
Content creator claims homeless prank was staged, issues apology
The creator @aluk_77 took to Instagram, yesterday, to address the widespread backlash, asserting that the viral video showing them giving chicken bones to a homeless individual was not genuine exploitation but rather a staged scenario.
According to his explanation, the homeless man had consented to participate in the filming beforehand, with both parties agreeing to the scripted nature of the content.
The creator emphasised that the man was not actually left with only food scraps.
To support his claims, he shared additional footage showing the homeless individual receiving what appeared to be a complete meal consisting of rice and two pieces of fried chicken, which the man accepted gratefully.
'Please give us a better chance to give back to society. We will do more good deeds later, to help the homeless,' the content creator stated in his Instagram response.
He concluded his clarification with a direct apology to viewers: 'I'm really sorry, everyone.'
The explanation comes after the original video sparked widespread condemnation from Malaysian social media users, who criticised the creators for what they perceived as cruel and insensitive treatment of a vulnerable individual.
READ ALSO: Malaysian content creators face backlash for homeless prank
The controversial Instagram post by users @aluk_777, @olympiccc_555, and @kaijie_666, which has since been removed, documented their visit to a Kentucky Fried Chicken outlet where they consumed their meals before deciding to 'donate' their leftover bones.
In the video, the trio justified their actions by stating they didn't want to waste food, proceeding to pack the chicken bones with pre-packed KFC rice before approaching a sleeping homeless individual on a walkway.
The footage shows the homeless man initially appearing grateful upon receiving what he believed was a meal, only to discover the contents were merely food scraps.
Despite the humiliating situation, the man accepted the leftovers and thanked the creators.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
#SHOWBIZ: Amy of Search issues letter of demand to Shila Amzah
KUALA LUMPUR: Lawyers for Datuk Amy of Search have sent a letter of demand to singer Shila Amzah, following the recent viral controversy involving the two artistes. Amy's lawyer, Datuk M Reza Hassan, confirmed the notice had been issued but did not share any further details. "We just sent a letter of demand, but they (Shila's lawyers) have asked for time to get further instructions from Shila. I can't share anything more for now. We'll see how it goes," M Reza told HM Online. The dispute began after Shila, 35, whose real name is Nurshahila Amir Amzah, filed a police report on July 10. The 'Patah Seribu' singer claimed a legendary singer had verbally attacked her at a recent event they both attended. Shila later confirmed the individual was Amy, who is also the father of actress Nabila Huda. Initial police investigations revealed the tension was caused by Amy's dissatisfaction with Shila's alleged interference in his family's affairs. Both parties have since had their statements taken by the police. Following this, Amy filed a counter-report at the Shah Alam District Police Headquarters on July 16, which was also confirmed by M Reza. Adding to the speculation, Amy was recently seen deleting all of his posts on Instagram, leading to questions about his actions and current situation.


The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Court orders Caprice to remove defamatory Instagram posts about businessman
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court has ordered rapper Caprice to immediately remove defamatory Instagram posts about businessman Datuk Seri Jeyenderan Ramasamy. Judge Datuk Ahmad Shahrir Mohd Salleh granted an ad-interim injunction after Jeyenderan filed a lawsuit alleging that Caprice, whose real name is Ariz Ramli, had posted false claims linking him to criminal activities. The court also barred Caprice from making further defamatory statements pending a full hearing. Jeyenderan's legal team confirmed the ruling, while Caprice's lawyer acknowledged the order. The plaintiff, a shipping company CEO, claimed the posts damaged his reputation and caused financial losses. Jeyenderan stated that the posts, uploaded on July 10, falsely accused him of gangsterism and armed threats without evidence. He argued that Caprice, who has over 1.5 million Instagram followers, intended to harm his reputation. The defamatory content allegedly led to the cancellation of keynote speaking engagements in Dubai, Turkey, and India, costing him RM1 million in lost contracts. A letter of demand was issued on July 15, but Caprice rejected the terms through his lawyers. Jeyenderan is now seeking RM3 million in damages for reputational harm, alongside an injunction to prevent further defamation and a public apology. - Bernama


New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Court orders Caprice to remove defamatory Instagram posts about businessman
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today ordered rapper Caprice to immediately remove all defamatory posts about a businessman from his Instagram account, which were uploaded last month. Judge Datuk Ahmad Shahrir Mohd Salleh made the ruling after allowing an ad-interim injunction sought by Datuk Seri Jeyenderan Ramasamy, 50, against Caprice, whose real name is Ariz Ramli, 39, as the sole defendant. The court also restrained Caprice from making further defamatory statements about the plaintiff pending the hearing of the inter partes injunction. The order was confirmed by Jeyenderan's lawyers, Muniandy Vestanathan, Fiona Aurelia Culas and Muhammad Afiq Yahawa, as well as Caprice's counsel, Megat Syazlee Mokhtarom, when contacted by Bernama. Jeyenderan, the chief executive officer of a shipping company, filed the suit on July 21, claiming that on July 10, the defendant had uploaded several posts, including photographs and videos of him, on Instagram, allegedly linking him to criminal activities, gangsterism and armed threats, without any credible evidence. Based on his statement of claim, the plaintiff asserted that the defamatory posts were intended to create suspicion, public hatred and social pressure against him, and that the defendant had never contacted him or his representatives to seek verification or clarification before publishing such serious allegations. He contended that the defendant's actions clearly demonstrated no intent to provide fair and accurate information, but rather to tarnish his name and reputation, noting that the defendant commands significant influence on Instagram with over 1.5 million followers. As a result of the publications, Jeyenderan alleged that his reputation as a global shipping and maritime expert had been damaged, and claimed he suffered special damages amounting to RM1 million after losing several keynote speaking contracts in Dubai, Turkey and India, offered by a Dubai-based company. On July 15, his solicitors issued a letter of demand to the defendant outlining several demands, which the defendant subsequently rejected through Messrs Megat Iqbal & Co. The plaintiff is seeking RM3 million in damages for reputational harm, special damages, general damages and exemplary damages, along with costs and any other relief deemed appropriate by the court. He is also applying for an injunction to prevent the defendant from making further defamatory statements, to compel the removal of all defamatory content, and to require a public apology across all social media accounts owned or controlled by the defendant.