logo
Popular fast food chain leaves fans spitting in fury with 'tone deaf' ad

Popular fast food chain leaves fans spitting in fury with 'tone deaf' ad

Daily Mail​14 hours ago
Steak 'n Shake's latest 'marketing tactic' has left social media users with a sour taste in their mouths.
Customers slammed the small restaurant chain as 'so tone deaf' after it posted a photo of a hat that says 'Make Frying Oil Tallow Again.'
The red hat is similar to the 'Make America Great Again' baseball cap, a sign of support for President Donald Trump, while the reference to tallow aligns the company with Trump's top health official, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Steak 'n Shake posted a photo of the hat to advertise ' Tesla Tallow Twofer Tuesday,' an event that took place this week at all of its restaurants.
Each location rewarded its first Tesla-owning customers with free grass-fed beef tallow to use at home, along with what some Reddit users called an 'ugly hat.'
'This is just gross and forces your political ideology onto your workers, comedic or not. Steak n' Shake should stay focused on being Steak n' Shake, not some political vehicle,' a post creator wrote on Reddit.
The promotion came after Steak 'n Shake backed up RFK Jr.'s plan to switch from vegetable oil to beef tallow in its fries.
'It's just a dying chain latching onto anything they can for relevance. The sad part is the fries don't even taste better in the tallow,' a social media user wrote.
Several social media users believe Steak 'n Shake chain began its fall from grace long before the latest promotion.
'They've been going downhill for a while and for the few that remain this just gives me another reason not to go there. Better options like Culvers, Freddy's, etc. exist,' a Reddit user wrote.
'They used to be one of the best places to go get a cheap greasy meal and still have a couple bucks left at the end of the night,' a customer responded.
'Around the time the pandemic started they just lost control. Especially being a restaurant that tried to have an emphasis on being a sit down restaurant with fast service.'
A few customers admitted to liking the promotion, and didn't understand why customers found the items controversial.
'Literally every other fast food company pushes left wing agendas in advertising and social media. But this one you have a problem with?,' a commenter responded.
The restaurant chain has grown to operate over 400 restaurants since it was founded more than 85 years ago.
However, one of its parent organizations, Biglari Holdings, has been struggling financially, and suffered over $40 million in revenue loss last year, according to San Antonio Express News.
RFK Jr. visited a Florida Steak 'n Shake after the company announced that it was officially switching from seed oil to beef tallow at all of their 400+ locations
The company managed to increase its first quarter revenue by 6.2 percent compared to last year's total. It's unclear how much money Steak 'n Shake contributed to its $95 million in revenue.
Steak 'n Shake is not the only restaurant chain on board with RFK Jr.'s initiative - although other companies adopted the alternative before Trump's second presidency.
Popeyes has been using beef tallow when cooking chicken and fries for many years.
While Outback Steakhouse, one of America's favorite restaurant chains, has been using beef tallow since 1988.
Other brands that include beef tallow in its food include Buffalo Wild Wings, Sweetgreen, and Smashburger.
McDonald's, however, has not changed its vegetable oil-using ways.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump could be running the most incompetent peace process in history
Trump could be running the most incompetent peace process in history

Telegraph

time10 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump could be running the most incompetent peace process in history

If the consequences were not so brutal, it might almost be possible to admire the brazen audacity of Vladimir Putin. Having just put down the phone on Donald Trump, he launched the biggest air assault on Kyiv since the war began, pounding Ukraine's capital with 550 killer drones and ballistic missiles. Putin committed this outrage because he has every confidence that Mr Trump will fail to exact any price. True, the American president might compose an angry social media post, but Putin is clearly convinced that nothing more will happen. Tragically, Mr Trump has given him every reason to believe as much. On Tuesday, America stopped supplying Ukraine with Patriot-3 interceptors, designed to shoot down incoming Russian missiles. Some of these vital defence systems had already been flown across the Atlantic to Poland for onward passage to Ukraine. It seems they will just be sent back again. With this extraordinary decision, Mr Trump effectively informed Putin that America is content to leave Kyiv defenceless against Russian air attack. Putin responded entirely logically and ordered his biggest assault yet. By withholding the Patriots, Mr Trump gave Putin the greenest light imaginable. The Kremlin will also have noticed that Mr Trump has not imposed any new US sanctions on Russia since his return to the White House. All sanctions regimes are vulnerable to circumvention: the only response is to update and extend the restrictions, blocking loopholes as they appear, just as Britain and the EU frequently do. By not passing any new sanctions, Mr Trump is allowing the existing ones to wither on the vine and sending another signal for Putin to do his worst. The great irony is that a Sanctions Bill that really would crush the Russian economy is ready to go in the Senate, with overwhelming bipartisan support. This measure, proposed by Senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal, a Republican and Democrat respectively, would impose US tariffs of 500 per cent on any country foolish enough to buy Putin's oil or gas. It can pass whenever the president gives the word. But there is no sign that Mr Trump will give the word. He occasionally threatens and blusters. On May 28, the president claimed that he would know 'within two weeks' whether Putin was 'tapping us along'. Five weeks have passed and all that Mr Trump has done is deprive Ukraine of vital defences. Putin has obviously concluded that the Sanctions Bill will never pass no matter what he does. Now there are only two possibilities. Mr Trump could be running the most cack-handed and incompetent peace process in history, based on asking Putin to lay off or else America will stop helping his enemy. What kind of a negotiating position is that? Or else Mr Trump thinks that the only route to peace is for Russia to achieve the total defeat and conquest of Ukraine as rapidly as possible.

Trump criticised for using antisemitic term to describe money lenders
Trump criticised for using antisemitic term to describe money lenders

BreakingNews.ie

time11 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Trump criticised for using antisemitic term to describe money lenders

President Donald Trump has claimed he did not know the term 'shylock' is considered antisemitic when he used it in a speech to describe unscrupulous money lenders. Mr Trump told reporters early on Friday after returning from an event in Iowa that he had 'never heard it that way' and 'never heard that' the term was considered an offensive stereotype about Jews. Advertisement Shylock refers to the villainous Jewish moneylender in Shakespeare's The Merchant Of Venice who demands a pound of flesh from a debtor. The Anti-Defamation League, which works to combat antisemitism, said in a statement that the term 'evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible'. Democrat Joe Biden, while vice president, said in 2014 that he had made a 'poor choice' of words a day after he used the term in remarks to a legal aid group. Mr Trump's administration has said cracking down on antisemitism is a priority. His administration said it is screening for antisemitic activity when granting immigration benefits and its fight with Harvard University has centred on allegations from the White House that the school has tolerated antisemitism. Advertisement But the Republican president has also had a history of playing on stereotypes about Jewish people. He told the Republican Jewish Coalition in 2015 that 'you want to control your politicians' and suggested the audience used money to exert control. Before he kicked off his 2024 presidential campaign, Mr Trump drew widespread criticism for dining at his Florida club with a Holocaust-denying white nationalist. Last year, he made repeated comments accusing Jewish Americans who identify as Democrats of disloyalty because of the Democratic leaders' criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Critics said it perpetuated an antisemitic trope about Jews having divided loyalties and there being only one right way to be Jewish. Advertisement On Thursday night in his speech in Iowa, Mr Trump used the term while talking about his signature legislation that was passed by Congress earlier in the day. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing some from, in some cases, a fine banker and in some cases shylocks and bad people,' he said. When a reporter later asked about the word's antisemitic association and his intent, Mr Trump said; 'No, I've never heard it that way. To me, a shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. I've never heard it that way. You view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' The Anti-Defamation League said Mr Trump's use of the word 'underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States'. Advertisement

EPA puts 139 employees on leave after they sign a ‘declaration of dissent'
EPA puts 139 employees on leave after they sign a ‘declaration of dissent'

The Guardian

time19 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

EPA puts 139 employees on leave after they sign a ‘declaration of dissent'

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Thursday put on administrative leave 139 employees who signed a 'declaration of dissent' about its policies, accusing them of 'unlawfully undermining' the Trump administration's agenda. In a letter made public on Monday, the employees wrote that the agency is no longer living up to its mission to protect human health and the environment. The letter represented rare public criticism from agency employees who knew they could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. In a statement Thursday, the EPA said it has a 'zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging and undercutting' the Trump administration's agenda. Employees were notified that they had been placed in a 'temporary, non-duty, paid status' for the next two weeks, pending an 'administrative investigation', according to a copy of the email obtained by the Associated Press. 'It is important that you understand that this is not a disciplinary action,' the email reads. More than 170 EPA employees put their names on the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor in chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move earlier in June, but Berg said he was unaware of anyone at the NIH who had been placed on similar administrative leave. Under its administrator, Lee Zeldin, the EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and on tribal reservations, advanced undoing a ban on a type of asbestos, and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash its budget and gut its study of climate change and environmental justice. He's also seeking to roll back pollution rules that an Associated Press examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275bn every year. The EPA responded to the employees' letter earlier this week by saying policy decisions 'are a result of a process where Administrator Zeldin is briefed on the latest research and science by EPA's career professionals, and the vast majority who are consummate professionals who take pride in the work this agency does day in and day out'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store