Our Similarities Prove Intelligent Design, Not Evolution!
Something that Darwinists claim to be one of the greatest pieces of evidence for the theory of evolution and common ancestry are biological similarities. This idea states that different species share common ancestors proven by similar physical structure and/or biology. Such similarities include the number of bones in our arms, legs, neck, the presence of a liver, a digestive system, or even an appendix. One of the most debated similarities that Darwinists present as proof for our own evolution is that certain types of primates actually share a few of the same blood types as humans. On the surface this all sounds like excellent solid evidence; but is it really? Is there no other explanation that can be offered to justify these similarities?
First and foremost, one advantage that the seasoned scientist has over the general public would be the public is severely lacking in their understanding of the complexity of life and the universe. It would be very easy for a scientist to withhold specific details of discoveries that contradict their narrative, either omitting them or downplaying their importance. I believe the study of the complexity of life and the universe is one of those topics that is overly de-emphasized and even ignored. It's actually the discovery of the complexity of life and the universe that has brought many scientists to faith in God. But, since evolution is the socially accepted explanation for our origins, this narrative is aggressively driven. The problem is, what is presented to be hard core facts really does not support anything. Remember this; it is always the interpretation of the exact same set of facts that can lead us to one conclusion or the other. Additionally, the interpretation must be logically sound when held under scrutiny, not quickly skimmed over resulting in a fast-food like outcome. Allow me to give you a far more plausible explanation for these similarities.
Imagine, if you would, that you are a painter. As such, you would have your own artistic style. You would select the type of canvas you like to use, the colors you frequently paint with, and even the brands of paints and tools you prefer to work with because you know what works for you. This would all achieve the desired artistic outcome you are looking for. Your paintings have some variety, but they all have your unique artistic touch. Soon others would eventually recognize your work by your familiar style and technique as well. Because you use the same tools and paint, along with your particular style, have created many similarities in your paintings.
Now let's say I have two of your paintings hanging in my home. Could you imagine someone looking at them and concluding that one painting descended from the other, proven by their similarities? Sounds crazy. My guess is most would presume the same person painted both of the pictures due to artistic similarities; and they would be correct.
Is it crazy to think that there are close similarities because we all have a common designer that is highly intelligent? Would it also be crazy to say this designer used what works several times for different types of life?
'You can take a lug nut off of a Pontiac and put it on a Buick, but that doesn't mean the Pontiac evolved from the Buick. It means they were both made by General Motors.'
– Dr. Kent Hovind
'The proof that Darwinists really need is evidence of species change, not similarity of structure or function. Lacking that evidence, an attempt to prove the point by appearance is shallow at best.'
– Vance Ferrel, 'Science vs. Evolution' p. 660.
As stated above, there really is a lack of 'species change' which is the deal breaker. Charles Darwin himself stated it in his book, 'Origin of Species',
'Why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against this theory.'
– Charles Darwin, Origins of Species, pg. 413
Darwin understood that the lack of intermediate species was the hole in his theory. Missing these links really blows the doors off of any arguments for evolution. With that said, similarities cannot be explained by Darwin's theory. Of course you may argue that many missing links have been found; such as Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man, Peking Man, Lucy, and others. However, if you were to dig into the historical facts of these findings you would learn that all these have been faked by those seeking the fame of discovering the 'missing link'.
Not only have we never found physical evidence for species changing, we have also never observed this process ourselves either. If all living creatures descend from a common ancestor, why do we not see this taking place today by any measure? If primates evolved into humans, why then do we STILL have primates on this earth? We have thousands of years of recorded human history on this planet, but we have NEVER recorded one type of species evolving into another. The burden of proof really is on the Darwinist. Not to mention, due to the overwhelming complexity of life, it really is a mathematical IMPOSSIBILITY for life to emerge from random change with zero intelligence.
'In the real world of scientific observation, as opposed to metaphysical speculation, however, no more complex system can ever 'evolve' out of a less complex system, so the probability of the naturalistic origin of even the simplest imaginary form of life is zero.'
– Henry Morris, PH.D.
The truth is the creation of life requires intent and intelligence. This intelligence appeared to have used similarities in several living things, most likely because it was deemed a good design for its intended purposes. However, this intelligence also displays a vast amount of creativity with life's abundance of differences as well. What is this intelligence? I propose it's the God of the bible, but don't take my word for it.
'In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.'
– Gen 1:1 KJV
'… The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.'
– Psa 19:1 KJV
'For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:'
– Rom 1:20 KJV
Disclaimer: The views and interpretations expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or positions of WiProud. This article is intended for informational and discussion purposes only. Readers are encouraged to explore multiple perspectives and conduct their own research when forming conclusions about religious texts and beliefs.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to FOX2548 & WIProud.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
16-07-2025
- UPI
Supernatural beliefs vary across different groups in the U.S.
Younger Americans are more likely to express belief in witchcraft and luck, as our new research shows. As sociologists who research the social dynamics of religion in the United States, we conducted a nationally representative survey in 2021. Our survey posed dozens of questions to 2,000 Americans over age 18 on a wide range of beliefs in supernatural phenomena -- everything from belief in the devil to belief in the magical power of crystals. Our statistical analyses found that supernatural beliefs in the United States tend to group into four types. The first represents what many consider "traditional religious beliefs." These include beliefs in God, the existence of angels and demons, and belief in the soul and its journey beyond this lifetime. A second represents belief in "spiritual and mental forces," some of which are associated with either paranormal or new age beliefs. These include communicating with the dead, predicting the future, or believing that one's soul can travel through space or time. A third group represents belief in "witches and witchcraft." This was measured on our survey with questions about the existence of "black magic" and whether it was "possible to cast spells on people." The fourth and final group represents beliefs in supernatural forces that shape "luck" -- for instance, that "black cats bring bad luck." Our analysis finds that higher education and higher income are associated with lower levels of all four types of supernatural belief. Those with a bachelor's degree or higher, for instance, score below average on all four types of belief, while those with less education score higher than average on all four. Looking at race and ethnicity, we found that Latino or Hispanic individuals were more likely than white individuals to express belief in the "witches and witchcraft" form of supernatural belief. About 50% of Latino or Hispanic individuals in our survey, for example, strongly agreed that "witches exist." This compares with about 37% of White individuals. Comparing gender differences, we find that women are more likely than men to believe in the "spiritual and mental forces" forms of supernatural belief. For instance, about 31% of women in our survey agreed that "it is possible to communicate with the dead" compared with about 22% of men. Why it matters Our research addresses two key questions: first, whether people who hold one type of supernatural belief are also more likely to hold other types of supernatural beliefs; and second, how do different types of supernatural belief vary across key demographic groups, such as across educational levels, racial and ethnic groups, and gender? Answering these questions can be surprisingly difficult. Most scientific surveys of the U.S. public include, at best, only one or two questions about religious beliefs; rarely do they include questions about other types of supernatural beliefs, such as belief in paranormal or superstitious forces. This could lead to an incomplete understanding of how supernatural beliefs and practices are changing in the United States. An increasing number of Americans are leaving organized religion. However, it is not clear that supernatural beliefs have or will follow the same trajectory -- especially beliefs that are not explicitly connected to those religious identities. For example, someone can identify as nonreligious but believe that the crystal they wear will provide them with supernatural benefits. Moreover, recognizing that supernatural beliefs can include more than traditionally religious supernatural beliefs may be vital for better understanding other social issues. Research has found, for example, that belief in paranormal phenomena is associated with lower trust in science and medicine. What's next Our survey provides some insight into the nature and patterns of supernatural belief in the United States at one point in time, but it does not tell us how such beliefs are changing over time. We would like to see future surveys -- both ours or from other social scientists -- that ask more diverse questions about belief in supernatural beings and forces that will allow for an assessment of such changes. The Research Brief is a short take on interesting academic work. Christopher P. Scheitle is an associate professor of sociology, Bernard DiGregorio a doctoral candidate in sociology, and Katie E. Corcoran, a professor of sociology at West Virginia University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary are solely the views of the authors.


Buzz Feed
05-07-2025
- Buzz Feed
19 Things People Were Shocked They Had To Explain To Adults
Recently, u/Wonderful-Economy762 asked, r/Productivitycafe, "What couldn't you believe you had to explain to another adult?" And we thought we'd share some of the top responses. "I had to explain to an 18-year-old that you could get pregnant even if you're not married. I was friends with a girl in high school and we were discussing birth control. She said she didn't need any because she and her boyfriend weren't married. Guess who was pregnant when she graduated." "Saw a ventriloquist act with my aunt. After the show, she said the dummy was funnier than the man. I said you know the dummy is the man right? She didn't know." "That the sun doesn't follow you when you drive. It's not stalking you, it's 93 million miles away." "A few years ago obviously, but I had to explain that a fax machine wasn't a paper teleportation device." "That Alaska is not an island and that it was connected to Canada so yes, you can drive from Alaska to Georgia. Her flabbers were gasted when a mutual friend mentioned his drive from Alaska to Georgia when he moved states." "That you can't drive to Hawaii. I was a travel agent in the mid-1980s." "That the Earth has one moon. We were watching a sports game on TV. The camera panned out and it showed the full moon over the stadium. I said, 'look at the moon over the ballpark tonight' and her reply was, 'have you seen the one outside'. Swear to God." "That the hole in the ozone layer was not caused by satellite and rocket launches." "That iceberg lettuce doesn't grow on icebergs." "How chickens mate. And that it doesn't involve the rooster standing over the eggs 'spraying' them." "When I was a waiter training a new waiter, I had to explain that they need to wipe tables before sweeping because, if they sweep first, the floor will get dirty from cleaning the tables. Basically, that gravity exists. It was a long night." "I had to explain deer crossing signs, after being asked how do deer know where to cross. And no, I'm not borrowing this from that viral radio bit. This situation happened years before." "That Washington DC and Washington state are two separate places in the US. In this same vein, that Puerto Rico, as well as the US Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands, are all US territories, not foreign countries AND, their citizens are US CITIZENS! So, telling them to 'go back to their own country' is really damn stupid and ignorant (not to mention really f'ing racist)." "That when they do the dishes there isn't supposed to be food on them still and it needs to be cleaned more thoroughly." "Literally tonight I had to tell a 23-year-old that you can't put a takeout container full of leftover edamame in the recycling bin." "That being a resident of New Mexico meant she was American, and not some kind of English-speaking 'new' Mexican." "I had to explain to an adult man that women don't pee out of their vaginas." "North does not change based on which way you face." "I've had two college educated adults ask if my birth date changes every year to match the date of the holiday I was born on." H/T to u/Wonderful-Economy762 and r/Productivitycafe for having the discussion! Any of your own to add? Let us know in the comments below!


The Onion
03-07-2025
- The Onion
Study Finds Curative Power Of Prayer Limited To Genital Warts
CHICAGO—Emphasizing the constraints of God's healing hands, a new study published Thursday in the Journal Of The American Medical Association found that the curative power of prayer was limited exclusively to genital warts. 'Our data revealed that while people attempt to cure a host of medical conditions by praying, the only ailment it was shown to be effective against was genital warts,' said lead author Dr. Patrick Mercier, explaining that despite prayer being promoted as a remedy for cancer, drug addiction, and mental illnesses like depression and schizophrenia, such invocations for divine intervention were utterly useless unless the condition somehow involved viral growths located around the groin and anus. 'The ability of prayer to treat sicknesses and disorders was so narrow, in fact, that it could not even heal plantar warts found on the soles of feet. That said, entreaties to our Creator were so efficient at addressing genital warts specifically that patients who held their hands over the affected vulvas and penises and pleaded to a higher power for relief often found their HPV breakouts cleared up within 24 hours.' Mercier added that curing genital warts was actually the only thing prayer was capable of achieving across the board.