
How many regulators does it take to completely stifle Ireland's AI innovation?
Much of the talk at the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Artificial Intelligence meeting on Tuesday centred on finding the balance between controlling the risks and harnessing the potential of
AI
within Ireland's regulatory framework.
'We can't afford to stand still,' Patricia Scanlon of the AI Advisory Council told members of the Oireachtas, going on to repeatedly stress the importance of 'implementing serious regulatory reforms' and avoiding having a 'fragmented response' to AI.
The regulatory response to this new technology is critical, the Oireachtas repeatedly heard.
In Leinster House, a building in which phrases such as 'joined-up thinking' and 'co-ordinated response' echo around the halls, it was notable to hear the experts say there are eight separate regulatory bodies over AI in Ireland.
READ MORE
Based on work by the Department of Enterprise on the rollout of the EU-wide Artificial Intelligence Act, there will be a 'complex' web of 'cross-sectoral regulation' due to how vast an area the regulation will cover.
'There are actually going to be eight competent authorities or regulators under the Act,' Prof Deirdre Aherne, law professor at Trinity College Dublin and a member of the AI Advisory Council, told the committee.
Fear not, however, that there may be too many cooks. These regulatory bodies will also co-ordinate with other bodies that have sectoral expertise. Added on top of that 'distributed' regulatory model, the committee heard, will be a 'co-ordinating body' that will look to manage the overlaps between the bodies. Ireland's regulatory framework will then feed into an EU-wide approach to the new technology's adoption.
Furthermore, in its recent paper on digital innovation, the business lobbying group Ibec identified 'at least 30 different State entities and 10 plans that can influence the direction of Ireland's digital and AI ambitions'.
It noted one Cabinet committee, six departments, three Oireachtas committees, 10 departmental plans and 20 agencies that have various responsibilities related to implementing different aspects of the EU digital rule book.
It all begs the question: will eight separate regulators, 30 State agencies and 10 plans be enough to stifle Ireland's AI innovation?
Perhaps the State's response to AI needs more joined-up thinking at the helm, more opportunities for cross-sectoral collaboration and synergistic thinking, and maybe even one more regulatory body.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Report on Coalition plan to restrict social housing for migrants dismissed by campaigners
Campaigners have dismissed a report about a Government plan to clamp down on the provision of social housing to migrants, saying it is an attempt to solve a problem 'that does not exist'. The Sunday Times reported this weekend that the Coalition wants to limit access to social housing to people with strong and long-term connections to the Republic, with restrictions also coming in for emergency homeless accommodation. Focus Ireland director of advocacy and research Mike Allen said previous legislative forays into this area had been 'exposed as a poorly drafted response to a problem that does not exist'. 'Nobody believed that social housing should be allocated to people with no right to live in Ireland, but the Government was unable to give any evidence that it was happening and needed complex legislation to stop it,' he said. READ MORE Sunday's report outlined that after extensive legal advice, the Coalition was preparing to revisit proposals first made in a law early last year, but which were later dropped. Citing plans due to go to Cabinet in the next fortnight, the report suggested Ministers would be told the law is needed to eliminate ambiguity over existing rules for non-Irish nationals who want to apply for social housing. It said similar rules were planned for accessing emergency accommodation, with local authorities not required to assess households unless they are legally and habitually resident in the State. Mr Allen said the proposals to restrict the capacity of local authorities to provide emergency shelter on a short-term humanitarian basis would result in more people being forced to sleep on the streets. He said there will be 'inevitable consequences' for people's health and for public areas if such a condition were imposed. The Opposition also criticised the proposals, with Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin calling it a 'deeply disingenuous and dangerous briefing'. He said it sought to shift blame for the housing and homelessness crises on to migrant communities. The Dublin Mid-West TD said residency rules are already applied to social housing applications and when accessing emergency accommodation. He said his understanding was that the mooted Bill intends to put existing practice into primary legislation. He accused Minister for Housing James Browne of 'wasting his officials' time drafting a Bill that is not needed'. In a reply to a recent parliamentary question put down by Mr Ó Broin, Mr Browne outlined the conditions applied by local authorities when determining a 'local connection' as part of a social housing application. These include having lived in the area for five years at any time, being employed in the area or within 15km of it, being in full-time education or receiving specialist medical care there, or having a relative living in the area for two years or longer.

Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Teacher and SNA resign from Dublin school over alleged ‘harassment' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves
Two staff members at a primary school in Dublin resigned after claiming they were 'harassed and bullied' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves, T-shirts and a tattoo in support of Palestine . The man and woman, a teacher and a special needs assistant (SNA), expressed disappointment with the school's handling of the issue, claiming a small group of parents were 'allowed to harass and bully with impunity'. The pair said they handed in their resignation this month and are due to cease employment in August. They claimed they were asked to stop wearing keffiyeh scarves at work following complaints from parents who accused them of 'blatant anti-Semitism' and 'psychologically abusive behaviour'. One parent also allegedly complained about a T-shirt worn by the SNA that, the parent said, bore a 'watermelon covering the full state of Israel ' and about a tattoo on the male teacher's arm 'with the pre-1967 borders of my country, which is interpreted by many as a call for the annihilation of my people'. READ MORE In a complaint seen by The Irish Times, the parent claimed the SNA's T-shirt 'promotes the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel'. The teacher said he had been wearing a keffiyeh to work since he began teaching at the school in September. Following initial complaints over the scarf, he claimed, he was told to remove it while on school premises in a decision made by the school's board of management. Despite this, he said he continued to wear the keffiyeh and claimed his photo was subsequently taken on multiple occasions by a parent, which he described as 'extremely intimidating'. 'It's been so stressful and so deeply upsetting. We go home every day and we have a live-streamed genocide on our phones along with the fact that we were being harassed and bullied by this small group,' the teacher said. The SNA claimed that on one occasion earlier this month, a parent confronted her over the clothing while another 'shouted' at her in an encounter she described as 'intimidating and distressing'. 'I just couldn't continue to work there,' she said, adding that she raised a grievance with the school, though is 'incredibly disappointed' by the response. While saying staff should not be seen taking sides in times of war and conflict, she claimed, 'this isn't a war or a conflict, it's apartheid, genocide and ethnic cleansing, and if you're not taking a side, you have taken a side'. Both say they exhausted 'every avenue' with the school in an attempt to resolve the issue, including calls for a dress code, which they say is not currently in place. The issue was raised with Tánaiste Simon Harris in the Dáil on Thursday by People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, who claimed the staff members were 'pressured by school management' not to wear the keffiyeh scarves. 'When Russia invaded Ukraine, schools organised shows of solidarity with Ukraine. But when it comes to Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, some teachers are being silenced, and their clothing choices are being policed,' he claimed. In response, the Tánaiste said: 'There should always be a very high bar before you interfere with anybody's clothing', adding that he would discuss the matter with the Minister for Education. In a statement, the school's board of management said it 'places the welfare and education of the children at the centre of all decisions'. 'As a diverse and equality-based school community, including children, families and staff from over 40 nationalities, the board is committed to ensuring that all actions taken are respectful, inclusive and welcoming to every child and family. 'The board will not be commenting on any individual staff matter, in line with its responsibilities as an employer,' it said.


Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Údarás na Gaeltachta looking to develop AI for Irish language
State agency Údarás na Gaeltachta is looking to develop the capacity for AI technologies to communicate as Gaeilge, new documents have shown. The body, which is responsible for the development of Irish-speaking regions of the country, is appointing consultants to provide guidance to its AI development team and support discussions with leading AI companies to advocate for Irish language service development. Its main goal is to create speech-to-speech capacity in the Irish language for generative AI tools like ChatGPT, which would see people able to speak to an AI in Irish and have it respond in the same language. It comes after Údarás na Gaeltachta first went to tender late last year for technology providers, researchers, and stakeholders to give feedback on how the presence and usability of the Irish language could be enhanced on such AI models. '[We seek] professional consultancy services to support the development of Irish language capabilities in AI technologies,' it said. 'The contractor will serve as a core member of Údarás na Gaeltachta's AI team, providing support in future strategy development and implementation.' The agency set out primary objectives for these consultants to focus on, which includes supporting the drafting of scope documentation for a platform delivering services in Irish. Speech-to-speech functionality in Irish It must also support the ongoing development of technical specifications for speech-to-speech functionality in Irish for generative AI products. Furthermore, it must also make efforts to maintain Irish language AI development a topic of industry discussion through the publication of its results, and establishing an authoritative source for ranking the Irish language capabilities of different AI systems. Údarás na Gaeltachta said: 'The contractor must support discussions with leading AI companies (including Anthropic, Mistral, and others) to advocate for Irish language service development. '[And support] developing a backlog of Irish language AI implementation opportunities.' It added that the contract, worth an estimated €40,000, would be valid for 18 months. Debate on the future of AI in Ireland has come to the fore in recent months, with an oireachtas committee established in this Dáil for the first time. Its remit is to make recommendations on Ireland's approach to the development, deployment, regulation, and ethical considerations of AI. Last week, it heard that software engineers, junior lawyers, and customer service roles will be among the first in Ireland to be affected by job losses to artificial intelligence. 'We cannot predict the exact pace, scale, or whether new jobs will replace those lost,' AI Advisory Council chairwoman Patricia Scanlon said. Údarás na Gaeltachta has been contacted for comment. Read More Government criticised for not doing more to roll out AI across civil service