logo
‘I have a £10k house deposit. Should I pay off my £45k student loan first?'

‘I have a £10k house deposit. Should I pay off my £45k student loan first?'

Telegraph15-04-2025
Receive personalised tips on how to improve your financial situation, for free. Here's how to apply or fill in the form below.
Imogen Cromack faces a dilemma typical for her generation.
The 26-year-old, who works in communications in London, would like to buy a house with her partner before she turns 30.
She has around £10,000 saved in cash, which she has put away in a two-year fixed-rate savings account, where it will earn decent guaranteed returns.
However, she's also saddled with £45,000 student loan debt, having completed a three-year business course at the University of the West of England.
Repayments are taken from her salary each month, at 9pc on anything earned over the Plan 2 threshold of £28,470. Thanks to the interest charged, for many graduates, the prospect of never paying off a student loan is all too real.
She asks: 'My main question, really, is: should I look at paying off my student loan faster, or should I save instead for a deposit and other house buying expenses?'
Ms Cromack spends less than £2,000 a year on holidays, choosing to go on one 'big' holiday a year, usually lasting a week.
She pays £1,000 a month in rent and bills, and prioritises a £80-a-month gym membership, which she gets heavily discounted through work.
She says: 'I don't frequently go out for big expensive dinners. I probably spend more on just seeing my friends and doing some activities and stuff like that. I am more of a homebody personally.'
As she looks towards the next five years, Cromack says her priority is to be financially stable, adding: 'I would like to be prepped to be able to stand on my own two feet.'
Lucie Spencer, financial planning partner at Evelyn Partners, said:
Ms Cromack lives a relatively conservative lifestyle in terms of expenditure, so it is sensible to consider the implications of paying off her student loan early versus saving to buy her first home.
What she must remember is that student loan repayments can affect the size of the mortgage she can secure, though it won't have as heavy an impact as other personal debts.
While student loans do not appear on a credit file, and therefore won't affect her credit rating, they can impact her affordability level, as the student loan repayment counts as a regular outgoing in the same way her gym membership does.
However, in contrast with other debts, it is the amount which you repay which gets factored into this assessment rather than the total outstanding debt.
In essence, the student loan system works more like a graduate tax on earnings than a conventional loan. Like income tax, the more you earn the more you pay, so it is the higher earners that will end up paying the most.
But, while Ms Cromack qualifies for repayments and may want to consider repaying her debt earlier, the savings she has now won't be enough to clear her outstanding liabilities, and she will continue to repay the same amount each month.
If she chooses to take time out from her career at any point, perhaps to raise a family or take a sabbatical, her repayments will stop for that period.
The current interest rate on a Plan 2 student loan is relatively high at 7.3pc, as of September 2024, but this typically resets every September and is linked back to the RPI of the previous March, so it should lower later this year.
With that in mind, it may make more sense for Ms Cromack to prioritise short-term financial priorities such as raising a deposit to buy a home rather than clearing her student debt.
If she wants to focus on building up a deposit, then she could consider a lifetime Isa (Lisa), where she will attract not only interest on her savings, but also an additional 25pc top-up from the Government of up to £1,000 on the maximum annual contribution of £4,000.
Savings rates are in retreat mode, and it is important to keep savings as tax efficient as possible – something a Lisa can offer.
A Lisa pot can be invested in stocks and shares or held in cash, but if Ms Cromack plans to purchase a home within the next five years, it may be better to stick with a cash option to ensure she is not impacted by any stock market fluctuations.
Darius McDermott, managing director at Chelsea Financial Services, said:
It's great to see someone in their 20s balancing both ambition and financial discipline. The desire to save for a home while also thinking about clearing debt is admirable, but it's important to be realistic and strategic with priorities.
With £10,000 already saved in a two-year fixed-rate account, the foundation for a house deposit is in place.
However, the student loan repayment at 9pc is a significant cost. Put simply, if the interest on the loan is higher than the return on your savings, it often makes financial sense to prioritise debt repayment, especially with high inflation eroding savings in real terms.
That said, student loans are unlike other forms of debt – repayment is tied to income and is eventually written off. So rather than rushing to pay it off entirely, a balanced approach might be wiser, continuing to save steadily, while ensuring you're not accruing more expensive interest than necessary.
As Ms Cromack's income grows, gradually increasing contributions to savings, and eventually exploring investment options, could help build momentum towards her long-term goals. She's already made a strong start with her fixed-rate savings.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I'm paying thousands of pounds to protect my children from inheritance tax'
‘I'm paying thousands of pounds to protect my children from inheritance tax'

Telegraph

time3 days ago

  • Telegraph

‘I'm paying thousands of pounds to protect my children from inheritance tax'

Paul Hiatt is spending hundreds of pounds a year on life insurance to protect his children's inheritance from falling into the clutches of Rachel Reeves. Hiatt first took out a policy eight years ago, but was forced to take another deal out shortly after the October Budget, Labour's first in 14 years. 'Our pensions are now a cash cow for the Chancellor,' he says. He is one of thousands of families across Britain attempting to shield their hard-earned money and mitigate a large inheritance tax bill. Financial advisers say life insurance policies designed to pay off tax bills were traditionally seen as a 'last resort or sticking plaster' due to expensive premiums. However, Labour's premiership has 'triggered a renewed surge in interest', says David Little, of financial planner Evelyn Partners. Some policies are specifically designed to meet death duties that may be due on gifts under the 'seven-year rule' (see more, below), while others simply pay out a cash amount that can be used as the family sees fit. So, should you follow suit and take evasive action now, parting with large sums of cash today to potentially avoid larger sums in the future? How life insurance can reduce your bill From April 2027, private pensions will become part of a person's estate and therefore be liable for inheritance tax. This will add substantially to the amount of inheritance tax HMRC collects. Reeves also targeted family businesses and farmers. Inheritance tax will be charged on 50pc of the value of business or agricultural assets above £1m from April 2026. Hiatt, who lives in rural Warwickshire, spent 46 years working in the water industry as a project manager and retired nearly three years ago. The 67-year-old has one life insurance policy with Scottish Widows, costing £500 a year, and one with Vitality Life, costing £717.24 annually. They are 'term' policies, meaning a lump sum is only paid to his beneficiaries if he dies before his 90th birthday, and each payout is fixed at £50,000. He wants to leave his estate to his two children, who are 24 and 30. If a life insurance policy is written into a trust, it is counted as outside of a person's estate, and the lump sum can then be used to pay an inheritance tax bill. Sometimes this is done automatically, but in other cases, it is up to whoever takes out the policy to make sure it is written into trust. Millions of pounds a year are needlessly handed over to HMRC in extra inheritance tax because this simple decision has not been taken. Premiums vary depending on your age and other factors, such as whether you smoke. As the chances of dying sooner are far greater, policies for over-65s are usually significantly more expensive than for younger customers. The average inheritance tax bill paid by estates has increased from £199,000 to £243,000, according to LifeSearch, a broker. It said a 60-year-old non-smoker can expect to pay £431 a month for whole of life cover of £300,000. For an 80-year-old, this soars to £1,413 a month. On the other end of the scale, a 30-year-old buying a whole life policy would currently pay around £9.39 a month, with a £10,000 payout. If a 30-year-old wants a policy that will pay out £100,000, it will cost £54.20 a month with Legal and General, at today's rates. Sales of whole of life cover, also known as life assurance, have increased more than threefold since last autumn, says insurance broker Justin Harper. Harper, of LifeSearch, says: 'We have seen a noticeable rise in the number of whole of life policies being taken out specifically to address inheritance tax planning, driven by both adviser recommendations and customer-initiated enquiries. A fixed amount of cover or cover that rises with inflation are available, Harper explains. The latter might be chosen as the potential tax liability is likely to increase over time. If you are younger and planning ahead, term insurance can be 'more cost-effective in the short term'. However, Katie Ridland, of wealth manager St James's Place, advises clients to opt for whole of life policies because 'you can't plan the date of your death'. Both policies mean your family does not have to wait for probate, the money is released quickly and allows them to pay inheritance tax without delay. 'The best day to take out life insurance was yesterday,' adds Ridland. 'It's the two inevitable things that people don't want to talk about – death and taxes – but we need to talk about protection from an early age.' After the Budget left him 'gobsmacked', Hiatt also decided to give money away to his children. Unlimited sums of money can be given away without being liable for inheritance tax if they are made out of income, are part of normal expenditure and leave the donor enough money to maintain a normal standard of living (see more on the valuable unlimited gifting rule here). The donor must live for seven years after giving the money to avoid a tax bill if they are leaving behind more than the tax-free allowance. 'I've got a substantial amount in a defined contribution pension pot, and I have also benefited from a final salary benefit scheme as well, so I count myself very lucky,' Hiatt says, 'but the Budget certainly put the cat among the pigeons. I'm really disappointed.' Families can also use an insurance policy to protect these gifts from inheritance tax. A gift inter vivos insurance can be used to shield a loved one from paying the levy on money or assets if you pass away within seven years of gifting. Tony Müdd of St James's Place says this is growing in popularity and is a 'simple and effective solution' to covering unexpected tax liabilities. 'Better ways of saving inheritance tax' However, life insurance policies are 'by no means a silver bullet', Evelyn Partners' Little says. Mike Warburton, The Telegraph's tax expert, warns they are only 'appropriate in the right circumstances'. He adds: 'I am not keen on whole life policies, which are expensive and do not reduce the overall tax burden. In my view, there are better ways of saving inheritance tax.' Savers can put other assets into trusts to protect them from death duties, as well as giving money out of surplus income, as explained above. Warburton says there is a risk that elderly people will enter into a commitment to make regular premiums and 'subsequently run into a problem if they have expensive care needs.' Little says: 'Whole of life insurance plans were seen somewhat as a last resort, or a sticking plaster until financial planning evolved. This was mainly due to the cost of the premiums, which can be very expensive, especially if health concerns are present. 'However, the October Budget introduced pensions into the estate calculation from 2027, triggering a renewed surge in interest from clients in these policies. When written in trust, they can provide a tax-free lump sum for children or other beneficiaries outside of probate, enabling the inheritance tax liability to be cleared, leaving the other assets intact and ready to be inherited. 'That's said, they are by no means a silver bullet. It is important that the expected total premium payable is weighed against the sum assured and life expectancy of the client.'

Inheritance tax on pensions could destroy thousands of family businesses
Inheritance tax on pensions could destroy thousands of family businesses

Times

time07-07-2025

  • Times

Inheritance tax on pensions could destroy thousands of family businesses

Thousands of family firms face being wiped out by a little-understood tweak to inheritance tax rules, experts say. The move by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to charge death tax on pensions could force the liquidation of businesses, jeopardising jobs and the broader economy, according to the wealth manager Evelyn Partners. It said that about 15,000 businesses are at risk. From April 2027 unspent pension assets will be subject to inheritance tax and, crucially, pension schemes will have to settle their share of the tax bill within six months of the pension holder's death. This shift, which was revealed in the autumn budget, will hit business owners who have held commercial property — such as company premises, workshops or machinery — within their self-invested personal pensions (Sipps) or small self-administered schemes. What's the problem? Holding company assets within pensions has been widely recommended for years, allowing business owners to draw rental income from their property in retirement. These pension assets can then be left to beneficiaries tax-free, passing on the operational reins of the company to the next generation and ensuring the continuity of the family enterprise. However, this once-sensible succession planning is now poised to become a fiscal nightmare. Gary Smith from Evelyn Partners said: 'It could be a serious problem for thousands of small and medium-sized businesses that are flying under the radar, probably because it's not widely understood. 'Together with the host of tax and cost pressures on entrepreneurs and family businesses at the moment, owners and directors who don't take advice or make preparations could fall foul of the new inheritance tax charge — with the end result in some cases that their businesses are liquidated and jobs lost.' It's about liquidity The most immediate danger that the inheritance tax changes could pose stems from the illiquid nature of commercial property. Selling a building or piece of machinery that is held within a pension could take months or years, unlike cash or shares which can be sold or moved instantly. Under the government's proposals, a pension scheme (not the wider estate where other cash may be available) would have to settle an inheritance tax bill within HM Revenue & Customs' six-month deadline. 'On the death of the business owner, the firm could face the prospect of a disruptive fire sale of their premises to meet a tax bill that could even jeopardise the survival of the firm,' Smith said. • Failure to meet the deadline would trigger interest charges and penalties from HMRC, adding to the the financial strain on grieving families and vulnerable businesses. What are the rules? The inheritance tax rules allow you to pass on £325,000 of your estate inheritance tax-free. You can get an extra £175,000 allowance if your estate is worth less than £2 million and you leave your main home to direct descendants, such as children or grandchildren. This gives you a potential £500,000 tax-free allowance. Anything left to a spouse or civil partner is tax-free and they can also inherit one another's unused allowances, allowing a couple to pass on up to £1 million tax-free. Anything above these thresholds can be subject to 40 per cent tax. Any unused part of a pension, including property, is also exempt from inheritance tax — until April 2027. After that date, companies will face big tax bills and could find their ways to pay limited, given the immovable nature of commercial property. One option would be a fire sale of illiquid assets — potentially taking financial hits because of the need to settle up quickly. Another option would be for the pension holder to build up cash reserves in their fund to mitigate tax bills after their death. This could, however, inflate the value of the pension and, therefore, the potential inheritance tax bill. Double blow Another change is in the pipeline that will also make it harder to pass on a family firm. Business relief tax exemption, which at the moment gives qualifying business interests 100 per cent exemption from inheritance tax, will be cut in April so that only the first £1 million of such assets will get full relief. Any value above that will get 50 per cent relief. A £5 million family business would be fully exempt from inheritance tax under today's rules, but from April, £4 million of that value would get partial relief, leaving £2 million exposed to a 40 per cent tax rate. • Inheritance tax brings in record £8.2 billion for HMRC Smith said: 'The pending inheritance tax on pensions rule change is just one more blow to entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized businesses, coming alongside the new cap on business relief, higher capital gains tax, employer national insurance hikes, a big jump in the minimum wage and the new employee rights legislation. 'It's not just about the impact on business owners' retirement plans but about the threat to jobs and investment and the harm this will cause to entrepreneurship.' 'This will drive a bus through my life's work' One businessman based in the north of England started up a small self-administered pension scheme in 1993. His logistics company was growing, he was looking to buy up nearby land, and his adviser recommended putting it into a pension. 'They said, look, you are a growing business, why don't you set up a pension fund and start making contributions and then you can get to a point where you can buy the land next door in a tax-efficient way,' explained the company boss, 66, who now gets a pension from the scheme. He bought the first property through the fund in 2000, and it expanded to hold five worth a total of about £20 million. They include the main two facilities that his logistics company operates in, which pay rent back to the fund, and three rented by other businesses. • How to give money to your family without sparking a big tax bill Buying property through a pension fund has several tax advantages: no tax is paid on rental income paid to the fund by tenants of the properties it holds and they are also free from capital gains tax if sold. It also meant that the boss's two children, who are trustees and beneficiaries of the fund, could inherit the fund tax-free. But then came the change to inheritance tax rules, which means that if he and his wife die after April 2027, their children would have to find £9 million within six months to settle the tax bill. With most of the fund tied up in property, this could mean the children having to quickly sell the business premises. 'It'll have to be a fire sale, meaning we probably won't get good value on the sale, and selling these facilities will damage the family business, potentially irreparably,' he said. 'Rachel Reeves is driving a bus right through my life's work with these changes.'

Why the pension death tax could destroy thousands of family businesses
Why the pension death tax could destroy thousands of family businesses

Times

time02-07-2025

  • Times

Why the pension death tax could destroy thousands of family businesses

Thousands of family firms face being wiped out by a little-understood tweak to inheritance tax rules, experts say. The move by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to charge death tax on pensions could force the liquidation of businesses, jeopardising jobs and the broader economy, according to the wealth manager Evelyn Partners. It said that about 15,000 businesses are at risk. From April 2027 unspent pension assets will be subject to inheritance tax and, crucially, pension schemes will have to settle their share of the tax bill within six months of the pension holder's death. This shift, which was revealed in the autumn budget, will hit business owners who have held commercial property — such as company premises, workshops or machinery — within their self-invested personal pensions (Sipps) or small self-administered schemes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store