EU Opens New Probe Into TikTok Data Transfer To China
TikTok was fined 530 million euros ($620 million) in May by the Data Protection Commission over sending personal data to China, though the Chinese social media giant had insisted this data was only accessed remotely.
The DPC on Thursday said it had been informed by TikTok in April that "limited EEA user data had in fact been stored on servers in China," then deleted, contrary to evidence previously presented by the company.
The watchdog said it had expressed "deep concern" in its previous investigation that "TikTok had submitted inaccurate information".
TikTok plans to appeal the May fine -- the second largest ever imposed by the DPC.
The social media giant has been in the crosshairs of Western governments for years over fears personal data could be used by China for espionage or propaganda purposes.
But TikTok has insisted that it has never received any requests from Chinese authorities for European users' data.
TikTok, which has 1.5 billion users worldwide, is a division of Chinese tech giant ByteDance.
But since it has its European headquarters in Ireland, the Irish authority is the lead regulator in Europe for the social platform -- as well as others such as Google, Meta and Apple.
The DPC is tasked with ensuring companies comply with the EU's strict General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), launched in 2018 to protect European consumers from personal data breaches.
Its latest probe against the Chinese-owned giant will determine "whether TikTok has complied with its relevant obligations" to comply with the GDPR.
The data protection watchdog has imposed a number of massive fines against tech companies as the EU seeks to rein in big tech firms over privacy, competition, disinformation and taxation.
For years, TikTok promoted its data protection policies. It made much of what it called Project Clover, a plan to invest 12 billion euros (currently $14 billion) in European data security over 10 years, from 2023 onwards.
It claimed that Europeans' data was by default stored in Norway, Ireland, and the United States and "that employees in China have no access to restricted data," such as phone numbers or IP addresses.
TikTok told AFP in May that it had "promptly" informed the DPC of a technical issue regarding data transfers.
The social media giant is also under pressure in the United States where it faces a looming ban if it does not find a non-Chinese buyer.
US President Donald Trump said at the end of June that a group of buyers had been found for TikTok, adding that he could name the purchasers in a matter of weeks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
26 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
EU Climate VP Seeks 'Fair Competition' With China On Green Energy
The European Union is seeking "fair competition" with China and not a race to the bottom in wages and environmental standards, the bloc's vice president for the clean transition told AFP on Monday. Deep frictions exist over economic relations between the 27-nation bloc and Beijing. Brussels is worried that a manufacturing glut propelled by massive state subsidies could add to a yawning trade deficit and result in a flood of cheap Chinese goods undercutting European firms. Speaking during a visit to Beijing ahead of a major EU-China summit in the city this month, Teresa Ribera dismissed China's claims that the bloc was engaging in "protectionism". "We Europeans don't want to go down a race towards low incomes, lower labour rights or lower environmental standards," said Ribera, who also serves as the bloc's competition chief. "It is obvious that we could not be in a good position if there could be an ... over-flooding in our markets that could undermine us with prices that do not reflect the real cost," she said. The EU imposed extra import taxes of up to 35 percent on Chinese electric vehicle imports in October and has investigated Chinese-owned solar panel manufacturers. Asked whether EU moves against Chinese green energy firms could harm the global transition to renewables, Ribera said: "It is fair to say that, yes, we may benefit in the very short term." However, she also warned "it could kill the possibility" of long-term investment in the bloc's future. Ribera's visit comes as Beijing seeks to improve relations with the European Union as a counterweight to superpower rival the United States, whose President Donald Trump has disrupted the global order and pulled Washington out of international climate accords. "I don't think that we have witnessed many occasions in the past where a big economy, a big country, decides to isolate in such a relevant manner," she told AFP. "It is a pity. "The Chinese may think that the United States has given them a great opportunity to be much more relevant in the international arena," Ribera said. The visit also comes as the bloc and the United States wrangle over a trade deal. Trump threw months of negotiations into disarray on Saturday by announcing he would hammer the bloc with sweeping tariffs if no agreement was reached by August 1. Ribera vowed on Monday that the EU would "defend the interests of our companies, our society, our business". Asked if a deal was in sight, she said: "Who knows? We'll do our best." However, she insisted that EU digital competition rules -- frequently condemned by Trump as "non-tariff barriers" to trade -- were not on the table. "It's a question of sovereignty," Ribera said. "We are not going to compromise on the way we understand that we need to defend our citizens and our society, our values and our market."
DW
43 minutes ago
- DW
Can debt-laden NATO members spend billions more on defense? – DW – 07/14/2025
NATO members recently agreed to increase defense spending to 5% by 2035 — a "quantum leap," according to the military alliance's chief, Mark Rutte. But can its indebted members really afford the hike? The NATO summit at the end of June left Donald Trump happy. The US President called it "tremendous" that the military alliance's 32 members had agreed to ramp up defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. He has been pressuring them to do so for years. However, he reserved his customary ire for one member: Spain. After vocal opposition from the country's prime minister, Pedro Sanchez, the Spanish government found a way out of the 5% commitment by claiming it could meet its defense obligations by spending much less. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump said the decision was "very terrible" and that they would be made "pay twice as much." Sanchez argued the 5% target — which is broken down into 3.5% on defence and 1.5% on defense-related infrastructure — was unreasonable and that diverting public spending in such a way could damage the economy. In the end, Spain secured an agreement with NATO that granted it an effective opt-out. That has raised questions about the extent to which many member nations will ultimately be able to afford the spending pledges they have made. "The choice to ringfence and prioritize defense amidst public spending cuts is politically challenging and will need strong public messaging to be accepted by the electorate and indeed across governments in office," Fenella McGerty, senior fellow for defense economics at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), told DW. She points out that when Spain previously signaled a hike in defense spending in April, Sanchez was keen to emphasize that it would not add to the country's debt pile or impact social spending. Ilke Toygür, director of the global policy center at Madrid's IE University, thinks Spain's position was partly about having an "open conversation" on the fact that prioritizing defense spending would impact other key areas of national budgets and could lead to a damaging backlash. "If there is no understanding about the importance of the fight against climate change or on other social issues, for example, housing or support for health or education, then this [defense spending hike] will create the contrary effect that European leaders are trying to get," she told DW. At the end of the day, what Europe really needs is a "sustained defense investment that will make the continent more secure," she said, adding that a "sustained public backlash could create the opposite effect." NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has hailed the 5% increase as a "quantum leap" and said it "laid the foundations for a stronger, fairer and more lethal NATO." McGerty believes the 2035 pledge is a "significant commitment," particularly if European members manage to "increase core defense spending to 3.5% of GDP" — up from the current average of 2%. The NATO agreement specifies that 3.5% of GDP should "resource core defense requirements" and meet so-called NATO capability targets — a list of specific defense-preparedness goals, from air defense to land maneuvers. According to NATO, the extra 1.5% of spending will, among other things, "protect critical infrastructure, defend networks, ensure civil preparedness and resilience, innovate, and strengthen the defense industrial base." McGerty acknowledges that the pledge to bolster spending comes "at a time of considerable fiscal pressures" for member states. However, she thinks the 1.5% infrastructure element has a "broad definition" to give countries flexibility. "Many countries are likely already spending this much on such funding areas," said McGerty. Yet, there are still substantial doubts over the capacity of some member states to hit the agreed levels. According to NATO's most recent defense spending figures from 2024, all but eight of the alliance's members were hitting the existing 2% target. A few have caught up in the meantime. However, those furthest behind in terms of military spending — Spain, Belgium, Canada, Italy and Portugal — also have the problem of having high government debt of close to or even over 100% of their gross domestic product (GDP). Greece is an outlier in that it has the highest debt level of all, but it already spends more than 3% on its defense. Ilke Toygür is sceptical if some northern European countries, who during the 2008/2009 financial crisis decried the debt levels of some southern European countries, understand the scale of the challenge for economies ramping up defense spending while managing high existing debt levels. "What will happen if these countries use the next 5-10 years to increase their defense spending. Does it mean more private sector investment is needed?" she wonders. In her opinion, a "fairer assessment of the debt question and the overall impact on the European economy at large" is needed. McGerty argues that countries with strong fiscal positions, such as Germany, can borrow to meet the targets but those with longer-term debt issues will be reluctant to add to that debt. If those still lagging behind the 2% mark are to have "any hope of meeting the 5% target without borrowing more," she noted, they would have to make the kind of dramatic choices abhorred by Sanchez, or hope the private sector comes to the rescue. Increases in military spending would have to be funded through other means, McGerty believes, including, for example, "higher taxation, cuts to other areas of public spending or via other creative funding options including special funds administered by central banks or treasuries, multilateral lending instruments, or mobilizing private investment." While leaders like Sanchez and others are concerned about borrowing and potential cuts, experts say the writing has been on the wall for a while. McGerty noted that NATO chief Rutte stated already in December 2024 that increases in European defense spending would necessarily impact spending on pensions, education and health care, Yet ramping up military spending brings its own financial risks. As Europe rushes to build up its own arms sector, rising inflation in the defense industry, supply chain delays, and labor issues mean ever more money is being needed to meet the same ends. So, Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank (ECB), warned in March that higher defense spending itself could contribute to inflation — yet another reminder that for many countries, the rush to make Europe safer, will come at a high price.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
India's Jaishankar hails 'positive trajectory' in China ties – DW – 07/14/2025
Indian Foreign Minister Jaishankar said during a visit to Beijing that India supports China's SCO leadership. It comes after New Delhi indicated it wanted to permanently resolve a Himalayan border dispute. Chinese Vice President Han Zheng said on Monday that India and China need to advance practical cooperation and respect mutual concerns to ensure stable development of bilateral ties, according to state news agency Xinhua. Han made the remarks during a meeting with India's External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in Beijing. The Indian minister is attending a regional security meeting under the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) in Tianjin in northern China on July 15 and holding bilateral meetings on the sidelines. In his opening remarks during the meeting with Vice President Han, Jaishankar commended the 75th anniversary of diplomatic ties between India and China and said the "continued normalization of our ties can produce mutually beneficial outcomes." He called for "an open exchange of views and perspectives between India and China" in an international situation that is becoming increasingly complex. In a post on X, Jaishankar said he conveyed India's support for China's SCO leadership and noted improvements in bilateral relations. The foreign minister said he expressed confidence that discussions during his "visit will maintain that positive trajectory." Beijing has positioned the 10-member SCO as a counterbalance to Western alliances and continues to promote deeper collaboration among member states in areas such as security, trade, and science. New Delhi also participates in the "Quad" group alongside the United States, Japan and Australia. Last month, on the sidelines of the SCO defense ministers' meeting in China's Qingdao, Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh said India seeks a permanent solution to its longstanding border dispute with China. Singh made the comments during a meeting with his Chinese counterpart Dong Jun, as the ministers held in-depth talks on the need to maintain peace along the India-China frontier. In 2020, deadly military clashes at the disputed border in the Himalayas prompted India to officially cut passenger flights to mainland China, ban numerous Chinese apps, and limit Chinese investment in the country. The thaw in relations between the neighbors also led to the resumption of direct passenger flights in January, after almost five years without a direct connection amid deteriorating ties between Beijing and New Delhi, the founding members of the BRICS bloc.
