
Foreign buyers ban: Winston Peters says change to be announced this year, denies NZ First ‘softening'
A proposal to loosen the current ban is unlikely to face resistance from David Seymour (right). Photo / Mark Mitchell
It was introduced in 2018 when Labour was in a coalition with NZ First. Classifying residential housing as 'sensitive' in the legislation meant non-residents and non-citizens couldn't purchase existing residential homes.
Rumours have swirled for months that the Government is eyeing changes to the ban, with Peters suggesting on several occasions he is open to considering an adjustment.
Foreign investment has been a critical focus for ministers as part of the coalition's growth agenda. The Government has changed the Active Investor Plus Visa – the so-called Golden Visa – to reduce the minimum amount foreigners need to invest, and has begun establishing Invest New Zealand to streamline overseas investment.
In an interview with the Herald this week, Peters denied his party was 'softening' its approach but did say an announcement will come this year.
Asked about a possible reversal of the policy, Peters rejected allowing foreigners to purchase houses worth $2 million.
It was National's 2023 election policy to impose a 15% tax on overseas people who want to purchase property valued at more than $2m.
The policy's costings received criticism during the campaign, but National stood by it. However, the tax proposal did not make it through coalition negotiations.
'The idea that for $2 million you could come into this country and get a key and that's your investment was a nonsense,' Peters told the Herald.
'We said so before the election. We also debunked the costings for it, and were joined not long after that by economists who said that New Zealand First was right.
'We're saying if you're coming here with millions of dollars to invest in this country, then yes, you could buy a house, and we're setting the terms for that.'
And what is the threshold, if not $2m? Peters said: 'We will announce it to you before too long.'
He confirmed that would be this year.
NZ First's Winston Peters says an announcement will be made this year. Photo / Mark Mitchell
The Herald asked if someone who invested in New Zealand through the Active Investor Plus Visa (it previously required a minimum investment of $15m, but the minimum option is now $5m) should be able to buy a property.
'If you are going to put $15 million in the country, I think you should be able to buy a house, yes. But not a $2m house,' Peters said.
He said any investors purchasing property in New Zealand would need to do so on 'our conditions' like 'smart economies' require.
National didn't want to comment for this story, but Luxon has previously admitted his party's previous $2m threshold may have been too low and has suggested lifting it to around $5m.
Former Prime Minister Sir John Key last week spoke about investor immigrants being put off by the foreign buyer ban.
'If I'm turning up with $100 million, are you telling me the best I can do is rent a house?' Key said.
'We're a little country at the bottom of the world. And to make that work, you need foreign capital. You need smart foreigners to come here. You need positive population growth, migration.'
He didn't think the ban was keeping house prices down as intended.
'If I'm a billionaire in China, I'm not going to wake up and think I want to buy a $800,000 house in Pakūranga,' he said. 'They might buy a $50m property on the lakefront in Queenstown.'
Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
42 minutes ago
- 1News
Govt making thousands more building products available for NZ use
The Government has opened the door for many building products from overseas to become available in New Zealand, including cladding systems, external doors, plasterboard, and windows. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said products had been given "the green light" for use in New Zealand to end what he called "costly monopolies" on select products. "These changes have the potential to reduce total building costs by thousands of dollars when building a home." Penk said it was "frankly outrageous" how much it cost to build a house in New Zealand. "It is 50% more expensive to build a standalone home in New Zealand than in Australia." ADVERTISEMENT He said there were thousands of well-made, high-performing products that had been tested against international standards but had faced barriers here because they had not been tested against New Zealand standards. "This Government is serious about lowering the cost of building and helping Kiwis into homes faster." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said it would provide "much needed" competition, lowering the cost of building and subsequently the cost of living. "We want to level the playing field by increasing competition for high quality buildings products, and in turn, lower prices for builders, which leads to lowering the cost of living and making houses more affordable for Kiwis." The first version of the building product specifications document would be released tomorrow. This lists international standards for products such as plasterboard, cladding, windows and external doors. "Later this year, additional pathways will go live enabling more high-quality building products to be used including over 200,000 plumbing products through the Australian Watermark scheme," Penk said.


NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Prime Minister Chris Luxon faces questions on building product investment, immigration numbers
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon will face questions this morning on the latest boost for builders, the Foreign Minister's concerns on immigration numbers and the new road cone hotline. He will join Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking at 7.30am. It comes after Luxon said the Government would be increasing the number of building products available in New Zealand, including plasterboard, cladding systems, external doors and windows. He made the announcement at the weekend with Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk, who said thousands of overseas building products had been given the green light for construction. '[This ends] costly monopolies on a small number of products that are currently used in New Zealand,' Penk said. 'It is 50% more expensive to build a standalone home in New Zealand than in Australia. That is frankly outrageous.' Luxon is also expected to face heat this week from NZ First leader Winston Peters, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, over his concerns about the number of migrants entering New Zealand. Peters said he is observing an 'alarming development' overseas where 'careless immigration policies' are 'transforming cities' and 'changing centuries of development and social life'. He referred to his party as 'nationalist' while his coalition partners are 'globalists', and believes Kiwis are increasingly worried about immigration issues. 'We intend to turn that problem into a success story, so people do understand that, when you're coming here, there are some fundamental things you need to sign up to,' he said. 'If you don't want to sign up to it, don't come.' Meanwhile, Luxon's new hotline to curb overzealous road cone use has come under scrutiny, with a chief executive of a traffic management company saying he is very doubtful it will work. Traffic management planning company Parallaxx helps train WorkSafe staff for the hotline, but chief executive Dave Tilton is sceptical of the concept, partly due to the number of people a report needs to go through before action is taken. 'We absolutely have oversupply [of road cones] beyond the minimum without question ... but I'm very doubtful that this particular thread [the hotline] is going to bear fruit in fixing it.'


Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Business case flawed: Brooking
The release of a "flawed" business case means more information is needed before Labour decides whether it would dump the planned Waikato Medical School, a Dunedin MP says. Last Monday, Health Minister Simeon Brown announced Cabinet had approved $82.85 million in government funding to build the country's third medical school at the University of Waikato — the institution was expected to contribute more than $150m to the project. Dunedin MP Rachel Brooking, of Labour, said she was "very sceptical" about figures used by the government to make its decision. The project's detailed business case was made public on Friday evening, part of a document dump which revealed the cost of producing GPs at the graduate-entry Waikato medical school would be $50 million a year cheaper than at the existing medical schools at Otago and Auckland universities. "The business case has really been written with an outcome in mind and not traversed all of the options, and that's just bad decision-making," Ms Brooking said. "It's bad way to make use of taxpayers' money, and it seems that in general, this all will cost more." She said the "flawed" business case would have consequences for the Otago Medical School: "those are difficult to predict exactly". However, Labour had "no plans at the moment" to dump the medical school, Ms Brooking said. "The issue is that we don't think the business case is credible. "So we'll keep asking questions about that and try and make any assessments on good information when we're in a position to do so." Taieri MP Ingrid Leary said "the so-called business case is really just a public relations document, given the outlandish assumptions and comparators". In a statement last Monday, Mr Brown said the project was an innovative model "that supports our focus on strengthening primary care, making it easier for people to see their doctor — helping Kiwis stay well and out of hospital". Waikato University would begin construction on new teaching facilities later this year. A full cost-benefit analysis was presented to Cabinet before any proposal was finalised, as part of the National-Act New Zealand coalition agreement, he said. Green MP Francisco Hernandez said the government's cost-benefit analysis used to "ram through" the Waikato Medical School made assumptions revealing the "lack of objectivity". Mr Hernandez said the document "falsely assumed" Otago and Auckland universities could not have negotiated a four-year rural graduate programme similar to Waikato University's proposal. "This assumption enables the government to claim that Waikato University will train medical students 'cheaper' because Waikato is assumed to have a four-year programme," he said. The government had also assumed Waikato University was more likely to produce GPs "even though Otago and Auckland could have also done a rural graduate programme". "Fundamentally, these flawed assumptions stem from the government's failure to run a transparent tender process from the start," Mr Hernandez said. "Rather than putting out an open tender to every university in New Zealand, they gave Waikato University a sweetheart deal." He called for the government to "be up front and honest about the actual costs" of the project and release the full agreement with Waikato University with all relevant advice. "The government's failure to rule out further handouts or to release the actual agreement raises questions on whether there were further sweetheart deals negotiated behind closed doors in the agreement that might end up with the taxpayer bailing out Waikato University."