logo
The war that ended, the suffering that didn't

The war that ended, the suffering that didn't

Express Tribune2 days ago

It is well known that when power is left unchecked, it can lead to disaster. Throughout history, numerous individuals and nations have struggled to emerge as the dominant power, but there is one that remains undefeated — the United States of America. John Hersey's Hiroshima explores this country's relentless pursuit of global dominance through the lives of six survivors and the tragic bombing of Hiroshima. Though this event occurred decades ago, we remain subversive beings, dominated and controlled by the US.
Hiroshima remains relevant in today's world, while in the modern era, as the US continues to exert its influence through military interventions, economic pressures, and political maneouvering, Hiroshima remains a crucial text for understanding how power is wielded at the expense of human lives.
Published in 1946, this book takes a narrative-driven approach, describing the lives of six survivors — two doctors, two women, a Catholic priest, and a factory worker — before, during, and after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. The book is divided into four sections: the immediate impact of the bomb, the survivors' experiences in the aftermath, their struggles in the following weeks, and a final chapter, added 40 years later, examining their long-term physical and emotional scars. Additionally, the structure brings these characters to life in a powerful way, as it documents their entire experience. Hersey doesn't focus on just one instance or occasion; rather, he elaborates on how the past, present, and future of these individuals were completely shattered by the bombing. This is one of the book's greatest strengths, as it allows readers to connect with the narrative on a deeper level.
To truly understand a tragedy and draw parallels between different time periods, it is imperative that an author humanise their characters by presenting various aspects of their lives. Hersey achieves this by providing detailed descriptions of his characters, such as Mr Tanimoto's background: 'There was another thing, too: Mr Tanimoto had studied theology at Emory College, in Atlanta, Georgia; he had graduated in 1940; he spoke excellent English; he dressed in American clothes; he had corresponded with many American friends right up to the time the war began; and among a people obsessed with a fear of being spied upon — perhaps almost obsessed himself — he found himself growing increasingly uneasy' (Hersey 10). Moreover, Hersey's depiction of the immediate and long-term effects of the atomic bomb compels readers to connect with the survivors' suffering. For example, Miss Sasaki, trapped under debris for hours, not only endures severe physical injury but also faces a life permanently altered by disability and isolation. Her pain is poignantly conveyed in the line: 'There, in the tin factory, in the first moment of the atomic age, a human being was crushed by books' (Hersey 22). Similarly, Father Kleinsorge's quiet suffering, as he battles ongoing illness due to radiation sickness, mirrors the fate of countless hibakusha (survivors of the bombing), who endured discrimination and health struggles long after the war ended. While reading the book, I constantly found myself linking this tragedy to the present-day world order. To me, Hiroshima still exists today because the US continues to wreak havoc and destruction in many nations.
The book illustrates how a sense of normalcy is suddenly shattered by a country's decision to test atomic weapons without any regard for human lives. This remains our reality today. In an instant, war can erupt, a nation can launch an attack, lives can be lost, and international agreements can be breached — all it takes is a single moment for normalcy to be disrupted. This is precisely what we observe in the book from the very beginning. As readers, we are aware that something devastating is about to befall the characters, yet they are merely going about their daily lives when their world is completely upended. More often than not, it is the US that chooses to play the villain, justifying its actions in various ways. But Hiroshima is not confined to one place. You will find Hiroshima in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in the Middle East, and in all the countries that the US has treated as secondary. Hersey's text forces readers to reflect on the immense power this nation wields and raises an unsettling question: to what extent will it remain unchecked? And once this power fades, which nation — perhaps China or Russia — will scramble to seize it?
Moreover, several instances in the book illustrate the aftermath of the bombing and how the victims adapted to their new, devastated world. These depictions reminded me of present-day Palestine, Syria, Yemen, and other war-torn regions where civilians are forced to endure unimaginable suffering. Just as Hiroshima's residents became collateral damage in a larger geopolitical struggle, modern wars continue to dehumanise victims, treating them as mere statistics rather than individuals with lives, dreams, and families. Hersey captures this ongoing struggle through his poignant portrayal of the survivors: 'A year after the bomb was dropped, Miss Sasaki was a cripple; Mrs Nakamura was destitute; Father Kleinsorge was back in the hospital; Dr Sasaki was not capable of the work he once could do; Dr Fujii had lost the thirty-room hospital it took him many years to acquire and had no prospects of rebuilding it; Mr Tanimoto's church had been ruined, and he no longer had his exceptional vitality. The lives of these six people, who were among the luckiest in Hiroshima, would never be the same.' (Hersey 89). This passage underscores one of the book's greatest strengths: its ability to humanise the victims and show that survival does not equate to an end of suffering. The destruction of Hiroshima was not just about immediate death — it was about irreversible loss, both physical and emotional, that extended long after the bomb had fallen. This mirrors the reality of millions today who, even after the airstrikes have ceased or the conflicts have subsided, must navigate a shattered world with no hope of returning to the life they once knew. Hersey's text forces readers to recognise that Hiroshima is not just a historical event; it is a recurring tragedy, playing out in different forms across the globe. It serves as a stark reminder that, despite decades of progress, war continues to erase entire communities, leaving survivors to pick up the pieces in a world that often turns a blind eye.
As we discussed in class, the bombing of Hiroshima has been framed in US narratives as a necessity — an unavoidable act to hasten the end of World War II. According to this perspective, the attack was justified to prevent further casualties and bring about peace. However, Hersey's text deconstructs this view by presenting the personal suffering of civilians, shifting the focus from military strategy to human tragedy. Instead of reinforcing the dominant narrative of triumph and justification, Hiroshima forces readers to confront the devastating, long-term consequences of war on ordinary people — those who had no role in the decisions that sealed their fate.Hersey's journalistic writing style plays a crucial role in this deconstruction. His detailed, matter-of-fact descriptions strip away political rhetoric, replacing it with an intimate portrayal of loss, pain, and survival. By following the lives of six individuals, he makes the horrors of war accessible and deeply personal, ensuring that history does not erase their suffering in favor of abstract discussions of strategy and victory. The neutrality of his prose makes the destruction even more chilling; there is no embellishment, no overt condemnation — just raw, undeniable reality.
In conclusion, Hersey's text forces us to question existing power structures and the limits placed upon them — if any truly exist. The book serves as a reminder that history is often written by the victors, allowing those in power to justify destruction in the name of progress, security, or peace. Ultimately, Hiroshima is more than a historical account — it is a call to remember, to question, and to resist the dangerous normalisation of war and destruction.
Syeda Fizza Jafri is a media student and a freelance writer
All facts are information are the sole responsibility of the writer

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The war that ended, the suffering that didn't
The war that ended, the suffering that didn't

Express Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Express Tribune

The war that ended, the suffering that didn't

It is well known that when power is left unchecked, it can lead to disaster. Throughout history, numerous individuals and nations have struggled to emerge as the dominant power, but there is one that remains undefeated — the United States of America. John Hersey's Hiroshima explores this country's relentless pursuit of global dominance through the lives of six survivors and the tragic bombing of Hiroshima. Though this event occurred decades ago, we remain subversive beings, dominated and controlled by the US. Hiroshima remains relevant in today's world, while in the modern era, as the US continues to exert its influence through military interventions, economic pressures, and political maneouvering, Hiroshima remains a crucial text for understanding how power is wielded at the expense of human lives. Published in 1946, this book takes a narrative-driven approach, describing the lives of six survivors — two doctors, two women, a Catholic priest, and a factory worker — before, during, and after the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. The book is divided into four sections: the immediate impact of the bomb, the survivors' experiences in the aftermath, their struggles in the following weeks, and a final chapter, added 40 years later, examining their long-term physical and emotional scars. Additionally, the structure brings these characters to life in a powerful way, as it documents their entire experience. Hersey doesn't focus on just one instance or occasion; rather, he elaborates on how the past, present, and future of these individuals were completely shattered by the bombing. This is one of the book's greatest strengths, as it allows readers to connect with the narrative on a deeper level. To truly understand a tragedy and draw parallels between different time periods, it is imperative that an author humanise their characters by presenting various aspects of their lives. Hersey achieves this by providing detailed descriptions of his characters, such as Mr Tanimoto's background: 'There was another thing, too: Mr Tanimoto had studied theology at Emory College, in Atlanta, Georgia; he had graduated in 1940; he spoke excellent English; he dressed in American clothes; he had corresponded with many American friends right up to the time the war began; and among a people obsessed with a fear of being spied upon — perhaps almost obsessed himself — he found himself growing increasingly uneasy' (Hersey 10). Moreover, Hersey's depiction of the immediate and long-term effects of the atomic bomb compels readers to connect with the survivors' suffering. For example, Miss Sasaki, trapped under debris for hours, not only endures severe physical injury but also faces a life permanently altered by disability and isolation. Her pain is poignantly conveyed in the line: 'There, in the tin factory, in the first moment of the atomic age, a human being was crushed by books' (Hersey 22). Similarly, Father Kleinsorge's quiet suffering, as he battles ongoing illness due to radiation sickness, mirrors the fate of countless hibakusha (survivors of the bombing), who endured discrimination and health struggles long after the war ended. While reading the book, I constantly found myself linking this tragedy to the present-day world order. To me, Hiroshima still exists today because the US continues to wreak havoc and destruction in many nations. The book illustrates how a sense of normalcy is suddenly shattered by a country's decision to test atomic weapons without any regard for human lives. This remains our reality today. In an instant, war can erupt, a nation can launch an attack, lives can be lost, and international agreements can be breached — all it takes is a single moment for normalcy to be disrupted. This is precisely what we observe in the book from the very beginning. As readers, we are aware that something devastating is about to befall the characters, yet they are merely going about their daily lives when their world is completely upended. More often than not, it is the US that chooses to play the villain, justifying its actions in various ways. But Hiroshima is not confined to one place. You will find Hiroshima in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in the Middle East, and in all the countries that the US has treated as secondary. Hersey's text forces readers to reflect on the immense power this nation wields and raises an unsettling question: to what extent will it remain unchecked? And once this power fades, which nation — perhaps China or Russia — will scramble to seize it? Moreover, several instances in the book illustrate the aftermath of the bombing and how the victims adapted to their new, devastated world. These depictions reminded me of present-day Palestine, Syria, Yemen, and other war-torn regions where civilians are forced to endure unimaginable suffering. Just as Hiroshima's residents became collateral damage in a larger geopolitical struggle, modern wars continue to dehumanise victims, treating them as mere statistics rather than individuals with lives, dreams, and families. Hersey captures this ongoing struggle through his poignant portrayal of the survivors: 'A year after the bomb was dropped, Miss Sasaki was a cripple; Mrs Nakamura was destitute; Father Kleinsorge was back in the hospital; Dr Sasaki was not capable of the work he once could do; Dr Fujii had lost the thirty-room hospital it took him many years to acquire and had no prospects of rebuilding it; Mr Tanimoto's church had been ruined, and he no longer had his exceptional vitality. The lives of these six people, who were among the luckiest in Hiroshima, would never be the same.' (Hersey 89). This passage underscores one of the book's greatest strengths: its ability to humanise the victims and show that survival does not equate to an end of suffering. The destruction of Hiroshima was not just about immediate death — it was about irreversible loss, both physical and emotional, that extended long after the bomb had fallen. This mirrors the reality of millions today who, even after the airstrikes have ceased or the conflicts have subsided, must navigate a shattered world with no hope of returning to the life they once knew. Hersey's text forces readers to recognise that Hiroshima is not just a historical event; it is a recurring tragedy, playing out in different forms across the globe. It serves as a stark reminder that, despite decades of progress, war continues to erase entire communities, leaving survivors to pick up the pieces in a world that often turns a blind eye. As we discussed in class, the bombing of Hiroshima has been framed in US narratives as a necessity — an unavoidable act to hasten the end of World War II. According to this perspective, the attack was justified to prevent further casualties and bring about peace. However, Hersey's text deconstructs this view by presenting the personal suffering of civilians, shifting the focus from military strategy to human tragedy. Instead of reinforcing the dominant narrative of triumph and justification, Hiroshima forces readers to confront the devastating, long-term consequences of war on ordinary people — those who had no role in the decisions that sealed their journalistic writing style plays a crucial role in this deconstruction. His detailed, matter-of-fact descriptions strip away political rhetoric, replacing it with an intimate portrayal of loss, pain, and survival. By following the lives of six individuals, he makes the horrors of war accessible and deeply personal, ensuring that history does not erase their suffering in favor of abstract discussions of strategy and victory. The neutrality of his prose makes the destruction even more chilling; there is no embellishment, no overt condemnation — just raw, undeniable reality. In conclusion, Hersey's text forces us to question existing power structures and the limits placed upon them — if any truly exist. The book serves as a reminder that history is often written by the victors, allowing those in power to justify destruction in the name of progress, security, or peace. Ultimately, Hiroshima is more than a historical account — it is a call to remember, to question, and to resist the dangerous normalisation of war and destruction. Syeda Fizza Jafri is a media student and a freelance writer All facts are information are the sole responsibility of the writer

Americans rudest on the internet
Americans rudest on the internet

Express Tribune

time22-06-2025

  • Express Tribune

Americans rudest on the internet

Almost two billion words — just under 600 of them swear words — were carefully assessed, and the United States then handed the dubious honour of being the most cursing country in the English-speaking world, at least online. For the Australian duo behind the research, it came as a surprise that the inhabitants of their own country did not lead the way, such is the stereotype that Aussies are easy-going and relaxed, in actions and words. But Australians were only the third-most likely citizens to drop a swear word in conversation online. The reason that America — viewed by some to be a more conservative and polite culture among English-speakers — is the most profane community online may be the anonymity of the screen, according to the study's co-author Martin Schweinberger, a linguist at the University of Queensland, Australia. "Especially when you're not tied to what you write with your name, for example," said Schweinberger. "There are also cultural differences on what is allowed in social situations." "Different cultures have different norms on when and what is permitted. It seems as if the Americans, basically, are more forgiving online," he said. Billions of words Schweinberger and collaborating linguist Kate Burridge evaluated 1.7 billion words used in online news stories, company websites, institutional publications, blogs and other web sources, across 20 English-speaking regions. From these sources, they created a list of around 600 obscenities, including modified words and abbreviations, like "WTF", and dozens of variations of the "F" and "C" words and other vulgarities. They then analysed how frequently those vulgarities appeared in the documents they had found online. In their results, Americans topped the list with a curse word appearing 0.036 per cent of the time. That is equivalent to 36 curse words in a 100,000-word text. The British were next, with 25 curses per 100,000 words. Then the Aussies with 22, Singaporeans with 21 and New Zealanders with 20. Bangladeshis are the politest among English-speakers — just seven vulgarities per 100,000 words. Polite in the real world While a broad range of internet sources were used for the study, social media was excluded from the dataset. That was done deliberately, said Schweinberger, because social platforms require more "weeding" of material that is not suitable for analysis. However, he said they have analysed the use of vulgarities on social media — compared to face-to-face interactions — in a separate study. The results, which have yet to be published, are quite different: On social media, New Zealanders top the list, ahead of the Irish and Australians, said Schweinberger. And in face-to-face interactions, the American stereotype for conservatism is evident. "Face-to-face, the Americans are way down the list," Schweinberger said. "But social media basically had the same pattern that we find in general online data." Swearing culture For linguists, a data-rich analysis of the use of language online provides insight into how humans behave and interact. Andrea Calude, a linguist at the University of Waikato, New Zealand, who was not involved in the study, said it was important to have a scientific approach to how words are used. "Sometimes you think you know things which you don't, so you have to look at [the] data," said Calude. "We think of English as one thing — one language — but look at how different English [is used] around the world," Calude said. In particular, the context in which speakers use vulgarity is a useful way to help non-native speakers integrate into a new environment. "Even in this connected world, we each have our own idiosyncratic way of speaking locally," said Calude. "If you break those patterns, you identify yourself as not one of the locals. It speaks to this idea that there are local communities, even when you have a globalised world." Schweinberger, who hails from Germany, knows it from personal experience. He once used vulgarity in the company of American colleagues and said he "could see their faces shift completely, as if I'd said something really horrible. I just wasn't aware of these cultural constraints." Analysing vulgarity, he said, was not only a valuable tool for linguists but for people in all walks of life. "When we think of these bad words or bad language, it's not that you need to avoid it, it's to learn when to use it appropriately," Schweinberger said, "and then it can be really effective for improving your communication style and skills."

Born unwelcome
Born unwelcome

Express Tribune

time17-06-2025

  • Express Tribune

Born unwelcome

The writer is a Lecturer in English at the Higher Education Department, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Email him at namdar057@ Many claim daughters are a blessing. They gush about how much they love their sisters. They insist women deserve respect. But the truth hits the moment — day zero — a girl is born. No fireworks, no mithai, no praise, no photos, no phone calls — just silence, sometimes laced with regret and disappointment. And in rural districts like Torghar (K-P) or Kech (Balochistan), she might not even be registered. It's like she didn't arrive at all. The air turns heavy when it's 'just a girl'. The in-laws' mood curdles. The same people who cheered your wedding now weigh your worth. The mother-in-law rattles off how many grandsons her other daughters-in-law have brought into the family. Expect taunts, quiet snubs or worse if you fail to deliver sons. Boys get new clothes, toys and gold; girls often get hand-me-downs or knockoffs. Aqeeqahs and other traditional feasts for baby girls are often modest or skipped altogether while boys get lavish celebrations. Boys are called Shahzaib or Zarrar — names echoing honour, legacy and strength — while girls' names are chosen perfunctorily, almost like ticking off a task. The chromosome that determines a baby's sex comes from the father, not the mother — right? But she bears the consequences of his ignorance, ego and entitlement. Some men remarry after two or three daughters, convinced a new wife will deliver the prize; some erupt in rage; some walk away; others push their wives time and again until a son arrives. One man I know kept trying until the ninth child. When he finally had a son — born with a disability — the unease behind the congratulations was hard to miss. Disturbingly, some still opt for illegal sex-selective abortions. Thanks to pressure, most gynecologists now refuse to reveal gender — a tiny and hard-fought victory. But even if a girl survives the womb, what awaits her next? She tastes it in nutrition. She feels it in healthcare. If there's only enough for one child's food or treatment, the boy gets it; girls get leftovers and their coughs can wait. It's worse in poor households where every rupee must be defended. Even the same parents who lovingly feed and treat their sons think twice about wasting (as they see it) a doctor's visit on a feverish daughter. Before school even begins, her training starts: not in books, but in chores. She helps her mother sweep, cook and care for siblings. She's taught silence and endurance while the boy beside her is told to lead, speak and aim higher (much like training one to crawl while urging the other to fly). No one sees how it chips away at her mind and confidence. In some tribal areas, her fate is sealed before she can even open her eyes. Newborn girls are informally engaged to cousins or tribal allies, tiny futures locked in without consent. It's not fate; it's a choice we keep making as a society. Let's stop pretending these injustices are confined to rural pockets. Urban hypocrisy just wears better clothes. Let's not pretend only the uneducated enable this or that the gender gap in child survival is natural, cultural or economic. We engineer it by preference and prejudice. Change doesn't need another national campaign or billboard with smiling girls. It needs shame! Shame in the hearts of families who treat their sons like heirs and their daughters like consolation prizes. Shame in the voices of husbands who blame women for the biology they themselves pass on. Shame in a society that keeps girls alive, but never lets them thrive. Until we begin to see the birth of a daughter as a cause for celebration -— not restraint, not regret — we'll remain a nation guilty of waging a quiet war on half our future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store