1MDB maliciously filed lawsuit against me
Mohd Irwan said this was because he was a senior and high-ranking civil servant, holding the post of secretary general in the Ministry of Finance, while at that time Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak was the Prime Minister and also the Minister of Finance.
'1MDB's main target was Datuk Seri Najib. However, they wanted to blame someone other than Datuk Seri Najib, and I was an easy target because of my position as the secretary-general of the Ministry of Finance.
'1MDB also wanted to sensationalise their case by falsely alleging that I was aligned to Datuk Seri Najib and his alleged wrongdoings and that I, somehow, conspired or colluded with Datuk Seri Najib in failing in my duties and responsibility to take the relevant steps to investigate the wrongdoers,' he said.
Mohd Irwan said this in his witness statement when testifying as the second defendant during the hearing of the USD6.59 billion lawsuit filed by 1MDB, as plaintiff, against him and former 1MDB chief executive officer Arul Kanda Kandasamy for breach of trust and conspiracy.
Mohd Irwan, who was former Treasury secretary-general said the filing of the suit was also clearly selective prosecution and done only to bring disrepute against him.
He said this was clear as he had resigned in 2018 and it was only three years later in 2021 when the then government had changed hands after the 14th General Election, was this action filed against him.
He said that at no point in time from May 2018 till May 2021 was a demand issued against him or was he asked to answer any allegations or given a chance to explain matters belatedly raised against him.
'Their conduct of bad faith is further shown when they filed this claim for alleged breach of duties as member of the board but yet, chose not to include the remaining members of the board at that material time namely Datuk Kamal Mohd Ali and Datuk Seri Norazman Ayob despite being aware that all decisions were collective decisions and none of the allegations made was a decision that I made on my own accord or attempted to push through without the consensus and approval of the entire board,' he said.
Mohd Irwan said as a result of the lawsuit, he lost his reputation and his credibility had been tarnished.
'I am subject to ridicule and having to defend myself constantly. As a result, it is very difficult for me to continue to hold certain directorships as people are sceptical and weary of the allegations that have been made against me. Apart from that, I had to incur legal expenses in appointing solicitors to defend me,' he said.
The hearing before Judge Datuk Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah Raja Mohzan continues on May 19.
In May 2021, 1MDB filed a lawsuit against Mohd Irwan and Arulkanda, accusing them of breach of trust and conspiracy, which led to losses of USD1.83 billion, linked to the company's investment in 1MDB-Petrosaudi Ltd, which was subsequently converted into the Brazen Sky Limited investment, purportedly recoverable from the Bridge Global Fund.
1MDB also alleged that both defendants committed breach of trust and conspiracy by misappropriating USD3.5 billion in company funds paid to Aabar Investments and USD1.265 billion paid to International Petroleum Investment Company on May 9, 2017.
1MDB further alleged that Mohd Irwan conspired with Arul Kanda to extend his employment agreement, resulting in a payment of RM2,905,200 to Arul Kanda, all while disregarding the company's interests, which ultimately led to financial losses and damages.
Consequently, 1MDB is seeking USD6.59 billion in damages from both defendants and an additional RM2.9 million from Mohd Irwan related to the extension of the employment agreement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
GLCs to co-create with startups under Cradle's BIG innovation initiative
PETALING JAYA: The Ministry of Finance (MOF), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) and Cradle Fund Sdn Bhd have selected eight government-linked companies (GLCs) under the Bengkel Inovasi GLC (BIG) programme. The companies are Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd, CelcomDigi Bhd, Edotco Group Sdn Bhd, Malaysia Aviation Group Bhd, Sime Darby Property Bhd, S P Setia Bhd, Tenaga Nasional Bhd and Cenviro Sdn Bhd. In a release, Cradle stated the GLCs were selected for their innovative technology applications, particularly in digital and AI — showcasing clear potential to improve operational efficiency, support business growth and scale across their respective industries. They also demonstrated strong partnership models with local and global startups, reinforcing the collaborative spirit of BIG programme. "Over the next six months, the selected GLCs will collaborate with in-house innovation teams, startups and venture builders through either the Venture Client Track, the Venture Co-Creation Track, or a combination of both. Each will develop a proof-of-concept, culminating in a Demo Day that paves the way for real-world deployment and co-created ventures," the release noted. Startups interested in collaborating with GLCs are encouraged to submit their interest via BIG's website at
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Hotel rate hikes unjustified by SST revision says MoF
KUALA LUMPUR: The Ministry of Finance (MoF) has dismissed claims that the recent Sales and Service Tax (SST) adjustments justify hotel room rate increases. The ministry confirmed that the updated tax structure, effective July 1, does not alter service tax rates for hotel stays or food and beverages served on premises. The MoF acknowledged that while the SST expansion now includes commercial property rentals and sales tax on select premium food items, these changes should not lead to the 10 to 15 per cent cost surge cited by some hotel operators. 'The indirect effects of SST adjustments are insufficient to warrant such steep price hikes,' the ministry stated in response to industry concerns. Hotel associations had earlier warned of impending rate increases, attributing them to the revised tax framework. However, the MoF cautioned that unjustified price adjustments would be scrutinised. 'If hotels raise rates by 15 per cent citing SST, the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN) will assess whether profiteering is involved,' it added. The government emphasised its commitment to preventing unreasonable price surges, ensuring consumers are not burdened by disproportionate cost escalations.
Focus Malaysia
3 days ago
- Focus Malaysia
A case of 'Act of God, blaming silly soil in Putra Heights explosion
SO the Putra Heights gas pipe explosion was due to an 'Act of God', sorry, I mean an 'Act of Soil'. No politicians or developers were at fault, even though there was digging work for a construction project near the pipe. Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari revealed on June 30 that soil subsidence had happened since the PETRONAS gas pipeline was laid in 2000, causing it to sink by 15.9cm. So was the MB indirectly pointing the finger at PETRONAS for not maintaining the gas pipeline properly in those 25 years? Yet Selangor police chief Datuk Hussein Omar Khan declared there was no negligence, no sabotage and no mischief. Did that clear PETRONAS? So, we have yet another Malaysian disaster with ZERO human involvement. Let's all blame the silent soil that can't speak! I read many funny and sarcastic comments online about the 'real cause' of the tragedy. Here are some: 'Maybe the earthworms wrongly hit the gas pipe.' 'Bring the soil to court!!' 'Even the foreign grass cutters would have noticed if the soil was sinking.' Only in Malaysia. Floods: Blame too much rain. Landslides: Blame rain and weak soil. Gasipe explosion: Blame soil movement! 1MDB repeated? It's like 1MDB all over again — a great crime with 'no criminals' – as local authorities initially proclaimed. And now we have Malaysia's biggest industrial disaster – with no human fault. The only difference is that this is happening under a Madani, not Barisan Nasional (BN) government. On April 1, the fire from the PETRONAS gas pipeline saw flames shooting over 30m into the air with temperatures reaching 1,000 degrees Celsius. The surroundings became a hellfire landscape with 162 houses severely or partially damaged though incredibly no single life was lost.. So who is going to compensate residents for the damage and hardship? The soil? The Department of Occupational Safety and Health Department (DOSH) said the gas pipe met technical specifications but was not fully supported by the soil around it. This caused a weakness in the welded joint which then broke apart. The Minerals and Geosciences Department had also found that the pipe was located in 'waterlogged soil'. The presence of water had caused the soil to become loose, causing the pipe to sink. But something doesn't smell right. Even if soil is water-logged, why would it move when it's not on a slope but deep underground? No landslides were reported there. I'm sorry to say this but blaming 'water in soil' is like saying 'heavy rain from the heavens' caused the explosion. This sounds like the 'Act of God' excuse that the late Tun S. Samy Vellu used whenever disasters struck. The DOSH finding is very alarming because PETRONAS has 2,623km of gas pipelines supplying power and petrochemical plants plus other factories across Peninsular Malaysia. Since our country has heavy rains, how many pipes are in 'water-logged' soil? The Cilisos portal traced PETRONAS gas pipes online and the map shows that they pass areas of coastal Selangor that were once peat swamps bit now drained for padi fields. These soils become 'water-logged' during downpours. Cilisos also found many housing areas next to gas pipelines – some without the required 30m 'buffer zone'.\ Does PETRONAS need to stop transporting gas until every inch of pipeline is inspected and certified safe? Or should all residents living near such pipes sell their homes to avoid getting burnt alive? Is PETRONAS guilty? DAP Puchong MP Yeo Bee Yin now insisted PETRONAS is still liable for the disaster even though ground instability was found to be 'the cause'. Yeo, a former oil and gas field engineer, further claimed that PETRONAS is responsible for ensuring its assets are in good condition and should compensate those affected by the fire. But there is one problem here – the Selangor police chief has already announced there was NO negligence, sabotage nor mischief. So how can PETRONAS be liable? Yet all these years before the Putra Heights disaster, there have been no explosions on over 2,000km of gas pipelines even though some surely pass through 'water-logged' soil. According to an expert familiar with pipeline safety, PETRONAS actually has a decent safety record. 'Gas pipelines are very robust and virtually indestructible. They have gauges at every junction.' 'If there is a leakage, this will trigger an alarm at the central command centre,' explained the expert. 'The pipe is monitored by Petronas with sound and pressure sensors. But the gas leak and ignition may have happened too fast before action could be taken.' The shops and excavator So what could have caused such a sudden gas leak? Shortly after the explosion, many netizens pointed to the building of shop lots near the accident site. In response, Subang Jaya mayor Datuk Amirul Azizan Abd Rahim told The Star that the shop development was legally sanctioned back in 2022. This included approvals to utilise the PETRONAS Right-of-Way (ROW) over the pipeline area. The contractor was also on an approved panel said the mayor. But we may have a 'smoking gun' clue to this great mystery, a big metal suspect. This is the infamous excavator at the site. Menteri Besar Amirudin initially said no excavators were found there. But he was forced to U-turn on this, claiming he was 'misunderstood'. He also denied that he was trying to 'protect' certain developers. This was after Selangor police chief Hussein confirmed in early April that excavation work for a sewage pipe was done 30m from the site but said police would need two more weeks to investigate if this had caused the blast. He promised the public then, 'No one will escape, and every party involved will be investigated.' Yet a few days later on April 7, Hussein was quoted by The Rakyat Post that there was 'no need to reveal the contractor's identity at this stage.' According to police statements, the contractor 'followed all standard operating procedures', including maintaining the approved 2.1-meter depth limit for the sewage pipe installation. Yet given that investigations were on-going then, so how did the police know that excavation SOP had been followed? On April 29, Hussein announced that this notorious excavator had been located buried using ground penetrating radar. And now, three months after the tragedy – when the soil is being blamed = the excavation contractor has STILL not been publicly revealed. The pipe safety expert commented, 'The soil subsided because digging was not supervised properly.' 'The same amount of soil extracted must be replaced with the same amount of soil filled. Otherwise, the soil will subside. It's basic soil mechanics.' So what's the conclusion? Unfortunately, it's to blame the stupid soil for not staying still. Blame the wicked water in the soil. Because humans are beyond blame when it comes to mysterious Malaysian disasters. – July 3, 2025
