Cottage dream turns to ‘misery'
Roxburgh East resident Lou Farrand said she was facing fines she could not pay, the cost of securing a retrospective building consent, or losing the "dream" stone cottage she bought nine years ago and preserved.
"I didn't expect a damehood but thought they might have said thank you for looking after it," Mrs Farrand, 76, said.
"If they'd just come to visit and had a cuppa we could have sorted it out without all this threatening me with fines.
"I just love the place, but it has caused me more misery than I've ever had in my life."
The work done at the cottage came to the Central Otago District Council's attention years after it was completed and, the council said, only when Mrs Farrand complained about neighbouring dogs barking that would have affected her ability to rent out the property.
Lou Farrand, of Crossan's Cottage, in East Roxburgh, holds a letter from the Ministry of Justice regarding a fine from the Central Otago District Council relating to work done on the cottage, which was built in 1865 and preserved in 2015 by Mrs Farrand. Inset (top): The cottage's restored interior and (bottom) exterior.
The council, for its part, said Mrs Farrand bought a "deteriorated and fallen down" property, in Roxburgh East Rd — and then rebuilt it without a building consent.
Mrs Farrand said in December last year she got a phone message while at a Christmas event from a council enforcement officer.
"I felt sick — there had been no prior contact," she said.
The message said she had made extensive modifications to the building and would have to seek retrospective permissions for them.
Council regulatory services manager Lee Webster said the council issued a notice to fix under section 40 of the Building Act that gave Mrs Farrand two options to remedy the non-compliance — either apply for a certificate of acceptance, essentially a retrospective building consent for the works, or remove the unconsented building works.
Mrs Farrand said removing the unconsented building works, including her new replacement roof, macrocarpa ceiling and a wall removed when the cottage was used by a blacksmith, would mean demolishing the building.
Mrs Farrand said she could not afford to pay fines for non-compliance or to engage a structural engineer to gain the certificate of acceptance the council sought.
"I wish I'd died [before hearing from the council] because I'm quite old and I would have kept my dream and not be going through this."
Mr Webster said a visit to the property had not been necessary as the council had details regarding the unconsented building works from Mrs Farrand herself.
Photos she posted to social media showed the building was in a collapsed state, consisting of only about half the exterior walls and no internal structure or roof, he said.
Mrs Farrand said she bought the property after selling her Auckland property in 2015 and started her remedial work in September that year. It was finished nine months later.
At least 90% of the original walls were still standing when she bought the property, she said.
She had first seen the cottage from the road.
She viewed it as a "poor little darling" and had hoped someone would fix it up.
When she found it was for sale, Mrs Farrand took up the challenge herself.
The roof and ceiling needed replacing, along with one wall that had been removed so horses could access a forge when the building housed a blacksmith's shop.
The East Roxburgh cottage as it was when built. PHOTOS: JULIE ASHER & SUPPLIED
There were no internal walls and it had been left an open space with the original fireplace at one end and a coal range at the other, she said.
Mr Webster said the council looked forward to hearing from Mrs Farrand and preferred not to have to issue infringement notices "and that Ms Farrand worked with council to address the non-compliance".
"However, if Ms Farrand cannot afford to pay the infringement, this would be referred to the courts, with the additional court costs, too.
"If Ms Farrand speaks with council, we can discuss a payment plan, negating the need to refer this to the courts to recover these costs."
However, Mrs Farrand said she had already been fined $1000 by the council because she had not returned some forms they had requested. She had not paid the fine and it had now been passed on to the Ministry of Justice, from whom she had received a letter to which she had not responded.
The cottage was originally built by the Crossan family in 1865.
The older Crossan children arrived in Roxburgh from Scotland and, with the help of Chinese neighbours, built the stone cottage.
Eventually the rest of the family — mother, father and 11 siblings — lived at the property.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Cottage dream turns to ‘misery'
A distraught woman fears her rebuilt Central Otago gold rush-era cottage will be reduced to rubble after it came to the attention of council bureaucrats. Roxburgh East resident Lou Farrand said she was facing fines she could not pay, the cost of securing a retrospective building consent, or losing the "dream" stone cottage she bought nine years ago and preserved. "I didn't expect a damehood but thought they might have said thank you for looking after it," Mrs Farrand, 76, said. "If they'd just come to visit and had a cuppa we could have sorted it out without all this threatening me with fines. "I just love the place, but it has caused me more misery than I've ever had in my life." The work done at the cottage came to the Central Otago District Council's attention years after it was completed and, the council said, only when Mrs Farrand complained about neighbouring dogs barking that would have affected her ability to rent out the property. Lou Farrand, of Crossan's Cottage, in East Roxburgh, holds a letter from the Ministry of Justice regarding a fine from the Central Otago District Council relating to work done on the cottage, which was built in 1865 and preserved in 2015 by Mrs Farrand. Inset (top): The cottage's restored interior and (bottom) exterior. The council, for its part, said Mrs Farrand bought a "deteriorated and fallen down" property, in Roxburgh East Rd — and then rebuilt it without a building consent. Mrs Farrand said in December last year she got a phone message while at a Christmas event from a council enforcement officer. "I felt sick — there had been no prior contact," she said. The message said she had made extensive modifications to the building and would have to seek retrospective permissions for them. Council regulatory services manager Lee Webster said the council issued a notice to fix under section 40 of the Building Act that gave Mrs Farrand two options to remedy the non-compliance — either apply for a certificate of acceptance, essentially a retrospective building consent for the works, or remove the unconsented building works. Mrs Farrand said removing the unconsented building works, including her new replacement roof, macrocarpa ceiling and a wall removed when the cottage was used by a blacksmith, would mean demolishing the building. Mrs Farrand said she could not afford to pay fines for non-compliance or to engage a structural engineer to gain the certificate of acceptance the council sought. "I wish I'd died [before hearing from the council] because I'm quite old and I would have kept my dream and not be going through this." Mr Webster said a visit to the property had not been necessary as the council had details regarding the unconsented building works from Mrs Farrand herself. Photos she posted to social media showed the building was in a collapsed state, consisting of only about half the exterior walls and no internal structure or roof, he said. Mrs Farrand said she bought the property after selling her Auckland property in 2015 and started her remedial work in September that year. It was finished nine months later. At least 90% of the original walls were still standing when she bought the property, she said. She had first seen the cottage from the road. She viewed it as a "poor little darling" and had hoped someone would fix it up. When she found it was for sale, Mrs Farrand took up the challenge herself. The roof and ceiling needed replacing, along with one wall that had been removed so horses could access a forge when the building housed a blacksmith's shop. The East Roxburgh cottage as it was when built. PHOTOS: JULIE ASHER & SUPPLIED There were no internal walls and it had been left an open space with the original fireplace at one end and a coal range at the other, she said. Mr Webster said the council looked forward to hearing from Mrs Farrand and preferred not to have to issue infringement notices "and that Ms Farrand worked with council to address the non-compliance". "However, if Ms Farrand cannot afford to pay the infringement, this would be referred to the courts, with the additional court costs, too. "If Ms Farrand speaks with council, we can discuss a payment plan, negating the need to refer this to the courts to recover these costs." However, Mrs Farrand said she had already been fined $1000 by the council because she had not returned some forms they had requested. She had not paid the fine and it had now been passed on to the Ministry of Justice, from whom she had received a letter to which she had not responded. The cottage was originally built by the Crossan family in 1865. The older Crossan children arrived in Roxburgh from Scotland and, with the help of Chinese neighbours, built the stone cottage. Eventually the rest of the family — mother, father and 11 siblings — lived at the property.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Programme helping those settling in
New people are essential to filling all roles needed in Central Otago's ever-expanding work force but settling in to a new place is often difficult, making newcomers hard to retain. Central Otago District Council community and engagement manager Paula Penno said Welcoming Communities was a programme led by Immigration New Zealand in partnership with the Human Rights Commission. It was so successful that after the government funding ran out the council agreed in the 2024-25 annual plan to extend the programme for a further two years. The council approached Central Lakes Trust for support and received $16,000 — 20% of the programme cost of $80,000 per year which included a part-time paid position, Ms Penno said. Welcoming Communities officer Heather Harries said her part-time role worked well alongside her other role as an ESOL teacher with Reap. Helping people feel part of the community led to better outcomes for the newcomers and the rest of society, she said. Most newcomers in Central Otago arrived from somewhere else in New Zealand. Some were from overseas and needed assistance with residency and visas and others needed to find their place in the community. Challenges included finding accommodation and then travelling to work given the lack of public transport in the region. A lack of childcare options often meant a family could only have one parent working which led to unanticipated financial pressures, Ms Harries said. One family she had worked with were struggling as the father had to pass an academic English exam but his wife was working 5pm to 10pm, so instead of attending his English lessons he was minding the children. With few contacts in the community and no family around those were traps people found themselves in, she said. "Creating networks and connections between the families, schools, employers, and support networks is crucial in guiding the families through the settlement process." Other newcomers were older Kiwis from other parts of the country and remote workers. They sometimes found it difficult trying to make friends in a new community without the easy introductions that came with meeting people through work or having children at school. The ultimate aim of Welcoming Communities was that it would be self-supporting and not need a paid leader, Ms Harries said. However, volunteers came and went as their circumstances changed and they settled into their new lives, so someone was needed to keep the momentum going. A wide range of activities were organised by the group, from international potluck meals, sporting events, evening drinks, walking groups and a women's swimming group. Ms Harries said she identified with newcomers as she had moved to Central Otago more than six years ago and found things difficult initially. "As an ESOL teacher I realised everything I felt was magnified. I had New Zealand residency... a government department rejecting an application feels like a personal rejection but it's just them doing their job." Moving from Mumbai, in India, to Cromwell seven years ago brought many surprises for Mamta Nerurkar. From finding familiar food to much more limited shopping options and no public transport were some of the things she had to adjust to, along with very short days in winter and long ones in summer. Meeting other mums and families through Welcoming Communities and other community groups had made the transition easier, she said.
Otago Daily Times
6 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Something in the water makes Maniototo a caring place
We live in a caring place in Maniototo and no-one is more caring than the Central Otago District Council. Sure, the rates have increased by 47.95% over the past three years, more than any other Otago or Southland local body, but look what the council is prepared to spend on our welfare. One option was to spend $15 million to upgrade Patearoa's water supply but with only about 40 ratepayers in the township kindness had to be tempered with some sort of fiscal responsibility so, in the end, there's a scheme costing about $1.7m. Still not a bad return for the locals and probably more than they've paid in rates in spite of that 47.95% rise. Patearoa's water comes from the gentle Sowburn which meanders through the settlement, but its clear waters are deceiving, the council tells us. They could suffer from high turbidity, and you don't need me to tell you that turbidity is cloudiness caused by suspended particles of silt, clay and organic matter, particularly after heavy rainfall. Thus, while heavy rainfall is almost unknown in Patearoa, we're under instructions to boil water for the next few months while the new scheme is installed. But the caring council don't just give orders, it explains why. The full story came in a letter from the council. Now, my letters from the CODC usually touch on unpaid rates, the urgent need to register the dog or a plea to return library books, so I opened this one with trepidation. What a relief it was to find it was about water. I learned that protozoa in the water was the culprit and that it would soon be filtered out of our water. As you know protozoa are microscopic organisms such as cryptosporidium and giardia, which can enter the water from animal faeces. I didn't show that part of the letter to the dog who, although he never uses the river as a toilet, is sensitive about such slurs. To make sure we are on side with all this, the council pulled no punches in describing the effects of cryptosporidium and giardia. They can cause gastrointestinal illness such as vomiting and diarrhoea. We were warned that babies, young children, pregnant women, the elderly and people who have weakened immune systems are more at risk of illness and that just about covers the entire population of Patearoa, apart from a few young blokes, who although they drink only Speight's or DB, have been known to produce at least one of the symptoms of giardia ingestion. But just scaring the wits out of us is not the role of a caring council. It also provides practical advice and that's essential if boiling water is something you don't do too often. My letter spelt it out: "Boil all water used for: Drinking water, Brushing teeth, Preparing food, Washing fruits and vegetables, Making ice, baby formula, juice and cold beverages." When it comes to cold beverages, I never put water in whisky so that was a relief. Car washing and watering the garden weren't mentioned so we'll have to risk cars vomiting or cabbages with diarrhoea. Most useful of all were the instructions on how to boil water. They went something like this: first find your water and place it in a non-leaking container capable of withstanding high temperatures. Bring water to a rolling boil (where bubbles appear and do not disappear when the water is stirred) for one minute or boil a full electric jug until it switches off. Cool the water (do not use ice cubes to do this) and pour it into a clean container with a lid. Refrigerate until needed. I tried the method, but my first go was not entirely successful as I hadn't twigged that "freeze" and "refrigerate" are not exactly the same thing. To be honest, I was also a bit confused about the "rolling boil" business. But the council came to the rescue for those who can't boil water properly. Just across the road they've parked a tank labelled "drinking water" and its free. The tank is also labelled "Gore District Council". Carting water from Gore to Patearoa for six months will certainly make a hole in that $1.4m but that's the way it is with big jobs. The work itself will provide entertainment in a village where watching other people work is a well-ingrained pastime. Although the treatment equipment is being prefabricated elsewhere, I foresee regular gatherings at the top bridge to watch the filtration and ultraviolet treatment systems being added to the humble shed which is the present "treatment station". While we're looking at these modern marvels, we'll wonder how the gold miners of the 1800s, sweltering in summer heat by the Sowburn, ever lived to their 90s as so many did. I guess they never took water with their whisky either. — Jim Sullivan is a Patearoa writer.
