logo
Anti-sacrilege bill likely to tabled in Punjab Assembly

Anti-sacrilege bill likely to tabled in Punjab Assembly

The Hindu3 days ago
A draft bill seeking stricter punishment for acts of sacrilege is likely to be introduced in the Punjab Assembly on Monday (July 14, 2025), sources said.
Ahead of the third day of the special session of the State Assembly, a Cabinet meeting was held here in which the anti-sacrilege bill was given nod by the council of ministers, the sources said.
The draft bill may propose life imprisonment for sacrilege acts against religious scriptures, sources said.
There may also be a provision for setting up special courts to deal with cases pertaining to desecration of scriptures. There will be no parole for those guilty of sacrilege acts, they further said.
Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann had earlier said the State Government would seek the opinion of all stakeholders and religious bodies for the proposed legislation, indicating it would not be enacted immediately.
"We are drafting it. A law is going to be enacted. But for this, we will talk to stakeholders, religious organisations. We will present the draft legislation [in the Assembly].
"But for the final draft, we will require time. After presenting it in the Vidhan Sabha, we will seek public opinion," he had said.
"We will speak to religious bodies about how the law should be. We will take the (draft) bill to the public to seek their opinion for any amendments," he had then said.
Mr. Mann had said the government would consult leading legal experts to ensure that a robust State legislation is enacted - one that prevents offenders from evading strict consequences, including the possibility of capital punishment for such heinous crimes.
Reaffirming his government's commitment to justice, Mr. Mann had stated that every person involved in these sacrilegious acts, either directly or indirectly, would face exemplary punishment.
Mr. Mann had highlighted that while the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) provides clear provisions regarding religious places, it remains silent on holy 'granths'.
He had also said that as the subject falls under the concurrent list, the State has the authority to enact such legislation, and legal opinions would be sought accordingly.
Previous attempts at increasing punishment for act of sacrilege
It is not the first time that a law was being brought in the State for stricter punishment for perpetrators of sacrilege acts.
In 2016, the then SAD-BJP government brought in the IPC (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2016 and CrPC (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2016 recommending life sentence for sacrilege acts against Guru Granth Sahib. The Centre later returned the bill, saying all religions should be treated equally given the secular nature of the Constitution.
In 2018, the Amarinder Singh government had passed two bills — the Indian Penal Code (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2018', and 'the Code of Criminal Procedure (Punjab Amendment) Bill 2018', which stipulated a punishment of up to life imprisonment for injury, damage or sacrilege to Guru Granth Sahib, Bhagavad Gita, Quran and the Bible.
However, the two Bills did not get the President's assent.
Acts of sacrilege against religious scriptures has been an emotive issue in Punjab and there has been a demand from various quarters for stringent punishment for the acts of sacrilege against religious texts.
The incident related to the theft of a 'bir' (copy) of Guru Ganth Sahib from Burj Jawahar Singh Wala gurdwara, putting up handwritten sacrilegious posters in Bargari and Burj Jawahar Singh Wala and torn pages of the holy book found scattered at Bargari, had taken place in Bargari in Faridkot in 2015.
These incidents had led to anti-sacrilege protests in Faridkot. In the police firing at anti-sacrilege protesters in October 2015, two persons were killed in Behbal Kalan while some persons were injured at Kotkapura in Faridkot.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Daughter Of Ex-FBI Director Involved In Epstein's Prosecution Fired From US Attorney's Office
Daughter Of Ex-FBI Director Involved In Epstein's Prosecution Fired From US Attorney's Office

News18

time22 minutes ago

  • News18

Daughter Of Ex-FBI Director Involved In Epstein's Prosecution Fired From US Attorney's Office

Last Updated: Her firing comes amid ongoing tension between her father, James Comey, and the Trump administration. The Manhattan US Attorney's Office dismissed its employee, Maurene Comey, on July 16, according to sources close to the matter. Maurene, the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, who was dismissed by Donald Trump during his first term in 2017, had been part of the prosecution team in the Jeffrey Epstein-Ghislaine Maxwell case. While the exact reason for her termination has not been confirmed, it has raised significant questions. Maurene had served as an assistant in the US Attorney's Office in New York since 2015, contributing to several high-profile cases, including those of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Sean 'Diddy" Combs. Her firing comes amid ongoing tension between her father, James Comey, and the Trump administration, particularly US Attorney General Pam Bondi. Trump has accused James of fabricating evidence in the Epstein case while serving as FBI Director. Investigations are also examining his role in the probe that investigated links between Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia. This political turmoil has also brought Maurene into the spotlight. Notably, right-wing figure Laura Loomer called for her dismissal as early as May. According to a Politico report, Maurene has not provided an explanation for her firing, but sources suggest the decision likely came from someone at the Department of Justice headquarters, rather than from Jay Clayton, the interim US Attorney for the office. Maurene was informed that her dismissal was under Article II of the Constitution. Maurene had played a significant role in the prosecution of Epstein, a convicted paedophile and sex offender, and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein was sentenced to 20 years in prison after being convicted of multiple sex crimes, though he died while serving his sentence. Maurene was also a part of the team that worked on the sex trafficking case against Sean 'Diddy" Combs. Recently, the authorities dismissed the existence of the so-called Epstein files, a controversial list allegedly containing the names of Epstein's clients. Despite this, James has not publicly commented on the DOJ's July 6 memo. Meanwhile, President Trump has consistently asserted that there was no client list created by Epstein, calling it a hoax supposedly fabricated by former President Barack Obama and former FBI director. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

SC orders action against building constructed illegally in Thiruvananthapuram
SC orders action against building constructed illegally in Thiruvananthapuram

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

SC orders action against building constructed illegally in Thiruvananthapuram

T'puram: The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the city corporation to take stern action against a four-storey commercial building constructed by flouting the civic body rules. The apex court also dismissed an appeal filed by Thiruvananthapuram-based building owner G Mohandas, who sought to quash criminal proceedings against him for its alleged illegal construction. The bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, upheld the Kerala high court's decision dated Jan 16, 2024, which refused to interfere in the case. According to the prosecution, Mohandas allegedly obtained a renovation permit from the corporation under pretences and used it to demolish an old building and construct a new commercial complex in a prohibited zone. The permit, intended for internal alterations and renovations, did not authorise demolition or new construction. A complaint by businessman and hotelier Biju Ramesh prompted a vigilance inquiry, which led to the registration of an FIR in 2009. The investigation found that Mohandas, in collusion with the corporation officials and an architect, bypassed legal requirements, ignored a stop memo issued in Nov 2006, and continued illegal construction. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How To Reduce Debt Over R100,000 (Without Another Loan) ExpertMoney Learn More Undo Mohandas argued that the original building collapsed due to heavy rainfall and that he was compelled to rebuild it. He also claimed that the municipal corporation agreed to regularise the new structure upon payment of a compounding fee and that similar charges against the architect were already quashed by the high court. However, the Supreme Court rejected the claims, stating that the appellant acted in conspiracy with municipal officials to create a façade of legality and that the attempt to regularise the building did not absolve him of criminal liability. The court emphasised that the architect's role was limited to preparing designs and did not involve active participation in the conspiracy, making Mohandas's claim for equal treatment untenable. The bench further directed the authorities proceed with appropriate action against the illegal construction and confirmed that the charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC were well-founded. Stating that the appeal lacked merit, the court concluded that there was no reason to interfere with the Kerala high court's decision.

Trial delay forces HC to quash criminal proceedings against 2
Trial delay forces HC to quash criminal proceedings against 2

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trial delay forces HC to quash criminal proceedings against 2

Cuttack: Observing that prolonged delay had violated the fundamental right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution, Orissa high court has quashed criminal proceedings against two persons in a 2015 snatching and assault case. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Tribikram Acharya and Sk Immtiaz Chand had moved the high court seeking quashing of a Jan 24, 2024 order that had allowed the framing of charges against them in a case which was registered 9 years back. A systems administrator at a private computer education institute had lodged a case at Saheed Nagar police station, alleging that Acharya and Chand, who were faculty members, had assaulted him and snatched his gold chain, ring, wallet, ATM card and cash after a dispute over salary. Though investigation was completed and chargesheet filed, the trial did not commence in all these years. The petitioners approached the court in 2025, citing mental harassment and denial of a fair trial. In his judgment delivered on July 14, Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra noted that the delay was "solely attributable to the non-appearance of prosecution witnesses, including the informant." The court observed that despite issuance of arrest warrants, the witnesses had not been produced, making it impossible for trial to begin. "There is no doubt in the mind of the court that serious prejudice has been caused to the petitioners," the judge observed, adding that the accused had already suffered punishment in the form of prolonged mental agony and trial uncertainty. Terming it a "rare and exceptional case," the court invoked its inherent powers to quash the FIR, chargesheet and all proceedings pending before a JMFC Court in Bhubaneswar. The judge held that continuing the case would serve no purpose and would further violate the petitioners' constitutional rights.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store