Baku energy talks strengthen EU–Azerbaijan partnership on gas and long-term energy security
Baku hosted the 11th Southern Gas Corridor and 3rd Green Energy Advisory Councils, uniting officials from 24 countries.
The EU and Azerbaijan reinforced energy ties, with discussions on renewables, hydrogen, and emissions reduction. Over 25 billion cubic metres of Azerbaijani gas was delivered last year, with a growing share reaching EU markets.
Bulgaria announced work on the Vertical Gas Corridor, while Masdar confirmed $1.2 billion in renewable investments. A new memorandum signed by Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan supports the Caspian Green Energy Corridor, aiming to boost cross-border electricity trade and accelerate clean energy transition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
20 minutes ago
- Euronews
Will the EU budget turn cohesion policy into regional 'Hunger Games'?
The EU's proposed budget for 2028 until 2034 runs the risk of turning its cohesion policy into a competition for funding, as it would merge it with other major spending areas. There are now concerns over reduced local control and lack of support for disadvantaged regions. For decades, cohesion funds have helped reduce regional disparities across the EU, supporting everything from road construction and hospital upgrades to unemployment, training programmes and green initiatives. As one of the EU's most tangible policy tools, cohesion funding has delivered visible results in citizens' daily lives — but that may be about to change. This week, the European Commission unveiled its proposed EU long-term budget — the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2028–2034 — which could fundamentally reshape how cohesion policy works, while also potentially marking the end of the system as we know it. Under the new proposal, cohesion policy would be absorbed into a single mega-fund, combining it with other major spending areas such as agriculture, rural development, migration and border control. The stated aim? Simplification. But critics warn this approach could ignite intense competition among regions, sectors and interest groups. 'Putting agriculture, migration, border control, and cohesion policy into one container will turn it into a 'Hunger Games',' said Kata Tüttő, President of the European Committee of the Regions, in an interview with Euronews. She warned that the new structure risks pitting farmers against city mayors, and those in need of agricultural support with those seeking unemployment support, for example. Fears of fragmentation and lost priorities Out of the total proposed €2 trillion budget, €865 billion would be allocated to this consolidated fund, which merges long-standing programs like the EU's Common Agricultural Policy, cohesion funds (accounting for two-thirds of the current EU budget) and the European Social Fund, which supports employment and education. The competition between different lines in the single fund has raised alarm bells among regional leaders, who fear cohesion funding may be deprioritised in the budget negotiations. According to the Commission, €450 billion of the merged fund would still go toward regional development, fisheries and rural areas. Additionally, the proposal includes a minimum allocation of €218 billion specifically earmarked for less developed regions, one of the three traditional pillars of cohesion funding — with the others being developing and developed regions. While this minimum allocation offers a safeguard for the EU's most disadvantaged areas, the remaining categories could face fluctuating support, as they are not ringfenced under the new plan. Centralisation vs. local engagement Beyond the battle for funding, critics have also voiced concerns regarding governance. The proposed delivery model marks a shift away from the EU's tradition of shared management with local and regional authorities. Tüttő sees the move as a clear case of centralisation: 'We will be kicked out from the design, the management and the creation parts of the policy. We will just become implementers, fighting for money,' she said. With many aspects of the proposal still unclear, the coming months will be critical. Local governments across the EU are calling for more involvement in the process — and potentially a rethinking of the proposal before the budget is finalised. 'This is a proposal from the European Commission — it is not the final step, but a starting point,' said Raffaele Fitto, Executive Vice-President for cohesion, while presenting the budget. He added, however, that the EU budget needs more flexibility to respond to evolving challenges.
France 24
20 minutes ago
- France 24
EU encourages sustainable journeys by rail: Are trains the future of travel?
Europe 12:07 From the show The EU is aiming to double high-speed rail traffic by 2030 and triple it by 2050. But harmonising rail networks across the continent is easier said than done. While some cross-border routes have opened in 2025, other projects have been hampered by a lack of infrastructure or investment, as well as vested interests in the EU member states. Our panelists discuss what it would take to change this situation – rail travel being a component of the EU 's stated goal of becoming climate-neutral by 2050.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
EU countries begin political battle over €2 trillion budget
The political battle over Ursula von der Leyen's proposed €2 trillion budget for the European Union began in earnest on Friday as ministers for European affairs met in Brussels, with initial criticism focused on the size of the ambitious proposal. Von der Leyen's plan, unveiled on Wenesday after weeks of mounting speculation, will require unanimity from the 27 member states. The president of the European Commission called it the "most ambitious" budget ever presented. "No country is ready to accept the budget as it is today," said Marie Bjerre, Denmark's minister, at the end of the meeting. As the rotating presidency of the EU Council, Denmark will steer the debate until the end of the year. "This is a long discussion we will have, and obviously, there are different views on how to structure the budget, and it will also be difficult. But Europe needs a budget," she said. Long-standing tensions between fiscally conservative countries such as Austria, Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands, and more indebted southern nations, like Spain and France, resurfaced on Friday, offering a preview of the squabble to come. Finland's Minister for European Affairs, Joakim Strand, argued the budget level — which has increased from 1.13% of the EU's GNI to 1.26% — was "too high" and must be slashed. The Commission says the figure is 1.15% after subtracting 0.11% from the €168 billion needed to repay the COVID-era debt between 2028 and 2034. Austria's Claudia Plakolm, whose country joined the Frugal Four in the 2020 talks, said the proposed budget was "very, very far" from a position she could endorse. "We called for the careful and wise use of Europeans' tax money, and this draft is neither more careful nor wise," she said. "We find the volume of the EU budget excessive." Her Polish counterpart, Adam Szlapka, praised von der Leyen's proposal for its ambition and scope, but cautioned: "We still need some discussion about it, especially in terms of cohesion and common agricultural policy." Agricultural subsidies and cohesion funds — aimed at narrowing the socio-economic gap between the richest and poorest regions — have been merged into a larger pot, with important changes in how they are managed and distributed, as Euronews reported. Spain's Fernando Sampedro voiced a discordant note, saying the €2 trillion size "does not measure up to the challenges" facing the bloc. 'We appreciate that security and defence are treated as a European public good that requires a strong response from the Union, but this should not be at the expense of other European public goods such as the triple green, digital and social transition, cohesion policy and other important areas of the budget that will require attention,' Sampedro said. The long-term budget — formally known as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) — is funded through two main channels: national contributions from member states, which cover the bulk, and so-called own resources, which are EU-wide taxes. In her proposal, von der Leyen has suggested boosting the existing pool of own resources with three new taxes on electronic waste (e-waste), tobacco products and companies with an annual turnover above €100 million, together with the Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the Carbon Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). In total, Brussels expects to raise about €58.5 billion every year through old and new own resources, which would be enough to cover the COVID-era repayments without asking member states for extra cash or sacrificing strategic programmes. Governments have traditionally opposed boosting the Commission's ability to collect revenue independently, however, and von der Leyen's last proposal to modernise the EU's own resources is still on the table and in limbo. Nordic countries like Sweden and Finland have already voiced their opposition to new taxes, while Germany has firmly rejected the idea of issuing new common debt. "We do not see the need for new own resources or new common borrowing. There is no such thing as a free lunch," said Jessica Rosencrantz, Sweden's representative. "In a time where national budgets are under great economic pressure, the answer can't be more money and a bigger budget. It has to be about responsible handling of limited resources, about making priorities and tough calls," she added. But the French Minister for European Affairs disagreed and called the introduction of new own resources a condition "sine qua non" for supporting strategic priorities. At the end of the meeting, Piotr Serafin, the European Commissioner for Budget, defended the proposal against the first chorus of criticism. "We understand it is not the time to call for higher contributions from the member states to the European budget," Serafin said in response to a question from Euronews. "That is the only way to square the circle of being more effective, more ambitious with respect to financing new priorities is therefore an ambitious own resources package." Serafin acknowledged the concerns among ministers but noted the discussions were still in "very early stages" and required "a lot" of technical work before developing at the political level of ministers and, ultimately, leaders. "Europe is in a crucial time, and it seemed to me that we are all very well aware of that," said Denmark's Marie Bjerre, speaking next to Serafin. "The state of play for Europe is different. We need a stronger Europe. We need to be more ambitious, and I think that is something we can agree on." The Danish presidency intends to finalise a "nego-box" by the end of the year, laying out the core principles on which the negotiations will follow over the next two years.
