CPI MP writes a letter to all political parties calling for an impeachment against Allahabad HC judge Yashwant Varma
His letter comes in the backdrop of reports that the government is likely to introduce an impeachment motion in the upcoming monsoon session of Parliament. Mr. Kumar is the second Rajya Sabha member to raise this demand. Last week, Congress MP Vivek Tankha, in a letter to Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar, raised the question that Parliament alone has the power to initiate removal proceedings and yet the inquiry report had not been shared with the 'constitutionally empowered body.'
Former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna had forwarded a copy of the Supreme Court panel's inquiry report, along with a recommendation to initiate impeachment proceedings against the judge, to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
'If proven true, these allegations are not only a gross betrayal of public trust but also a serious affront to the integrity of our judicial institutions,' Mr. Kumar said in his letter, and urged all political parties to rise above partisanship and take constitutional responsibility to safeguard the credibility of India's judiciary.
Invoking the provisions of Article 124 (establishment of Supreme Court) and Article 218 (provisions concerning removal of judges) of the Constitution to initiate impeachment proceedings, the Mr. Kumar said, 'The legislature cannot be a silent spectator when such grave questions of judicial propriety and public accountability are raised.' He also called for a 'nationwide political dialogue on making the judiciary more accountable, inclusive, and socially representative.' Mr. Kumar added that the judiciary continues to remain opaque in its appointments and largely unrepresentative in terms of caste, gender, and regional diversity.
'Our courts must reflect the plural character of Indian society. Accountability mechanisms for the higher judiciary are long overdue. What we are facing today is not an isolated case of alleged corruption — it is a systemic failure that demands both institutional reform and democratic will,' he stated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
The dragon is tightening its hold: Can India defy it?
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is China waging a low-intensity war on Indian manufacturing? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in Company Can China hobble India's rise as a manufacturing power? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In recent months, geopolitical undercurrents have intensified between Asia's two largest economies, India and China. While the military standoff in Ladakh's Galwan Valley in 2020 marked a turning point in bilateral relations, a quieter but far more consequential confrontation is now unfolding. China is trying to undermine India's manufacturing ascent through strategic export denials, regulatory pressure and skilled labour restrictions. Several steps taken by China in the past few months indicate a well-formed strategy to hobble India's rise as a manufacturing power just when many factors align to help India's dependence on Chinese imports in several sectors, China can seriously hamper India's dream of becoming a rival manufacturing power. But in the long run, its obstructive measures will only help India gain economic strategy appears to be increasingly shaped by the need to maintain its dominance as the world's factory, especially as global manufacturers pursue the 'China Plus One' strategy to diversify supply chains. India, with its vast labour force, growing infrastructure and government-backed industrial policies, is emerging as a prime alternative. This transition poses a direct threat to China's central role in global recent actions suggest it is deploying several tools to delay or derail India's industrial ambitions. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that over 300 Chinese engineers employed by Foxconn in India have been recalled to China, reportedly due to regulatory pressure from Beijing. These engineers were supposed to be critical to the upskilling of Indian teams at Foxconn's iPhone assembly lines, a process essential to ramp up production of future models like the iPhone China has either halted or significantly delayed exports of key materials to India, including rare earth magnets (vital for manufacturing electric vehicles), specialty fertilisers (essential for Indian agriculture), and even tunnel boring machines (critical for infrastructure projects like metros and smart cities). These are not isolated trade hiccups but part of a broader strategy to weaponize trade and technology transfers. Beijing is keen to prevent a large-scale migration of Chinese technology and manufacturing expertise to India. By restricting technology and skilled labour exports, China aims to create bottlenecks in India's supply chain just as it begins gaining global could be two key motivations behind China's behaviour. India's post-Galwan measures, such as tightened scrutiny of Chinese FDI, banning hundreds of Chinese apps and blocking Huawei and ZTE from 5G trials in 2021, have significantly curtailed China's economic leverage in India. Denied access to one of the world's largest markets, Beijing may be retaliating economically to assert its relevance and influence. Secondly, China wants to strengthen a pre-emptive control of supply chains. As India's PLI schemes begin to yield tangible results -- Apple boosting iPhone production, semiconductor plans taking off and India becoming a major mobile phone exporter -- China wants to prevent a global narrative shift from 'Make in China' to 'Make in India".India's dependence on China for several intermediate goods, especially in electronics, EVs, chemicals and rare earth elements, is substantial. China controls more than 85% of global rare earth processing, and a large portion of Indian imports for electronics manufacturing still originate from China. In the short term, China's restrictions can cause delays, cost overruns and capacity the long-term picture is more nuanced. The exit of Chinese engineers from Foxconn's Indian operations is deemed to have a "negligible" impact, as per Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. He noted that there were not many Chinese employees at the company's India iPhone facilities. Production capabilities at Foxconn's India iPhone facilities were established by the company's Taiwanese employees, like those from FIH's Minsheng plant, not Chinese employees, he said. Even amid US tariff threat over iPhones, Foxconn has not slowed down its ongoing mega expansion in India. This indicates that while Chinese know-how may have played a critical role in the initial ramp-up, Indian talent and local engineering capabilities are set to mature global firms are increasingly bullish on India. Apple's contract manufacturers, including Foxconn, Pegatron and Wistron (now owned by Tata), continue to expand their Indian footprints. With supply chain diversification being a geopolitical imperative for Western companies, India remains a central part of this new global manufacturing has recognized the vulnerabilities arising from over-reliance on China and has responded with a mix of policy, investment and diplomatic initiatives. India is offering financial incentives across 14 sectors -- including semiconductors, electronics, EVs and pharmaceuticals -- to attract investment and scale up manufacturing. The PLI scheme has already contributed to India becoming the second-largest mobile phone producer in the in a direct response to China's rare earth squeeze, India is preparing a Rs 3,500–5,000 crore PLI scheme to boost the local manufacturing of rare earth magnets. Under this scheme, Sona Comstar, a major importer of these magnets, has announced plans to produce them domestically, signaling industry alignment with national goals. India is actively exploring alternate sources for specialty fertilisers and critical minerals, including deals with countries like Australia, Vietnam, and African nations. This aims to insulate agriculture and green energy sectors from Chinese pressure. India is investing heavily in upskilling its labour force and creating engineering talent pipelines to reduce dependency on Chinese programmes and partnerships with industry are part of this push. India is negotiating trade agreements with the US and EU while it has already signed an FTA with the UK. These deals will open up new export markets and attract investment, helping India position itself as a global manufacturing hub outside China's manufacturing ecosystem is still young, but it is evolving rapidly, powered by a combination of global realignment, domestic ambition and geopolitical support from the West. China's export denials and covert trade obstructionism are signs of concern but they also reflect a realization that India is no longer just a large market -- it is a serious manufacturing contender .Ultimately, China's restrictions may serve as an accelerator rather than an obstacle. They are pushing India to build domestic capabilities, diversify partnerships, and focus on resilience. If India continues on its current trajectory - with strategic clarity, global cooperation, and internal reforms - it has the potential not just to withstand China's pressure, but to emerge stronger from it.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Justice Varma case: House to set up a probe panel, reduce three-month timeframe
AN INQUIRY committee will be set up by the presiding officer of the House concerned to probe charges against Supreme Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma during the coming Monsoon Session of Parliament. Sources said the timeline for the panel to submit its report will be crunched from three months, so that action against the judge, from whose residence stacks of currency notes were allegedly recovered, is not further delayed. 'Matters related to the judiciary must be beyond politics, so the government has reached out to all the prominent parties and the process (of removal of Justice Varma) would be a unified stand. The government will start collecting the signatures of MPs – after deciding which House should initiate the process – next week,' Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said on Thursday. 'The Chair will then constitute a committee as per the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968, and the committee will table the report, following which the discussions will take place,' Rijiju said. Sources in the government said it is exploring 'special provisions to do away with the three-month tenure of the committee'. Incidentally, sources also indicated that the government was in no hurry over the Opposition's demand for the removal of Allahabad High Court judge Justice Shekhar Yadav, over a controversial speech made by him at a Vishwa Hindu Parishad event last year. While admitting that more than 50 Opposition MPs had signed on the papers required to initiate the process for the removal of Justice Yadav, and that their signatures had been verified, a source said the case could not be compared to Justice Varma's. 'There is a stark difference between the charges of corruption and others. The Opposition has initiated the move against Justice Yadav in the Rajya Sabha, and Chairman Jagdeep Dhankar is expected to give a ruling on the notice in the Monsoon Session. Earlier, the government as well as some Opposition parties had also suggested dispensing with a probe committee of the House in the case of Justice Varma since a three-member committee appointed by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna had already indicted him. Rijiju said Thursday that the government, however, decided on holding a House probe too. 'We would like to go by established rules in this.' The Monsoon Session of Parliament, which was earlier scheduled from July 21 to August 12, has now been extended till August 21. A government official said, 'We hope the removal process (of Justice Varma) will be over in this session itself.' Asked about the extended session, Rijiju said the government has 'legislative business to finish' and that it would come out with the agenda soon. An all-party meeting to discuss the business of the government is expected to be held on July 20. The panel set up by the Supreme Court in the Justice Varma case had submitted its report upholding allegations that wads of currency notes were discovered at his official residence on March 14, by authorities called to the spot due to a fire. As per the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968, a complaint against a judge requires as a first step a resolution signed by at least 100 members if moved in the Lok Sabha and 50 members if initiated in the Rajya Sabha. Once the MPs submit the motion, the presiding officer of the House can either accept or reject it. In the case of Justice Varma, the government is yet to decide which House will take up the motion first. But since it is the government initiating the action, and seeking to build political consensus, it is expected that the presiding officer will accept it. After a motion for impeachment is adopted by either House, the Speaker / Chairman constitutes a three-member committee of inquiry, headed by the Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court judge, and including a Chief Justice of any High Court, and a person who is in the opinion of the Speaker/ Chairman, a 'distinguished jurist'. If the committee renders a guilty finding, the report of the committee is then adopted by the House in which it was introduced, and the judge's removal is debated. For an impeachment motion against a Supreme Court or High Court judge to go through, at least two-thirds of those 'present and voting' in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha must vote in favour of removing the judge – and the number of votes in favour must be more than 50% of the 'total membership' of each House. If Parliament passes such a vote, the President eventually signs an order for the removal of the judge.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
New West Bengal BJP president: Samik Bhattacharya replaces Sukanta Majumdar; unanimously elected state chief
NEW DELHI: The Bharatiya Janata Party on Thursday unanimously elected Rajya Sabha MP Samik Bhattacharya as the new president of its West Bengal unit. Bhattacharya, the lone nominee for the post, submitted his nomination on Wednesday at the BJP's Salt Lake office in Kolkata, accompanied by Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari and outgoing state chief Sukanta Majumdar. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Bhattacharya, who flew in from New Delhi to file his nomination, had earlier met BJP national president JP Nadda on Monday at his residence in the capital. 'A party president changes, and the baton is handed over. It's a continuous process. The principles of the party remain the same,' Bhattacharya told reporters. Bhattacharya, a seasoned BJP member for over four decades, began his political journey with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in 1971. He served over ten years as state general secretary of the BJP's youth wing (BJYM) and was instrumental in maintaining coordination between the RSS and the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), according to a senior BJP functionary. His organisational credentials include serving three consecutive terms as BJP state general secretary and being part of the party's national council. In 2014, he won the Basirhat assembly bypoll, securing the seat from the CPM and boosting BJP's vote share in the region from 4% in 2011 to 33.5%. Known for his academic depth and calm demeanour, Bhattacharya earned wide respect as BJP's state spokesperson and often served as the party's crisis manager. He also played a prominent role in the party's global outreach during Operation Sindoor. 'Bhattacharya is well accepted by party veterans as well as the newcomers. He has constantly been working as a bridge between the old and the new. He has travelled to every district and has close contact with party workers. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Even if it involved Dilip Ghosh or Sukanta Majumdar, Bhattacharya was always the person to resolve differences,' a Bengal BJP leader said. During his political career, Bhattacharya has earned a reputation for his accessibility and simplicity. 'He is one of the very few party netas who still don't use personal guards,' said another party senior. However, with his elevation to state president, that may soon change.
