logo
How Brazil won the 1962 World Cup: With Garrincha coming to the fore after Pele injury

How Brazil won the 1962 World Cup: With Garrincha coming to the fore after Pele injury

New York Times13-07-2025
This is the seventh in a series by The Athletic looking back at the winners of each men's World Cup. The previous six articles have looked at Uruguay in 1930, Italy in 1934 and Italy again in 1938, before Uruguay won it for a second time in 1950. West Germany followed in 1954, before Brazil won their first World Cup in 1958. Four years later, Brazil won it again.
World Cup 1962, hosted in Chile, is up there with World Cup 1938 as the least fabled editions of the tournament.
There's a common link between them: they're the only two World Cups where the defending champion has triumphed. And this one came as little surprise — it was almost impossible to find a tournament preview that didn't imply that Brazil were strong favourites.
Advertisement
They retained their title with a familiar group of players. Five of their six goalscorers at this World Cup — Garrincha, Vava, Pele, Zito and Mario Zagallo — had also won World Cup 1958. Amarildo, the striker who came into the side midway through the tournament and scored three times, is the exception.
Brazil did everything possible to ensure their preparation for the tournament mirrored that of 1958. Paulo Machado de Carvalho, head of Brazil's commission for the tournament, even arranged for the same pilot to fly their plane. And when he learned that the airline used for the 1958 flight to Europe had gone bankrupt, he insisted on getting their logo and sticking it on the new plane.
Overall, the tournament wasn't a classic. The goals-per-game rate dropped to 2.78, the lowest yet, and an incredibly poor figure in comparison to 5.38 from World Cup 1954. Football had changed over the previous eight years, becoming more systemised and cautious.
World Cup 1962 is also infamous for its thuggery. The Battle of Santiago, an appallingly violent clash where hosts Chile defeated Italy 2-0, went down in history. But reports from the time suggest this was merely an exaggerated version of most matches at the tournament, rather than an outlier.
World Soccer magazine took to ranking the worst matches, breaking them down into categories of 'scandalous', 'violent', 'very rough' and 'rough', with columnist Roger MacDonald writing, 'I am utterly sick of the World Cup… of the renewed burst of thuggery and brutality.'
But Brazil, save for a spell in their semi-final against Chile where they were largely the victims, weren't really involved in all this, and largely played attractive football.
When the winning coach from 1958, Vicente Feola, stepped down a year before this tournament due to ill health, he was replaced Aymore Moreira — brother of Zeze, who had led the side at World Cup 1954.
But, just as Brazil's unusually large technical staff had raised eyebrows in 1958, this situation also seemed complex. Feola was retained in some kind of overseeing role, while long-serving Santos manager Lula was recruited on a part-time basis as a consultant. It therefore seemed there was a three-way power struggle in the months leading up to the tournament: Feola wanted the 1958 side to remain largely intact, Lula lobbied for the introduction of more Santos players, while Moreira apparently wanted to bring in newcomers. But in the end, Moreira realised there was little reason to meddle with the 1958 side.
Advertisement
Moreira, a former goalkeeper with the national team, received little attention during the tournament, at least from foreign media. There was no reason to concentrate on his decisions; he kept a settled XI, making only one injury-enforced change across the six matches.
There were reports that players grew frustrated with the emphasis upon physical drills rather than ball work. But the identity of the Brazil manager was less important than the fact they were still ahead of the curve in terms of employing specific coaches to work on fitness and psychology. They were seemingly the best-prepared team at the competition, as well as having the best players.
Pele was now regarded as the world's best player. He opened his tournament with a superb goal against Mexico, beating four opponents before providing a fine finish — it's a brilliant goal, yet probably not in his five most famous World Cup goals.
However, Pele was struggling with an injury, and kept the extent of it a secret from his coach, fearing he'd be dropped. In the second game, a goalless draw with Czechoslovakia, Pele pulled up with a groin strain after attempting a long-range shot. His game was over. In fact, his tournament was over. The Czech players sportingly went easy on Pele for the rest of the game (although had they known they'd face Brazil again in the final, perhaps they would have done to Pele what West Germany did to Ferenc Puskas eight years earlier).
There were rumours Pele would be fit to return for the final, but he'd suffered a recurrence of his injury in training, and was asked to pretend he was in contention — wearing the team tracksuit on his way to the ground — as a bluff.
Pele's absence meant Garrincha had even more responsibility, and he responded with arguably the greatest ever individual World Cup campaign. In 1958 he was a brilliant dribbler who relied on dropping his shoulder and going down the outside. He showed he still had that in his locker (even when opponents doubled up against him) with his assist for Amarildo to open the scoring in Brazil's final group game, a 2-1 win over Spain.
But the Garrincha of 1962 was a completely different player. He was now an all-rounder.
Garrincha had become adept at shooting with both feet and was a powerful presence in the air — very rare for a winger at this stage — as he demonstrated in the knockout stage. In the 3-1 quarter-final win over England, he scored a bullet near-post header from an outswinging Zagallo corner, then curled home a beautiful goal from outside the box with his right foot.
Advertisement
In the 4-2 semi-final win over Chile, he scored a carbon copy of his previous headed goal, again from a Zagallo corner, then smashed home into the top corner with his supposedly weaker left foot.
As Rob Fielder notes in his comprehensive game-by-game history of the World Cup, Chile were so frightened by Garrincha that they dropped their captain to bring in Manuel Rodriguez, on the basis that he'd handled Garrincha well in previous meetings. But a left-back can do little about a headed goal from a corner, or a first-time long-range finish.
Garrincha is understandably remembered for his swivelling hips and his dribbling, but to paint him as a pure old-school outside-right undersells him — the difference between the Garrincha of 1958 and 1962 is like the difference between the Cristiano Ronaldo of 2004 and 2008.
It was made clear in the build-up to the tournament that Moreira wasn't a fan of the 4-2-4 that had brought Brazil success in 1958. He wanted something safer, although in practice he didn't change too much. His variation basically involved bringing left-winger Mario Zagallo deeper and narrower to create more of a 4-3-3 system. But even in 1958, Zagallo was regarded as a more functional, workmanlike winger than Garrincha down the right.
The only change Moreira made in the tournament was after Pele's injury. Amarildo replaced him and played more as an inside-left than a second striker, providing some balance now Zagallo had tucked further inside. Amarildo, incidentally, is the only member of this side still alive.
The centre-backs were regarded as 'new' to outsiders, but both Zozimo and Mauro Ramos, who captained the side, had been non-playing members of the 1958 squad. Either side of them, Brazil continued to use — some would say pioneer — the use of overlapping full-backs, with the legendary double act of Djalma Santos and Nilton Santos both still in the starting XI.
Garrincha should have been banned for the final. Towards the end of the semi-final victory over a terribly physical Chile side, after being kicked throughout the game, Garrincha reacted to a minor block-off by Eladio Rojas by giving him a sneaky kick up the backside on his way past. Rojas thought about things for a second, decided he'd been hurt, and then dropped to the floor. Simulation in football is far from a 'modern' issue.
Advertisement
For this, Garrincha should have been suspended for the final. Yes, technically there was no mandatory one-match suspension in these days, but five other players were sent off at this tournament, and all five were handed a ban. What made this one different?
On the basis of video evidence, Garrincha's kick was foolish but probably not a red card offence. Still, video evidence wasn't considered at this point, so the key factor was the testimony of the Uruguayan linesman who witnessed Garrincha's 'violent conduct' and reported it to the referee.
But linesman Esteban Marino failed to turn up at the disciplinary hearing, and seemingly left the country altogether. Without his testimony, Garrincha couldn't be banned.
FIFA's own account is that 'Chile president Jorge Alessandri led a petition to allow Garrincha to perform in the final, which was ultimately successful', although other stories involve more of a lobbying effort from Brazil's hefty delegation in Chile, with involvement from various South American ambassadors, Brazilian prime minister Tancredo Neves and FIFA President Sir Stanley Rous himself.
The outcome was that Garrincha was available to play, which was probably fair considering how minor his indiscretion had been, although you can also argue that two wrongs don't make a right.
After all this, Garrincha was ill on the day of the final, and not at his best.
In keeping with the general anonymity of this tournament, this final seems somewhat forgotten. Coming after a run of genuinely legendary finals (the Maracanazo in 1950, the Miracle of Bern in 1954, the highest-scoring final in 1958), no-one ever really mentions this one.
That's something of a shame, as it featured good attacking play from both sides — and, as had become somewhat familiar in World Cup finals, a come-from-behind victory. Czechoslovakia's opener was a lovely goal, featuring a neat through ball from right-winger Tomas Pospichal to legendary midfielder Josef Masopust to run onto and finish. It's a goal that feels very modern for an era when getting the ball wide and crossing was the most common method of attack.
Advertisement
But Amarildo, as ever making inroads down the left, equalised with a swerving shot that caught out Czech goalkeeper Viliam Schrojf at his near post. It wasn't dissimilar to the Uruguayan winner in the 1950 final. The old adage that 'a goalkeeper shouldn't be beaten at his near post' probably made more sense at this point, as they did seem to position themselves too far towards their far post.
Brazil went 2-1 ahead with the third nice goal of the game. Zito brought through the midfield, slipped in Amarildo down the left, and continued his run into the box. Amarildo took his time, then floated a far-post cross for Zito to head home.
Victory was sealed by a terrible error from Schrojf, who otherwise enjoyed a fine tournament. He completely misjudged an up-and-under that dropped towards the edge of his six-yard box, spilling the ball to Vava for a tap-in.
In all honesty, there probably isn't one, despite Brazil's tournament being packed with great moments. Most notably, there's Pele's dribble against Mexico, and two fantastic Garrincha long-range beauties. Their first two goals in the final were very attractive too.
This lack of an obvious moment is a combination of two things: a reflection of the fact Brazil never needed to snatch a crucial late goal, and the fact their three goals in the final came from a source other than Garrincha or Pele, their two superstars.
This Brazil was considered less spectacular than the side from four years beforehand, but it's difficult to make a case that anyone else was on their level. Runners-up Czechoslovakia were surprise finalists, and third-placed Chile were reliant on home advantage. The Soviet Union were promising but fell short at the quarter-final stage.
And, besides, Brazil completed the job without being able to count upon the world's best player at any point in the knockout stage. They were now the World Cup's dominant nation, having been considered its great underachievers just five years beforehand. The most notable underachievers were now the inventors of the sport, England — four World Cups in, they were still yet to make it past the quarter-finals. But they would host the next edition…
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eagles email survey to season-ticket holders about new stadium, renovations at Lincoln Financial Field
Eagles email survey to season-ticket holders about new stadium, renovations at Lincoln Financial Field

CBS News

time42 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Eagles email survey to season-ticket holders about new stadium, renovations at Lincoln Financial Field

In an email to season-ticket holders on Thursday, the Philadelphia Eagles sent a survey about potential renovations to Lincoln Financial Field or the possibility of a brand new stadium. "As we look to the future, we're committed to delivering the best-in-class gameday experience for Philadelphia Eagles fans," the email read. "To help guide this vision, we're exploring potential updates to Lincoln Financial Field — including both renovation options and the possibility of a brand new stadium in the region." The Eagles' lease with the city is set to expire in 2032. The survey sent to fans comes as Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie expressed potential interest in bringing a Super Bowl to Philadelphia, but that would require adding a retractable roof to the stadium. "I don't have a strong opinion on it, because you're torn," Lurie told CBS Sports at Super Bowl media night earlier this year. "I love outdoor football. I love it. I love the cold games. I like the hot games. I like the snow games. On the other hand, Philadelphia deserves to host the Super Bowl, NCAA Final Four, and lots of great events. It's an incredible sports city, so yes, you got to balance all those things." The Linc opened in 2003, and the 2025 season will be the 23rd football season at the stadium. In that span, the Birds have gone to four Super Bowls and won two. The Eagles have done renovations to the Linc since opening, but they would need a roof to host an event like the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl hasn't been hosted in an open-air stadium with cold weather since it was at MetLife Stadium in 2014. The Linc recently hosted the FIFA Club World Cup and will host the World Cup in 2026, and the city will host other events like NCAA Tournament games and the 2026 MLB All-Star Game. The South Philly Sports Complex is set to undergo a makeover over the next several years and that could include a new Eagles stadium if the team decides to go that route. Earlier this year, the Flyers and Sixers announced they would open a new shared arena to replace the Wells Fargo Center. The Sixers had initially pushed to build a new arena in Center City, but the deal fell through. In the last 10 years, four NFL teams — the Las Vegas Raiders, Los Angeles Rams, Atlanta Falcons and Minnesota Vikings — have all opened new stadiums. Each of them are either a dome or have a retractable roof. Philadelphia's NFC East rival, the Washington Commanders, is also working to build a new stadium.

Venezuelan team denied entry into U.S. for Little League's senior tournament
Venezuelan team denied entry into U.S. for Little League's senior tournament

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Venezuelan team denied entry into U.S. for Little League's senior tournament

One of Little League's international tournaments will be played without its planned field. The Cacique Mara team from Maracaibo, Venezuela was denied visas into the United States and will be forced to missed the Senior League World Series for players between 13 and 16 years old, Little League confirmed in a statement to South Carolina's WSPA. A team from Victoria, Mexico will reportedly take their place as the tournament's Latin American team in Easley, South Carolina. The full statement: 'Little League® International has been notified that the Cacique Mara Little League team from Venezuela was unfortunately unable to obtain the appropriate visas to travel to the Senior League Baseball World Series in Easley, South Carolina. While this is extremely disappointing, especially to these young athletes, the Little League International Tournament Committee has made the decision to advance the second place team, Santa Maria de Aguayo Little League (Victoria, Mexico), to participate in the Senior League Baseball World Series and ensure the Latin America Region is represented in the tournament and that the players, coaches, and families from Mexico are able to have a memorable World Series experience.' The Senior League World Series is held each year in Easley with six teams from the United States and six American teams. A different team from Maracaibo won the tournament last year. The Venezuelan team was reportedly deemed ineligible for visas due to a June executive order from President Donald Trump which limits entry into the U.S. from certain countries. Venezuela is one of the countries that currently faces a limited ban. The Venezuelan team, which was attempting to procure its visas in Bogota, Colombia, posted its own statement on Instagram calling the decision a "mockery" via a machine translation. Team Venzuela beat the Mexican team it's being replaced by in the Latin American regional tournament last month. The president of the team had his own reaction, as translated by World Baseball: 'The players are demoralized. All they know how to do is play baseball. They want to compete and honor Venezuela and Latin America. They don't pose any threat; they're 15-year-old kids who want to win the World Cup,' said Kendry Gutiérrez, president of the Cacique Mara Little League, the Maracaibo, Zulia-based league that sponsored the team. While the Senior League World Series is not a high-profile tournament, an international team being denied entry into the U.S. will be cause for concern for some given how many international sporting events the country is set to host over the next three years, headlined by the FIFA World Cup in 2026 and the Summer Olympics in 2028. Trump's executive order does specifically grant exceptions to 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the Secretary of State.' However, that leaves room for uncertainty on what constitutes a "major" sporting event, turning Secretary of State Marco Rubio into a significant athletic authority. Earlier this month, a Cuban women's volleyball team was denied visas into Puerto Rico under similar circumstances.

Costa Rica goalkeeper Keylor Navas joins Pumas in Mexico after some advice from Ramos and Herrera
Costa Rica goalkeeper Keylor Navas joins Pumas in Mexico after some advice from Ramos and Herrera

San Francisco Chronicle​

time3 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Costa Rica goalkeeper Keylor Navas joins Pumas in Mexico after some advice from Ramos and Herrera

MEXICO CITY (AP) — When former Real Madrid goalkeeper Keylor Navas got an offer to play in Mexico for UNAM Pumas, he knew who to ask for advice. The Costa Rica goalkeeper called his ex-Madrid teammate Sergio Ramos, as well as Costa Rica coach Miguel Herrera, before he eventually agreed to join Pumas in the top-tier Liga MX on a reported one-year contract. The move follows a six-month stint in Argentina with Newell's Old Boys. The 38-year-old Navas was introduced on Thursday as the Mexican side revamps its roster to try to end a 14-year spell without winning a league title. 'I'm here eager to give my all, to push myself, and to be on the pitch playing at my best,' Navas said. 'I have the mentality to make history, to be able to win a title. I believe we can achieve those goals by working with humility.' No details were given but Newell's Old Boys said it will receive $2 million as part of the deal. Ramos on Mexico Navas and Ramos played together for five seasons with Madrid, winning three Champions League titles. The pair also joined forces at Paris Saint-Germain where they were part of the team that won the Ligue 1 title in 2022. The 39-year-old Ramos signed with Mexican team Monterrey earlier this year. 'Sergio told me a little about his experience in Mexico. I know James (Rodriguez) is also here and playing at a high level,' Navas said at a press conference. 'Liga MX is growing and is very competitive, with a very good infrastructure, and I thought I'd come to a club where we can compete for titles.' James Rodriguez, who played with Navas and Ramos for four seasons with Madrid, also plays in Mexico with Leon. Pumas had already bought Wales midfielder Aaron Ramsey, Colombian left back Alvaro Angulo and Ecuador midfielder Pedro Vite. Help from Herrera Navas also called Herrera, who had coached six first division teams in Mexico before he was hired as coach of the Costa Rica men's national team as it attempts to qualify for the 2026 World Cup. 'I spoke with Miguel because he knows the league and the club well, and he told me I should sign without a doubt,' Navas said. 'I'm joining a big club, and having him in the national team helps you make these decisions.' Navas also made the decision to move closer to Central America because his national team has World Cup qualifying games, starting in September, with 'Los Ticos' in Group C with Honduras, Haiti and Nicaragua. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store