logo
The tragic story of the hippy who died defying the Stasi

The tragic story of the hippy who died defying the Stasi

Telegrapha day ago
Matthias Domaschk was only 23 years old when his body was found dangling from a heating pipe in a Stasi prison, on April 12 1981. Two days earlier, Matthias, known as 'Matz' to his friends, had boarded the fast train from his home town of Jena to East Berlin, the capital of East Germany, or the German Democratic Republic as it was officially known. All he had wanted to do was attend a birthday party there – but he never arrived.
Suspicious that Matz might have plans to disrupt the 10th Congress of the ruling Socialist Unity Party (SED) held in Berlin that weekend, the Stasi had him and his friends arrested en route. Forty-eight hours later, Matz was dead. Attempts to revive the young man were in vain. The Stasi recorded his death as suicide, but many of his friends and relatives suspected, and still suspect, foul play.
But that isn't the point of Generation GDR: Truth, Freedom and One Man's Last Journey, a book written in German by Peter Wensierski and translated seamlessly into English by Jamie Bulloch. It's about the life of Matthias Domaschk, and the one thing that is certain about his death: Matz died desperate and alone, in a place that had broken his spirit. A veteran journalist, Wensierski is uniquely positioned to investigate this story. He began his career in 1979 with reports from the GDR and has spent decades chronicling the inner workings of the post-war state. It's likely down to his journalistic credentials, too, that Wensierski has prioritised readability over academic accountability, choosing to drop footnotes – despite studying around 60,000 pages of archival material – as well as reconstructing some of the speech and thought processes of Matz and those close to him.
As a result, Generation GDR reads as an intimate portrait of Matz's search for personal freedom, ground up by one of the most pervasive surveillance systems in human history. Supported by a network of police officers, teachers and citizen informants, the Stasi had begun to destroy Matz's life long before it ended. From the regime's point of view, he had belonged to the most dangerous type of opponent: he didn't want to leave East Germany but rather wanted to stay and reform it. With his long hair, hippyish clothes and a commune-type lifestyle, he resisted the petit bourgeois ideals of his elders.
Like many other Left-wingers of his generation, Matz didn't want the GDR to dissolve, nor for it to become capitalist. 'The lot that we drew when we were born was the half of Germany in which we had fewer freedoms and fewer opportunities. But the whole time we hoped that the future was on our side, that socialism was the more progressive society,' Wensierski writes, reconstructing Matz's thoughts. 'The dinosaurs in the SED currently in power in Berlin simply haven't got it right.'
So Matz began asking awkward questions in school. Like so many others, his father had been coerced to join the ruling SED party in exchange for an uninterrupted career and certain privileges, such as travel to foreign countries for work. When Matz was 13, he asked his teachers why his father had been forced to join when surely all SED members should do so out of true conviction. His parents were immediately summoned to the school.
Matz later became involved in the Junge Gemeinde, a Protestant youth organisation, where he met like-minded people who became both friends and lovers. When the singer and regime-critic Wolf Biermann, who had emigrated to the GDR from Hamburg as a teenager, was expatriated in 1976, Matz joined the vociferous protests coming from artists and intellectuals all over East Germany against the regime's decision. This was when the Stasi interrogated him for the first time.
Determined not to cow under the pressure, Matz continued to support arrested comrades. He travelled to Czechoslovakia and Poland, where he met more like-minded young people. Here, Wensierski sketches a life full of youthful idealism. Moments of pristine happiness sit alongside moments of deep depression. The Stasi never let Matz out of their sight, narrowing his room to build a free life more and more. Just before gaining his A-level equivalents, Matz was expelled from class, barring his access to university education.
Things eventually became too much for his estranged partner Renate, who was also constantly harassed by the Stasi. She eventually decided to live in West Germany with their young daughter Julia. By the time Matz embarked on his ill-fated journey to Berlin on April 10 1981, the Stasi suspected him of subversive activity, to the point of political terrorism. Matz was clearly well integrated into a network of friends and fellow dissidents – as became evident after his death, when more than 100 people attended his funeral, despite the Stasi's attempt to suppress the gathering.
This was a regime run by a generation of political dinosaurs whose paranoia came from a different age. Stasi boss Erich Mielke himself had been trained in political terrorism in Moscow in the 1930s and honed his skills during the Spanish Civil War. Now he ran the Stasi, still seeing shadows of his own behaviour in a new generation that had grown up in peacetime and without Stalinist schooling.
Just over a week before Matz died in one of his prisons, Mielke gave a speech to his staff in which he outlined his belief that there were six types of citizens, ranging from outright 'enemies' with a 'hostile-negative attitude' to those 'on whom can party and state depend at all times'. The latter was the only positive category out of six. It was this deep-seated mistrust of its own people that drove the regime to curtail the life opportunities of people such as Matz.
As the author points out, Matz was a young man who would have challenged authority in any system. Born in 1957, he belonged to a generation of intellectuals keen to unshackle 'themselves from the authoritarian spirit of post-war society, battling their parents' conformity and apathy'. In contrast to Western democracies, the GDR left little room for alternative lifestyles.
In that respect, the title of the English translation does this book no favours. This isn't a book about an entire generation but about those who chose lives that differed from the mainstream. Much to the frustration of civil rights campaigners, most people in the GDR simply tried to get on with their lives, considering people like Matz troublemakers. Most East Germans did what they felt they had to, which is why there were no uprisings between the major eruptions of unrest in 1953 and 1989. Wensierski's book, then, is about the impossibility of a different life in the GDR, about the hostility those who chose not to blend in encountered not just from the Stasi but also from their peers.
In his research of this story, Wensierski found himself reminded of his earlier 'work on the 1950s and 1960s in West Germany, when almost a million young people were put into children's homes because they didn't correspond to the desired norm'. Whether in East Germany, West Germany, Britain or America, Wensierski muses, long-haired youths like Matz were told to 'Have a wash! Get yourself a job!' But there's no moral equivalence between such attitudes in West Germany and the way Matz's spirit was broken by the GDR, and Wensierski doesn't claim this either.
Though it details events that occurred nearly half a century ago, Generation GDR reads like a cautionary tale for our time. Speaking to 30 former Stasi agents, the author found himself baffled by how those 'who destroyed other people's lives' found it possible to 'believe that they were part of building a more humane society'. His villains aren't shadowy figures in grey cloaks but complex humans who did what they did out of opportunism, idealism or coercion.
We live in an age where many people in positions of authority feel their own outlook to be morally superior and that other views and lifestyles should not be aired or encouraged. Today, voices are also silenced, careers destroyed and life chances diminished, all in the name of building a 'kinder' future. Generation GDR delivers a powerful warning from history – against the curtailment of individual freedoms in the name of a supposed greater good.
★★★★☆
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A sinister Left-wing cabal is turning Britain into a dystopia
A sinister Left-wing cabal is turning Britain into a dystopia

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

A sinister Left-wing cabal is turning Britain into a dystopia

Who would have thought that a generation after the collapse of communism, freedom of speech would become controversial? Surely we had definitively settled this question of whether governments should prohibit or limit the expression of opinions. The Free World, as it was then known, had won the argument without even having to take up arms. Those peoples who had been subjected to the official suppression of ideas and information had repudiated that tyranny of their own accord. In East Germany, they simply walked out from under it. In Soviet Russia, Gorbachev's attempt at a more open, liberalised regime ended in ignominious collapse because a little bit of freedom just increased the longing for more. So surely there can be no doubt: liberty of thought and expression is what modern peoples demand. Yet here we are. A democratically elected government in a nation which gave the world Magna Carta has apparently installed a dedicated bureau to monitor all opinions put forward in public discourse. Further, it proposes legislation which would compel any forum that gave a platform to opinions considered to be unacceptable, to remove them. This is, prima facie, outrageous: a betrayal not only of the historic principles of open democracy but of the victories of freedom over totalitarianism that marked the last century. So how on earth could anyone – any political party or governing class – in the Western world possibly think that such a move was necessary or desirable? It would be easy (indeed it is easy) simply to condemn it as the arrogant imposition of what a smug elite considers the limits of morally acceptable opinion. Any statement or assertion that appears to be encouraging or condoning racism, or even prejudice against an approved social minority, must be policed out of existence. It is scarcely necessary to warn where this policy could lead – or what it implies about the attitude of the current Government to its own population. But perhaps this is a more complex and confusing situation than it appears and paradoxically, some of the factors that contribute to it may be the result of precisely the ideological successes of which the West is most proud. What is it exactly that has produced this panic over unlimited public expression? It is the unbridled, unchecked and irresponsible dissemination of supposed 'information', or opinions based on deliberately deceptive information, on publicly accessible platforms often augmented by fake videos, AI doctored photographs and false 'evidence'. This is a new thing for which traditional democratic societies have no previous experience. We have become aware quite suddenly of the possible consequences in terms of civil disorder and mortal risk that the dissemination of such material can produce – and that it now spreads remarkably, and terrifyingly, quickly. Suspicion, distrust and their anarchic effects can be ignited and propelled at a speed that those responsible for keeping order in the streets have not previously encountered. So yes, as you will have gathered, I do believe that the rise of social media – which has no enforced codes of practice or legal liability – is presenting civil authority with an unprecedented set of problems. That observation, of course, is not original. It is, in fact, the official justification used by the government for its repressive measures. The added element in this toxic mix which has received less attention is the use that these media serve in the infiltration by professional activists of any convenient social cause. As a youthful Trotskyite, I was tutored in the techniques of exploiting any social discontent as a force for undermining trust in capitalism and what was considered to be the sham of democratic freedom. At the end of every meeting of what was then called International Socialism (IS), now known as the Socialist Workers Party, a list was recited of the latest venues at which we were expected to appear, brandishing pre-printed posters and demonstrating solidarity with whatever protest group was currently disrupting the functions of an industry, government department or public agency. When I see all those disparate agitator groups now, whether they are demonstrating on behalf of the environment or against racism – carrying identical placards (generally with the words 'Socialist Workers Party' emblazoned at the top), I can guess what instructions they have been given. Make as much noise and monopolise as much of the television news coverage as you possibly can. Try to make the story about you and your message, even if you have been bussed in to compete with a genuine spontaneous protest over a local issue. I thought of this again when the police got into big trouble for apparently offering protection to, or even escorting, 'Stand Up to Racism' counter protestors at the site of a migrant hotel demonstration. Their presence appeared to be endorsed by the police who seemed to be shielding them from the anger of unworthy locals. But what should be done if, say, an anti-racist group's planned arrival makes it necessary for the police to prevent any potential violent confrontation and breakdown of public order? That would be, in my experience, a classic professional activists' technique. They would exploit the fact that it is the first responsibility of the police to maintain order in the streets whatever the issue. The ultimate irony may be that this phenomenon has been given extra propulsion by the collapse of communism. Back in the dark days of the Cold War, infiltration by the Left was a serious business run by serious people. The Communist party loathed what they considered to be juvenile, undisciplined Trotskyist messing around. My friends and I were regularly warned that our indiscriminate, ill-thought out negativism was going to discredit the sacred Marxist cause. While IS (now the SWP) handed out copies of the Socialist Worker newspaper on street corners, the Communist Party members maintained their terrifying diligence, their 'cover' identities and their dedicated take over of trade unions and nuclear disarmament campaigns. That's all gone now. Anti-capitalism in its most inchoate, incoherent and irresponsible form is running the show and it is making use of all the opportunities modern technology offers to spread dangerous lies and inflammatory messages. There is no easy answer to this.

Six great reads: Keir Starmer's human rights record, Jamie Lee Curtis on cosmetic surgery and the best of Euro 25
Six great reads: Keir Starmer's human rights record, Jamie Lee Curtis on cosmetic surgery and the best of Euro 25

The Guardian

time9 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Six great reads: Keir Starmer's human rights record, Jamie Lee Curtis on cosmetic surgery and the best of Euro 25

'Why is Labour's record to date on human rights – the one thing you might expect a Starmer-led government to be rock solid on – so mixed?' asks Daniel Trilling in this comprehensive long read. Due to Keir Starmer's background as a distinguished human rights lawyer, his supporters hoped that he would restore the UK's commitment to international law. Unfortunately, he is being blocked by a powerful man who has conflated protest with terrorism and called for musicians whose views he dislikes to be dropped from festival bills. That man is also named Keir Starmer. Over the past six months, Trilling has spoken to two dozen Labour insiders, former colleagues of the prime minister and leading human rights advocates in an attempt to pin down the shapeshifting PM. Read more 'At 66, I get to be a boss,' says Jamie Lee Curtis. That is very much the vibe of this interview, in which the actor shows up 'aggressively early' to the Zoom chat, opens up about her experience with addiction, and uses – and staunchly defends – the word 'genocide' to describe the impact that cosmetic surgery has had on a generation of women. Emma Brockes speaks to Curtis before the forthcoming sequel to Freaky Friday, which sees the actor reuniting with Lindsay Lohan in the mother-daughter body-swap comedy ('I felt tremendous maternal care for Lindsay after the first movie, and continued to feel that') – but their chat ends up becoming about so much more. Read more 'The lack of integration means I'm not the only remote worker feeling adrift. What happens when the shared spaces of your so-called community are sun-drenched cafes and boutique fitness studios? What does it mean to never volunteer, or spend time with an elderly person, to rarely take public transport, or read the local news?' It's easy to romanticise the life of a digital nomad: swapping the office for a beachside cafe; living in a flat far more spacious than the ones available back home; being eternally drenched in the southern European sun. But this thoughtful piece by Alex Holder, who moved from London to Lisbon, reveals the cracks in this fantasy. 'Maybe,' she wonders, 'it's time to move and make room for someone else.' Read more He had charisma. He had good content. He also had the support of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), an organisation whose membership has grown from 6,000 or so upon its founding in the 80s to a sizeable 80,000 today. Zohran Mamdani's record-setting success in New York's June mayoral primary was bolstered by 60,000 volunteers knocking on 1.6m doors across the city – a vast effort, Dharna Noor writes, made possible by New York's DSA field team. In this piece, Noor tracks the rise of an organisation that is increasingly shaping American politics – and considers whether it's ready for a face-off with the Democratic establishment. Read more From the match of the tournament and the best player to the most memorable goal, Guardian sports writers nominate their picks and personal highlights from Euro 2025, and share what they'd like to see next for women's football – 'Just more of everything!' Read more They say it takes a village, and parents today are ever increasingly turning to their own parents for help with childcare. One study estimates that 9 million British grandparents spend an average of eight hours a week helping to care for their grandchildren. Ellie Violet Bramley meets members of the 'grey army' and talks to them about the joys – and lows – of taking a hands-on role in their grandchildren's lives. Read more

Holy orders vs EU borders: how ‘church asylum' is blocking deportations
Holy orders vs EU borders: how ‘church asylum' is blocking deportations

Times

time20 hours ago

  • Times

Holy orders vs EU borders: how ‘church asylum' is blocking deportations

At first glance, the Church of the Holy Trinity in Steglitz, a middle-class neighbourhood in south Berlin, appears more like a youth hostel. The church's grounds are buzzing with young men who sit together in groups, play pool, or read the Bible in the garden. The pastor, Gottfried Martens, calls the scene his 'monastery', where people 'pray and work'. But the 'monks' here are refugees from Afghanistan and Iran, many of whom have converted to Christianity, and who Martens is protecting from being deported. As the German government attempts to crack down on irregular migration and increase deportations, Martens and four Afghan members of his congregation have triggered a fierce political row over the practice of 'church asylum' and how it obstructs national and EU law. Churches in Germany have given temporary shelter to refugees for decades under a special privilege that has no firm legal basis, but which grew out of Christian traditions. By convention, churches can flag cases of particular human hardship to regional authorities, and ask for them to remain in the 'shelter of the church'. In Berlin, Martens successfully applied for four Afghan members of his congregation to remain in this way, although they were due to be deported. • Merz: Strict asylum policy needed to stop Germany becoming overloaded The young men had arrived in Germany earlier this year from Sweden, where they had faced being sent back to Taliban-run Afghanistan. Upon arrival in the northern city of Hamburg, the authorities there wanted to return them to the Scandinavian country, which was still responsible for handling their claims, according to EU law. But the men travelled on to Berlin, where last month local police declined a request from Hamburg to enter the church and arrest them. The stand-off escalated into a row between the mayors of Germany's two largest cities, with Peter Tschentscher, Hamburg's mayor, denouncing 'systematic abuse of church asylum' in the capital. His own city has been especially hostile to church asylum, as it claims that churches 'systematically undermine the application of European law' by preventing deportations even to other European countries. Of the four men at the centre of the storm, only two are still sheltering at the church. One was arrested this week by police officers when he briefly left the church's grounds, and therefore invalidated his claim to sanctuary there. Another had spent six months in Germany, allowing him to leave the church without facing deportation to Sweden as his asylum claim is now reviewed in Germany. The other two men are hoping they can stay long enough with Martens to also earn a legal right to remain. Martens, 62, a Lutheran, insists he never aimed to become a 'refugee pastor' and only learned about the public row over his congregation members when he was asked to comment by the press. When he started more than 30 years ago, the congregation at first included many Germans from Russia, who from 2013 were followed by an influx of Iranian migrants, many of whom converted from Islam. 'Our people are incredibly active missionaries,' he added. He now offers services in the Persian language which has boosted the congregation to 1,700 members, predominantly of Afghan and Iranian background, including a few refugees who received church asylum. While overall numbers of church asylum cases are low — rising from 2,703 granted claims in 2023 to 2,966 last year, out of some 250,000 total asylum applications — the heightened scrutiny on places of worship giving sanctuary to refugees reflects hardening attitudes towards immigrants in general. The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, has vowed to step up deportations, including to Afghanistan, and to turn all asylum seekers away at the border, in response to rising public pressure after a series of violent attacks linked to migrants in recent months. It is a stark contrast from the days of Angela Merkel, his predecessor as leader of the Christian Democrat Union (CDU), who voluntarily took in thousands of migrants as a humanitarian gesture in 2015 and 2016. Günter Krings, the CDU's lead spokesman in the Bundestag on home affairs, said that although the party backed the principle of church asylum, it was 'increasingly used to circumvent legally binding decisions' in particular for internal European deportations He argued that churches should restrict their claims to 'exceptional cases again'. Martens insists that his parishioners had been judged unfairly both by Sweden, where the minority government, backed by a hard-right anti-immigration party, is trying to deport Afghan asylum seekers in particular, and by the Hamburg authorities. Germany has also made an effort to resume deportations to Afghanistan, with the first return flight in over a year taking off earlier this month. • Friedrich Merz's economic cure for Germany, the sick man of Europe• Why Germany's border gambit threatens the EU's asylum rule book Amir, 24, one of those sought for deportation, previously lived for a decade in Sweden and was working as a hospital nurse when he was caught under a new policy specifically targeting young Afghan men. A member of the Hazare minority which has faced repressions from the Taliban, he felt he had no option but to flee, leaving behind his elderly parents who were legally settled in Sweden. If Amir were to return to Afghanistan his life would be at risk, argued Martens, who said he was aware of two Christian converts who were murdered by the Taliban after they were deported from Germany. Martens, whose views on migration are nuanced but conservative, hardly fits the image of a left-wing hero. He said, however, that he has also rejected attempts by the hard-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party to instrumentalise his pro-Christian activism. His own health is suffering from the stress of offering sanctuary, and his doctor told him he was 'mad' to do so, he said. But, he added, 'when I see these wonderful people, I can't leave them alone'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store