringe, what happens when that wears off or you can't afford the jab anymore? In recent studies on weight-loss injections, it has been found that a staggering 60 per cent of the weight lost is regained within the first three months. This concerning statistic highlights a critical point: injections alone aren't a sustainable solution for long-term weight management.
The reason for this is straightforward but crucial many individuals using the injections fail to understand that weight loss is a multifaceted process that requires a combination of factors to be effective over time. If people use these drugs as a quick fix without understanding the basic changes that have to be made, are we going to simply accept that people will be on these drugs for a lifetime?
These drugs are not without side effects either. From nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and in some cases, gallbladder issues, to kidney problems and pancreatic inflammation. That could be a hefty trade-off, especially if the results aren't lasting.
My main issue is that many users tend to rely solely on the jab for results, without integrating consistent physical activity and making lasting changes to their eating habits. While the injections can help reduce hunger or regulate metabolism, they don't address the root cause of poor dietary choices or sedentary lifestyles.
Use of these injections doesn't automatically correct the underlying patterns that contributed to weight gain in the first place. Without engaging in regular exercise, which is essential for building muscle and maintaining long-term fat loss, the body is more likely to return to its previous weight once the treatment is halted. Falling back into old eating habits, consuming high-calorie, low-nutrient foods, or overeating will quickly negate any positive effect of these injections, causing the weight to creep back on.
The injections might act as a catalyst, but lasting weight loss requires a complete, holistic approach that focuses on building healthier habits and making lasting changes to the way we live, eat and move. I often tell my clients, if nothing changes, nothing will change. So if nothing else has changed with your mindset around food and movement, the chances are the weight will come back. Fast.
The best we can hope for is that these weight-loss injections will help people feel more confident about getting into the gym or trying out new sports. For many, shedding some pounds can make a huge difference in how they feel about themselves and their abilities. They might feel more physically capable or just more comfortable in their own skin, which makes things like exercising or being active in public feel a lot more achievable. If someone understands it's not just about the number on the scales, it's about feeling empowered to try things they might have once thought were out of reach, then we should applaud the first step toward a more active, healthier lifestyle.
That's why I believe these medications should be used only when truly necessary and always alongside education, lifestyle change, and real support. And should never be used as a replacement for the work that actually transforms people's lives.
As a society, we can't just keep looking for quick fixes. We need to focus on building a culture that supports healthy habits. That means doctors using lifestyle prescriptions more, encouraging more movement, and schools and community programmes teaching people about nutrition and how to cook cheap and healthy meals. The government also has a role to play too, by resisting 'big food' influence and reducing access to unhealthy, sugary, processed foods and tackling 'food deserts' in many poorer areas. It's all about creating a positive environment that makes it easier for all people to live healthier, active lives.
I've been fortunate enough to see many lifestyle changes that are kept and held on to. There is nothing more satisfying than that.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lila Moss fronts new campaign as Barbie launches its first ever 'diabetic' doll - after the model opened up about living with the condition
Lila Moss fronted a new campaign as Barbie launched its first ever 'diabetic doll' this week. The model, 22, - who lives with type one diabetes - posed in a pink silk mini dress for the project before changing into a black top and white skirt for another shot. The 'diabetic' doll features a continuous glucose monitor and insulin pump - which Lila has spoken about using in the past. The toy firm says it made the first Barbie with type 1 diabetes (T1D) so more children could see themselves reflected in the range of dolls. It worked with Breakthrough T1D, the leading global type 1 diabetes research organisation in developing the new doll, which also has a purse perfect for carrying 'snacks'. The company has marked the release by partnering with fashion model Lila who is an insulin-dependent diabetic herself. The young model previously discussed her condition during a segment on Vogue's In The Bag YouTube after making the unconventional decision to wear the monitor on the catwalk. She said: 'I have some sugar tablets, in case my blood sugar goes low. I'm diabetic so I have this which controls a pod on my leg, which gives me insulin. 'This is very important to keep in my bag, it comes with me everywhere.' The star - worried her essential device could get lost - added: 'I even have an apple air-tag to follow it around with my phone.' Speaking about her condition in 2020, she told The Kit: 'I think not many people know that I have diabetes. It's not visible from the outside, so no one would really know just by looking at you.' Type 1 diabetes causes the level of glucose (sugar) in your blood to become too high. It happens when your body cannot produce enough of a hormone called insulin, which controls blood glucose. You need daily injections of insulin to keep your blood glucose levels under control. It worked with Breakthrough T1D, the leading global type 1 diabetes research organisation in developing the new doll, which also has a purse perfect for carrying 'snacks' Lila landed her first modelling gig at the age of 15 - nabbing a campaign for Marc Jacobs Beauty - at just a year older than her mother was when she entered the business. Yet despite her mother being one of the famous models in the business, Lila has previously revealed that Kate was keen to deter her from following in her footsteps. 'My mum always put me off [modelling],' Lila said. 'She was always like, 'If you wanna do it, you can, but I wouldn't recommend it.'' Despite her mother's apprehension, Lila insisted that she doesn't feel anxious at the thought that modelling success could bring the fame from which her parents tried to protect her. She mused: 'Not really. I've seen it first-hand, so I'm much more able to cope with it. I've had to say no to people. But I'm always nice!' Lila's father is journalist Jefferson Hack, with whom Kate was in a relationship in the early Noughties. Jefferson and Kate - who dated from 2001 to 2004 with Lila being born in 2002 - have an amicable relationship and would ensure their daughter spent a regular amount of time with each of them in her childhood.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Neil Gray blasted for 'disgusting spin' on worst cancer wait times ever recorded
Neil Gray has been accused of a 'grotesque' attempt to 'spin' the worst ever cancer waiting times by hiding behind a statistic now exposed as another record failure. The SNP health secretary was urged to apologise yesterday after his 'crass' and 'desperate' bid to distract the public was revealed by the Lib Dems. The row blew up as Mr Gray faced further criticism over the Government's apparent inability to get a grip on waiting times in A&E. Public Health Scotland reported almost a third of patients waiting too long to be seen in casualty units last week barely changed from the week before. Mr Gray came under intense criticism last month when it emerged Scotland's NHS recorded its worst cancer waiting times in the first three months of 2025. Since 2016, the target has been for 95 per cent of patients referred with an urgent suspicion of cancer to start treatment within 62 days. But between January and March a record low of just 68.9 per cent were treated on time, down from 73.5 per cent the previous quarter. Mr Gray chose to lead a healthcare trade mission to Japan when the data was published, leading to claims he was 'missing in action' on a 'junket'. But he did issue a statement drawing attention to a different cancer statistic - which has now caused a second outcry. 'The median wait for urgent suspicion of cancer referral to treatment is 52 days, demonstrating the extensive work by staff across Scotland to treat people as quickly and effectively as possible,' he said. But official data has revealed this was a record high, up from 49 days the previous quarter, and from 41 days when records began in 2016. The median is the central point in a set of numbers. Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said: 'The SNP are fast running out of excuses. 'It is grotesque and dangerously misleading for the Health Secretary to suggest that the average wait of 52 days shows progress, when that too is the worst on record. 'This kind of desperate and irresponsible political spin does nothing to bring down waits. The Health Secretary ought to apologise to patients.' Tory public health spokesman Brian Whittle said: 'It is appalling that Neil Gray doubled down on trying to paint the worst cancer waiting times on record in a better light. 'His attempts to distract from the SNP's record-breaking failure is crass and deeply insulting to suffering patients. He should be focused on saving lives, not saving face. 'Under the SNP, cancer care is in crisis and no amount of PR can mask their shocking neglect of Scotland's health service.' But in response, Mr Gray refused to apologise and effectively repeated his original spin. He said: 'We want to improve cancer waiting times and we know some people are waiting too long. 'The median wait from urgent suspicion of cancer referral to treatment is 52 days, and once a decision has been taken to treat somebody, the median wait for that treatment to begin is three days. This demonstrates the extensive work by staff across Scotland to treat people as quickly and effectively as possible.' New data yesterday also showed A&E waits improved in the week to June 29, with 67.6 per cent of patients seen within the four-hour target, up from 67.3 per cent the previous week. Waits of over eight and 12 hours also fell by around 0.5 per centage points. But the marginal gains were only achieved after patient numbers slumped 9.3 per cent. Mr Gray said the numbers were 'moving in the right direction'. Tory MSP Dr Sandesh Gulhane said the health secretary was 'burying his head in the sand'. Scottish Labour deputy Dame Jackie Baillie added: 'The reality is that John Swinney and the SNP have no meaningful plan, no strategy, and no ideas to save our NHS.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Legal action expected over loyalist bonfire sparking concern in Belfast
Legal action is expected to be launched over a loyalist bonfire in south Belfast which has sparked concern. The location of the towering pyre is close to an electricity substation which powers two major Belfast hospitals. It is set to be lit on July 11 ahead of annual Orange Order parades on July 12. NIE Networks said it has put mitigations in place at the substation to reduce the risk of damage. It is understood that correspondence has been exchanged between a Belfast legal firm and the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), the Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA), Belfast City Council, the Department for Infrastructure and the Department for Communities. The PSNI said it 'continues to work with our partner agencies, community representatives and landowners to address community safety issues relating to bonfires'. A spokesperson added: 'As there is the potential that judicial proceedings may be initiated, it would be inappropriate to comment any further.' Earlier a spokesperson for the Belfast Health Trust confirmed the substation supplies power to both the Royal Victoria Hospital and Belfast City Hospital (BCH). They said they are continuing to monitor developments in relation to the bonfire, and said at this stage there is no requirement to cancel any appointments. 'Our staff will remain in contact with relevant stakeholders over the coming days,' they said. 'On-site contingency measures include emergency back-up generators, which are tested regularly. 'Belfast Trust continues to review these arrangements with clinical teams at the BCH site. 'The trust is satisfied that there is currently no requirement to cancel any planned treatments or procedures.' Health Minister Mike Nesbitt paid a 'fact-finding visit to the site' on Tuesday. A department spokesperson said he took part in the visit 'in line with his ministerial responsibilities', and will receive updates from Belfast Trust and Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service. The Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) said the NIEA is working with Belfast City Council to cover asbestos-containing material at the site and erect additional fencing. Although a spokesperson said it is 'primarily the responsibility of the landowner'. Stormont Opposition leader Matthew O'Toole, who represents South Belfast, also expressed concern around the presence of asbestos on the site. 'The issue of the bonfire at Donegall Road exposes the democratic scandal of how this place works,' he said in a post on the social media network X. 'There is a credible risk to public health but neither the responsible Alliance environment minister, UUP health minister nor any Executive party will say anything. Why not?' NIE Networks said it has met with relevant stakeholders to express its concerns over the bonfire's proximity to the substation causing potential risk to critical infrastructure and power outages. 'Mitigations have been put in place, including turning off the transformers adjacent to the bonfire, building scaffolding with metal sheeting around the transformers and placing steel plates on open cable ducts to reduce the risk of fire and damage,' they said. 'Whilst these mitigations are in place, there will be a reduction in security of supply for the area. 'We would remind the public that flames near to power lines and electricity substations pose serious risk to everyone's safety and wellbeing.' The DAERA also said that NIEA officials remain in ongoing contact with the council and enforcement investigation continues in relation to the site. The bonfire, just off the Donegall Road, is one of an estimated 300 set to be lit across July 10-11 in Northern Ireland. Most of the bonfires, which are normally lit ahead of loyal order parades across the region on July 12, pass off without incident. However the fires, ranging from towering structures to beacons, have sparked anger following the burning of flags, effigies and election posters in the past. One of the tallest bonfires in recent years has been at Craigyhill in Larne, which reportedly reached 62 metres in 2022.