Record 140,457 sit Leaving, Junior and other state exams starting today
The number entered to take the 2025 certificate examinations has increased by 3pc (up 4,297) compared with last year's entry figure of 136,160 candidates, with the most significant increases in the numbers entered for the Leaving Cert programme (5pc) and Leaving Cert Applied programme (up 11pc).
Of those sitting state exams, 61,632 are Leaving Cert candidates, 4,512 are final-year Leaving Cert Applied (LCA) candidates and 74,313 are Junior Cycle candidates.
Education Minister Helen McEntee said: 'I want to send the very best wishes to all the students around the country who are starting their Leaving Certificate, Leaving Certificate Applied and Junior Cycle examinations today.
'I know the amount of work and effort you have put in to reach this point. It is the culmination of many years of effort.
'This can be a very stressful time, so I would remind everyone that when it comes to examinations, all we can do is our best.
An extensive logistical exercise involving the secure distribution of about four million exam papers to the examination superintendents
'We are all very much behind you over the next few weeks and I know that, regardless of the outcome of these examinations, there will be many great opportunities ahead for you all.'
Students are set to sit exams in more than 800 centres nationwide, including post-primary schools and other locations.
Delivery of the state examinations is an extensive logistical exercise involving the secure distribution of about four million exam papers to the examination superintendents responsible for overseeing written exams.
The exams will run from today until June 24 for Leaving Cert (Established and Vocational); June 12 for Leaving Cert Applied; and June 16 for Junior Cycle exams.
The SEC will apply a post-marking adjustment for the 2025 Leaving Cert examinations, once tests are completed, 'in order to bring the overall Leaving Certificate results in the aggregate on average to a point broadly midway between the 2020 and 2021 levels'.
The SEC said it aimed to issue the 2025 Leaving Cert and Leaving Cert Applied examination results to candidates on August 22.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Ireland pushes back at EU over hate-speech laws as it faces legal action
Last year, the Government decided to separate hate-crime and hate-speech legislation and drop the section on hate-speech laws. In May, the EU Commission told the Government it had two months to begin implementing an EU directive that combats racism and xenophobia. The Government has written back to the commission, saying the laws on hate crimes 'are effectively transposed' by existing Irish laws. The State faces legal action from the EU if it does not enforce European laws on hate speech. A spokesperson for Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan said: 'Ireland has engaged with the European Commission on this matter and has certain reservations with regard to the commission's analysis of the perceived shortcomings of the current Irish implementation, in particular, that sufficient weight has not been given to Ireland's position that the provisions in the framework are effectively transposed by existing Irish constitutional, statute and common law. 'The Government will continue to engage with the commission to ensure that any outcome respects Ireland's common law tradition and the implementation of the framework.' The spokesperson said the hate-crime laws already brought in mean longer prison sentences for hate crimes, if they can be proven to have been motivated by hatred or where hatred is demonstrated. 'For example, the legislation ensures that assault aggravated by hatred, or damage to property aggravated by hatred, will attract higher prison sentences. Where hatred is not proven, a person can still be charged with assault or damage to property,' they said. The hate-speech part of the law was dropped after pressure on the previous justice minister Helen McEntee from her own backbenchers in the last government. Sinn Féin also called for the contentious legislation to be scrapped, even though the party initially voted for the laws in the Dáil. Taoiseach Micheál Martin previously disagreed with the commission's position, saying existing laws go beyond the proposed EU laws. 'My understanding is the [Justice] Minister believes the commission isn't quite accurate, but it's a matter and we have to work out and deal with the commission. We want to be in compliance with the European framework,' he said.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Have we learned any lessons after Grace?
Last week the minister for education and youth Helen McEntee announced the establishment of a commission of investigation on 'historical abuse' in schools. Broadly welcomed by survivor groups, the commission follows a scoping inquiry published in 2024 detailing 2,395 allegations of sexual abuse recorded across 308 schools run by religious orders up until the 1990s. The commission will examine the handling of allegations, suspicions, and concerns of sexual abuse in all schools, including primary and post-primary. There is nothing 'historical' about the deep trauma survivors have carried with them in the intervening period. There is nothing historical about the legacy of that trauma, the lasting scars from the silence in the face of horror, and the intergenerational wounds carried in families across the country. Devastatingly for our members in Inclusion Ireland, the scoping inquiry found that children in special schools were disproportionately affected; 17 schools accounted for 590 allegations involving 190 alleged perpetrators. It is a sad, well documented fact that children with intellectual disabilities are 4.6 times more likely to be abused than their nondisabled peers (World Health Organization Study). The CSO confirmed a higher rate of abuse for disabled children in its 2022 report. The shocking reality that almost 25% of the total number of allegations of abuse arose in special schools must be faced. The State has a unique opportunity right now to rectify some of the wrongs and to meaningfully and purposefully support people to access their fundamental right to justice. Since the publishing of the final report of the Farrelly Commission into the 'Grace' foster home abuse case, Inclusion Ireland alongside leading advocates, survivors, and family members have been documenting lessons learned. One of the biggest lessons from Grace was how the commission terms of reference did not give adequate recognition to her communication as a non-speaking woman. She was therefore, in effect, silenced in a process that could have done a lot more to ensure her voice was heard. Many of the survivors who attended special schools will have communication rights that must be recognised, just like Grace. Some of the survivors will be non-speaking, some individuals cannot rely on speech to communicate, and may use technology or other forms of communication to get their message across. Read More Grace is not a victim of unfortunate oversight, but a citizen whose rights were repeatedly violated These facts should in no way inhibit a person's right to access justice. These facts mean that the commission needs to be designed in a specific way that recognises the communication preferences of the survivors and puts every measure in place to ensure survivors can communicate their stories, in their own way. The commission must see non-speaking people's communication and testimony as just as valuable and valid as any other survivor. On a practical level, there are a number of measures that can be put in place to make this a reality. The role of the intermediary, independent advocacy, and the role of the family can all be named in the terms of reference. Consideration can be given to the person's right to express their will and preference and to make decisions, with a specific naming of the assumption (as per our Assisted Decision Making legislation) that every person has the capacity to make decisions for themselves, no matter what level of support they might need to do so. Specific reference can be made to reasonable accommodations and the use of accessible information as part of the inquiry process. The commission could have independent oversight from disabled persons organisations and human rights bodies to ensure that it meets its obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. To not give due weight to these considerations means that we have failed the survivors yet again and failed to learn from the stories of exclusion and injustice that disabled people and their families have communicated so clearly to the State. The systematic abuse of children in special schools is an absolute stain on our society. How can we face this, make this right? How do we break this cyclical pattern and say with real clarity and conviction, never again? There is a moment now to do just this. The terms of reference for the commission have not been published yet. There is a unique opportunity to get them right. Survivors of trauma often talk about their silencing. The survivors we know are twice silenced; once through their abuse and the second time by a failure to recognise and support their communication as valid and meaningful. Today we will write to the minister to highlight what needs to be done so that people with intellectual disabilities can have their rights vindicated. The dark hallmarks of our past as a society; turning the other cheek, institutional power and infallibility must be relegated to the past. It is beyond time for voices that were long silenced to be fully heard. Derval McDonagh is CEO of Inclusion Ireland. Read More Government accused of failing Grace abuse victims amid backlash over Farrelly report findings
Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
Redress for school abuse survivors would be biggest in State's history, sparking fears among officials
A redress scheme for survivors of sexual abuse in schools would be at a 'far greater scale' than any other scheme in the history of the State, and could have 'far-reaching implications'. A group of civil servants across five senior Government departments warned they could not support a call for such a redress scheme without 'concrete data' about how high demand and what 'potential costs' would be. It is possible that a commission of investigation would have to start its work before a redress scheme is set up, with the early stages of the inquiry being used as a way to measure demand for redress. There are concerns among senior sources about the impact the redress scheme would have on budgets for present-day needs. The Government will now consider if the insurance policies of schools found liable for abuse can be used to 'offset' the costs of payments to a possible 40,000 survivors or more. READ MORE This week Ministers agreed to set up a commission of investigation into historic abuse in schools. Minister for Education Helen McEntee said 'further' investigation and analysis was required before an anticipated redress scheme for abuse survivors could be announced. [ Q&A: Will survivors of historical abuse in schools be compensated? And who will be liable? Opens in new window ] The commission of investigation and proposed redress scheme were among the recommendations of a scoping inquiry published last year, which detailed 2,395 allegations of sexual abuse at 308 schools run by religious congregations, involving 884 alleged abusers. An inter-departmental group report (IDG) including officials from the Departments of the Taoiseach, Education, Justice, Children, and Public Expenditure and Reform wrote a report examining the main recommendations of the scoping inquiry. The group of civil servants felt that setting up a redress scheme for survivors of sexual abuse in schools was 'as complex' as setting up a commission of investigation. Analysis by the Department of Public Expenditure warned against 'the significant risks' of a 'rushed' redress scheme, 'including the assumption of risk by the State when liability should more appropriately be borne by third parties'. The report said that recent case law on the liability for the actions of school employees found that 'the State does not have such liability'. IDG said such a redress scheme requires 'serious and careful consideration' and that it could have 'far-reaching implications'. [ The Irish Times view on the inquiry into the handling of child abuse in schools: a mammoth task Opens in new window ] The IDG report noted that based on information from the Central Statistics Office (CSO), there are more than 41,300 people aged 35 or over in Ireland that have been affected by sexual abuse in schools, with the added note that sexual abuse tends to be 'under-reported'. 'In the event that a comparable number of people applied to any future redress scheme, the impact would be considerable and certainly on a far greater scale than any such scheme implemented to date in Ireland,' it said. It said: 'Concrete data regarding the potential scale of historical sexual abuse in day and boarding schools in Ireland is unavailable and in the absence of such information, the IDG is not in a position to advise on an appropriate response to [the recommendation for a redress scheme] at this time.' Officials will now carry out further work on the practical issues of a redress scheme. [ Highest number of abuse allegations in 16 years received by Catholic Church's safeguarding body Opens in new window ] International examples of redress schemes that succeeded in getting third parties found liable for abuse to pay for redress will also be examined, including a scheme in Australia that succeeded in getting religious organisations to pay for redress by threatening to withdraw charitable status or state funding. Survivors had stressed to the scoping inquiry the need for the future Commission of Investigation to be carried out quickly, with Ms McEntee this week setting a five-year timeline for the inquiry. The IDG has proposed letting the commission sit in parallel 'divisions' to save time. This would be the first time in the history of the State that an inquiry has been carried out in such a way, and it would be likely to require additional legislation passed by the Oireachtas.
