logo
Trump dumps a pile of MLK files. Why not the Epstein files?

Trump dumps a pile of MLK files. Why not the Epstein files?

Al Jazeeraa day ago
Nearly six decades after the assassination of United States civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr (MLK) in 1968, the White House has released more than 230,000 pages of once-classified files relating to his murder.
After becoming president in January, Donald Trump signed an executive order declassifying documents related to the assassinations of King, former President John F Kennedy and former Senator Robert F Kennedy.
The MLK files largely reinforce the longstanding official conclusion that James Earl Ray, the convicted assassin, acted alone with no conclusive evidence of a broader conspiracy.
The files released on Monday add to the well-documented record of FBI surveillance and harassment of King, including efforts to discredit and intimidate him in the years leading up to his assassination.
So what do the MLK files offer? What was the FBI operation against him? And why has Trump released them now?
What are the MLK files?
The MLK files are the trove of documents related to both the FBI's surveillance of King throughout the 1950s and 1960s and the investigation into his assassination in 1968. The records were put under a court-imposed seal in 1977 after the FBI compiled them and turned them over to the National Archives and Records Administration.
The files include internal memos, wiretap transcripts, informant reports and correspondence from then-FBI Director J Edgar Hoover and senior officials, reflecting how the FBI viewed King as a political threat due to his civil rights activism.
Advertisement
A major focus is the FBI's covert campaign to discredit and intimidate King, which included bugging his hotel rooms, infiltrating his inner circle and even sending him an anonymous letter urging him to commit suicide in 1964.
The FBI also falsely labelled King as a communist sympathiser based on his ties to former Communist Party member Stanley Levison, using this claim to justify illegal surveillance and attempts to destroy his reputation.
These operations were part of the FBI's wider COINTELPRO programme, which targeted activists and dissenters across the country.
Did the files reveal anything new?
The newly released MLK files do not reveal any dramatic new evidence about his assassination or secret plots.
The files largely reinforce what was already known: Ray was convicted as the lone shooter, and the FBI engaged in an extensive surveillance campaign.
The communications also suggest the FBI considered multiple suspects beyond Ray but dropped those leads. Ray confessed to killing King in 1969 but later recanted and claimed he was framed.
Before being arrested, Ray was on the run for nearly two months. He fled to Canada, Portugal and the United Kingdom before being extradited to the US, where he was convicted and sentenced to 99 years in prison. He died in April 1998 from complications related to kidney and liver disease.
The documents reaffirm that the FBI, under the direction of Hoover, viewed King as a subversive figure and engaged in extensive surveillance and disinformation campaigns against him. These tactics, which included wiretaps and anonymous threats, have been public knowledge for decades, particularly after the findings of the US Senate's Church Committee in the 1970s.
The new files appear to confirm this history while adding more granular details. They provide additional internal records and memos that reinforce previous accounts of the bureau's efforts to discredit King and monitor his activities.
Notably, the release does not contain new evidence implicating anyone beyond Ray in King's assassination.
But King scholars would like to see the information the FBI was discussing and circulating as part of its investigation, Ryan Jones, director of history, interpretation and curatorial services at the National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, Tennessee told The Associated Press news agency.
'That's critical given the fact the American public, at that time, was unaware that the FBI that is involved in the investigation was leading a smear campaign to discredit the same man while he was alive,' Jones was quoted as saying. 'They were the same bureau who was receiving notices of assassination attempts against King and ignored them.'
What is the civil rights movement?
The civil rights movement was a decades-long struggle, primarily in the US during the 1950s and 1960s, aimed at ending racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans.
Advertisement
Rooted in centuries of resistance to slavery and racial injustice, the movement gained momentum after World War II as Black Americans demanded equal treatment under the law and full access to political, social and economic rights guaranteed by the US Constitution.
Led by figures such as Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, King and countless grassroots activists, the movement employed strategies ranging from peaceful protests and legal challenges to civil disobedience and mass mobilisation.
Landmark events like the Montgomery bus boycott in Alabama; the March on Washington, where King delivered his 'I Have a Dream' speech; and the Selma-to-Montgomery marches, also in Alabama, pressured lawmakers and reshaped public opinion. These efforts led to major legislative victories, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
What was this FBI operation?
The FBI's operation against King was primarily conducted under the Counterintelligence Program, known as COINTELPRO, a covert initiative launched by the FBI under Hoover.
Initiated in 1956, COINTELPRO targeted various organisations, but its focus on King and the broader civil rights movement intensified in the early 1960s, particularly as King's prominence grew.
The FBI labelled King a national security threat, suspecting communist influence within the civil rights movement although no such ties were ever substantiated.
Declassified documents outline a systematic campaign to monitor King's activities, undermine his leadership and tarnish his public image through surveillance and psychological tactics. Wiretaps were placed on King's home and office phones, and hidden microphones were installed in hotel rooms where he stayed.
These efforts, authorised by Attorney General Robert F Kennedy in 1963, were often abused to collect salacious details about King's private life, particularly extramarital affairs.
In 1964, the FBI sent an anonymous letter to King accompanied by an audiotape it pulled from bugged hotel rooms that allegedly was evidence of his affairs and urged him to commit suicide to avoid public disgrace.
The FBI's operation against King, which continued until his assassination in 1968, reflected Hoover's animosity and the agency's broader paranoia about civil rights activism disrupting the status quo.
'He was relentlessly targeted by an invasive, predatory, and deeply disturbing disinformation and surveillance campaign,' a King family statement said.
Why did Trump release them now?
The Trump administration released the MLK files despite opposition from his family and the political group he once led.
In a statement, Attorney General Pamela Bondi said: 'The American people deserve answers decades after the horrific assassination of one of our nation's great leaders.'
Trump's order for the files to be released said it was in the 'national interest' to release the records. 'Their families and the American people deserve transparency and truth,' it said.
Advertisement
Bondi hosted Alveda King, a conservative commentator and MLK's niece, at the Department of Justice to commemorate the release of the files. Alveda said she was grateful to Trump 'for delivering on their pledge of transparency in the release of these documents on the assassination' of King.
The King family said in its statement that it had hoped to get an opportunity to review the files as a family before their public release.
In a statement released on Monday, King's children called their father's case a 'captivating public curiosity for decades' but emphasised that 'these files must be viewed within their full historical context.'
'We ask those who engage with the release of these files to do so with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family's continuing grief,' the statement said.
Has Trump released other files?
Before releasing the MLK files, Trump declassified thousands of documents related to the assassinations of former President Kennedy (JFK) and his younger brother, Robert F Kennedy, calling it a push for transparency.
In March, the National Archives released tens of thousands of pages concerning JFK's 1963 assassination, including previously redacted FBI and CIA records. These documents offered further detail on the intelligence tracking of JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald and US surveillance efforts during the Cold War.
After that, from April to June, the Trump administration released more than 70,000 pages related to the 1968 assassination of Senator Kennedy. These records included FBI field reports, informant files and internal memos.
While many hailed this latest release, Trump also faced criticism from other leaders who called it a political distraction at a time when pressure has been mounting over the president's handling of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein files.
The Epstein files detail the life and connections of the disgraced financier with deep ties to elite political, business and cultural circles. Calls for transparency have intensified after renewed demands from civil society, victims advocates and bipartisan lawmakers who argued that shielding the full extent of Epstein's connections undermines justice and accountability.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Supreme Court says Trump can remove Democrats from consumer safety panel
US Supreme Court says Trump can remove Democrats from consumer safety panel

Al Jazeera

timean hour ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Supreme Court says Trump can remove Democrats from consumer safety panel

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that President Donald Trump can remove three Democratic members of a consumer safety watchdog, handing him a win in his efforts to concentrate more power in the hands of the executive. The court's decision allows Trump to boot three members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission appointed by his Democratic predecessor, former President Joe Biden. That ruling reverses a lower court decision barring Trump from doing so, on the basis that he had overstepped his authority by seeking their removals. Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr had sued the Trump administration in May after being terminated from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, an independent body created by Congress. Their seven-year terms were set to expire in 2025, 2027 and 2028, respectively. In their lawsuit, they argued that Trump had exceeded his powers as president by firing them without cause. A 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent known as Humphrey's Executor holds that the president cannot fire members of an independent board without providing a legitimate justification. The commission members also said that their firing would deprive the public of vital expertise and oversight. The Department of Justice, however, has maintained that preventing the president from firing members of the executive branch undercuts his constitutional authority. Even independent agencies like the Consumer Product Safety Commission fall under the executive branch, the Justice Department pointed out. The Trump administration's argument was dealt a defeat on July 2, when US District Judge Matthew Maddox issued an order blocking the dismissal of the three Democratic appointees while their case proceeded. But Trump's Justice Department made an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court, whose conservative majority sided with the president in a brief, unsigned order. The majority wrote that the government risked greater harm by allowing fired employees to remain in the executive branch than by removing them, even wrongfully, while their court cases proceeded. The court's three left-leaning justices, however, issued a dissent that denounced the ruling as an erosion of the separation of powers. Justice Elena Kagan pointed out that the Consumer Product Safety Commission was created by an act of Congress and answers both to the legislature and the president. 'By allowing the President to remove Commissioners for no reason other than their party affiliation, the majority has negated Congress's choice of agency bipartisanship and independence,' Kagan wrote. She added that the court's decision on Wednesday was part of a series of rulings that amounted to 'an increase of executive power at the expense of legislative authority'. The Trump administration has sought to exercise greater control over federal agencies created and funded by Congress, often using a maximalist interpretation of presidential powers to do so. The Supreme Court, which has six conservative members, has mostly ruled in favour of such efforts. In a similar case in May, the court allowed Trump to remove Democratic members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board as their cases moved forward. The Supreme Court also ruled earlier this month that the Trump administration's efforts to hollow out the Department of Education through a campaign of mass firings could move forward.

Tesla reports biggest quarterly revenue decline in more than a decade
Tesla reports biggest quarterly revenue decline in more than a decade

Al Jazeera

time3 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Tesla reports biggest quarterly revenue decline in more than a decade

Tesla has reported its biggest decline in quarterly revenue in more than a decade as CEO Elon Musk's political activity weighs on the electric carmaker brand's reputation. Revenue fell to $22.5bn for the April-June quarter from $25.5bn a year earlier, according to its earnings report, which Tesla released after the closing bell on Wall Street. Analysts on average were expecting revenue of $22.74bn, according to data compiled by LSEG. Revenue from car sales declined by 16 percent. Tesla attributed the revenue dip to a decline in vehicle deliveries. Earlier this month, it reported a 14 percent decline in car deliveries in the second quarter. Investors are worried about whether Musk will be able to give enough time and attention to Tesla after he locked horns with United States President Donald Trump by forming a new political party this month. Weeks earlier, he had promised that he would cut back on government work and focus on his companies. Musk's connections to the Trump administration and layoffs across the US government when he headed the Department of Government Efficiency weighed on its US reputation. Meanwhile, the billionaire's endorsements of the far-right AfD party in Germany have affected the brand's reputation in Europe. A series of high-profile executive exits, including last month of a longtime Musk confidant who oversaw sales and manufacturing in North America and Europe, is also adding to the concerns. The company reported a second straight quarterly revenue drop, despite rolling out a much-awaited refreshed version of its best-selling Model Y SUV that investors had hoped would rekindle demand. Much of the company's trillion-dollar valuation hangs on its bet on its robotaxi service – a small trial of which started in Austin, Texas, last month – and developing humanoid robots. On Wednesday, Bloomberg News reported that Tesla has been in talks with the state of Nevada about introducing robotaxi services there. Analysts believe that this will keep the automaker on pace for growth in future quarters. 'We are at a 'positive crossroads' in the Tesla story: Musk is laser focused as CEO, Robotaxi/autonomous expansion has begun, demand stabilisation has begun especially in China, and Tesla is about to embark on an aggressive AI-focused strategy that, we believe, will include owning a significant piece of xAI,' Dan Ives, an analyst at the financial services company Wedbush Securities, said in a note provided to Al Jazeera. xAI is Musk's AI firm which also makes the chatbot Grok. 'While near-term and this quarter the numbers are nothing to write home about, we believe investors are instead focused on the AI future at Tesla, with a motivated Musk back driving Tesla's future,' Ives said. Tesla's stock closed the trading day in positive territory, up by 0.1, but has tumbled in after-hours trading, down by 0.3 percent.

Trump admin leans into unsubstantiated claims Obama committed ‘treason'
Trump admin leans into unsubstantiated claims Obama committed ‘treason'

Al Jazeera

time3 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump admin leans into unsubstantiated claims Obama committed ‘treason'

The administration of United States President Donald Trump has again pushed unsubstantiated claims that former President Barack Obama committed treason by falsely tying him to Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 election. Speaking at the White House on Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said that Obama and key allies had misled the public and manipulated intelligence to undermine Trump. Asked if she believed Obama had committed treason, Gabbard said it was up to the Department of Justice to bring criminal charges, but said that the actions of Obama and his allies could 'only be described as a years-long coup and a treasonous conspiracy against the American people, our republic, and an effort to undermine President Trump's administration'. Trump has frequently pushed baseless claims about his political rivals and threatened them with persecution. He has also remained fixated on past grievances, promoting allegations that he has been undermined by murky forces and repeating the false claim that he was the true winner of the 2020 election. His administration has recently come under increased pressure from members of his own right-wing base, some of whom have been disappointed with his administration's handling of information about disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Trump has said that he wants Obama, who served as president before Trump's first term in office, to face 'accountability'. 'It's there; he's guilty. This was treason,' Trump said on Tuesday, pushing accusations widely denounced as baseless. 'They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries.' Asked about those comments on Wednesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt did not specify what actions Trump would like to see. 'It's in the Department of Justice's hands and we trust them to move the ball forward,' she said. During her remarks on Wednesday, Gabbard also named several figures from the Obama administration, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, and former CIA Director John Brennan. A spokesperson for Obama has previously said that Trump's 'bizarre' claims of treason are 'ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction'. Trump faced allegations of attempting to overturn his loss in 2020 through anti-democratic means after a mob of his supporters stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, to prevent the certification of the election results based on false claims pushed by Trump that the election had been 'stolen' through massive fraud.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store