North Dakota Senate passes Education Savings Accounts for private school students
The North Dakota Senate approved a bill Thursday establishing Education Savings Accounts for private school students, but details are likely to be worked out by a conference committee.
The Senate voted 27-20 in favor of an amended version of House Bill 1540, which would provide vouchers for families to use for private school tuition or other qualifying education expenses. The accounts would not be available to public school or homeschooled students.
The amount each family could receive varies based on household income. Students from families in the lowest income category could receive about $4,000 per year, while students from the highest income category could receive a little over $1,000 per year.
Families with high incomes would qualify for vouchers in the version of the bill senators advanced. A previous version of the bill limited the vouchers to families who fall within 400% of the federal poverty level, which is an annual income of $128,600 for a family of four.
The Education Saving Accounts would be available for students for the 2026-27 school year.
Sen. Michelle Axtman, R-Bismarck, who introduced the amendment, estimated the program would cost about $20 million per school year. The exact cost to the state would depend on how many students use the accounts.
Bills look to expand North Dakota student opportunities through savings accounts
Sen. Mike Wobbema, R-Valley City, was among those who spoke in favor of Education Savings Accounts.
'We need to recognize that taxpayer funds need to be prioritized for use in educating taxpayers' children,' Wobbema said.
He argued that Education Savings Accounts could save the state money over time, if public school students switch to private schools, reducing how much the state spends on per-pupil payments to public schools.
Sen. Janne Myrdal, R-Edinburg, voted against the bill. She said there are no private schools in her district, so the bill wouldn't be used by her constituents.
'If we're going to do school choice, it's got to be for all kids,' Myrdal said. 'I can't in true conscience stand here today to vote for a vehicle that doesn't give any power to the parents in my district.'
Axtman is the chief sponsor of a competing Education Savings Account bill, Senate Bill 2400, which is still under consideration by the House Education Committee. The key difference in that bill is dollars could be used for educational expenses for public school or homeschooled students in addition to private school students.
Axtman voted in favor of the Senate version, but said she's still hopeful for a more universal policy.
'My goal is still a very comprehensive ESA that affects, truly, all students in North Dakota,' she said.
North Dakota United, a union representing educators and public sector employees, is among those who oppose the Education Savings Account bills.
'This bill, 1540, is all about private schools, just public money given right to the private schools,' said Nick Archuleta, president of North Dakota United.
The bill is expected to head to a conference committee made up of three lawmakers from each legislative chamber.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Some Republicans push to undo gambling tax hike they passed in Trump's megabill
WASHINGTON — Some top Republicans are regretting that they inserted a tax hike on gamblers into President Donald Trump's megabill, with several lawmakers who supported the legislation now calling for rolling back that policy. Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., the chair of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, told NBC News that the provision was a 'mistake' and needs to be undone. 'It was definitely not something that we did in the House. I don't understand why the Senate decided to do something like that,' Smith said in a brief interview Wednesday. 'And so it is definitely a provision that — I'm interested in making sure that we fix the Senate's mistake.' The new law cuts the tax deduction on 'wagering losses' from 100% to 90% of losses starting in 2026, disrupting the current dynamic where bettors can offset losses with gains and pay taxes only on net earnings. The new policy could tax gamblers even in years where they break even or net-out losses. For instance, a bettor who wins $100,000 and loses $100,000 in the same year would be stuck with a taxable income of $10,000. 'It would be potentially catastrophic for the industry as it would disproportionately affect high volume gamblers,' said Jack Andrews, the professional sports bettor who goes by that alias. 'Those high volume players are the lifeblood of most casinos,' he added. 'If they realize they could lose, and still have taxable income to pay that they didn't make, they'll stop playing. Or find ways to play that don't generate a paper trail.' Andrews said the new law 'could result in players losing money gambling, but still owing taxes on 'income' they didn't make.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the gambling tax change will raise $1.1 billion over a decade. At least a couple of senators who supported the megabill — which passed with only GOP votes — want to undo the gambling tax. Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Bill Hagerty of Tennessee have signed on to legislation to roll it back, alongside Nevada's two Democratic senators, Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen. The bill is called the Facilitating Useful Loss Limitations to Help Our Unique Service Economy Act, or the FULL HOUSE Act. 'It's unfair. It makes no sense,' Cruz, who plays poker in his spare time, said in an interview of the tax provision. 'The income tax is designed to tax actual income,' he said. 'For example, playing poker for profession — not allowing them to deduct their losses means they're paying taxes not on their actual income.' 'I think we should fix it,' he added. Cruz said most Republicans voted to pass the gambling tax change without knowing about it, a damning indictment of the legislative process for the bill. 'Nobody really takes responsibility for introducing it,' Cruz said. 'None of us knew about it. It's a very big, beautiful bill, and so there are lots of provisions there that at the end, things were moving very fast. I don't know of anyone who was aware of the provision at the time it passed.' The provision was introduced in the mid-June version of the bill, with Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, overseeing the tax portion as chair of the Senate Finance Committee. And he, too, is open to revisiting it. 'Senator Crapo is open to receiving feedback from affected stakeholders and learning more about industry reporting and compliance,' a Crapo spokesperson said. 'To comply with the rules of reconciliation, every provision from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act needed to be modified to create a budgetary effect. In order to retain the gambling loss provision, it was changed to 90 percent,' the spokesperson added. 'While the committee heard from gaming associations on other provisions after text was released on June 16th, there were no concerns raised with lowering the threshold.' The blowback from bettors has since grown since Trump signed the bill into law on July 4, and Democrats have added it to their list of grievances with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'Republicans' hastily put-together bill is full of provisions that are completely counterproductive and harmful to Americans. The provision limiting the wagering loss deduction will have a negative impact on Nevada, and it's one of the many reasons I voted no,' Cortez Masto, the author of the FULL HOUSE Act. On July 10, she sought unanimous consent on the Senate floor to pass the legislation but was met with an objection from Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., which prevented speedy passage. Her office said she will 'continue to explore all options available to restore the 100% dedication for gambling losses and protect Nevada's gaming and hospitality industries.' If the tax change isn't undone, it will come as a shock to some bettors, as 'many of them wouldn't realize this until they do their 2026 taxes, which would be early 2027,' Andrews said. But reversing it won't be so easy. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., poured cold water on the proposals from some Republicans to roll back parts of the bill. Asked by NBC News on Tuesday whether measures offered by his colleagues to undo the Medicaid cuts and gambling tax were going to succeed, Thune said flatly, 'No.' 'There are members out there who are saying, we'd like to do this or that differently. That's always the case,' Thune said. 'This was a big piece of legislation that had a lot of moving parts. Not everybody got everything they wanted, but at the end of the day, it's historic in its breadth and the things that it addresses.' The White House didn't immediately return a message seeking comment on whether Trump is open to revisiting the provision. Other Republicans say they're unfamiliar with the industry blowback to the gamblers' tax change. 'I honestly, frankly, haven't had a chance to look at it. So I don't even know what they're talking about,' Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., the second ranking Republican on Ways and Means, said. On the other hand, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, sounded surprised by how much attention the issue is getting. 'Why do so many people care about the gamblers tax?' he quipped. 'I'm kind of agnostic. I don't, frankly, understand why it's such a big deal. But happy to look at anything they propose.'
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Congress can't decide how much more to cut on climate
The House left Washington this week for its August recess, setting the stage for fall showdowns with the Senate and White House on deeper cuts to climate and environment spending. If the sides can't work out their differences, or agree on how to kick the can past Oct. 1, a partial government shutdown could hit in a little more than nine weeks. Three distinct visions of the future are at play: — President Donald Trump's budget request in May asked lawmakers for massive reductions for programs that aim to fight climate change, and agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Park Service. — The Senate has put forth largely bipartisan proposals, eyeing a small cut to EPA and an increase for the Interior Department. In some cases, senators are pushing back at how Trump is handling government funding. — The House, on the other hand, is aiming to take a sledgehammer to those agencies and more, with double-digit percentage cuts that would have to advance with only Republican votes. Its cuts still wouldn't bite as deeply as what Trump proposed. A MOUNTAIN OF DIFFERENCES: Take the spending bill for the Energy Department and water development programs, which advanced through the House Appropriations Committee last week on a party-line vote. It would fund the agencies in its purview at $57.3 billion, or $766 million less than current levels. The Energy Department would get $48.8 billion, a cut of $1.4 billion. Its Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is targeted for a 46 percent decrease, while the Office of Grid Deployment's funding would fall by more than half. Trump's budget request eyed even bigger cuts, seeking to reduce the Energy Department's budget by $4.7 billion, slash about 70 percent of the renewable energy office's funding and mostly eliminate money from the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law. Things are even messier on the Senate side. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), who chairs the subcommittee overseeing the energy and water legislation, says he wants the bill to spend less than the $59.9 billion that Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) and ranking member Patty Murray (D-Wash.) had agreed to, creating an impasse that has blocked the legislation from moving forward, our Andres Picon reported. A COLLISION OVER EPA: House and Senate appropriators have also shown stark differences in how they're handling Interior and EPA — including which programs they want to cut. The House Appropriations Committee advanced its bill along party lines this week, including a proposed 23 percent cut for the EPA. The bill's total spending for the agencies it covers, $38 billion, is $9.2 billion higher than what Trump requested. But the Senate version, advanced the following day by a subcommittee chaired by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), would cut EPA just 5 percent. The Senate bill also takes aim at the Trump administration and its priorities. It would cut EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin's office, provide no funding for EPA's planned closure of its research office, and require the administration to change the name of Alaska's Mount McKinley back to Denali, reversing Trump's January renaming. It's Friday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Timothy Cama. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to tcama@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Zack Colman breaks down how the Trump administration is planning to back off from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Power Centers Extreme storms producing even more rain than some scientists expected Heavy rainfall events like the one that created deadly flooding in the Texas Hill Country are a symptom of climate change, Chelsea Harvey writes. 'The biggest, baddest, rarest extreme precipitation events are precisely those which are going to increase the most in a warming climate,' Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the California Institute for Water Resources, said not long after the Texas floods. This is because a warmer atmosphere can hold more water. But scientists say recent flash floods have produced more rainfall than their equations hold. Trade deals take gas along for the ride Some nations are currying favor with the Trump administration ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline for tariffs by buying liquefied natural gas from the U.S., Brian Dabbs and Carlos Anchondo write. The president announced new trade deals this week with Indonesia and Japan, the latter of which he said will include a 'major expansion of U.S. energy exports.' 'LNG is playing a significant role in the bilateral trade talks,' said Mark Menezes, president of the U.S. Energy Association trade group and a former Department of Energy official in Trump's first term. China, EU agree and disagree on climate European Union leaders agreed to a joint effort with China to fight climate change this week after leaving Beijing without a wider trade deal, Karl Mathiesen, Koen Verhelst and Jordyn Dahl write. The friction over trade stems from China's dominance in clean technology and its associated supply chains. European leaders see China's exports as a threat to their own manufacturing. Chinese President Xi Jinping called on EU leaders to see that 'convergent interests are not a threat,' in remarks reported by the state-run Xinhua News Agency. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called the agreement a 'big step forward … our cooperation can set a global benchmark.' In Other News Pumped up: Massachusetts regulators are considering cutting electricity rates in the winter for households that use heat pumps. Dried up: Louisiana canceled a $3 billion coastal restoration project meant to protect the state from rising seas and extreme weather. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. The CEO of Exelon and chair of the Edison Electric Institute says he's ready to meet the Trump administration's goals but calls for an 'all of the above' energy approach. The Securities and Exchange Commission wants an appeals court to continue hearing a challenge to a Biden-era climate rule even though it is not defending it in court. That's it for today, folks. Thanks for reading, and have a great weekend!
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
After Lara Trump opts out, president endorses RNC Chair Whatley for NC Senate race
North Carolina is a pivotal battleground state and the Senate race is one of the premier contests of the upcoming midterm elections. There won't be a Trump on the ballot in North Carolina's Senate race, but the president is still putting his imprint on the marquee 2026 matchup. Lara Trump, President Donald Trump's daughter-in-law and his first choice for the U.S. Senate seat in the state where she was born, announced July 24 she won't be running. So the president went to his second choice, endorsing Republican National Committee chair and former North Carolina GOP Chair Michael Whatley in a July 24 social media post. Whatley was Trump's handpicked candidate to lead the RNC during the 2024 election cycle, helping him win the popular vote and secure victories in every swing state, including North Carolina. Whatley co-chaired the RNC with Lara Trump, who resigned after the election. Lara Trump is married to the president's second child, Eric Trump. More: Where did Trump's children go to college? See which schools they attended North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis opted not to seek re-election in 2026 after he announced his opposition to Trump's signature tax legislation, criticizing the bill's cuts to Medicaid. Whatley would give Trump a staunch supporter in the Senate if he wins, with the president declaring, "I need him in Washington." Whatley hasn't announced his plans, but is expected to run for the seat, according to media reports. Trump also endorsed a replacement for Whatley to chair the RNC, Florida state senator and former Florida GOP chair Joe Gruters. More: Melania Trump may get name on the Kennedy opera house. What has she done as first lady? Gruters is a longtime Trump supporter who co-chaired the president's 2016 campaign in Florida with current White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. "I'm looking forward to advancing President Trump's America First agenda as the next chair of the RNC," Gruters said in a statement. More: How Trump and 'terrific guy' Jeffrey Epstein's party boy friendship ended badly North Carolina is a pivotal battleground state and the Senate race is one of the premier contests of the upcoming midterm elections, which will decide if Republicans maintain control of Congress and the ability to enact Trump's agenda. Republicans hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate. Democrats are expected to closely contest the North Carolina race. Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper is considered a top potential Democratic candidate.
