GOP senators want nothing to do with Trump-Epstein-MAGA controversy
President Trump is facing what may be the biggest backlash he's ever encountered from usually loyal activists, such as former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn and prominent conservative activist Laura Loomer.
Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel are coming under tremendous pressure from MAGA activists to provide more information about the people who may have been involved in Epstein's alleged sex trafficking activities, even though the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI concluded in a memo that there is no 'incriminating 'client list.''
Republican lawmakers don't want to go near the Epstein controversy that divides their base.
They already have their hands full responding to political attacks from Democrats on Trump's tariff policies and on the Medicaid spending cuts they passed into law this month, along with trillions of dollars in tax relief and new spending on border security and defense.
'I'll leave that up to DOJ and to the FBI. I think that's in their purview. I think the president's expressed his views on it and so I'll just leave it at that,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Monday.
Trump pushed back on some of his most loyal supporters on Saturday and defended Bondi after MAGA-aligned activists took shots at her handling of the Epstein case and related files at a student action summit hosted by the activist group Turning Point USA in Tampa this weekend.
'For years, it's Epstein, over and over again,' Trump posted on Truth Social, implying that Democrats have pushed the clamor of Epstein's files.
'Why are we giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden administration,' he wrote, referring to former Presidents Obama and Biden, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said Monday that Bondi has done enough to provide transparency on what government investigators know about Epstein and his illicit activities.
Asked if Bondi has been forthcoming enough with information, Grassley told The Hill: 'What I know now, yes.'
'With anything in government, I always urge the greatest of transparency,' he said. 'I'm not saying they're coming up short there but that's just a good principle of government as far as I'm concerned.'
Asked if the Justice Department needs to provide more information about Epstein-related documents, Grassley said: 'I think I've said all I should say.'
Conservative activists have zeroed in on Bondi's statement in February implying that the Epstein files were 'sitting on her desk.'
The joint Justice Department-FBI memo stated that much of the Epstein-related material is 'subject to court-ordered sealing' and 'only a fraction of this material would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial.'
The Justice Department and FBI said there was 'no credible evidence' that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.
And the memo dismissed theories that Epstein was murdered in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City on Aug. 10, 2019, stating the finding that he committed suicide was supported by video footage.
GOP lawmakers are ready to accept the administration's explanation of its handling of the issue, despite the uproar from the party's base.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Senate Intelligence Committee, said he's leaving the handling of all Epstein-related matters to Trump.
Cornyn and other Republicans don't seem at all inclined to endorse activists' calls for Bondi to appoint a special counsel to investigate the alleged Epstein files.
'I trust the president to handle it the way he deems appropriate,' Cornyn said Monday.
Trump has expressed his irritation with the relentless focus of some conservative social media influencers and activists on the possibility of a cover-up to protect wealthy and powerful figures who consorted with Epstein and the underage women he allegedly trafficked.
The president expressed his disgust with the topic when a reporter asked him about Epstein at a July 8 Cabinet meeting.
'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' Trump asked, appearing annoyed by the question.
'This guy's been talked about for years,' he said. 'We have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things. And are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable.'
But Republican strategists are starting to acknowledge that dismissing the controversy and moving on to new topics isn't working for Trump, at least at the moment.
'I think this administration is definitely going to have some second thoughts about their strategy. Ultimately, they will have to put out more information. I just don't see how the current strategy is sustainable to say everything's out there and there are other issues that are more important. That's not a winning message and it's not a message that's going to go over well,' said Brian Darling, a Republican strategist and former Senate aide.
'I think the strategy has to change by the administration,' he added.
Loomer, a prominent activist who seems to have Trump's ear on key executive-branch appointments, warned in a Saturday post on the social platform X that the 'lack of results at the DOJ and lack of transparency' could 'cost the GOP House and Senate seats.'
'Don't say I didn't warn you,' she warned.
A Trump-aligned strategist who requested anonymity said that Trump's team would likely offer a 'half-measure' concession to prominent conservative influencers and activists in an attempt to tamp down the controversy.
'Various portions of the MAGA base kind of feel like this is a key item. It's really MAGA-specific. It's something that's being battled over more in the conservative media,' the strategist said. 'I think they're going to try to release as little as possible because there are all sorts of issues with this stuff, legally.'
'It's one of the rare things that I've seen where at least as of right now where the president takes a different position and MAGA doesn't fall right into line immediately. There's been a little pushback. Is it going to cost seats? I don't know,' the source added.
'Bondi overpromised and underdelivered. It's an unforced error,' the strategist argued.
Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law, told conservative influencer Benny Johnson in an interview Monday that the administration would release more information related to Epstein's alleged crimes.
'There needs to be more transparency. I think that will happen. I know this is important to the president. He is frustrated,' Trump told Johnson.
'He is going to want to set things right. I believe there will be more coming and anything they are able to release they will try to get out. They hear it and understand it,' she added.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who has been outspoken about shedding more light on Epstein's criminal activities, said last week that she hoped to 'uncover' more information.
'For years, I have fought to expose the business associates of Jeffrey Epstein and those who were bankrolling his trafficking ring,' she said in a social media post last week after the Justice Department and FBI released their joint memo.
'Human trafficking generates more than $150 billion a year in profits, and I remain committed to breaking apart the human trafficking rings that ensnare innocent victims in modern-day slavery. I'm hopeful we can still uncover this information from the financial records to assist law enforcement in locking up vile criminals,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas adds transgender bathroom bill to agenda for special legislative session to deal with deadly flooding
A transgender bathroom bill was added to the agenda for Texas' special legislative session to deal with the deadly flooding event on July 4. The 30-day session was called by Governor Greg Abbott in June to deal with six bills he had vetoed. But when flash flooding in Central Texas devastated communities along the Guadalupe River earlier this month, disaster preparedness became a focal point of the session. More than 130 people have died, and just under 100 remain missing, Abbott said Monday. Following the disaster, questions have been raised over whether more could have been done to prevent at least some of the deaths. Last week, Abbott released an 18-point agenda for the special session, which included four points related to the flooding or natural disasters in general. A transgender bathroom bill was added to the agenda for Texas' special legislative session to deal with the deadly flooding event on July 4 () Last week, Governor Greg Abbott released an 18-point agenda for the special session, which included four points related to the flooding or natural disasters in general () Lawmakers will discuss legislation to 'improve early warning systems' and 'strengthen emergency communications' in flood-prone areas. Legislation to 'provide relief funding for response to and recovery from' the early July storms will also be discussed. There is also a more general agenda point to 'evaluate and streamline rules and regulations to speed preparedness for and recovery from natural disasters.' Besides the agenda points related to the flood disaster, Abbott included a point to discuss 'legislation protecting women's privacy in sex-segregated spaces' among other points, such as making it a crime to provide hemp-derived products to those under 21 years old and anti-abortion legislation. Monday was the first day lawmakers could file bills for the special session, and of the 82 bills filed, none were related to the deadly floods, NBC News reported, citing its Austin affiliate, KXAN-TV. Among the measures was a Republican-led bill, known as the Texas Women's Privacy Act, which requires transgender people to use bathrooms that align with their sex assigned at birth in public schools, government buildings and correctional facilities, per NBC News. Under the bill, these public entities could face financial penalties and be sued if they violate the bathroom rules. The regular legislative session, which ended in early June, saw 88 anti-LGBTQ bill proposals, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. Only four were signed into law. There are currently 19 states that have some sort of ban on transgender people using public bathrooms consistent with their gender identity, according to the think tank Movement Advancement Project. The bathroom bill would make transgender people use bathrooms that align with their sex assigned at birth in public places such as schools ()
San Francisco Chronicle
26 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump wields tariffs to sway Putin on Ukraine. Here's how they might work, or not
WASHINGTON (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin has sacrificed an estimated 1 million of his soldiers, killed and wounded, in a three-year campaign to crush Ukraine. Now President Donald Trump is betting that his go-to economic weapon — tariffs — can succeed where Ukrainian drones and rockets haven't, and finally persuade Putin to end his war. Tariffs, which the U.S. president has called ' the most beautiful word in the dictionary,'' are taxes on imports. They are Trump's all-purpose fix — a tool he deploys to protect American industry, lure factories to the United States, tackle drug trafficking and illegal immigration, and raise money to pay for his massive tax cuts. On the campaign trail last year, Trump promised he'd negotiate an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 24 hours. But months have passed without a peace deal, and the president has recently expressed frustration with the Russians. 'We're very, very unhappy with them ... I thought we would have had a deal two months ago, but it doesn't seem to get there,' Trump told reporters Monday. So in addition to agreeing to send more weapons to Ukraine, he's once again unsheathing tariffs. He said Monday the U.S. would impose 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil, natural gas and other products if there isn't a peace deal in 50 days. The levies are meant to cause Russia financial pain by making its trading partners think twice before buying Russian energy. 'I use trade for a lot of things,'' Trump said, "but it's great for settling wars.' 'Unilateral tariffs are likely to be ineffective in influencing Putin's actions,' said Douglas Irwin, a Dartmouth College economist who studies American trade policy. "Financial sanctions in cooperation with European and other allies are much more likely to damage Russian economy, but whether they soften Russia's approach is also uncertain.'' The secondary tariffs idea isn't new. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut earlier this year introduced legislation that would impose a 500% tariff on countries that buy Russian oil, petroleum products and uranium. If Trump goes through with his threat, his 100% tariffs have the potential to disrupt global commerce and push oil prices higher. They might also complicate Trump's efforts to strike separate trade deals with countries like China and India. The 100% tariffs would likely target China and India Since December 2022, when the European Union banned Russian oil, China and India have bought 85% of Russia's crude oil exports and 63% of its coal, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a Finnish nonprofit. So they would likely be the two countries most affected by Trump's 100% import taxes. Trump has already tangled with China this year, and things did not go well. In April, Trump plastered a 145% levy on Chinese imports, and Beijing counterpunched with 125% tariffs of its own. The triple-digit tariffs threatened to end trade between the world's two biggest economies and briefly sent financial markets reeling. China also withheld shipments of rare earth minerals used in products such as electric vehicles and wind turbines, crippling U.S. businesses. After showing how much pain they could inflict on each other, the United States and China agreed to a ceasefire. A new 100% secondary tariff 'would blow up that deal,' said Gary Hufbauer, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'China is particularly well-placed to hold out,' said Nicholas Mulder, a Cornell University historian. "All this would get us back to a position of full confrontation that would be uncomfortable for all sides.'' Hufbauer also noted that the secondary tariffs would also likely end 'any rapprochement with India'' — the world's fifth-biggest economy and one with which Trump is pursuing a trade deal. Energy prices could climb If Trump goes ahead with the tariffs, 'it would invariably lead to higher global energy prices,'' especially for natural gas, economists Kieran Tompkins and Liam Peach of Capital Economics wrote in a commentary Monday. Other oil-exporting countries have enough spare capacity to ramp up production and offset any loss of Russian oil exports in global market. But if they did, the world would have no buffer to rely on if there were an oil shock caused by, say, conflict in the Middle East — and prices could skyrocket. 'Removing that spare capacity would be akin to riding a bike with no shock absorbers,'' Tompkins and Peach wrote. The Russian economy has been resilient After Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the United States and its allies slammed Russia with sanctions. Among other things, the U.S. froze the assets of Russia's central bank and barred some Russian banks from using a key international payments system run by Belgium. With its allies from the Group of Seven rich nations, it also capped the price that importers could pay for Russian oil. The sanctions were expected to crush the Russian economy, but they didn't. Putin put Russia on a wartime budget, and high defense spending kept unemployment low. Military recruits were given big sign-up bonuses and the families of the fallen received death benefits, pumping income into some of Russia's poorer regions. To keep its oil sales going, Russia deployed "shadow fleets,'' hundreds of aging tankers of uncertain ownership and dodgy safety practices that delivered oil priced above the G7 price cap. 'The experience of the G7 oil price cap against Russia showed how challenging the enforcement of measures against the Russian oil trade can be,' Mulder said. Last year, the Russian economy grew 4.1%, according to the International Monetary Fund. But strains are showing, partly because Putin's war has made Russia a pariah to foreign investors. The IMF forecasts growth will decelerate to 1.5% this year, and last month the Russian economy minister warned the country is "on the brink of going into a recession.'' Trump's tariffs could increase the pressure, in part by driving down Russia's energy exports — and the revenue the Russian government collects from an energy tax. Tariffs are mostly untried as a diplomatic lever 'To my knowledge, tariffs have never been applied as an explicit anti-aggression measure,' said Mulder, author of a 2022 history of economic sanctions. "I am skeptical that the secondary tariffs threat will be effective.'' For one thing, he said, it's unclear whether Trump will actually impose them after 50 days. The president has repeatedly announced tariffs against other countries, and then sometimes suspended or tweaked them. For another, the secondary tariffs would target countries — namely China and India — that might have some sway in Moscow. 'The United States needs cooperation and collaboration to bring Russia to the negotiating table,' said Cullen Hendrix, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute. "Threatening to harm the actors who actually have leverage over Moscow may backfire.''
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
PEPFAR survives rescissions
Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) and Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought told reporters that the White House agreed with a plan to change the rescissions package with a substitute amendment that would exempt the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) from being cut. 'It's substantially the same package and the Senate has to work its will and we've appreciated the work along the way to get to a place where they've got the votes,' Vought said. 'There is a substitute amendment that does not include the PEPFAR rescission and we're fine with that.' Trump had requested that $900 million be clawed back from PEPFAR. If the substitute amendment is adopted, the size of the initial $9.4 billion request would be narrowed to $9 billion, Vought said Tuesday. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) repeatedly stated her desire to remove PEPFAR from the package. Other GOP appropriators maintained their support for the program but didn't say whether it was a deal breaker. 'This is progress,' Collins told reporters about saving PEPFAR. But she added Vought did not give a clear enough explanation about what programs he wanted to 'save' and the specifics about what programs are being cut. 'It's unclear to me how you get to $9 billion,' Collins said. 'We still have the problem of not having detailed account information from OMB.' The amendment means the House will have to vote again on the legislation. House Republicans had pressed for the Senate not to change the bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R) told reporters Tuesday there had been 'a lot of interest' in preserving PEPFAR funding among his conference, adding that he hopes the House will accept 'that one small modification.'
