logo
With an exodus of millionaires, businesses and workers, has London lost its spark?

With an exodus of millionaires, businesses and workers, has London lost its spark?

CNBC6 hours ago
London, the jewel in the crown of the U.K.'s economy and national culture, has taken a bit of a battering lately, with big business looking to expand elsewhere, workers looking for more affordable places to live and a flock of millionaires fleeing the city.
A new tax regime targeting the "non-dom" status of the London-based super rich prompted an estimated 10,000 millionaires to flee the city in 2024 in search of safer havens for their cash. For the have-nots, high living costs — and a post-pandemic reevaluation of what makes for quality of life — have prompted many people of working age to leave the city, data shows, as it becomes prohibitively expensive to stay.
London's pride as a business hub has also been dented in recent years as homegrown firms have looked elsewhere to base themselves or expand, increasingly looking to IPO abroad or moving their primary listing away from the U.K.
So, is it all doom and gloom for the Big Smoke? Not necessarily.
While the streets might not be paved with gold, London still has an irresistible pull for millions of people looking for work, study and play, with an estimated 20 million tourists visiting the city in 2023.
CNBC asked several U.K.-based analysts for their thoughts on whether the city is on downward trajectory, or just experiencing some bumps in the road. Here's what they had to say.
London's crown has been slipping "for years" when it comes to its business appeal and affordability for ordinary folk, Bill Blain, market strategist, former investment banker and author of the "Blain's Morning porridge" newsletter, told CNBC.
He said doing business in the capital is "just not nice anymore," and the atmosphere in the affluent City of London and Canary Wharf, the capital's financial districts, is even worse.
"There is not the buzz that we used to have in the City, in Canary Wharf," Blain said, lamenting "how quickly London is becoming relevant."
"You name me a single significant U.K. investment bank? You name me a single significant U.K. private capital market firm? They're all big American firms," Blain said.
"When it comes to the banks, you've got the Europeans, the French and the Germans, who are there just by the skin of their teeth. But there's nothing left for the U.K. You go into the City today and take a look around, and it's dire. There's lots of people there, but they're all insurance clerks, or whatever. They're not the investment bankers of a previous generation. My generation were the last who got it good," he said.
Blain blamed over-regulation for the City's demise, believing that "the number of people who are involved in compliance and regulation and form filling vastly outnumbers the number who are on the front line of finance."
Blain said he believes it lost its global reputation for having a relatively stable political establishment, with six prime ministers in the last 10 years, and that it was also tarnished in the wake of the tumultuous departure from the European Union five years ago.
After a landslide election win last year, the current Labour government, and Finance Minister Rachel Reeves, find themselves under heightened pressure to stick to self-imposed rules on debt and borrowing, while trying to increase public spending and to promote much-needed growth.
"In the past, you could look at the U.K. and say, yes, it's no longer the biggest economy in the world, but it's generally stable in [terms of] competence, so you invest in it. But these things are now beginning to be questioned, and that's the big risk for the U.K.," Blain said.
Barret Kupelian, chief U.K. economist at PwC was keen to point out it's not all gloom and doom for the capital in the long term.
"If I focus on the fundamentals that make London, London the first thing is the rule of law, and then you've got all the intangibles like history, culture, diversity, talent, innovation, regulation, time zone, probity, infrastructure, etc. These things haven't changed in a massive manner in the past few years," Kupelian told CNBC Wednesday.
"We see London actually having a quiet, stable, soft infrastructure, and businesses are still here, large businesses that are in London, because of the quality of regulation," he said. Kupelian defended London's status as a hub for financial services but said it's also adapting and evolving.
"One of the things that's happening quite in the background is that our goods exports are stagnating, partly because of the trading environment we're in right now, tariffs and what have you ... but services exports are growing quite strongly and a lot of it is being driven by business services," he said.
"We always thought FS [financial services] was the crown jewel in London, and it is, but actually, in terms of growth rates, if you take a look at the export side of the ledger, a lot of it is being driven by business services," he noted.
PwC, in conjunction with pollster Demos, produces an annual "Good Growth for Cities Index" which measures the economic well-being of British cities and looks beyond economic output, considering factors like jobs, income, health, skills and work-life balance.
It found in 2024 that while London was expected to see strong economic growth in 2025, it compared much less favorably with other British cities in terms of livability factors. That includes the lack of affordable housing and creaking transport infrastructure — as anyone on a hot, dirty and cramped Central Line tube on their morning commute to work will attest.
"This is the story relative to the rest of the country, but then what about relative to the rest of the world?" Kupelian remarked, noting that "there's always been intense competition between the large metropolises of the world," such as New York, Paris, Singapore, Beijing and Tokyo.
"I think London is feeling that competition on a much more intense level now," Kupelian said, with the city needing to look at its counterparts, and itself, with a more critical eye to see what it could do better.
Prescribing "targeted interventions" rather than a "complete reinvention," he said London is well placed to keep attracting a talented, skilled workforce, businesses and growth.
"Businesses are still here, large businesses that are in London, because of the quality of regulation. I think that that's one of the main appeals of London. [Policymakers should] re-emphasize those points and just keep at it. I don't think there's one thing that would flick the switch leading to fortune and success, but I think there's these smaller things that probably need tweaking rather than complete reinvention — that London can do."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's 30% tariff letter leaves EU scrambling to bring U.S. on side
Trump's 30% tariff letter leaves EU scrambling to bring U.S. on side

CNBC

time12 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump's 30% tariff letter leaves EU scrambling to bring U.S. on side

The European Union has been left scrambling after U.S. President Donald Trump said he would slap a 30% tariff on goods imported from the bloc beginning Aug. 1. European leaders were quick to respond, saying they would still work to strike an agreement with the U.S. before the start of August. The EU also further delayed countermeasures which were set to come into effect this week and warned that preparations for additional retaliatory moves were underway. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic on Monday told reporters that the letter had been received with "regret and disappointment ... especially considering the advanced stage of our ongoing negotiations." Sefcovic stressed that the EU was still focused on finding a negotiated solution, but was preparing for all possible outcomes — which could include countermeasures. He also said that he would speak to his U.S. counterparts later in the day. "I cannot imagine walking away without genuine effort," the trade commissioner said. With less than a month before Trump's new deadline, the European Union will have to act fast to prevent the tariffs from coming into effect or risk further escalation. While EU leaders remain determined to strike a deal, economists and analysts warned that the threat of a 30% tariff rate has nevertheless added fresh pressure to the 27-member block. "It's very bad news for Europe," Alicia Garcia-Herrero, senior fellow at Bruegel and chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, told CNBC's "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. "Trump is pushing the commission to really come up with a better deal," she added. Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, and Inga Fechner, a senior economist at ING who focuses on global trade, struck a similar tone. "Trump's letter to the EU is not a love letter but also not a hate letter. It's a letter to increase pressure in the ongoing negotiations," they said in a note on Sunday. The EU however still has options, the economists said, suggesting that one approach could be for the EU to offer to boost its purchasing of U.S. products ranging from soybeans to military equipment. Brussels could also reduce existing tariffs and other trade hurdles on items such as U.S. cars, or introduce export bans on products that are important to the U.S. such as European-made pharmaceuticals, Brzeski and Fechner said. "The fourth and final option would be to go into outright retaliation with either increasing tariffs on US goods or the nuclear option in trade: tariffs on digital services but also tighter regulations on US tech firms," the economists suggested, noting, however that this would likely trigger a full blown trade war. Despite the additional pressure for the EU, the expectation remains that the bloc and Washington D.C. will strike a agreement in the coming weeks. "I think both sides will strike a compromise. This is in the best interest of both the U.S. and the European Union," said Joerg Kraemer, chief economist at Commerzbank. "I expect in the end, a kind of average tariff rate for the European Union for exports to the U.S. in the area of 15%," he told CNBC'S "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. Notably, this rate would be higher than the 10% that had previously been anticipated by many and is in line with the deal that has been agreed upon by the U.K. and U.S. Berenberg Economist Salomon Fiedler meanwhile appeared more optimistic, saying in a note that the bank was still expecting 10% duties even as "the risks are now strongly skewed towards higher rates." One reason for optimism is that Trump has repeatedly taken extreme positions initially, and then later compromised, Fiedler argued. "The fact that Trump only threatened the new 30% rate for 1 August, instead of implementing it more quickly, suggests he is still looking to negotiate," he said. Trump may also shy away from further tariffs as businesses start passing on higher import costs to consumers, Fiedler suggested. The domestic political backdrop may also change, which could make it less important for the U.S. president to try and keep public attention on trade, he added. On the flipside, risk factors for higher levies include the unlikelihood that the U.S.' trade deficits — which Trump has often used as an argument for tariffs — will disappear, and the U.S. administration's reliance on tariff incomes to supplement its budget, according to Fiedler. "The always remote hope of a good negotiation outcome — the bilateral removal of all tariffs and some other trade barriers between the EU and the US — has all but disappeared from view by now," he noted.

US clothing sales dip in June 2025 amid tariff concerns
US clothing sales dip in June 2025 amid tariff concerns

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US clothing sales dip in June 2025 amid tariff concerns

According to the CNBC/NRF Retail Monitor, US clothing and accessory stores sales decreased by 0.22% in June after seasonal adjustments. Without seasonal adjustments, sales in these categories grew 2.71% compared to the same month in the previous year, however, this growth is less than the 3.21% year-on-year increase recorded in May 2025. NRF president and CEO Matthew Shay said: 'This was the first monthly decline since February, and spending was down across almost all sectors. Economic fundamentals haven't been disrupted yet and shoppers still have the ability to spend on priorities, but the economy is gradually slowing and there has been an impact on the psyche of consumers. While passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' is clearly supportive of economic growth, unresolved and restrictive trade policies remain a significant headwind.' The Retail Monitor, which is powered by Affinity Solutions, also shows that overall retail sales, excluding automobiles and gasoline, dropped by 0.33% seasonally adjusted month over month but increased by 3.19% unadjusted year over year in June this year. This contrasts with the increases of 0.49% month over month and 4.44% year over year in May. Core retail sales, which includes categories except restaurants, automobile dealers and gasoline stations, fell by 0.32% month over month in June but rose by 3.36% year over year. These figures compare with increases of 0.23% month over month and 4.2% year over year in May. For the first half of the year, total sales were up by 4.66% year over year, while core sales increased by 4.93%. The monthly declines were the first since February when both total and core sales saw a decrease of 0.22% from January. On an annual basis, June sales increased in seven out of nine categories, led by digital products, sporting goods stores, and health and personal care stores; however, on a monthly basis, sales were down in all but one category. NRF chief economist Jack Kleinhenz recently cautioned that US tariff disputes and policy changes are causing 'anxiety and confusion,' contributing to economic uncertainty. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has 'threatened' fresh tariffs of 30% on imports from Mexico and the EU, starting 1 August 2025. Trump justified these measures on social media by pointing to drug trafficking issues with Mexico and longstanding trade imbalances with the EU. This announcement followed earlier warnings issued by Trump to more than 20 countries regarding potential tariffs ranging from 25% to 40%, set to take effect from August unless new bilateral trade agreements are reached. The countries affected include Japan, South Korea, and South Africa. "US clothing sales dip in June 2025 amid tariff concerns" was originally created and published by Just Style, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Is DOGE Preventing Financial Fraud or Making It Easier?
Is DOGE Preventing Financial Fraud or Making It Easier?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is DOGE Preventing Financial Fraud or Making It Easier?

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was pitched to the American people as an organization that is supposed to eliminate excessive spending in the government while reducing fraud and saving taxpayers money. According to the DOGE website, it has saved an estimated $190 billion in total and $1,180 per taxpayer so far, though this exact figure is disputed by some economists. Read Next: Learn More: However, even before the exit of Elon Musk from the White House and corresponding friction with President Trump, many have had concerns that DOGE has overstepped by removing too many federal jobs, cutting essential programs in public health, education, DEI and more, while causing confusion across the country. DOGE remains controversial at best, especially now when many systems and assistance programs seem to be slipping through the cracks. From the beginning, there has been cause for worry, according to Daniel Berulis, a whistleblower who spoke to NPR. He went on record stating Musk and his team are demanding access to the National Labor Relations Board (NLBR) internal data — an independent federal agency that handles complaints about unfair labor practices. While it's nothing new that DOGE is trying to access sensitive information, Berulis revealed DOGE engineers were granted access and noticed a 'spike' in information leaving the agency. The sensitive data could have included details on corporate secrets, ongoing legal battles and unions that don't pertain to government efficiency and should almost never leave the NLRB, four labor law experts told NPR. It's also worth noting that DOGE members were diligent in requesting their online activities not be logged and deleted records of their online presence manually. At this time, it's unknown what the information will be used for, but the labor law experts NPR spoke to fear the data could be abused by private companies that have ongoing cases with the agency, which could expose damaging testimony, legal strategies and sensitive details on competitors. Tim Bearese, the NLRB's acting press secretary, denied that DOGE had access to the system and said the agency investigated after Berulis' concerns and 'determined that no breach of agency systems occurred.' However, Berulis' account is backed up by documentation that was reviewed by 11 technical experts. 'I can't attest to what their end goal was or what they're doing with the data,' Berulis told NPR, 'but I can tell you that… this is a very bad picture we're looking at.' So, is DOGE making it easier to commit fraud, or is the organization really about eliminating waste and saving taxpayers money? For You: While DOGE has a list of 'receipts' on the website, there's still a lot of uncertainty. 'As a business owner with years in finance and leadership, I've seen how innovation can either plug holes or blow them wide open,' said Danny Ray, founder of PinnacleQuote. 'Elon Musk's DOGE may have started with good intentions, but when transparency disappears, so does trust. Based on what we've learned, I don't believe DOGE is preventing financial fraud. In fact, it may be making it easier.' Ray said the deleting of access records and avoidance of monitoring tools is a red flag, 'no matter who's in charge.' He added, 'Above all, accountability must be the foundation of any efficiency initiative. Trying to improve government operations shouldn't come at the cost of security or oversight.' An alarming issue to be wary of is the reported behavior of DOGE team members avoiding audits and possibly moving sensitive information, according to Ray. 'That smells less like efficiency and more like evasion,' he said. 'For example, if private legal files or union data were accessed and removed without documentation, that's not streamlining — it's undermining.' Things have certainly not been perfect with DOGE, but Peter Diamond, a federally licensed tax, accounting, real estate and structure and certified bankability expert takes a different viewpoint and believes it's just growing pains. 'DOGE, at its core, is disrupting inefficiency — and change/disruption by nature will always makes people uncomfortable,' he explained. 'But the truth is, it's exposing fraud and waste that's been swept under the rug for far too long.' He said the end result will be positive, despite current temporary pain and delays. 'Anytime you pull back the curtain on corruption, there's going to be pushback.' He added, 'But that doesn't mean you stop. You stay the course. I believe DOGE is a much-needed shake-up that, if executed right, will lead to cleaner, leaner systems with far less room for bad actors to hide. In the end, we should see savings for all of us as taxpayers.' While many Americans are protesting the actions of DOGE, Diamond said the organization needs more time to do its job — but also needs balance. 'Look — no system should be above scrutiny, especially not one built to scrutinize others,' he said. 'DOGE is out here checking for fraud and inefficiency in other institutions, which is great — but who's watching DOGE?' He explained, 'That's the part that should give anyone pause. I'm not questioning the mission or the motive — but any unchecked authority, even with the best intentions, can become the very thing it set out to fix. We need balance, oversight and transparency at every level. That's how you build trust that lasts and how we got here in the first place.' The account of the whistleblower is eye-opening, and Diamond said if it's proven accurate, 'it's a bit concerning.' However, he's willing to overlook errors if DOGE is truthful about mistakes. 'But let's not forget, every fast-growing organization is going to stumble at first,' he said. 'Growth exposes cracks, and no one is perfect. It doesn't mean the foundation is bad — it just means you've got to reinforce it as you go.' He continued, 'The question becomes: Are the people in charge willing to address those cracks or cover them up in terms of moving fast? If they're willing to own it, fix it and keep moving forward, then this becomes part of the evolution — not the downfall. That's what I'm watching for.' According to Diamond, there are positive aspects to DOGE, and it has been effective in certain areas. 'The most efficient part of DOGE is that it's applying private-sector precision to a public-sector mess,' he explained. 'You've got business-minded best of best operators identifying fraud and implementing real-time solutions.' He said running the government like a private business is 'long overdue' — removing red tape and focusing on clear objectives can be powerful. 'The speed, the focus and the accountability are unlike anything we've seen in this space before.' The idea of the government cutting spending and reducing fraud is one many can get behind, so DOGE started off with potential, Ray said. However, some of its actions are questionable. 'Streamlining outdated systems and trimming wasteful spending is something every taxpayer should support,' Ray explained. 'Furthermore, if applied ethically, automation and optimization could bring real savings. But without the checks and balances, it becomes a shortcut to chaos.' Recently, there was a devastating flood affecting many communities in Central Texas, namely in the Big Country, Concho Valley area. It has claimed the lives of an estimated 100 people and has become a hot-button issue for the DOGE cuts that were made to the National Weather Service (NWS). The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which houses the NWS, is among the agencies that have experienced mass layoffs under President Trump's Administration. When asked about the tragedy in a press conference, whether the federal government should hire back meteorologists who were fired due to DOGE cuts, Trump said, 'I wouldn't know that. I really wouldn't, I would think not. This was a thing that happened in seconds, nobody expected it, nobody saw it. Very talented people are there, and they didn't see it.' However, other experts claim that without the proper staffing for the NWS, there won't be enough coverage to effectively warn people about pending national disasters. As far as fraud is concerned, without accountability for this public service, there seems to be a focus on passing the blame rather than helping taxpaying citizens who are struggling with disaster. There are also questions as to how local and federal funds will be allocated now. Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on Is DOGE Preventing Financial Fraud or Making It Easier? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store