logo
Zionist ground troops conduct raids in Syria

Zionist ground troops conduct raids in Syria

Kuwait Times15 hours ago
JERUSALEM: Zionist military said Sunday ground troops had operated in southern Syria, seizing weapons and questioning individuals suspected of arms trafficking, in the latest cross-border raid since the fall of Bashar Al-Assad in December. A military statement said that troops had completed overnight 'a mission involving on-site questioning of several suspects involved in weapons trafficking in the Hader area in southern Syria', near the annexed Golan Heights. 'Troops entered four locations simultaneously and located numerous weapons that the suspects had been trafficking,' the statement said.
Footage released by the military showed uniformed Zionist troops in armored vehicles and on foot operating at night. A Zionist army division remains 'deployed in the area, continuing to operate and prevent the entrenchment of any terrorist elements in Syria, with the aim of protecting civilians, and in particular, the residents of the Golan Heights', the military said. As an Islamist-led offensive late last year toppled Syrian president Assad, Zionist entity deployed troops to the UN-patrolled buffer zone on the Golan Heights which has separated Zionist and Syrian forces following their 1973 war.
In July, Zionists bombed Syrian government forces in the capital Damascus and in Sweida province to force their withdrawal from the southern region amid a wave of sectarian violence. Zionist entity said it was acting in defense of the Druze community, but some diplomats and analysts say its goal is to weaken the Syrian military and keep the forces of the new government away from the frontier. Zionist entity launched hundreds of strikes on military sites following Asaad's overthrow in December, saying at the time it wanted to prevent weapons from falling into the hands of the new authorities it considers jihadists. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has demanded the demilitarization of southern Syria.
In another development, renewed sectarian clashes in southern Syria's Druze-majority Sweida province killed at least four people on Sunday, a war monitor said, as Damascus accused local groups of violating last month's ceasefire. The province witnessed deadly clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouins in July that drew the intervention of government forces and tribal fighters who came to support the Bedouins.
A ceasefire put an end to the week of bloodshed - which killed 1,400 people, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - but the situation remained tense, flaring into violence again on Sunday. The Observatory said three Syrian security forces personnel were killed 'as clashes erupted with local factions around Tal Hadid in the western Sweida countryside'.
The Observatory also reported the death of a 'local fighter'. Tal Hadid, controlled by government security forces, is a 'key control point' at a relatively high altitude, according to the monitor, allowing whoever holds it to overlook neighboring areas. Fighting also erupted around the city of Thaala, the Observatory said, 'following bombardment of the area with shells and heavy weapons launched from areas under the control of government forces, while the sound of explosions and gunfire was heard in various parts of Sweida city'.
Syrian state-run news agency SANA accused Druze groups loyal to influential spiritual leader Hikmat Al-Hijri of breaching the ceasefire by attacking government troops in Tal Hadid, killing one security forces officer and injuring others. In a statement, the Syrian interior ministry accused local groups of 'launching treacherous attacks against internal security forces in several locations and striking some villages with rockets and mortars, resulting in the killing and wounding of a number of security personnel'. A security source told Syrian state television that government forces regained control of Tal Hadid and other areas that were attacked on Sunday.
'Force inhabitants to comply'
According to the monitor and Sweida locals, Damascus has been imposing a siege on the province, with the Observatory saying the government wants to 'force inhabitants to comply'. On Friday, Sweida residents held protests across the province to demand the withdrawal of government forces and the opening of an aid corridor from neighboring Jordan.
The road linking Sweida to Damascus has been cut off since July 20. Damascus accuses Druze groups of cutting it, but the Observatory says armed groups allied with the government took control of the area and have been blocking travel. The United Nations was able to send some aid convoys to the province, but an interior ministry source told Syrian state television on Sunday that the humanitarian corridor was temporarily closed 'until the area is secured after outlaw groups violated the ceasefire'.
Syria's minority communities have expressed concerns for their safety since December, when an Islamist-led offensive toppled longtime Syrian ruler Bashar al-Assad, who had presented himself as a protector of minorities. While the new Syrian authorities have repeatedly stated their intent to protect all of the country's ethnic and religious groups, the killing of more than 1,700 mostly Alawite civilians along the coast in March and the violence in Sweida have raised doubts about their ability to manage sectarian tensions. The government has said it will investigate July's violence in Sweida, and a committee in charge of the inquiry held its first meeting on Saturday.- AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Finance Minister Fassam resigns
Finance Minister Fassam resigns

Kuwait Times

time6 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Finance Minister Fassam resigns

Mukhaizeem becomes acting Finance Minister • Gaza fundraising campaign nets KD 2m KUWAIT: An Amiri decree was issued on Monday accepting the resignation of Finance Minister Noura Al-Fassam and appointing Minister of Electricity and Water Dr Sabeeh Al-Mukhaizeem as Acting Finance Minister. Fassam was appointed as minister of finance and minister of state for economic affairs and investment in August 2024, replacing Anwar Al-Mudhaf who had also resigned. No reason was given for her sudden resignation. Before her appointment in the Cabinet, Fassam had experience of more than two decades in official and private economic posts including stints with the Kuwait Investment Authority, National Bank of Kuwait and Boubyan Bank. Under her short tenure, Kuwait issued its first public debt law in several years allowing the state to borrow KD 30 billion over the next half century. Also, under Fassam, Kuwait issued a law imposing a 15 percent tax on profits of multinational enterprises which envisages to collect some KD 250 million of taxes annually. Also, several months ago, a decree was issued allowing the government to raise charges on public services, replacing a law that was issued in 1992 banning the government from raising public charges without the prior approval of the national assembly. Kuwait has posted a budget deficit almost every year since 2015 because of the sharp drop in the price of oil, whose income contributes to about 90 percent of Kuwait's public revenues. In the meantime, another Amiri decree was issued Monday appointing five members to KIA board of directors which is headed by the finance minister. KIA, is Kuwait's sovereign wealth fund, and manages hundreds of billions of dollars of state surplus in overseas holdings. Unofficial reports put Kuwait's foreign assets at well over $1 trillion. In another development, an official campaign to raise funds for assisting Gaza has netted close to KD 2 million in its second day, official figures showed. The campaign ends on Tuesday. Since the start of the Zionist aggression on Gaza in October 2023, Kuwait has dispatched dozens of tons of material aid to Palestinians.

Zionist ground troops conduct raids in Syria
Zionist ground troops conduct raids in Syria

Kuwait Times

time15 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Zionist ground troops conduct raids in Syria

JERUSALEM: Zionist military said Sunday ground troops had operated in southern Syria, seizing weapons and questioning individuals suspected of arms trafficking, in the latest cross-border raid since the fall of Bashar Al-Assad in December. A military statement said that troops had completed overnight 'a mission involving on-site questioning of several suspects involved in weapons trafficking in the Hader area in southern Syria', near the annexed Golan Heights. 'Troops entered four locations simultaneously and located numerous weapons that the suspects had been trafficking,' the statement said. Footage released by the military showed uniformed Zionist troops in armored vehicles and on foot operating at night. A Zionist army division remains 'deployed in the area, continuing to operate and prevent the entrenchment of any terrorist elements in Syria, with the aim of protecting civilians, and in particular, the residents of the Golan Heights', the military said. As an Islamist-led offensive late last year toppled Syrian president Assad, Zionist entity deployed troops to the UN-patrolled buffer zone on the Golan Heights which has separated Zionist and Syrian forces following their 1973 war. In July, Zionists bombed Syrian government forces in the capital Damascus and in Sweida province to force their withdrawal from the southern region amid a wave of sectarian violence. Zionist entity said it was acting in defense of the Druze community, but some diplomats and analysts say its goal is to weaken the Syrian military and keep the forces of the new government away from the frontier. Zionist entity launched hundreds of strikes on military sites following Asaad's overthrow in December, saying at the time it wanted to prevent weapons from falling into the hands of the new authorities it considers jihadists. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has demanded the demilitarization of southern Syria. In another development, renewed sectarian clashes in southern Syria's Druze-majority Sweida province killed at least four people on Sunday, a war monitor said, as Damascus accused local groups of violating last month's ceasefire. The province witnessed deadly clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouins in July that drew the intervention of government forces and tribal fighters who came to support the Bedouins. A ceasefire put an end to the week of bloodshed - which killed 1,400 people, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights - but the situation remained tense, flaring into violence again on Sunday. The Observatory said three Syrian security forces personnel were killed 'as clashes erupted with local factions around Tal Hadid in the western Sweida countryside'. The Observatory also reported the death of a 'local fighter'. Tal Hadid, controlled by government security forces, is a 'key control point' at a relatively high altitude, according to the monitor, allowing whoever holds it to overlook neighboring areas. Fighting also erupted around the city of Thaala, the Observatory said, 'following bombardment of the area with shells and heavy weapons launched from areas under the control of government forces, while the sound of explosions and gunfire was heard in various parts of Sweida city'. Syrian state-run news agency SANA accused Druze groups loyal to influential spiritual leader Hikmat Al-Hijri of breaching the ceasefire by attacking government troops in Tal Hadid, killing one security forces officer and injuring others. In a statement, the Syrian interior ministry accused local groups of 'launching treacherous attacks against internal security forces in several locations and striking some villages with rockets and mortars, resulting in the killing and wounding of a number of security personnel'. A security source told Syrian state television that government forces regained control of Tal Hadid and other areas that were attacked on Sunday. 'Force inhabitants to comply' According to the monitor and Sweida locals, Damascus has been imposing a siege on the province, with the Observatory saying the government wants to 'force inhabitants to comply'. On Friday, Sweida residents held protests across the province to demand the withdrawal of government forces and the opening of an aid corridor from neighboring Jordan. The road linking Sweida to Damascus has been cut off since July 20. Damascus accuses Druze groups of cutting it, but the Observatory says armed groups allied with the government took control of the area and have been blocking travel. The United Nations was able to send some aid convoys to the province, but an interior ministry source told Syrian state television on Sunday that the humanitarian corridor was temporarily closed 'until the area is secured after outlaw groups violated the ceasefire'. Syria's minority communities have expressed concerns for their safety since December, when an Islamist-led offensive toppled longtime Syrian ruler Bashar al-Assad, who had presented himself as a protector of minorities. While the new Syrian authorities have repeatedly stated their intent to protect all of the country's ethnic and religious groups, the killing of more than 1,700 mostly Alawite civilians along the coast in March and the violence in Sweida have raised doubts about their ability to manage sectarian tensions. The government has said it will investigate July's violence in Sweida, and a committee in charge of the inquiry held its first meeting on Saturday.- AFP

What happens next in US court battle over Trump's tariffs?
What happens next in US court battle over Trump's tariffs?

Kuwait Times

time16 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

What happens next in US court battle over Trump's tariffs?

WASHINGTON: A federal appeals panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of US President Donald Trump's argument that a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets gave him the power to impose tariffs. Regardless of how the court rules, the litigation is almost certainly headed to the US Supreme Court. Here is what you need to know about the dispute, which Trump has called 'America's big case,' and how it is likely to play out in the months ahead. What is the case about? The litigation challenges the tariffs Trump imposed on a broad range of US trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. It centers around Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president the power to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies. Trump has said that trade imbalances, declining manufacturing power and the cross-border flow of drugs justified the tariffs under IEEPA. A dozen Democratic-led states and five small US businesses challenging the tariffs argue that IEEPA does not cover tariffs and that the US Constitution grants Congress, not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. A loss for Trump would also undermine the latest round of sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries that he unveiled late Thursday. Trump has made tariffs a cornerstone of his economic plan, arguing they will promote domestic manufacturing and substitute for income taxes. What's the status of the litigation? The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on Thursday in the case. The panel of 11 judges sharply questioned the government about Trump's use of IEEPA, but did not rule from the bench. The Federal Circuit has not said when it will issue a decision, but its briefing schedule suggests it intends to move quickly. Meanwhile, the tariffs remain in effect after the Federal Circuit paused a lower court's ruling declaring them illegal. Will Trump's tariffs be blocked if he loses in court? A Federal Circuit ruling would almost certainly not end the litigation, as the losing party is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court. If the Federal Circuit rules against Trump, the court could put its own ruling on hold while the government appeals to the Supreme Court. This approach would maintain the status quo and allow the nine justices to consider the matter more thoroughly. The justices themselves could also issue an 'administrative stay' that would temporarily pause the Federal Circuit's decision while it considers a request from the Justice Department for more permanent relief. Is the Supreme Court likely to step in? The Supreme Court is not obligated to review every case appealed to it, but it is widely expected to weigh in on Trump's tariffs because of the weighty constitutional questions at the heart of the case. If the Federal Circuit rules in the coming weeks, there is still time for the Supreme Court to add the case to its regular docket for the 2025-2026 term, which begins on October 6. The Supreme Court could rule before the end of the year, but that would require it to move quickly. How might the supreme court rule? There is no consensus among court-watchers about what the Supreme Court will do. Critics of Trump's tariffs are optimistic their side will win. They point to the Supreme Court's decision from 2023 that blocked President Joe Biden from forgiving student loan debt. In that ruling, the justices limited the authority of the executive branch to take action on issues of 'vast economic and political significance' except where Congress has explicitly authorized the action. The justices in other cases, however, have endorsed a broad view of presidential power, especially when it comes to foreign affairs. Can importers seek refunds for tariffs paid? If Trump loses at the Supreme Court, importers are likely to seek refunds of tariffs already paid. This would be a lengthy process given the large number of anticipated claims. Federal regulations dictate that such requests would be first heard by US Customs and Border Protection. If that agency denies a refund request, the importer can appeal to the Court of International Trade. There is precedent for tariff refund requests being granted. Since May, CBP has been processing refunds to importers who inadvertently overpaid duties because of tariff 'stacking' — where multiple overlapping tariffs are applied to the same imports. And in the 1990s, after the Court of International Trade struck down a tax on exporters that was being used to finance improvements to US harbors, the court set up a process for issuing refunds. That decision was upheld by both the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Would a courtroom defeat unravel Trump's trade deals? Trump has used the threat of emergency tariffs as leverage to secure concessions from trading partners. A loss at the Supreme Court would hamstring Trump in future negotiations. The White House, however, has other ways of imposing tariffs, like a 1962 law that allows the president to investigate imports that threaten national security. Trump has already used that law to put tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and those levies are not at issue in the case before the Federal Circuit. Some legal experts say a loss for Trump at the Supreme Court would not impact bilateral trade agreements the US has already inked with other countries. Others say that the trade deals alone might not provide sufficient legal authority for taxes on imports and may need to be approved by Congress. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store