Disorder breaks out at New Jersey immigration detention center
Much is still unclear about what unfolded at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark, where Immigrations and Customs Enforcement opened a 1,000-bed facility this year as part of President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration.
Photos and video from outside the facility Thursday show protesters pushing against the gates amid word that detainees inside were upset about delayed meals.
Amy Torres, executive director of New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, said some officers sprayed pepper spray and tackled and dragged protesters away from the facility. She said some protesters had minor injuries, but no one was hit by the vehicles.
An attorney for someone detained at the facility told told NJ.com that people inside became violent after meals were delayed.
'It's about the food, and some of the detainees were getting aggressive and it turned violent,' attorney Mustafa Cetin said. 'Based on what he told me it was an outer wall, not very strong, and they were able to push it down.' Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, a Democrat who's been critical of Trump's immigration crackdown, early Friday called for an end to this 'chaos and not allow this operation to continue unchecked.' 'We are concerned about reports of what has transpired at Delaney Hall this evening, ranging from withholding food and poor treatment, to uprising and escaped detainees,' he said.
It's unclear whether there have been any escapes.
Messages seeking comment were left with ICE, the Department of Homeland Security and local police.
Delaney Hall has been the cite of clashes this year between Democratic officials who say the facility needs more oversight and the administration and those who run the facility.
Baraka was arrested May 9 , handcuffed and charged with trespassing. The charge was later dropped and Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver was later charged with assaulting federal officers stemming from a skirmish that happened outside the facility. She has denied the charges said she was doing her job as a lawmaker conducting oversight. (AP)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump attacks Charlamagne Tha God after radio host criticizes his presidency
WASHINGTON (AP) — US President Donald Trump on Sunday lashed out at radio host Charlamagne Tha God, saying in a social media post that the popular broadcaster "knows nothing about me or what I have done." Trump's comments came a day after Charlamagne, whose real name is Lenard McKelvey, criticized Trump on the Fox News show "My View with Lara Trump." The show is hosted by the president's daughter-in-law, a former co-chair of the Republican National Committee. Asked how he would rate Trump's presidency, the radio host said, "I wouldn't give it a good rating simply because the least of us are still being impacted the worst." Trump said on Truth Social that Charlamagne was a "dope" who voted for Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris. Charlamagne said he personally will benefit from tax breaks approved in Trump's tax-and-spending law, but said, "There's going to be so many people that's hurt by that bill." "Anything that takes away Medicaid from people and will put people in a worse financial situation than they were previously in, I'm not for," he added. Charlamagne also predicted that "traditional conservatives" are going to take back the Republican Party from Trump's Make America Great Again movement, citing controversy over Trump's refusal to release files related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. "I think there's a political coup going on right now in the Republican Party that people aren't paying attention to," Charlamagne said. "I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back. I really do. I think that they know this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up, the MAGA base isn't letting this issue go and for the first time they can probably take their party back and not piss off the MAGA base. I think they're going to do that." The Epstein case has dominated news coverage in recent weeks after the Justice Department said it will not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision has infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Officials have said Epstein killed himself in his New York jail cell while awaiting trial in 2019, but his case has generated endless attention and conspiracy theories because of his links to famous people, including Trump and other billionaires. Trump on social media called Charlamagne a "racist sleazebag" and criticized his use of God in his professional nickname. "Can anyone imagine the uproar there would be if I used that nickname?" Trump asked. Charlamagne, who co-hosts a nationally syndicated radio show, "The Breakfast Club," told Lara Trump that his criticism of the Republican president was not new, adding that he "gave President Biden the same hell" when he didn't think the Democrat was doing a good job.
![[Yoo Choon-sik] What South Korea must see beyond US tariff deal](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F03%2Fnews-p.v1.20250803.f9e738156c1f4c549ebb73d1191ea6b4_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
19 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Yoo Choon-sik] What South Korea must see beyond US tariff deal
South Korea's last-minute trade agreement with the United States — concluded just under two days before the deadline — has dominated headlines and conversations both domestically and internationally. The attention is understandable. Since the beginning of President Donald Trump's second term earlier this year, US tariff policy has emerged as one of the most destabilizing forces in the global economy. For South Korea — a country that relies heavily on manufacturing and exports — the stakes could not have been more critical. The agreement sets US tariffs on most South Korean exports at 15 percent, a significant reduction from the initially proposed 25 percent. As part of the broader deal, South Korea has committed to investing $350 billion in the United States, including a $150 billion shipbuilding fund. The remaining $200 billion will be funneled into strategic sectors including semiconductors, nuclear energy, secondary batteries and biotechnology. While further details are expected to be revealed at the forthcoming summit between the two nations' leaders, the contours of this investment commitment already signal a recalibration in South Korea's trade and industrial strategy. President Lee Jae Myung rightly hailed the deal as both a diplomatic and economic achievement. It not only lowers tariff burdens, but also removes a significant source of uncertainty. Yet while South Korea's export-led model has been the backbone of its 'economic miracle' over the past half-century, it leaves the country acutely vulnerable to shifts in global trade dynamics and foreign policy. In stark contrast to the robust manufacturing sector, South Korea's domestic service industries remain underdeveloped. Their contribution to national gross domestic product and employment continues to lag behind those of service sectors in most other advanced economies. A vibrant service sector provides a buffer against external shocks, encourages inclusive employment, enhances human development and supports long-term economic resilience. For countries like South Korea that aim for both sustained prosperity and social cohesion, building a stronger domestic service economy is not just a desirable policy goal — it is a strategic necessity. A recent report by the Bank of Korea offers a timely assessment of the nation's service sector. On the surface, there has been progress. Since the 1990s, the share of manufacturing value added in nominal GDP has plateaued in the mid-to-high 20 percent range. Meanwhile, the service sector has steadily expanded, accounting for 44 percent of nominal GDP as of 2024. The share of workers in manufacturing has declined steadily since peaking at 28 percent in 1989. By contrast, the service sector now accounts for 65 percent of all employed workers in the country. Since the 1990s, services have been the main engine of job creation, and this trend shows no signs of reversing. Since the mid-1990s, however, productivity in services has consistently lagged behind that of manufacturing, with minimal improvement over time. For more than 20 years, service sector productivity has remained stuck at just 40 percent of manufacturing productivity. Making service sectors more productive This imbalance is particularly striking when compared to other manufacturing-heavy economies. Even in Japan and Germany — nations with similarly strong industrial foundations — the productivity gap between services and manufacturing is notably smaller. The Bank of Korea identifies this chronic inefficiency as one of the primary structural bottlenecks constraining South Korea's long-term growth potential. The COVID-19 pandemic has only magnified these vulnerabilities. In the wake of the global health crisis, South Korea's economic growth rate has declined sharply relative to pre-pandemic levels. The primary driver of this slowdown has been the diminished productivity of the private service sector. This has serious implications. In a world increasingly shaped by knowledge, data and digital platforms, a country's capacity to generate high-value services is becoming as important as its ability to manufacture high-quality goods. While the US tariff deal provides welcome short-term relief, it must serve as a broader catalyst for economic transformation. South Korea now stands at a pivotal moment — facing mounting structural, demographic and geopolitical challenges. A new strategy is needed, and the Bank of Korea outlines three core imperatives. South Korea must establish a comprehensive legal and institutional foundation for industrial policy that reflects the convergence of manufacturing and services. Current regulatory systems are ill-suited to accommodate hybrid sectors and emerging business models. Bold regulatory reforms are needed to create space for innovation across sectors. South Korea has an enviable repository of intellectual assets, technical know-how and operational capabilities accumulated through decades of industrial leadership. This expertise should now be redeployed into developing AI- and data-driven industrial services. Areas such as digital content, telemedicine, logistics and smart manufacturing offer fertile ground for combining South Korea's technical strengths with global service demand. The country's economy is burdened by a disproportionately high number of small-scale, often involuntarily self-employed workers. Rather than attempting to shrink this sector, the government should expand the availability of quality jobs in larger, more stable firms. At the same time, institutional and financial support for startups and business transitions must be enhanced to inject vitality into the broader economy. As South Korea's president heads off on a well-deserved summer holiday, it is a fitting moment for reflection. The successful tariff agreement with Washington offers breathing room, but it must not foster complacency. Now is the time to convert a reactive diplomatic victory into a proactive economic strategy. South Korea must shift from a narrow export-dependent model to a more balanced and resilient growth paradigm, one that fully harnesses the potential of its service sector. The agreement with the United States must be the beginning of a new chapter — one in which external pressure sparks internal reform and short-term compromise paves the way for long-term renewal. With vision, discipline and courage, South Korea can turn this moment of relief into a lasting opportunity for transformation. The country has risen to great challenges before. It can — and must — do so again.
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats
NEW DELHI (Reuters) -- India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite US President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. On top of a new 25 percent tariff on India's exports to the US, Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. But the sources said there would be no immediate changes. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions. However, during a regular press briefing Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. He has threatened 100 percent tariffs on US imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35 percent of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1 percent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters last week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 -- when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow -- due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Co., Hindustan Petroleum Co., Bharat Petroleum Co. and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Nayara Energy -- a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft, and major buyer of Russian oil -- was recently sanctioned by the EU. Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported earlyl this month.
