How Israel-Iran conflict hardens North Korea's nuclear resolve
Israel vs Iran , the shock waves are being felt in Pyongyang – where
North Korea 's leaders, ever watchful, see yet another reason to cling to their nuclear arsenal.
Advertisement
While views differ on precisely how Pyongyang is reading the escalating conflict, observers are united on one point: if there is ever to be a chance of drawing North Korea back to the table for denuclearisation talks, the diplomatic door must remain ajar.
Since
Israel launched its military campaign against Iran
on June 13 , hardliners in the US Congress, Israeli officials and exiled Iranian dissidents have ramped up calls to topple Tehran's clerical leadership, arguing for the exploitation of internal unrest to unseat Supreme Leader Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei 's regime.
But in Pyongyang, observers say the lesson is viewed through a singular prism: survival.
'North Korea has always pointed to the fate of Libya's Muammar Gaddafi and Iraq's Saddam Hussein as justification for never giving up its nuclear weapons,' said Koh Yu-hwan, a professor of North Korean studies at Dongguk University.
It has learned a lesson; if you want to hold on to power, you never give up your nuclear weapons
Koh Yu-hwan, professor of North Korean studies
'It has learned a lesson; if you want to hold on to power, you never give up your nuclear weapons,' he warned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
North Korea will be ‘honourable victors' in anti-US battles, leader Kim says
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un said the country would achieve victory in 'anti-imperialist, anti-US' battles, as Pyongyang marked the 72nd anniversary of the Korean war armistice, state media reported on Sunday. At his recent visit to a war museum, Kim 'affirmed that our state and its people would surely achieve the great cause of building a rich country with a strong army and become honourable victors in the anti-imperialist, anti-US showdown,' the KCNA state news agency said. North Korea signed an armistice agreement with the United States and China on July 27, 1953, ending the fighting in the three-year war. US generals signed the agreement representing the United Nations forces that backed South Korea. North Korea calls July 27 'Victory Day' even though the armistice drew a border dividing the Korean peninsula roughly equally in area and restoring balance after the two sides had made major advances back and forth during the war. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un (centre) pays respect to fallen soldiers at the Fatherland Liberation War Martyrs' Cemetery in Pyongyang in a photo released on Sunday. Photo: KCNA/Reuters
AllAfrica
2 days ago
- AllAfrica
Sanchez's Huawei stance puts Spain in Trump's line of fire
The United States could soon impose severe consequences on Spain's Sanchez administration for advancing the claim that the use of Huawei technology in its storage system for Spanish judicial wiretaps does not pose a national security threat. The Trump administration and the US Congress have made it clear that they believe that it is in the US national interest to aggressively counter the use of Chinese hardware and software in and around the national security-sensitive infrastructure of the United States and its allies. That includes NATO and major non-NATO allies. The Trump administration, therefore, cannot give the Sanchez government a pass on its controversial decision to downplay the national security threats posed by Huawei technology in the Spanish defense, security and intelligence sector. That would not only give rise to inconsistency between policy and practice, but also lead to confusion and uncertainty. It would create the impression that the Trump administration is willing to accept strategic misalignment with US national security and foreign policy interests by US allies and partners. It is not. The Trump administration, therefore, needs to quickly decide how best to respond to the Sanchez administration. In Washington, one proposal that has been discussed is to impose targeted sanctions that restrict travel and freeze the assets of Spanish individuals and entities that are involved in corruption, organized crime, human rights violations and anticompetitive practices. They might include Spanish organizations far outside the defense industrial base. Examples include La Liga, the Galician Mafia and the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party. Another option that has been discussed is to rein in bilateral defense, security and intelligence cooperation. That could include imposing restrictions on defense trade, relocating US military forces from Spanish military bases, suspending Spain from US intelligence sharing platforms, and/or ordering a full review of the bilateral relationship between Spain and the United States – similar to what is being discussed for South Africa. All of those options would impose heavy consequences for Spanish national security and foreign policy interests. Whatever policy pathway the Trump administration ultimately pursues, there is likely to be support within the US Congress for imposing harsh consequences on the Government of Spain. The Republican Party remains relatively united in demanding strong alignment on Chinese affairs from US allies and partners. That does not exist in the case of Spain right now, and many Republican elites are unwilling to continue to settle for the status quo. This is not the Biden era. To be clear, this is a predicament of Sanchez's own making. Since inauguration, Sanchez has been playing a high-stakes game of political poker with the Trump administration. Unfortunately, he has been using the bilateral strategic partnership as collateral in this game. At some point, both sides are going to have to show their hands. That could be disastrous for the future of US-Spain relations. Before that happens, the Sanchez administration would be wise to solicit non-partisan advice from the Spanish Ministry of Defense and National Intelligence Center. If domestic politics were taken off the table, one would have to imagine that those institutions would advise Sanchez against siding with the People's Republic of China over the United States on the matter. Michael Walsh is a non-resident senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Gaza war: Netanyahu says Israel, US consider ‘alternative' options after ceasefire talks collapse
Israel and its US allies are now considering 'alternative' options to bring their hostages home from Gaza and end the rule of Hamas in the territory, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Donald Trump said on Friday, apparently calling an end to ceasefire talks. Advertisement The remarks echoed statements made overnight by US envoy Steve Witkoff after Israel and the United States pulled their delegations out of the talks in Doha, mediated by Egypt and Qatar. Witkoff said Hamas was to blame for an impasse. Netanyahu said Witkoff had got it right, and that Hamas was the obstacle to a deal. reporters at the White House on Friday that the Palestinian militant group was unwilling to negotiate a ceasefire and hostage release in Gaza. The proposed ceasefire would have lasted 60 days, during which additional aid would be allowed into Gaza, and some of the remaining 50 hostages held by militants there would be freed in return for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu said stalled Gaza ceasefire talks have prompted Israel and the US to eye 'alternative' options to free hostages and end Hamas rule. Photo: dpa Meanwhile, Israel will allow foreign countries to parachute aid into Gaza starting on Friday, Israeli army radio quoted a military official as saying.
