Can lab-made blood make up for global shortages? – DW – 06/13/2025
Blood reserves are in short supply around the world. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), blood donation services in many countries are simply unable to meet demands for collecting and storing healthy blood. Germany's Red Cross (DRK) estimates that some 112 million annual donations are required to cover the need. The DRK adds that one blood donation can be enough to help up to three injured or extremely ill patients.
Blood donations, however, vary greatly according to national wealth, with 40% of 118.5 million annual donations coming from high-income countries that make up only 16% of the world's population.
Yet, even wealthy countries constantly need to draw from and replenish their blood banks. Germany alone uses some 15,000 units of blood each day. Often, even promises of money, gifts or vouchers are not enough to encourage donor participation.
Animal blood not (yet) an alternative
Although animal blood could theoretically be used in human transfusions if successfully altered with the use of gene-editing technology, the impediments to getting there are incredibly complex. Animal blood cells are significantly different from human blood cells, especially regarding surface structure.
The human immune system would immediately recognize non-altered animal blood cells as foreign and reject them. That is why all immune-related antigens would have to be removed or human antigens added, a highly complicated procedure. These issues have rendered the potential use of animal blood for human transfusions unrealistic in the near future.
The quest to create a new, universal blood type
At the moment, different approaches to finding a solution to blood shortages are being taken by scientists around the world. Researchers have, for instance, altered blood stem cells, also known as hematopoietic stem cells or HSCs, in ways that allow them to transport more oxygen. They have developed enzymes to neutralize blood type, doing away with the problem of compatibility. Artificial, longer-lasting red blood cells are being developed, too.
But the promise of blood substitutes also comes with considerable risk. Such blood can trigger potentially deadly anaphylactic reactions when, for example, the immune system recognizes foreign enzymes or elements contained in artificial blood. Any such blood substitute must replicate all of the functions of biological blood and be universally compatible — similar to naturally occurring Type O blood, which is considered a "universal donor" type.
What is your blood made of? Where is it formed?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The most promising research approaches so far
Several methods for producing lab-made blood are nearly ready for use; others need more trials, including human testing, to ensure such new blood products are safe. Here, a list of five top prospects:
1. Genetically modifying red blood cells
Researchers at Stanford University and the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) have used CRISPR gene-editing technology to develop a new method for altering bone marrow stem cells in a way that increases their production of hemoglobin in red blood cells, allowing these to carry more oxygen.
So far, returns have been modest when compared to biological blood, with researchers only producing roughly 1% of the hemoglobin that a donor would. Still, when the team's trial was completed with no complications or side-effects to participants, it was celebrated as a medical breakthrough.
2. Neutralizing blood type with gut bacteria enzymes
In Denmark and Sweden, scientists have found an enzyme in intestinal bacteria that can remove particular elements from blood cells, namely the ABO blood type antigens that determine the different biological blood groups, among them A and B. When these determiners are removed, blood cells become Type O, meaning they can be used for almost every possible patient.
Still, until now scientists have been unable to remove the determiners in their entirety, leaving small traces behind and thus posing a risk of allergic reaction in some individuals. Another major hurdle is the removal of the so-called rhesus factor — a surface protein key in determining blood compatibility.
3. Nano RBCs: Microscopic artificial blood cells
Researchers at Penn State University in the US are currently producing tiny, artificial red blood cells (RBC) that function just like the real thing. Although nano-RBCs are only one-tenth the size of normal blood cells they can transport just as much oxygen. These little cells are extremely flexible and can even move through small blood vessels. They would also seem ideally suited for emergency situations and natural catastrophes as they can be stored at room temperature for long periods of time.
4. Military application for enhanced performance
The US military is backing research that loads up red blood cells with special nanoparticles. The Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, is creating what it calls a "Red Blood Cell Factory" that will help soldiers cope with lack of oxygen at altitude, in extreme heat or cold, and when affected by pathogens or endemic illnesses such as malaria. China is reportedly conducting similar research.
5. Using blood banks to create a universal donor blood
Researchers at Japan's Nara Medical University began testing artificial hemoglobin in humans in March 2025. Scientists there are harvesting hemoglobin from unused blood bank reserves. They are efficient in transporting oxygen and can be used with any blood type. Initial data was published in the June issue of the Journal of Artificial Organs. The report said that some test persons developed a slight fever but that the results were so promising that researchers are hoping to make the method available for use by 2030.
All of these approaches are being pursued at great pace. Yet, it will still be years before safe artificial blood can be produced at scale.
Until then, human blood donations remain essential for transfusions to continue.
This article was originally written in German and translated by Jon Shelton.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
20 hours ago
- DW
Fake medication is a problem across the world – DW – 07/31/2025
Demand for drugs, including weight-loss injections, is sending people to dangerous places to get their medicine. But spotting dodgy marketplaces is not easy. Amid rising demand for popular medications, experts and industry groups are concerned that regulators may not be able to keep pace with the speed of counterfeiters. "A doctor simply writes down the prescription. They don't care where the patient buys the drug," said Saifuddin Ahmed, a public health practitioner and epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University in the US. "It is critically important that a healthcare provider should be engaged. The [regulators are] not enough," Ahmed told DW. Nowhere else is the challenge more obvious than with the huge demand for products like Wegovy and Zepbound. They contain active compounds called semaglutide or tirzepatide, which were originally designed to treat type 2 diabetes. But these drugs were found to have a side effect that triggered substantial, sustained weight loss. Demand rose from people wanting to lose weight, and that caused a shortage. Fakes have filled the gap. Drug counterfeiting is a major global problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 1 in 10 pharmaceuticals are fakes that carry no guarantee of any health benefits. While this is mainly in low-and-middle income countries, especially parts of Africa and Asia, around 1% of people in high-income nations also obtain medication from unregulated sources. In some cases, these drugs may have no effect. In other cases, however, ingredients in the fake may lead to adverse reactions or create new health problems. "Purchasing medicine online from unregulated, unlicensed sources can expose patients to potentially unsafe products that have not undergone appropriate evaluation or approval, or do not meet quality standards," said the US regulator, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2023, when it issued its first warnings about the problem. In 2024, the WHO issued a global warning that batches of fake Ozempic were flooding the black market. More recently, in July 2025, data from the UK National Pharmacy Association found 1 in 5 Britons had attempted to obtain weight loss treatments in the previous year. It warned that the high demand for these medicines carried the risk that people would "resort to unregulated online suppliers instead of regulated pharmacies." Unregulated pharmaceuticals are being sold via online-only pharmacies, international drug shopping and organized criminal distributors. These digital marketplaces are not online stores for established pharmacies, but sites that seemingly offer medicine at a fraction of the usual cost. The drugs may look identical to genuine medicines online, but when delivered often have spelling errors on the packet or incorrect ingredient listings. But it's not only fake drugs or placebos. Regulators have raised concern about compounding, where medicines that have been approved individually can be formulated to produce non-regulated "compounds" for individual patients. In some regions of the world, including the US, trained pharmacists are allowed to compound medicines, but even then, the practice is less regulated than the stringent approvals that drug manufacturers must meet to bring their products to market. For example, when the FDA temporarily allowed the compounding of weight loss drugs to address a product shortage, some pharmacists used semaglutide salts — which are not approved by regulators — instead of semaglutide itself. This led to reports of side effects. And it was not just trained compounding pharmacies that were formulating these products in the US. Ahmed said, "this is done in [places] like gymnasiums and spas." The FDA has now stopped allowing compounded versions of these weight loss drugs, but it is concerned that unregulated online pharmacies are still making substandard products available. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video To address concerns that consumers may seek unsafe products from unregulated sources, the FDA operates a campaign called BeSafeRx that provides guidance for consumers to identify genuine pharmaceuticals. In the European Union, safety features on medicines are mandated, and include standardized labelling practices. In a statement provided to DW, the European Medicines Agency said "patients should only use online retailers registered with the national competent authorities in the EU Member States, to reduce the risk of buying substandard or falsified medicines." Europol, which is responsible for law enforcement for pharmaceutical crime across member states, has coordinated regular actions across the bloc in collaboration with US and Colombian partners. In a 2023 operation, more than 1,284 people were charged for offenses related to the trafficking of counterfeit and misused medicines and doping substances. As well as local awareness campaigns and enforcement initiatives, the key measure, Ahmed said, was to help improve awareness between patients and their health practitioners. Ahmed heads the Johns Hopkins University's BESAFE initiative, which investigates risks and interventions to prevent the uptake of substandard and counterfeit medication. Surveys undertaken by BESAFE have found that within the US and South Africa, awareness of where to safely buy prescriptions and report fakes or adverse events is low. He said building trust between consumers, medical practitioners and regulators may help avoid the risks of counterfeit and unregulated drug purchases.
DW
a day ago
- DW
Can Australia's youth social media ban work? – DW – 07/31/2025
Australia is implementing a social media blackout for children under 16 to arrest a growing mental health crisis. But is a ban the best way to help young digital natives? When Australia's government decided to implement a world-first national youth social media ban, it was pitched as an antidote to a growing mental health crisis. It followed intense debate about the dangers of social media, much articulated in the book, "The Anxious Generation," by Jonathan Haidt. The American social psychologist argues that smartphone-based childhoods and social media is helping to fuel an epidemic of mental illness among teenagers. As the ban was passed in the Australian Parliament in November 2024, one poll revealed overwhelming support among 77% of Australians. The plan to fine TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X, Instagram, and now YouTube, 49.5 million Australian dollars (€27.7 million, $32.3 million) for failing to block young people was supported by 87% of those surveyed. Underage social media users and their parents will not be punished for any violations under the law. Social media companies, including Elon Musk's X, were predictably unimpressed with a ban that many concede will also be difficult to police. "It's entirely likely the ban could see young people pushed to darker corners of the internet where no community guidelines, safety tools, or protections exist," said a TikTok spokesperson when the bill was passed. The Australian social media ban partly seeks to protect young people from the cyberbullying, disinformation and illegal content that has riddled social media platforms. But some experts doubt whether prohibition is an antidote to deteriorating youth mental health. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Marilyn Campbell, a professor in the school of Early Childhood and Inclusive Education at the Queensland University of Technology who writes on cyberbullying, warns that there is little research that actually establishes a "causal" connection between social media and psychological health. "We know that there's a high correlation between the rise of new technologies and the increase in young people's poorer mental health," she said. "But we don't even know why yet." One 2023 study sampling social media use in 72 countries found "no evidence suggesting that the global penetration of social media is associated with widespread psychological harm." Even though populist psychology works like "The Anxious Generation" merely draw a correlation between rising youth anxiety and depression and social media use, they have been heavily hyped in the media, Campbell noted. Building on the popularity of these ideas, the government is now pursuing a "nice, simple solution," she told DW. "You don't have to spend any money on it," she said of the ban. "It's not complicated." Researchers at the University of Queensland note that the limited understanding of social media impacts on young people's mental health means that other influences need to be considered such as rising "social inequity," "climate anxiety" and "gendered violence." Instead of focusing on social media, governments need to "reform the mental health system," Campbell suggested, adding that "many more school counselors and school psychologists" would help. "There's lots of things that they could do but that costs money," she added. "We know that social media is doing social harm, and my Government and this Parliament is prepared to take action to protect young Australians," said Australian Prime Minsiter on Wednesday when announcing that YouTube would be added to the list of banned platforms after initially being left out. But social media can also be positive for young people, said Campbell. Writing for magazine in January, she noted that young people with autism or who are "exploring their sexual and gender identity" can sometimes more easily identify with peers online than in their physical locality. She added that like the prohibition of alcohol in the US, a ban just forces the problem underground. Youth also need to be prepared to live in a "technologically-saturated world," the professor told DW. "We are not doing them any favors by saying, well, you can't be in this world until you're 16." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Australian ban will not come into effect until this December, however trials are underway to address the complex task of enforcing the social media blackout. Platforms won't be allowed to compel users to provide government-issued ID or digital identification, but need to provide "alternative age assurance methods" to confirm the age of social media account holders. One recent study showed that some 80% of people surveyed are concerned about the accuracy of age assurance technologies, and potential data privacy breaches. Some 77% of German respondents to a 2024 poll also said they would either "fully" or "somewhat" support an Australia-like social media ban. An even higher percentage — 82% — were "absolutely certain" or "somewhat certain" that social media use is in some way bad for children and teenagers. Several US states are also limiting access to social media, including ensuring greater parental guidance over social media usage. For decades now, the US has required tech companies to seek parental consent to access the data of users under 13. Sweden too is looking to ban access to smartphones in schools due to worries about a decline in both mental and physical health. In 2024, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy suggested that warning labels be added to social media platforms akin to warnings on cigarettes and alcohol. This came after a Surgeon General report found some positives with social media use such as "community and connection with others who share identities, abilities and interests," but also "symptoms of depression and anxiety" among adolescents spending 3-plus hours a day on social platforms. Marilyn Campbell reiterated that social media apps should not be banned, but designed to encourage safer interaction with young people. "I think that children need to be educated to live in the digital world," she said.
DW
2 days ago
- DW
US, India launch satellite to track Earth's surface – DW – 07/30/2025
The "first of its kind" satellite will map the Earth's surface in incredible detail. Mission officials say it will help us better understand areas at risk of earthquakes. The US space administration NASA and the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) together launched an Earth-mapping satellite Wednesday. The NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR) satellite is designed to track even the tiniest of changes in the Earth's surface. The goal of the $1.3 billion (€1.14 billion) mission is to help understand what leads to both manmade and natural disasters, such as floods, landslides and volcanic eruptions. NISAR launched at 12:10 GMT from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre on the southeastern coast of India. "Congratulations India!" India's minister of science and technology, Jitendra Singh, posted on X once the satellite safely reached orbit. Now in orbit around Earth's poles, NISAR has got a busy 3 years ahead of itself. While 747 kilometers (464 miles) high, observing melting glaciers and polar ice sheets are among the satellite's research goals. NISAR will measure the Earth's surface twice every 12 days, observing shifts as small as 1 centimeter (0.4 inches). The satellite won't be able to predict the next earthquake but "it will help us better understand which areas of the world are most susceptible to significant earthquakes," the mission's geoscience lead, Mark Simons, said in a statement on NASA's website. "We'll see land substance and swelling, movement, deformation and melting of mountain glaciers and ice sheets covering both Greenland and Antarctica, and, of course, we'll see wildfires," added Karen St Germain, director of NASA's Earth Science division. She called NISAR "the most sophisticated radar we've ever built." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video NISAR is the world's first radar imaging satellite to use two radar frequencies. The so-called L-band radar is provided by NASA, and the S-band radar was developed by ISRO. These radars operate around the clock to capture Earth in extreme detail and can reportedly capture measurements regardless of weather conditions. The two radars will beam signals down to Earth. When these signals bounce back, the satellite will receive them via its huge antenna reflector. Scientists will then compare the incoming and outgoing signals as the satellite passes over the same location. "The potential applications from the satellite are huge, and the global scientific community is eagerly awaiting the satellite data," ISRO Chairman V. Narayanan said after the launch. "It is not going to be used by one or two countries. The entire globe is going to benefit from this great accomplishment," he said. NASA Deputy Associate Administrator Casey Swails said the satellite "really shows the world what our two nations can do." The launch marks the biggest space collaboration between the United States and India. NASA contributed $1.2 billion for the low-frequency radar and reflector, while ISRO contributed $91 million for the higher-frequency radar and main satellite structure. India's space program has seen a boost in recent years. In 2014, it placed a probe in Mars orbit and, in 2023, it landed a rover on the Moon. Shubhanshu Shukla recently became the first Indian to reach the International Space Station.
