Elderly man drives down Rome's Spanish Steps and gets stuck
The man was not injured in the incident but he was nonetheless taken to the hospital, where he tested negative for both drug and alcohol consumption, city police said in a statement.
The driver, who has not been identified, told officers he was 'going to work' and had taken a wrong turn, according to Italian media reports. It is unclear if he was using a GPS device.
The gray Mercedes-Benz A-Class car got stuck halfway down the 18th-century staircase around 4 a.m. on Tuesday, the Italian Fire Brigade said in a statement. The car had been stopped by police officers who were patrolling the area.
The fire department said it had to use a crane at the foot of the steps to lift the vehicle off the stairway. Some damage to the vehicle was visible, but it is unclear whether that was the result of Tuesday's incident.
The steps are currently closed to the public. The normal procedure when Rome's historic monuments are involved in an incident is for archaeologists to inspect them for damage.
The man had a valid driver's license, according to Italian media. Under Italian law, drivers over the age of 80 are obliged to renew their license every two years and undergo a medical examination, which includes basic cognition questions.
Back in 2022, a Saudi man tangled with the law after he drove a Maserati down the Spanish Steps. He was charged with aggravated damage to cultural heritage and monuments after the car caused fractures to the 16th and 29th steps of the right-hand flight rising up from the Piazza di Spagna.
That same year two American tourists were fined and briefly banned from Rome's city center after damaging the steps with electric scooters.
The steps owe their name to the Spanish Embassy to the Holy See, which is hosted in a palazzo in the square below.
A two-year, 1.5 million-euro ($1.7 million) restoration of the landmark — which has appeared in numerous movies, most notably 1953's 'Roman Holiday,' starring Audrey Hepburn and Gregory Peck — was completed in 2015.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists faces federal trial
'Students and faculty are avoiding political protests, purging their social media, and withdrawing from public engagement with groups associated with pro-Palestinian viewpoints,' they wrote. 'They're abstaining from certain public writing and scholarship they would otherwise have pursued. They're even self-censoring in the classroom.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Several scholars are expected to testify how the policy and subsequent arrests have prompted them to abandon their activism for Palestinian human rights and criticizing Israeli government's policies. Advertisement Since Trump took office, the U.S. government has used its immigration enforcement powers to crack down on international students and scholars at several American universities. Trump and other officials have accused protesters and others of being 'pro-Hamas,' referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Many protesters have said they were speaking out against Israel's actions in the war. Plaintiffs single out several activists by name, including Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, who was released last month after spending 104 days in federal immigration detention. Khalil has become a symbol of Trump 's clampdown on campus protests. Advertisement The lawsuit also references Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was released in May from a Louisiana immigration detention. She spent six weeks in detention after she was arrested walking on the street of a Boston suburb. She claims she was illegally detained following an op-ed she co-wrote last year that criticized the school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. The plaintiffs also accuse the Trump administration of supplying names to universities who they wanted to target, launching a social media surveillance program and used Trump's own words in which he said after Khalil's arrest that his was the 'first arrest of many to come.' The government argued in court documents that the plaintiffs are bringing a First Amendment challenge to a policy 'of their own creation.' 'They do not try to locate this program in any statute, regulation, rule, or directive. They do not allege that it is written down anywhere. And they do not even try to identify its specific terms and substance,' the government argues. 'That is all unsurprising, because no such policy exists.' They argue the plaintiffs case also rest on a 'misunderstanding of the First Amendment, 'which under binding Supreme Court precedent applies differently in the immigration context than it otherwise does domestically." But plaintiffs counter that evidence at the trial will show the Trump administration has implemented the policy a variety of ways, including issuing formal guidance on revoking visas and green cards and establishing a process for identifying those involved in pro-Palestinian protests. Advertisement 'Defendants have described their policy, defended it, and taken political credit for it,' plaintiffs wrote. 'It is only now that the policy has been challenged that they say, incredibly, that the policy does not actually exist. But the evidence at trial will show that the policy's existence is beyond cavil.'
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Shadowy CIA operative interacted with Lee Harvey Oswald months before JFK assassination, newly released docs show
A shadowy CIA operative specializing in psychological warfare interacted with Lee Harvey Oswald ahead of President John F. Kennedy's assassination — and then ran interference against congressional investigators probing whether the US spy agency was connected to the killing, newly disclosed documents show. CIA officer George Joannides assumed the alias 'Howard Gleber' in January 1963, and led an American effort to infiltrate anti-communist Cuban student groups in the year leading up to JFK's killing that November, according to government documents released Thursday and reviewed by Axios. Oswald, 23 at the time, got into a fight with members of one of those student groups — the DRE, an organization vehemently-opposed to dictator Fidel Castro's rule over Cuba — while he was handing out pro-communist leaflets in New Orleans nearly four months before the JFK assassination in Texas. 3 Lee Harvey Oswald was on the CIA's radar months before he shot JFK dead in Dallas in Nov. 1963. © Tom Dillard/Dallas Morning New That fight publicly exposed Oswald as a Castro-sympathizer — with news outlets covering a hearing that followed, and the soon-to-be killer later debating DRE members on a local television broadcast, according to Axios. A year before that exposure, the Pentagon was looking for excuses to attack Cuba — including plotting a false flag plan known as Operation Northwoods, which drew-up a fake assault on the US that would be blamed on the communist nation. Joannides was in charge of 'all aspects of political action and psychological warfare' at a Miami CIA office that funded the DRE when it encountered Oswald, and the name of a shadowy operative named 'Howard' who worked with the group has circulated in JFK assassination conspiracy theories and investigations for decades. But until Thursday's disclosure, the CIA has always maintained 'Howard' was not one of theirs — and Joannides himself even denied it point-blank until the day he died in 1990 after earning a Career Intelligence Medal. 3 JFK was shot in the head and killed as he drove through Dealy Plaza on November 22, 1963. Bettmann/CORBIS Joannides was assigned to be the CIA's liaison with the House Select Committee on Assassinations as it probed the president's murder in 1976, and he openly lied about the identity of 'Howard' when questioned. 'Joannides assured me that they could find no record of any such officer assigned to DRE, but that he would keep looking,' the House Committees chief counsel Robert Blakely testified in 2014, according to Axios. And a former investigator with the committee, Dan Hardway, testified in June that Joannides was behind a 'covert operation' to throw Congress off the CIA's trail. 'The cover story for Joannides is officially dead,' author and JFK assassination' expert Jefferson Morley told Axios. 'This is a big deal. The CIA is changing its tune on Lee Harvey Oswald.' Thursday's release is just the latest trove of information to emerge as the government works through a mandated disclosure of its files related to JFK's killing. 3 Oswald was fatally gunned down in public after he arrested for the assassination. AP The 1992 Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act decreed that all files would be released by 2017, but by 2018 there were still tens of thousands of documents withheld. President Biden released more in 2022, and in March President Trump released another trove. Previous releases have indicated the CIA knew more about Oswald than they told the public after the shooting, with documents disclosed in March showing 'three top CIA officials lied' to investigators about their knowledge of the assassin beforehand. The files on Joannides don't indicate why the CIA lied about his involvement with the DRE. '[The CIA] has fully complied and provided all documents — without redactions — related to the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy to NARA consistent with President Trump's direction in an unprecedented act of transparency by the agency,' a spokesperson for the agency told Axios.
Boston Globe
8 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Nearly half of America's murderers get away with it
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Louisville is representative of a national issue. In the United States, people often get away with murder. The clearance rate -- the share of cases that result in an arrest or are otherwise solved -- was 58% in 2023, the latest year for which FBI data is available. And that figure is inflated because it includes murders from previous years that police solved in 2023. Advertisement In other words, a murderer's chance of getting caught within a year essentially comes down to a coin flip. For other crimes, clearance rates are even lower. Only 8% of car thefts result in an arrest. Advertisement Compared with its peers, America overall does an unusually poor job of solving killings. The murder clearance rates of other rich nations, including Australia, Britain and Germany, hover in the 70s, 80s and even 90s. Several issues, including a lack of resources, the sheer volume of cases and a distrust of the police, have converged to make the jobs of American detectives much more difficult. 'It's a serious problem,' said Philip Cook, a criminal justice researcher at Duke University. The lack of legal accountability emboldens criminals, leading to more crime and violence. 'It's a vicious cycle,' Brian Forst, a criminologist at American University, told me. 'When the bad guys see that the police are not there to deter crime and catch criminals, they remain on the streets to do more bad stuff. And the rest of the community is less deterred from crime. They think, 'Why not? I'm not going to get caught.'' Building Deterrence Many things lead someone to commit a murder, but one factor is whether murderers are caught after the act. First, a locked-up killer can't kill more people, which is what criminologists call an incapacitation effect. Second, the act of catching a murderer deters would-be killers. In the 18th century, Italian criminologist Cesare Beccaria devised the deterrence theory that criminal justice systems worldwide have depended on since. He cited three primary principles to deterrence: the severity of a punishment, the speed at which someone is captured and the certainty he or she will be found. American policy often focuses on severity. In recent decades, lawmakers responded to spikes in crime by increasing the length of prison sentences. They paid less attention to the certainty and swiftness of punishment. Yet those two other factors may matter more to deterrence, some experts say. If people don't believe the police will catch them -- and quickly -- then the length of their punishment won't really matter. Empty threats won't deter them. Advertisement 'The certainty of being caught is a vastly more powerful deterrent than the punishment,' concluded the National Institute of Justice in its review of the evidence. The experience of communities with unchecked violence, which are often poor and Black, is instructive. The reality of daily robberies, shootings and killings forces people to take a harder view of the world to survive, as journalist Jill Leovy documented in her book 'Ghettoside: A True Story of Murder in America.' John Skaggs, a retired detective from Los Angeles, told her that the gang members he dealt with were often 'regular guys' who joined gangs and acted violently for self-protection. When the justice system is unlikely to catch criminals, people feel they can act with impunity, experts argue. They might even feel that they have to commit a crime -- such as killing someone who threatens them -- to protect themselves. 'Take a bunch of teenage boys from the whitest, safest suburb in America and plunk them down in a place where their friends are murdered and they are constantly attacked and threatened,' Leovy wrote. 'Signal that no one cares, and fail to solve murders. Limit their options for escape. Then see what happens.' What Went Wrong Why does America solve so few crimes? Experts point to five explanations. 1. A lack of attention and resources: We can solve difficult cases. Indeed, studies show that police departments solve more murders and shootings when they spend more time and money on them. One program in Boston, which revised procedures and boosted resources for homicide investigations, led to a 23% increase in clearance rates. The New York Police Department has one of the best-funded and staffed police departments in the country, and it consistently reports higher clearance rates than other major cities. Advertisement But departments and lawmakers have for decades focused on proactive strategies, such as flooding neighborhoods with police officers, that emphasize stopping crime before or as it happens. Those strategies can work to combat crime, studies have found. But they don't have to come at the cost of the other side of policing: catching criminals after the act. 2. Guns: America has more firearms than any other country in the world, and these weapons make it easier to get away with murder. A drive-by shooter can ride off before anyone sees his face, making it easier to kill anonymously. Killing another person with a knife, on the other hand, 'is a pretty intimate act that is likely to generate more and different kinds of evidence,' Cook, the Duke researcher, said. 3. The types of crime: The United States has more gang crime than other rich countries, and it's harder to solve. A personal crime involves people with more history. A husband who kills his wife has a legal relationship with her, easily found in court records. Family members know the killer and victim intimately. That is less likely for gang crimes; a gang member who kills a stranger in a carjacking gives the police less to work with. Gang members also work together to get away with crimes, and potential witnesses are often scared to testify against them. Advertisement 4. Volume: The United States has far more murders and fewer police officers, after controlling for population, than other rich countries. The number of cases overwhelms the police. A detective who deals with only one murder per year gets much more time on the case than a detective who deals with one murder per week. 'We've gotten swamped over the years,' said Emily McKinley, a deputy police chief in Louisville who previously worked as a homicide detective. 'Violent crime, we've lost control of it.' 5. Distrust of the police: High-profile deaths and protests have exposed abuses in police departments across the country. Detectives rely on witnesses to solve crimes. But 'ordinary citizens are not going to want to cooperate with the police when they see the police as alien storm troopers,' Forst said. They also are less likely to cooperate if they believe that the police can't or won't protect them from a crime suspect's retaliation. Potential Solutions Some of these problems are hard to solve. Lawmakers and jurists have wrestled with the abundance of guns for decades. And while killings in America have plummeted since the 1990s, the murder rate remains much higher here than it is in other rich countries. These ingrained problems will probably prevent the United States from matching Australia's or Germany's high clearance rates. Still, some policies could help. Experts point to two ideas. First, lawmakers and the police could commit more resources to solving murders. Some members of Congress want more funding for the police -- and detectives in particular -- but those proposals haven't gone anywhere. Police departments could also shift existing resources to solving more crimes, as the Boston study suggested, but that would require prioritizing the issue over others. Advertisement Second, the police could make greater use of modern technology. Cameras helped catch a suspect in the case of the UnitedHealthcare executive Brian Thompson in New York City. The police department used facial recognition software and widely shared photos and videos of the suspect. Within days, a fast-food worker in rural Pennsylvania tipped them off. In recent years, more police departments have embraced Flock cameras, named after the company that makes them, that can automatically read license plates and detect gunfire. Departments have also installed more traditional cameras. But the devices aren't ubiquitous, even in the biggest cities. And while private cameras are often around, police officers can't always gain access to them. Not everyone is on board with widespread use of cameras. Civil libertarians have raised privacy concerns; they worry that the government could abuse the technology to spy on or harass Americans. 'We have to have conversations about how to use the technology responsibly,' said Jennifer Doleac, the executive vice president for criminal justice at Arnold Ventures, a public policy philanthropy group. 'But these tools can help us.' Back in Kentucky, policymakers have taken some steps. Louisville's police department has released a new anticrime plan, installed more cameras around the city and increased recruitment. State lawmakers, meanwhile, passed a law in 2023 that made it easier for police departments to rehire retired officers to help with staffing shortages. Still, the changes have not yet produced results. From 2023 to 2024, the murder clearance rate in Louisville actually declined. 'I want someone to be held accountable for taking my son's life,' said Delphine Prentice, the mother of Damion Morton, who was shot and killed in 2017. But after eight years, she added, 'I'm about to give up hope.' This article originally appeared in
