Officials investigate ex-Trump prosecutor over alleged illegal political activity
The Office of Special Counsel, an independent federal agency, on Saturday confirmed the investigation after reporting by other news organisations. Smith was named special counsel to investigate
Trump by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022.
Trump and his Republican allies, including Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton, have – without offering evidence of wrongdoing – accused Smith of violating the Hatch Act, a federal law that bans certain public officials from engaging in political activity.
Smith prosecuted two federal cases against Republican candidate Trump in the lead-up to the November 2024 presidential election.
Smith ultimately dropped the cases – neither one had gone to trial – after Trump was reelected, which would have shielded him from prosecution according to long-standing Justice Department practice. Smith then subsequently resigned as special counsel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
Trump's tariff paradox is making China great again
Donald Trump's aggressive tariff regime was designed to restore American economic dominance, but early evidence suggests a troubling paradox. Rather than weakening China's position, the tariffs appear to be generating economic headwinds at home, straining key alliances, and creating new opportunities for Beijing to expand its global influence. Trump's tariffs have pushed the average US tariff rate to 18%—the highest since the 1930s. According to Yale Budget Lab estimates, these policies will cost US households approximately US$2,400 in 2025, raising prices across consumer goods from electronics to clothing. While monthly tariff revenues have surged to $29 billion by July 2025—triple the 2024 level—the Congressional Budget Office projects that higher prices and supply chain disruptions will ultimately drag down economic growth. The economic strain is already visible. US GDP growth slowed to 1.2% annualized in the first half of 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024. Manufacturing job growth has stalled, with trade-related sectors bearing particular costs. California faces over 64,000 projected job losses in trade and logistics, while the Port of Los Angeles now operates at just 70% capacity due to declining trade volumes. These domestic economic pressures create the foundation for broader strategic vulnerabilities, as allies and competitors alike recalibrate their relationships with an increasingly unpredictable Washington. The tariff strategy has complicated America's alliance relationships in ways that may prove counterproductive. While Trump initially announced blanket 25% tariffs on Japan, South Korea and India, the reality proved more complex. Japan and South Korea, after tense negotiations, accepted modified terms that reduced their tariffs to 15%—still roughly five times their pre-2025 levels. In exchange, they secured limited export quotas and investment commitments. Only India continues to face the full 25% tariff, which has drawn sharp diplomatic protests from New Delhi. The result is a fractured alliance structure where partners comply not from confidence in American leadership, but from a desire to limit damage. As one South Korean policy analyst noted, these were 'acts of damage control' rather than expressions of trust in US strategy. This approach has created new openings for Chinese influence. While Tokyo and Seoul haven't abandoned their US alliances, China can now offer more attractive economic incentives for regional cooperation. Beijing's pitch doesn't require ideological alignment—just pragmatic engagement that appears more stable than Washington's increasingly transactional approach. Rather than turning allies into adversaries, the tariffs have made Chinese alternatives harder to dismiss and positioned the US as the less reliable partner. The broader risk is that short-term tariff compliance masks a longer-term drift toward the kind of China-centric regional order that US policy until now has aimed to prevent. While Washington strains relationships with partners, Beijing has moved decisively to capitalize on the shifting dynamics. China's response has been multifaceted, targeting areas where US policy creates vulnerabilities. In clean energy technology, China has accelerated its dominance precisely as the US reduces support for renewable initiatives. China added 429 GW of new power generation capacity in 2024—86% from renewables—reaching 1.9 TW of total renewable capacity. Combined with over $85 billion in power grid investments, this positions China to lead the next phase of global energy transition while the US focuses inward. China has also expanded its engagement with the Global South as US tariffs strain relationships with developing nations. In May 2025, President Xi Jinping offered Latin American and Caribbean leaders a $9 billion investment credit line, building on China's position as South America's largest trading partner. Twenty-two Latin American countries have now joined Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative, while China's systematic engagement across Africa continues to deepen through infrastructure investment and mineral supply partnerships. Perhaps most significantly, China has leveraged US industry's continued dependence on Chinese supply chains—particularly in rare earths and critical minerals—to secure strategic concessions even as Washington escalates trade pressure. This dependency limits how far the US can push confrontation while giving Beijing leverage in key sectors. The evidence suggests that Trump's tariff strategy, while generating short-term revenue and compliance, may be producing outcomes contrary to its stated objectives. US consumers and businesses absorb higher costs while traditional allies manage around American volatility rather than embracing American leadership. Meanwhile, China advances in strategic technologies, deepens partnerships across the developing world and positions itself as a more predictable partner. The fundamental challenge is that economic coercion, while sometimes effective in securing immediate concessions, can weaken the foundation of influence it aims to restore. If current trends continue, the tariff regime risks accelerating the very shift toward Chinese centrality in the global economy that it was designed to prevent. The question facing policymakers is whether the tactical gains from tariffs justify the strategic risks they appear to create—and whether alternative approaches might better serve America's long-term competitive position. Y Tony Yang is an endowed professor and associate dean at the George Washington University in Washington, DC.
RTHK
5 hours ago
- RTHK
Trump signals tariffs for pharma, chips
Trump signals tariffs for pharma, chips Donald Trump said tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals could ultimately reach 250 percent. Photo: Reuters US President Donald Trump has signalled that fresh tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals and semiconductors could be unveiled within the coming week, amid a cascade of incoming duties. Governments around the world are bracing as new waves of US tariffs are due to take effect this week, first on many Brazilian products on Wednesday and then on dozens of other economies a day later. Trump's sweeping plans have sparked a flurry of activity as leaders seek to avert the worst of his threats, with Swiss officials heading to Washington on Tuesday in a last-minute push to avoid punitive duties. But the US president appears set to widen his trade wars. Trump told CNBC that upcoming tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals could reach 250 percent, while adding that he plans for new duties on foreign semiconductors soon. "We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150 percent," Trump said. "And then it's going to go to 250 percent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country." Trump also said that Washington will be announcing tariffs "within the next week or so." He added: "We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips." Trump has set out varying tariff rates for dozens of economies after imposing a 10-percent levy on almost all trading partners in April. But these broad duties taking effect Thursday exclude products like pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminium and lumber, which are being separately targeted by sector. This means that although the 39-percent tariff Swiss leaders seek to avoid come Thursday excludes pharmaceuticals, Trump's plans for a steep levy on such imports will likely remain a point of contention in any talks. Pharmaceuticals represented 60 percent of Swiss goods exports to the United States last year. Outside of Switzerland, most products from the European Union face a 15 percent tariff starting on Thursday, after Washington and Brussels struck a deal to avoid higher levies. But Trump warned Tuesday that the EU could see its tariff level surge again if it did not fulfil obligations under their recent pact. Some imports from Canada are also targeted by tariffs, although Prime Minister Mark Carney stressed Tuesday that more than 85 percent of trade between the North American neighbours remains tariff-free under existing exemptions. Besides probing pharmaceuticals and chips imports, Trump has already imposed steep duties of 50 percent on steel and aluminium, alongside lower levies on autos and parts. In the same CNBC interview Tuesday, Trump said he expects to raise the US tariff on Indian imports "very substantially over the next 24 hours" due to the country's purchases of Russian oil. His pressure on India comes after signaling fresh sanctions on Moscow if it did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Kyiv. US envoy Steve Witkoff will meet on Wednesday with Russian leadership in Moscow. (AFP)
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump-led Texas redistricting gambit ignites national arms race to control US Congress
The escalating political fight over the Texas congressional map is spreading across other states across the country, triggering an unprecedented mid-decade redistricting arms race with the balance of power in Washington at stake. At President Donald Trump's urging, Texas Republicans have proposed new congressional districts aimed at flipping five Democrat-held US House seats in next year's midterm elections, further skewing what is already considered a deeply partisan map in that state. In response, Democratic governors elsewhere – most notably Gavin Newsom of California, the only state with more congressional districts than Texas – have threatened to retaliate by mounting their own redistricting efforts. 'Donald Trump is a cheater, and so is Governor Greg Abbott,' JB Pritzker, the Democratic governor of Illinois, told reporters on Tuesday. Standing alongside him were several of the Democratic lawmakers from Texas who fled their home state on Monday to deny Republicans a quorum and prevent a vote on the proposed new map. 'As far as I'm concerned, everything is on the table,' Pritzker said.\ Illinois Governor JB Pritzker speaks during a news conference held by Texas Democratic lawmakers in Aurora, Illinois, on Tuesday. Photo: Reuters Democrats need to flip only three Republican-held seats to retake the majority in the 435-seat House next year, so even modest gains for either party via redistricting could prove decisive. If Democrats win the House, they could stymie much of Trump's legislative agenda and pursue multiple investigations into his administration.
