
Breakingviews - Scott Bessent debt plan has awkward historic echo
Scott Bessent, the current occupant of Gallatin's office, faces a task considerably bigger than his illustrious predecessor's. Buying Louisiana cost $15 million, equivalent, opens new tab to around $16 billion today. By contrast, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates, opens new tab the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) recently passed by Congress will increase the federal government's financing needs by $3.4 trillion over the next decade. Bessent's attempt to square the fiscal circle is reminiscent of an altogether more controversial pioneer of public finance: the 18th-century Scottish economist and speculator John Law, author of the world's first inflationary financial crash.
The political stakes are high. In stark contrast to the CBO's pessimistic assessment, the White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) expects, opens new tab the president's flagship economic bill to shrink future budget shortfalls by $5.5 trillion. The CBO sees the U.S.'s debt to GDP ballooning to nearly 130%, while the CEA has it shrinking to a relatively frugal 94%. If Bessent manages to realise the administration's vision, he will also have earned a statue on Pennsylvania Avenue.
Over the past six months, the outlines of a four-part plan have emerged. The first part is Trump's sweeping tariffs on imports. Economists used to the U.S. championing global free trade were understandably shocked when the president unveiled the levies in April. Yet from a fiscal perspective they are beginning to work. According to, opens new tab Treasury data, customs duties brought in $64 billion in the second quarter of 2025 – nearly $50 billion more than the same period last year – with almost half of that coming in June alone. Over the longer term, trade diversion and re-shoring of manufacturing will doubtless crimp those proceeds. Nevertheless, the bounty lends credence to Bessent's prediction that tariff revenue will top $300 billion in 2025, and to the CEA's prediction that the levies will bring in $2.8 trillion over the next decade.
Part two is even simpler: bet on economic growth. The CBO's baseline budget projections assume U.S. GDP will expand by less than 2% a year. The White House thinks that's a desultory underestimate. The CEA points to the artificial intelligence investment boom, rampant growth of private credit, a promised surge of deregulation, and the dynamic effects of the tax cuts and investment incentives embedded in the OBBBA. It predicts these factors will leave the U.S. economy significantly larger a decade from now than the CBO predicts. The non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget accuses, opens new tab the White House of 'fantasy growth assumptions'. Bessent is not deterred. After all, stronger growth narrows the financing gap by $4.7 trillion.
Part three is to force down interest rates and reduce the cost of servicing the public debt. Interest costs are now the U.S. government's second largest expenditure category, running at nearly $1 trillion a year. For months, Trump has assailed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell for what he claims is excessive hawkishness, dubbing him 'Mr. Too Late', a 'major loser', and a 'stubborn mule', and probed replacing Powell before his term expires next May. The president believes the central bank should drop its policy rate to 1%.
Undermining the Fed's inflation-fighting credentials would risk higher longer-term borrowing costs as investors demand a premium to hold U.S. debt. Bessent has a plan to head that off by reducing the Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR), which limits the size of U.S. banks' balance sheets relative to their equity capital. Relaxing this rule will enable large lenders to hold more Treasury bonds, offsetting selling by other investors. The Fed is considering the proposal.
These measures inch Bessent closer to meeting the White House's fiscal expectations, but won't get him all the way. That's where the fourth and most exotic part of the plan comes in: the promotion of U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins. The GENIUS Act currently passing through Congress would open the floodgates for cryptocurrencies backed by dollar-denominated assets. A surge in stablecoins and a corresponding boost in demand for U.S. Treasury debt, Bessent believes, opens new tab, 'could lower government borrowing costs and help rein in the national debt'. If the tokens catch on with overseas users the resulting extraterritorial seigniorage will also afford Uncle Sam a new way of monetising the greenback's exorbitant privilege, opens new tab. Citi analysts expect, opens new tab the stablecoin market to balloon to $3.7 trillion by 2030, from about $250 billion today.
Gallatin would recognise the first two parts of Bessent's plan - the exceptional potential of the American economy and the bumper customs revenues it brings. But pressuring financial institutions to hold U.S. government debt and championing monetary innovation go well beyond anything the financial guru ever dreamt of.
They are, however, eerily reminiscent of the infamous 'System' of John Law. In 1715, the Regent of France invited the Scottish professional gambler to cure the stricken superpower of its debt-ridden malaise. Over the next four years he implemented a visionary economic strategy the like of which the world had never seen before, nor has seen since – until now.
The lynchpin of Law's scheme was lockstep monetary and fiscal coordination. He founded France's first public bank and introduced a revolutionary innovation – paper money. Then he reformed the tax system and radically restructured the public debt, convincing investors to hold his novel banknotes instead. The result was that the cost of borrowing plummeted to a previously unheard-of 2%. For a brief moment in early 1720, it seemed France's problems had been solved.
Unfortunately it all unravelled in an epic inflationary boom and bust. Subordinating monetary to fiscal policy while simultaneously reinventing the means of payment itself proved an unstable combination. Law was driven out of France in ignominy and retired back to the casino in Venice. No statue commemorates his genius – just a plain paving stone in a local church, opens new tab.
Is Bessent a 21st-century Gallatin or the reincarnation of John Law? As the Scotsman himself might have put it: 'mesdames et messieurs – faites vos jeux'.
Follow @felixmwmartin, opens new tab on X
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
43 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh emerges as one of UK's top co-working markets
Scotland is home to 279 flexible workspaces as of Q2 2025 — with Glasgow (61), Edinburgh (55), and Aberdeen (26) all ranking among the UK's top 15 coworking markets. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Together, these three cities anchor Scotland's position as a key player in the UK's expanding flexible office landscape. That's according to CoworkingCafe's Q2 2025 State of the Coworking Industry Report, which draws on proprietary data as of July. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The report provides a detailed breakdown of flexible workspace supply at both national and local levels — highlighting the top 15 coworking markets, the largest operators, and median pricing for monthly memberships, day passes, virtual office packages, and meeting rooms. Median Subscription Prices by Country Q2 2025 Median Subscription Prices by Country Q2 2025 Scotland is home to 279 co-working spaces as of Q2 2025, with more than half of them concentrated in the country's three largest markets: Glasgow (#4), Edinburgh (#5), and Aberdeen (#11) in the UK-wide rankings. This urban clustering highlights the regional demand for flexible work solutions, particularly in cities with strong business, academic, and innovation ecosystems. Across Scotland, co-working pricing remains competitive compared to UK averages. The median monthly membership is £150, notably below the UK median of £180. Day passes average £23/day, and virtual office packages are priced at a median of £95/month, aligning with the national median. Meeting rooms in Scotland cost £25/hour on average. Among operators, Wasps is a key player in the region, with 18 co-working locations across various Scottish cities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Distribution of Coworking Spaces — UK & Ireland Q2 2025 With 61 flexible workspaces, Glasgow ranks #4 in the UK and leads Scotland in co-working availability. It offers a balanced pricing profile: monthly memberships are priced at £160, above the Scottish median but still below the UK benchmark. Day passes cost £23/day, tying Glasgow for the most affordable rate in the UK alongside Newcastle, Nottingham, and Brighton. Virtual office subscriptions, however, are relatively high at £119/month, well above both Scottish and UK medians. Meeting rooms are priced affordably at £23/hour, one of the lowest rates nationwide and comparable to Cardiff. Edinburgh ranks #5 in the UK and second in Scotland, offering 55 co-working locations across the city. As Scotland's capital, it commands some of the highest pricing in the region. Monthly memberships average £192, well above both the Scottish and UK medians. Day passes are priced at £30/day, placing Edinburgh among the UK's top-tier markets, alongside Greater London, Oxford, and Belfast. Virtual offices cost £99/month, slightly above the national median of £95, while meeting rooms are priced at £40/hour, among the highest in Scotland and the UK overall. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Aberdeen ranks #11 in the UK and third in Scotland, with 26 co-working spaces as of Q2 2025. Pricing in the city reflects a mid-range profile: monthly memberships are £160/month, above the Scottish average but still below the national median. Day passes cost £28/day, higher than both Scottish and UK medians, while virtual offices are priced at £95/month, matching the national figure. Meeting rooms in Aberdeen are typically £30/hour, aligning with the UK-wide median. As of Q2 2025, the UK and Ireland collectively host 4,199 co-working spaces, reflecting a broad and mature flexible office landscape. The UK accounts for 3,949 of these locations, with 3,456 in England, 279 in Scotland, 124 in Wales, and 90 in Northern Ireland. Greater London remains the epicenter of activity, with 1,202 coworking spaces, followed by other major hubs such as Manchester (118), Birmingham (68), Glasgow (61), and Bristol (61). In Ireland, there are 250 co-working spaces, with nearly half concentrated in Dublin (119) — firmly positioning the capital as the country's dominant flex office market. You can read the full report at


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Kate Forbes showed real bravery
There is a certain worldly cynicism aroused by the announcement that a politician is stepping down to spend more time with their family. It was for a long time the refuge of MPs who had earned themselves an entry in the News of the World, the Who's Who of romeos, rogues and reprobates, for their activities with ladies – or young gentlemen – of the night. Less commonly, it was regarded as an admission that someone could not hack it or was frustrated by their slow progress up the greasy pole. After all, no one wants to quit politics. Contra the cynics, Kate Forbes. Scotland's deputy first minister will stand down from Holyrood at next May's elections, having somehow crammed a whole political life into ten tempestuous years. In that time, she has been a backbencher, public finance minister, finance secretary, leadership candidate, backbencher again, and finally deputy first minister and economy secretary. In her letter to first minister John Swinney, she acknowledges that 'quite rightly this job entails long days far from home' but 'I do not wish to seek re-election and miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Forbes married her husband Alasdair, a widower, in 2021 and became stepmum to his three daughters. The following year the couple had a daughter, who is turning three. (Some men go to war, others jump out of planes, but living with five women is true bravery.) Forbes was never meant to get where she did. Upon her election to the Scottish parliament in 2016, her religious views were known and they marked her as an apostate in an era of secular progressivism. A member of the Free Presbyterian Church, Forbes's religion is not an identity category but a living faith. She believes in it all: birth, death, resurrection and salvation. The happy-clappy bits and the fire and brimstone alike. There was little chance of her progressing beyond the outer ministry in the modern, uber-liberal SNP, and she had to settle for a junior ministerial post in the Scottish government's finance department. Unfortunately for the party leadership, events overtook. The night before the 2020 budget speech, finance secretary Derek Mackay was forced to quit after a newspaper learned of his text messages to a 16 year old. Forbes, who had been allowed no real input into the budget, was thrust onto the floor of Holyrood to deliver – and be interrogated on – a speech she had only been handed hours before. She did so with such confidence and composure that even the SNP's most loyal critics commended her. That performance made her promotion to the cabinet finance post inevitable, though some more glumly considered it unavoidable. By the time Nicola Sturgeon resigned in February 2023, Forbes had established herself as a moderate, pro-business Nationalist who wanted the Scottish government to focus on prosperity rather than gender ideology, an agenda she opposed. Yet the prospect of the party moving to the centre, and especially of it being led by an evangelical Christian, prompted the SNP establishment to throw its weight behind Humza Yousaf, who was well-meaning but plainly not up to running a devolved government. In a straight fight, he would have been no match for Forbes, but instead the leadership contest was shaped by her internal enemies and the media into an inquisition on her religious beliefs. Journalists well-laden with secular prejudices delighted in making her answer for those verses of Scripture which scandalise modern sensibilities. To her credit as a Christian, but disastrously for a politician, she refused to lie or be evasive about her beliefs. When they asked her views on abortion, she told the truth. When they enquired as to her thinking about gay marriage, she did the same again. When they tried to corner her on trans rights, she was honest and took the punishment that came with it. Compelled to bear witness, she did so with her head held high, fighting the good fight and keeping the faith. It is one of the most personally admirable and politically suicidal decisions I have ever seen. In the end, she lost, though only narrowly, and was vindicated when her opponent swiftly proved as unequal to the challenges of office as she had warned. He inflicted so much damage with a programme of Continuity Sturgeon progressivism that, just 14 months later, his successor was drafting in Forbes as deputy head of the government to repair relations with the business sector, steer economic policy back to growth, and serve as the symbol of a new pragmatism. Despite our fundamental disagreements, I rate Forbes as a politician and a public official and said so regularly on Coffee House and elsewhere. This did nothing for her reputation among Nationalists. In fact, I know that it was used against her, and I'm sorry for that. Some regarded with bemusement, others horror, the sight of a gay Catholic Unionist simping for a Wee Free separatist, but the simping was not for Forbes so much as for the fleeting possibility that a leader of her calibre could get her hands on the controls. In a way, I should be relieved that she was sabotaged by the liberal bigots in her own party. If she had been half the first minister I reckon she might have been, she could have broadened the SNP's electoral coalition to the point at which independence became the consensus view across the electorate. She was a very dangerous woman for a time there, and might be again if she were to return after her children have grown up. The cynics will reassert themselves in the coming days, pronouncing that Forbes has seen the writing on the wall, that the SNP is finished, that she is hinting at her lack of faith in Swinney, that she had risen as high as she would be allowed to in a party thoroughly in the grips of identity politics progressives. Or, and I will tread lightly here, perhaps she truly values motherhood above career, one of the few remaining mortal sins in a non-judgemental age. Her fellow Nationalist Gail Ross did the same in 2021, admitting that five days a week away from her son was just too much. Not coincidentally, she too was a Highlands MSP, where constituencies rival small countries for square mileage. Labour's Jenny Marra, a considerable talent, walked away after ten years darting up and down the vast North East Scotland region. Family had to come first. Anglo culture is hardly alone in associating labour with fortitude and moral uprightness, but it is noticeably unforgiving of those who opt out in favour of raising children. Try to balance work and family but say you find it impossible, and you can expect to be chastised for failing at something so many parents do. The resentment is not for admitting you cannot manage but for forcing others to reconsider how well they are managing. I have sat in many a newsroom well into the evening, hearing bedtime stories read over the phone by loving parents who were wanted at home, and wanted to be there, but who were working late to give their children the best start in life. I'm not a parent, and maybe it's not my place to comment, but I know too many people whose fathers and mothers worked those hours, provided abundantly for their offspring, but now have no relationship with them. Their material needs were more than met but at the expense of other, deeper needs. No doubt Kate Forbes has made the right decision for her family but I can't help but wonder how many more families would have benefited from her making it to Bute House. Yes, she's hopelessly wrong about the constitution, but there's more to politics than policy. There's talent and character and leadership. We will have to settle for much less.

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Scottish ministers overrule advice and approve Cairngorms hotel plans
A letter published by the Scottish Government's Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) reveals that ministers have opted to green-light proposals for 22 self-catering apartments, shops, a hotel, and underground parking at 111 Grampian Road in Aviemore. It comes more than two years after SNP ministers took the decision to 'call in' the planning application and rule on it themselves – which happened on May 3, 2023. Later that month, the Cairngorms National Park Authority said it had been minded to approve the proposals. However, a Government planning reporter then recommended that the proposal be refused, submitting their initial report on the development on November 23, 2023, with a supplementary report following on January 17, 2025. The primary issues of concern were flood risk, transport impacts on B9152 Grampian Road, and design. However, SNP ministers have gone against the recommendations and approved the development, recognising that it will be on 'brownfield land set within a built up area'. Work on development will be allowed to go ahead after a series of conditions have been met. These include: Developers must contribute fairly (cash or in-kind) to active travel measures to offset traffic impact on B9152 Grampian Road. Updated reptile and otter surveys must be completed before starting work. An updated Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) must be conducted based on latest Scottish Environment Protection Agency climate data. Owners must install and maintain bat and bird boxes across the site. Four ensuite rooms must be kept permanently as hotel staff accommodation. The DPEA letter outlining the SNP ministers' decision states: 'On balance, and subject to conditions and planning obligation, the Scottish Ministers are satisfied there is sufficient development plan support to outweigh the conflict with flood policies, and they consider that the proposed development overall is in accordance with the development plan, and there are no material considerations which would outweigh that. 'In reaching this conclusion, the Scottish Ministers have given due consideration to the aims of the National Park as required by Section 9.6 of the National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000.'