logo
China wants more children. But its people cannot afford them

China wants more children. But its people cannot afford them

Indian Express8 hours ago
China's economy is facing multiple challenges today, and population decline is one of them. President Xi Jinping seems to be struggling to find a solution that mitigates this before it is irreversible. As per the January 2025 figures, China's population continued to decline for the third consecutive year and its total population declined by 1.39 million. This is accompanied by reducing marriage numbers and an advancing retirement age. Is China going to get older before it gets richer?
The one-child policy was introduced by Deng Xiaoping in 1979 who argued that a developing China required population control till it was in a position to improve living standards. The draconian policy was implemented with great rigour. At the same time, the role of Chinese labour in helping China present itself as the 'world's factory' and the centre of global supply chains can't be overlooked. The consistently declining population will adversely impact this pool of labour.
Under its most recent effort to improve the birth rate, the Chinese government has announced that it will provide RMB 3,600 (about $500) until the age of three. The policy states, 'A unified national system will be established to manage the childrearing subsidy programme. The payments will be exempt from personal income tax and will not be counted as household or individual income when calculating eligibility for social assistance programmes such as the minimum living allowance'.
In 2016, Xi Jinping abolished the one-child policy which was replaced by a two-child policy, hoping to see a change in population statistics. This was later changed to a three-child policy in 2021. However, the rising cost of childcare and education is proving to be a tough hurdle. As per a study by the China-based YuWa Population Research Institute, 'Raising a child to the age of 17 in China costs an average of $75,700'. The Chinese government has been keen to extend support by providing daycare as well as other benefits (like tax benefits) but it is still failing to address the original question: Why are Chinese couples having fewer children?
Cost is definitely a challenge but there is more to it. The one-child policy has resulted in a lop-sided demography. China, being a patriarchal society, has always had a male child preference. The sex-ratio, therefore, is heavily skewed towards males, which has, in turn, led to a situation where more and more Chinese men are unable to find a spouse. In addition, the country's economic growth has added a large number of women to the workforce, who are financially independent and not keen to sacrifice their careers.
Xi's call to Chinese women to have more children has had no major response. In 2023, he had asserted that women should 'actively cultivate a new culture of marriage and childbearing and strengthen guidance on young people's view on marriage, childbirth and family'. But after Covid, the cost of healthcare has been rising and is pushing people to save more. The heavily ageing population is also putting a burden on the younger workforce. In the last few years, the number of old age homes in China has been rising while kindergartens have been shutting down (by more than 5 per cent in 2023).
By now, every experiment seems to be too little too late. The issue that Xi and the Communist Party need to acknowledge is that Chinese society has effectively changed, not least due to the one-child policy. Economic reforms have helped women gain financial independence and move out of the traditional roles. Today, Xi hopes that in the name of the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, he can demand that women give up their hard-fought independence, limited as it may still be. Only time will tell whether the government's efforts will succeed or if a different strategy will be needed.
The writer is Associate Professor, OP Jindal Global University
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla to open second India showroom in Delhi's Aerocity on Aug 11: Report
Tesla to open second India showroom in Delhi's Aerocity on Aug 11: Report

Business Standard

time14 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Tesla to open second India showroom in Delhi's Aerocity on Aug 11: Report

US-based Electric vehicle giant Tesla is preparing to open its second showroom in India—this time in the national capital. After launching in Mumbai, the company has chosen Delhi's Aerocity, a high-end commercial area near the Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport, for its next location. According to a report by CNBC-TV18, the new showroom is scheduled to open on August 11. This move comes shortly after Tesla introduced its Model Y in India. On the same day, Tesla also activated its official India website, which initially allowed users to register interest only from Mumbai, Delhi, and Gurugram. First showroom in Mumbai's BKC Tesla's entry into the Indian market began with the opening of its first showroom in Maker Maxity Mall, located in Mumbai's Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC). Two versions of the Model Y, imported from Tesla's Shanghai plant, are currently being showcased there. The company expects to start deliveries for the rear-wheel drive variant by the end of the third quarter. Customers opting for the long-range version can expect to receive their vehicles in the fourth quarter. Tesla Model Y: Variants & prices Tesla has officially introduced two variants of the Model Y in India: a rear-wheel drive (RWD) version and a long-range RWD variant. The base RWD model is priced at ₹59.89 lakh, while the long-range version comes in at ₹67.89 lakh. Including additional costs, the on-road price of the RWD model is ₹61.07 lakh, whereas the long-range variant reaches ₹69.15 lakh. Buyers of the rear-wheel-drive Model Y can choose between two battery pack sizes — 60 kWh and 75 kWh. This version features a single electric motor, delivering around 295 horsepower. The 60 kWh battery offers an estimated WLTP-certified range of up to 500 km on a full charge. Meanwhile, the long-range version is expected to deliver a higher range of approximately 622 km.

AIFF top brass to meet eight ISL club CEOs on Aug 7 to discuss their concerns
AIFF top brass to meet eight ISL club CEOs on Aug 7 to discuss their concerns

News18

time24 minutes ago

  • News18

AIFF top brass to meet eight ISL club CEOs on Aug 7 to discuss their concerns

New Delhi, Aug 4 (PTI) The top brass of the AIFF will meet the CEOs of eight clubs of the country after the latter expressed concerns over the 'current status and direction" of the country's football with the Indian Super League (ISL) being put on hold. Worried about their future, eight ISL clubs had written to the All India Football Federation after the top-tier league was put on hold by the organisers — Football Sports Development Limited — due to the lack of clarity on the Master Rights Agreement (MRA) with the national federation. The 15-year MRA between the AIFF and the FSDL — the national federation's marketing partners — ends on December 18. 'AIFF officials will meet with CEOs from eight Indian Super League clubs, on Thursday, August 7, 2025, in New Delhi, to discuss issues regarding #IndianFootball," the AIFF said in a tweet. Earlier, the eight ISL clubs had written to the AIFF that they found themselves unable to plan with the level 'that professional football operations require" in the absence of proper interaction with the AIFF or FSDL. 'This has impacted not just short-term decisions but is now beginning to affect the structural backbone of our institutions," they wrote. The letter, calling for a 'constructive dialogue" with the AIFF, was signed by Bengaluru FC, Jamshedpur FC, FC Goa, Hyderabad FC, Kerala Blasters, NorthEast United FC, Odisha FC and Punjab FC. The three Kolkata-based clubs — Mohun Bagan Super Giant, East Bengal, Mohammedan Sporting — as well as Mumbai City FC and Chennaiyin FC were missing. Last month, AIFF President Kalyan Chaubey had assured that this season's ISL will be held, though he did not specify on a start date of the top-tier domestic competition. 'If the league doesn't take place, it is not only footballers but the people who are associated with football that will be affected. It's thousands of people who will be affected. So, we will put our best effort to ensure that the league happens," he has said. On July 11, ISL organisers FSDL announced that it has put the 2025-26 season 'on hold" due to the uncertainty surrounding the renewal of the MRA signed with the AIFF in 2010. ISL normally runs from September to April. Following a directive from the Supreme Court, the AIFF has been asked not to negotiate new terms of the MRA (with FSDL) until a final judgment is delivered in the AIFF draft constitution case. The Supreme Court may pronounce its judgment soon. PTI PDS PDS AH AH view comments First Published: August 04, 2025, 20:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

'If you were a true Indian, you would not say this," SC raps Rahul Gandhi over Army remarks
'If you were a true Indian, you would not say this," SC raps Rahul Gandhi over Army remarks

United News of India

time27 minutes ago

  • United News of India

'If you were a true Indian, you would not say this," SC raps Rahul Gandhi over Army remarks

New Delhi, Aug 4 (UNI) The Supreme Court today pulled up Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his alleged remarks against the Indian Army during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra, questioning the veracity and propriety of his statements. The Court said such comments were unbecoming of a 'true Indian' and sought to know the basis for his claims regarding Chinese incursions. A Bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice AG Masih was hearing Gandhi's plea challenging a defamation case filed over his December 16, 2022, remarks made after a border clash between Indian and Chinese troops in Arunachal Pradesh. 'If you were a true Indian, you would not say all these things,' Justice Datta observed during the hearing. The Bench questioned Gandhi's claim that 2,000 km of Indian territory had been occupied by China. 'Are you there? Do you have any credible material? Why would you make these statements without anything?' Justice Datta questioned the credibility of statements and said that public figures have a responsibility when making sensitive statements. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Gandhi, argued that the remarks were political in nature and made in the public interest. He read out the actual statements made by Gandhi and contended that the defamation complaint was politically motivated. 'There is a technique now, become an MP and file defamation for any criticism,' Singhvi submitted, arguing that the complaint was an abuse of the legal process. However, the Court appeared unconvinced, and Justice Datta further asked why such comments were made via social media instead of being raised in Parliament. Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia, appearing for the complainant Uday Shankar Srivastava, opposed the plea and submitted that the High Court had already examined the issue. He stated that relevant materials and statements were on record justifying the continuation of proceedings. The defamation case arises from Gandhi's statement, 'Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel,' which the complainant claimed was defamatory and demoralising to the armed forces. Earlier, on March 29, 2025, the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court had dismissed Gandhi's plea challenging the Magistrate Court's summons in the matter. Despite the scathing observations, the Supreme Court today issued notice and granted an interim stay on further proceedings in the defamation case. The matter will be heard again after three weeks. Separately, on May 27, a special MP-MLA court in Varanasi dismissed a petition against Gandhi over his reference to Lord Ram as a "fictional character" during a speech at a US university. The complaint, filed by Advocate Harishankar Pandey, was rejected as 'non-maintainable' under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. In another defamation case related to Gandhi's remarks against freedom fighter Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, the Supreme Court on April 24, 2025, had stayed the Allahabad High Court's order refusing to quash the summons. During that hearing, Justice Datta had warned Gandhi against making 'further irresponsible statements,' cautioning that the Court may take up the matter suo motu if required. The Apex Court had extended the stay on that case on July 25. UNI SNG AAB

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store