
Teenage girls shot near New York landmark after Pride march
The shooting occurred at approximately 10:15 p.m. outside a building close to the Greenwich Village venue.
One victim is in critical condition after being shot in the head, while the other is stable with a leg injury.
The New York Police Department is investigating the incident but has not yet determined if it is linked to the Pride march, and no suspect has been identified.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams expressed sadness over the "devastating incident" and said that police would work to bring the suspects to justice.
Two shot near historic Stonewall Inn after New York Pride march

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Six Chicago men exonerated in 1987 stabbing death of government official
A Chicago judge threw out the convictions today of six men who served a combined 124 years in prison for the 1987 stabbing death of a local government official. Attorneys for the men successfully petitioned a Cook county court to overturn the convictions based on new DNA evidence as well as allegations of misconduct by a now retired Chicago police detective linked to at least 51 other wrongful convictions. Attorneys for the six men convinced a court in 2021 to have the murder weapon – a cake knife found in the victim's apartment – tested for DNA. Those tests found DNA from an unknown person on the weapon but excluded each of the convicted men. The convictions of Fernando Gomez, Lowell Higgins-Bey, Michael McCastle, Harry Rodriguez, and brothers Gregorio and Robert Cardona, were based largely on confessions they claim were coerced when Chicago police detectives physically and psychologically abused them. 'This is a sad case. It's just a tragedy,' said Cook county judge Carol Howard, who presided over the exonerations. The men had been convicted of murdering Raymond Carvis, a 47-year-old who held several high-ranking positions within Cook county government agencies. Carvis was found with at least 19 stab wounds, including a fatal wound to his neck and head with a blow so forceful that the tip of the cake knife broke off and remained in his body. 'In a crime of this extremely physical nature, the likelihood of the perpetrator cutting themselves while handling the knife is extremely high,' attorneys for the men wrote in a court filing. Lauren Kaeseberg, an attorney representing the men, said her clients jumped at the chance to give their DNA. 'From Day One, every single one of them said, 'Test everything, there's nothing that scares us,'' she said. ''We were never in that house.'' In the hours after Carvis's murder, police seemed to be zeroing in on a suspect. Witnesses pointed to a handyman who had previously done work for Carvis and with whom he had told friends he had 'a date' with the day of his murder. The handyman was also suspected in a nearly identical murder four months earlier of another older man with whom he was allegedly romantically involved, according to court papers. The case switched gears three days later when detective Ernest Halvorsen entered the investigation. Halvorsen 'steered the investigation away' from the handyman and toward the six men, according to a legal filing by the men's attorney. 'They were forced to confess with promises of not only can you go home but they were also beaten into their confession,' Michael Oppenheimer, another attorney representing the men, said in court. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Some of the statements he collected implicated a man named Amador 'Pee Wee' Torres. But when detectives learned that Torres had an airtight alibi – he was in police custody at the time of Carvis's murder – detective Reynaldo Guevara found another man with the nickname 'Pee Wee', in this case, Gomez, to take Torres's place in the investigation. Dozens of people convicted of murders from the late 1980s through the early 2000s on Chicago's predominately Puerto Rican neighborhoods on the city's North West Side have had their convictions overturned based on claims that Guevara beat and threatened suspects and witnesses into making false identifications or confessions. An Illinois appellate court called Guevara a 'malignant blight' on the city's criminal legal system. In many of those cases, Halvorsen was his partner. The Carvis murder case is the first of the Guevara-related exonerations in which DNA testing helped overturn convictions. Defendants in those cases – most of whom spent decades in prison – have filed lawsuits against Guevara, Halvorsen and the city of Chicago. The city has paid nearly $100m in settlements and legal fees. Some legal experts estimate that these lawsuits could cost the city up to $2bn. An attorney for Guevara declined comment. The detective has repeatedly invoked his fifth amendment right to remain silent when questioned in the cases. Halvorsen died in 2020. Not all of the defendants were in court today for the exoneration. Rodriguez, who was 19 years old when arrested for Carvis's murder, died of muscular sclerosis in 2019 while in prison serving a life sentence in the case. His son, Daniel, wore a shirt with his father's picture on it to court to hear his father's name be cleared.


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Transgender woman defies Wyoming's new bathroom bill with stunt inside state's capitol building
A transgender woman defiantly violated a newly-implemented bathroom law in Wyoming - and was left stunned when nothing happened. Rihanna Kelver, 27, had been planning for months to use the women's restroom at the Wyoming State Capitol in protest of a new law that restricts people to the bathroom corresponding with their sex in public buildings. She explained to the Laramie Reporter that she saw her use of the women's bathroom at the state capitol - right next to the governor's office - as 'a pretty simple and creative direct action to either A) force litigation that could help us dismantle this policy or B) at least force the message that the policy is kind of worthless.' Kelver then traveled to Cheyenne on Tuesday, when the law went into effect, for her act of protest. 'I do not inherently believe in the state's interpretation of my identity,' she told supporters before walking into the women's room. 'Nor will I willfully be silent in the enforcement of where and how I can exist in public and who I am.' By 12.30pm, Kelver marched into the capitol and approached a Wyoming Highway Patrol officer stationed at a desk near the restrooms and announced her intention to use the bathroom, Cowboy State Daily reports. The officer did not have any issue with that, and Kelver then entered the women's room next to Gov. Mark Gordon's Office. Moments later, she exited the building via the front entrance without any issue - despite telling her supporters there was a chance she would be arrested. 'Now I don't know what I'm going to do with my evening,' Kelver admitted in the aftermath. 'I didn't really plan anything. Kept it really free.' But when addressing her supporters who had gathered outside the state capitol, Kelver said: 'This is exactly what should just be happening. 'I should have just been able to walk in and out like that,' she declared. Yet Wyoming's bathroom law does not include criminal liability for a transgender person found violating the act, unlike a similar bill in Florida. Instead, the only people who would suffer any consequences under the law if a transgender person used the bathroom of their preferred gender are the taxpayers. As written, the law gives women who encounter biological males in their bathroom at a public building - and vice versa - the authority to sue the governmental entity that oversees the facility. That governmental entity would then become liable for damages, reasonable attorneys fees and costs if it did not take 'reasonable steps' like posting signage and adopting enforcement policies. In Kelver's act of protest, however, her former English teacher, Nikki Bondurant, announced that Kelvar would be entering the women's room and made sure no one else was in there at the time of her demonstration - thereby removing any plaintiffs. 'I didn't want anyone else to get caught up in anything,' Kelver said of her decision to announce her bathroom use ahead of the protest. But some of the laws cosponsors argued she did not understand the crux of the legislation, as they hit out at her for her 'political stunt.' 'The fact that they're publicizing this and making this into something that they're trying to - I guess - get their name known [makes me] feel sad,' House Speaker Pro Tempore Jeremy Haroldson told Cowboy State Daily of Kelver. 'I believe this is just protecting spaces for our women and our girls - and that's predominantly what needs to be addressed here and highlighted here, and has nothing to do with this individual.' State Rep. Tom Kelly also called Kelver's protest a 'publicity stunt for a transgender cause' as he argued that the law seeks to honor 'objective reality,' and Rep. Joel Guggenmos said he felt sorry for Kelver. 'This whole trans issue is about getting attention since it has been glorified in certain groups in society,' he said, claiming he would prefer not to give Kelver the attention she seeks. 'I feel sorry for him actually,' Guggenmos said, purposely misgendering the protester. 'He is trying to be someone he can never become.' Still, the right-wing Wyoming Freedom Caucus took umbrage with Kelver's act of protest. It had called on the governor to use the Highway Patrol Capitol Security detail to 'defend' the new bathroom law ahead of the protest on Monday. 'It's time to show women - real women what it means to be an equality state,' the group said in a statement at the time. Following Kelver's protest, it declared that Gov. Gordon 'waved the white flag' by allowing her to use the women's bathroom. 'Wyoming deserves a leader who fights for real women,' the caucus said.


The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
A jury in San Jose, California, said on Tuesday that Google misused customers' cellphone data and must pay more than $314.6m to Android smartphone users in the state, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs. The jury agreed with the plaintiffs that Alphabet's Google was liable for sending and receiving information from the devices without permission while they were idle, causing what the lawsuit had called 'mandatory and unavoidable burdens shouldered by Android device users for Google's benefit'. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said in a statement that the company would appeal, and that the verdict 'misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices'. The plaintiffs' attorney Glen Summers said the verdict 'forcefully vindicates the merits of this case and reflects the seriousness of Google's misconduct'. The plaintiffs filed the class action in state court in 2019 on behalf of an estimated 14 million Californians. They argued that Google collected information from idle phones running its Android operating system for company uses like targeted advertising, consuming Android users' cellular data at their expense. Google told the court that no Android users were harmed by the data transfers and that users consented to them in the company's terms of service and privacy policies. Another group filed a separate lawsuit in federal court in San Jose, bringing the same claims against Google on behalf of Android users in the other 49 states. That case is scheduled for trial in April 2026.