US Congress passes Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
All but two Republicans voted in favor of the legislation on Thursday, and Democrats were united in their opposition. The final vote was 218 to 214.
Trump had been pressuring his party to pass the bill ahead of the Fourth of July holiday.
He told reporters: "I think when you go over the bill, it was very easy to get them to a yes. You know, we went over that bill and point after point, biggest tax cut in history."
Vice President JD Vance admitted in a post on X that even he sometimes doubted the bill would pass by Trump's deadline.
The legislation contains Trump's key agenda items, including sweeping tax cuts. It extends the tax cuts from his first term and temporarily exempts taxes on tips and overtime pay.
However, analysts at the Congressional Budget Office said the bill will add over 3 trillion dollars to the US debt over the next decade. Democrats have sharply criticized it for slashing safety-net programs. Former president Joe Biden described it on X as "cruel" and said it will deliver a "massive tax break to billionaires."
Trump is expected to sign the bill into law on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
8 hours ago
- NHK
Hamas response to US-proposed Gaza deal expected soon
US President Donald Trump says he is expecting Hamas to soon respond to a US-proposed ceasefire in the Gaza Strip amid media reports that the Islamic group views the development in a positive light. On Friday, Trump told reporters he would know over the next 24 hours whether Hamas has agreed to accept the ceasefire proposal. Multiple media outlets report that the agreement calls for a 60-day ceasefire in exchange for the release of 10 living hostages and the return of 18 bodies by Hamas to Israel in stages. They say the deal also seeks to arrange talks to end the conflict during the ceasefire. Trump earlier said that Israel had agreed to the proposal. An Israeli delegation reportedly would join indirect talks to cement the deal if Hamas gives a positive response. A Saudi media outlet reported on Friday that Hamas is moving toward accepting the US proposal. It says that is because the group saw new developments regarding the flow of aid into Gaza and Israel's withdrawal. Observers are waiting to see how the Islamic group will respond to this ceasefire proposal, as Hamas seeks guarantees that the truce will lead to a permanent end to hostilities with Israel, which has declared it aims to destroy the group.
Japan Times
10 hours ago
- Japan Times
As trade deadline approaches, Japan must draw lines
According to conventional wisdom, a strong national leader will force a weak one, or one with less popular support, to buckle in tough negotiations. By that logic, U.S. President Donald Trump has the whip hand in trade talks with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Yet, Ishiba has held out, resisting U.S. pressure to sign a quick deal, a position that is strengthened, ironically, by Ishiba's weakness. The prime minister cannot afford to make concessions as the July 20 Upper House election approaches. His spine is stiffened by the failure of the U.S. to make clear its demands and the U.S. president's record of ripping up deals that even he negotiated. Clarity and trust are the essential prerequisites of successful negotiations. Neither exists today. Japan was worried about Trump's return to the White House, fearful that the bilateral relationship would suffer given the 45th and 47th president's long-time animus toward Japan and the absence of a 'Trump whisperer,' former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Yet, in January, Trump described the partnership as 'a friendship like few others,' certain that 'the cherished alliances between our two countries will continue to flourish long into the future!' Sensing opportunity, Ishiba hurried to Washington to meet Trump, a move that some considered unseemly and perhaps unwise, but the resulting summit was a success. When Trump announced that he would impose blanket 10% tariffs on all trade partners, with still greater sanctions on specific sectors like autos, auto parts, steel and aluminum, Japan was one of the first countries to begin negotiations on a deal, its faith in the relationship yielding confidence that an agreement was possible. Since then, Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's chief tariff negotiator, has visited Washington regularly, sometimes weekly, in search of a deal. Despite seven rounds of talks, periodic claims that an agreement was imminent and impressive efforts by Japan to court the mercurial U.S. president — at one point, Akazawa wore a 'Make America Great Again' cap while meeting Trump — the two countries remain at loggerheads. In the last round, held late last month, Akazawa failed to even meet Scott Bessent, U.S. treasury secretary and chief U.S. negotiator, or U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Worse, when the talks adjourned Trump unloaded on Japan, complaining that the country was 'spoiled' and took no U.S. rice or automobiles. Talking to reporters, he wasn't sure if a deal with Japan was possible, saying 'I doubt it. ... They're very tough.' Trump said that he would be sending Japan 'a letter,' or notice of his intent to impose tariffs on its goods, which would mark 'the end of the trade deal.' In an interview, Trump warned that Japan would 'pay a 25% tariff on your cars,' and later comments hinted it could be as high as a 35% levy. Japan responded with silence. While the current deadline for a deal is July 9, Bessent has indicated that an extension might be possible. There are reports that Akazawa may make yet another trip to Washington for another round of talks. One of the questions he needs answered is what purpose U.S. tariffs serve. If they are intended to raise revenue that facilitates the restructuring of the U.S. tax system, which would imply that they are permanent, then the parameters of a deal are much changed. An agreement is difficult when one side doesn't understand the facts. The charge that Japan imports no U.S. rice is false, as agriculture minister Shinjiro Koizumi explained. 'Rice imports from abroad, including from the U.S., had increased 120 times from a year earlier.' If Japanese consumers don't buy U.S. automobiles, it isn't because of tariffs — this country imposes no levy on imported passenger cars — but because American automakers don't build vehicles that Japanese want. Koizumi was right to call Trump's comments an 'obvious misunderstanding of the facts.' Autos are central to any eventual resolution of this dispute. Trump insists that his 25% tariff, imposed in March, is nonnegotiable. Japan wants it gone. The U.S. may believe that Japan will be squeezed by its tariffs. And, in fact, exports to the U.S. dropped by 11% year on year in May, with automobile exports down 24.7%. Automakers have been working to avoid passing on the tariff costs, but they are reaching the limits at which they can squeeze their supply chains. Japanese automakers have increased production in the U.S., which is one of Trump's objectives. Any eventual resolution is more likely to reflect larger political and economic considerations than the specific terms of any document. Fearful of some of the consequences, Trump has been criticized for failing to follow through on his threats and the prospect of an economic slowdown in the U.S. — the perpetual warning of economists when they evaluate his trade policy — could force him to back off again. Trump has also been promising deals for so long and has achieved such meager results — only agreements with Vietnam and the U.K., while a purported pact with China remains unclear — that his administration might settle for something with Japan that is more symbolic than real. If Trump believed that Ishiba would readily submit to his demands, he was mistaken. That error is understandable. The U.S. is central to Japan's economy and critical to its security but the leverage that affords the U.S. president is limited. Growing numbers of Japanese voters oppose gross concessions. One poll shows more than half of voters believe Japan should not make a deal even if it hurts the bilateral relationship. Only 15% agree to concessions to avoid additional tariffs. Most worrisome now is a growing sense among the Japanese public that the U.S. is no longer a reliable partner. After all, in 2019, Trump and Abe released a joint statement after signing a trade pact that said 'While faithfully implementing these agreements, both nations will refrain from taking measures against the spirit of these agreements and this Joint Statement.' Yet here we are again. American credibility is also diminished by constant calls for ever-more defense spending, first to 2% of gross domestic product, then 3% and now 5%. It is not surprising, then, that another recent poll showed that only 22% either greatly (3%) or somewhat (19%) trust the U.S., while 68% somewhat (46%) or entirely (22%) distrust it. An agreement is difficult in these circumstances. Still, it is possible. And Japan has cards to play. It could pledge to increase purchases of crude oil, natural gas and agricultural products to help balance trade accounts. While these are ultimately private sector decisions, the Japanese government could also encourage companies to invest in the U.S. This shouldn't take much effort since it is already occurring. But Japan must also draw lines. While this country needs a good working relationship with the U.S., it must not be at any cost. This country has national interests to protect. They include a thriving security partnership, a stable and growing economy and a rules-based international order. Indulging a mercurial if not arbitrary U.S. president is not among them, especially if it threatens those other concerns. The Japan Times Editorial Board
Yomiuri Shimbun
13 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Is Set to Cement a Budget-Busting Legacy, Adding to the National Debt
President Donald Trump on Thursday cemented one of the most consequential – and expensive – economic legacies in modern American presidential history, as his Republican allies in Congress approved a second sweeping tax cut that will deepen the nation's fiscal imbalances for years to come. In the president's first term, Trump oversaw a roughly $8 trillion increase in the federal debt, which surged due to his first-term tax cuts and emergency spending approved by Congress during the coronavirus pandemic. Trump's second term began with billionaire Elon Musk in the administration vowing to reduce the federal debt by cutting government spending by more than $1 trillion, following substantial increases to the debt during the Biden administration. But those efforts fizzled as Musk has left the administration, and the second Trump tax cuts are projected to add more than $4 trillion to the national debt, once interest costs and likely policy extensions are accounted for. Taken together, the Trump tax laws mark one of the most significant fiscal expansions in peacetime U.S. history. Economists disagree about the extent to which Trump has exceeded the deficit binge of his predecessors, in part because nobody knows how much revenue the White House will ultimately raise in new tariff revenue. But the One Big Beautiful Bill, which centers on trillions in tax cuts across income brackets, represents the biggest component thus far of the president's deficit-increasing policies. When interest costs and likely extensions are included, the legislation is more expensive than the combined cost of Trump's first-term tax law, the 2020 covid stimulus package, and President Joe Biden's 2021 stimulus plan, said Jessica Riedl, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a center-right think tank. Riedl said that Trump's deficit increases surpass all prior presidents since at least Lyndon B. Johnson, in the 1960s. Other economists, including former Obama official Jason Furman, said George W. Bush probably added more to the deficit overall, though Furman also pointed out that Bush did so while inheriting a budget surplus – whereas Trump took office while deficits were already high. Already, the national debt as a share of the economy was larger last year than it was anytime outside of World War II, the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis or the covid pandemic. Deficit concerns contributed to Moody's downgrading of the U.S. credit rating in May – the third major credit agency to do so – over lack of progress on deficits. 'President Trump has added more red ink than any president since at least LBJ, and he is doing it on top of deficits that had already been soaring,' Riedl said. Biden also added to the national debt, primarily with a $1.9 trillion stimulus package during the first year of his administration. Biden also attempted to cancel roughly $400 billion in student debt, though that effort was later blocked by the Supreme Court. The White House has adamantly rejected economists' criticisms, arguing that the new tax bill does not worsen the nation's fiscal outlook and that the administration's agenda overall improves it. A White House memo last month pointed to more than $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and other programs in the legislation, which amount to the largest spending reductions on the U.S. safety net in modern history. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other officials have also pointed to the administration's broader strategy, which includes higher tariff revenue, cuts to federal regulations they say will unlock growth, and other spending cuts not yet approved. In total, the White House memo says, these measures will reduce federal deficits by up to $6.9 trillion over 10 years. The memo also contends that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's projections of the deficit impact of the bill are misleading, because they assume the expiration of the 2017 Trump tax cuts. The administration says that assumption isn't politically realistic. On its own, the memo claims, the new tax bill actually reduces projected deficits by over $1.4 trillion over the next decade, in part by spurring additional growth. Budget experts on the left, center and right, as well as on Wall Street, have strongly disputed these claims. Trump's tax law locks in trillions of dollars in revenue losses without equivalent spending cuts, widening structural deficits at a time when the nation's debt is already historically high, these analysts say. While the administration says factoring for economic growth decreases the bill's price tag, the legislation could also cause the Federal Reserve to leave interest rates higher in response to the fiscal stimulus, which would in turn slow the economy. When factoring in economic growth, the Penn Wharton budget model, the Yale Budget Lab and the CBO all found that the House tax bill would become more, not less, expensive. 'This bill is very clear: There are a certain number of tax cuts, there are a certain amount of spending cuts, and they don't offset each other,' said Martha Gimbel, executive director and co-founder of the Budget Lab at Yale. 'No amount of assumptions about the amount of growth we'll get will overcome the reality on the ground.' The implications of these decisions will be felt long after Trump leaves office. Larger deficits will probably constrain the government's ability to respond to future emergencies and place pressure on core federal programs like Social Security and Medicare. With baby boomers retiring and health costs rising, the fiscal space consumed by these tax cuts could crowd out other policy options for years. Under the legislation, the interest payments on the debt will rise to $2 trillion per year, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Furman, who served as chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Barack Obama, pointed out that the Trump tax bill could also make it harder for lawmakers to rein in the debt. In the aftermaths of the Bush tax cuts and those from Trump's first terms, Democrats largely sought to roll back breaks for the wealthy and reallocate some of the savings to deficit reduction or new programs. By contrast, Democrats will want to respond to this new legislation by restoring Medicaid funding, clean energy incentives and other policies repealed by Trump's bill. Those efforts will cost more than the legislation's cut for the rich and corporations, Furman said. Trump's tax bill not only extends existing policies with bipartisan support – a higher Child Tax Credit; a larger standard deduction – but it includes new populist giveaways, including a provision to end taxes on tips and a $6,000 tax deduction for millions of seniors. If those measures are extended, as seems likely, the nation's fiscal imbalance will only grow beyond the bill itself. 'The next Democratic administration will want to make this in some ways fiscally better, but in more ways want to make it fiscally worse,' Furman said. 'It is both worse than current policy and will prove hard to undo.'
