TMC MP Saket Gokhale publicly apologises to ex-diplomat, 10 months after Delhi HC order
In the apology, Gokhale said that a series of tweets that he put about Puri on June 13, 2021 and June 23, 2021 contained 'wrong and unverified allegations' about property that she had purchased.
pic.twitter.com/d6X2YMEVfa
— Saket Gokhale MP (@SaketGokhale) June 9, 2025
In July 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that Gokhale made 'incorrect, false and untrue' allegations about Puri, including claims that she had purchased property in Switzerland with disproportionate assets.
Puri had sued Gokhale, alleging that his social media posts were 'defamatory, malicious and based on false information'.
In its verdict, the court had ordered Gokhale to apologise in a leading English daily and on his X handle. He was also directed to pay Rs 50 lakh in damages.
Gokhale subsequently sought to recall the July 2024 order, arguing that it was issued ex parte, or in his absence, after his counsel stopped appearing.
Meanwhile, Puri approached the High Court to demand that the order be enforced. She also filed a contempt of court case against Gokhale for not complying with the order.
In response, Gokhale's lawyer proposed submitting an apology in a sealed cover until his plea challenging the High Court's order was decided. However, Justice Anish Dayal on May 9 dismissed the request and ordered Gokhale to issue a public apology in two weeks – or by May 23.
After repeated non compliance, on May 28, the court issued a show cause notice to Gokhale asking why he should not be sent to jail for failing to comply with its orders.
'If you don't publish then we will issue orders of detention,' the court had said.
Puri, a former assistant secretary-general at the United Nations and wife of Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri, had filed the defamation case in 2021. She argued that her reputation was tarnished by Gokhale's 'reckless and false allegations' regarding an apartment in Geneva.
Gokhale had questioned how Puri could afford the property on her income as a former Indian Foreign Service officer on deputation to the UN Conference on Trade and Development. He had also tagged Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in his posts, calling for an Enforcement Directorate inquiry in the matter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
India's sugar industry has surged to Rs 1.3 lakh crore mark: Pralhad Joshi
New Delhi: Union Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution Minister Pralhad Joshi on Thursday said that India's sugar sector has, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, grown into a Rs 1.3 lakh crore industry, driving rural prosperity, energy security and green power through reforms like record ethanol blending and Atmanirbharta in fuels. Addressing the 'Cooperative Sugar Industry Conclave 2025' at Dr. Ambedkar International Centre here, the minister said: "It's inspiring to see how the sector's evolution is shaping a sustainable and self-reliant future for India." The collective strength of the nation, innovation and efficiency have transformed this sector, he added. In an X post, Joshi said: "Addressed the 'Cooperative Sugar Industry Conclave 2025' & 'National Efficiency Award Ceremony' at Dr. Ambedkar International Centre, New Delhi, where we celebrated the remarkable progress of India's sugar cooperative sector". The minister had earlier highlighted that nearly 5 crore farmers (including family members) are engaged in the cultivation of sugarcane in India, and the industry is providing ample employment opportunities both directly and indirectly. He emphasised that the Centre, under the leadership of the Prime Minister, accords top priority to the welfare of farmers and safeguarding the interests of consumers as well as the industry, thereby ensuring collaborative efforts to improve agricultural practices. Joshi also highlighted India's commitment to advancing technology and skills in the sugar and biofuel sectors. Emphasising India's cultural and economic reliance on sugar, he noted India's status as the world's largest sugar consumer and a significant biofuel producer, achieving over 12 per cent ethanol blending with petrol and aiming for 20 per cent soon. The Minister underscored the role of biofuels in combating climate change and detailed the positive impacts of India's Ethanol Blended with Petrol (EBP) Programme on the sugar industry and farmers. Meanwhile, India's sugar production is projected to rise by 15 per cent in the 2025–26 season (October–September) to around 35 million tonnes, driven by expectations of an 'above-average' monsoon, which is likely to boost cane acreage and yields in key producing states such as Maharashtra and Karnataka, according to Crisil Ratings. The anticipated growth in output is expected to ease tightness in domestic supply and may also support higher ethanol diversion and a potential revival in sugar exports, the report said.
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Is the government reluctant to ensure better road safety for its citizens?
With the monsoon session of Parliament scheduled for the 21st of this month, road safety activists in the country have begun a push towards demanding more stringent legislation for automobiles, roads and highways, to ensure better safety for all road users. This is not a small concern – India has one of the highest road traffic accident rates in the world, its roads are some of the world's most deadly, and every three minutes in our country, there is a death due to a road accident. According to Union Minister for Road Transport Nitin Gadkari, every year India sees 4,80,000 accidents, which lead to 1,88,000 deaths of people aged between 18 and 45 years. Additionally, there are 10,000 deaths of children. The country loses 3% of its GDP annually, due to road accidents. Why are our roads so unsafe? Do the problems lie with road design, behaviour on the roads, a lack of implementation of laws or a combination of all these factors and more? Is the government reluctant to ensure better road safety for its citizens? Guest: Ranjit Gadgil, programme director, Parisar, which is part of the Road Safety Network, an Indian coalition of organisations working to improve road safety in the country Host: Zubeda Hamid Edited by Jude Francis Weston For more episodes of In Focus:
The Print
31 minutes ago
- The Print
Amit Shah's attack on English will club him with Jyoti Basu in West Bengal
While the praise for Indian languages and their rich diversity is indeed commendable, this unprovoked attack on the English language from the man who holds the second-most powerful office in the country was uncalled for. It disincentivises students from being proficient in English and seriously hampers their future job prospects, while making Amit Shah sound like former West Bengal chief minister Jyoti Basu, a comparison, one is inclined to believe, Shah would not be happy with. Shah called for a renewed effort across the country to reclaim India's linguistic heritage , and said English would be frowned upon as a symbol of colonial slavery across the world. Jyoti Basu had robbed an entire generation of Bengalis of the opportunities that come with English language education. Fifteen years after his death on 17 January 2010, Amit Shah is threatening to do the same. Last month at a book launch event, the Union Home Minister said: 'In this country, those who speak English will soon feel ashamed — the creation of such a society is not far away. I believe that the languages of our country are the jewels of our culture. Without our languages, we cease to be truly Indian.' English vinglish When Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power in 2014, a big chunk of the Right-wing ecosystem launched a scathing attack on Indians who had a certain proficiency for the English language and were considered socially liberal. Citizens who presumably did not vote for the BJP and were Left-liberal in their socio-political outlook were dubbed the 'Khan Market gang' (a pejorative term invented for a small slice of English-educated, privileged citizenry who were regular visitors to a posh shopping centre originally built to house refugees in the heart of New Delhi). It is another matter that not only were many vocal Right-wingers regular visitors at Khan Market, the rise of Modi saw a whole host of writers, economists, historians produce critically-acclaimed books from topline publishing houses written in English. The term, though, served its political purpose as Modi went on to win two more elections at the Centre with the government's hard push, among other issues, for vernacularity that yielded rich electoral dividends. A few recent events should have deterred the government, if not the Right-wing ecosystem, from attacking the need for English language proficiency. One of the government's all-party delegations formed for India's global outreach on Operation Sindoor was fronted by Congressman Shashi Tharoor, who brings to the table not just his diplomatese but also his command over the English language. But more importantly, a NITI Aayog report published this February said that the lack of English proficiency was a key barrier to state university graduates getting jobs. 'In many states, the talent pool and resources employed in local industries predominantly originate from outside the state. A significant contributing factor to this trend is the inadequate English language proficiency among local youth,' the report said. The report stated that there was a pressing need to enhance the employability skills of students, by encouraging them to remain within the state and contribute to its growth and development, not only at a regional but also at a national level. And to tackle the issue, the NITI Aayog recommended partnering with international language organisations to impart English and other foreign language proficiency programmes for students. Then there is the point about political optics. Ideologically, the Left has been the arch enemy of the Right globally, with India being no exception. In the run-up to the 2021 Assembly election in West Bengal, a senior RSS functionary told me during an interview for my book Bengal 2021: An Election Diary that the main enemy for the Right in Bengal was not Mamata Banerjee, but the Left. 'The Left is not just a small band of political parties but a foreign, disruptive ideology that has entered the very bloodstream of the country,' he said. Given such animosity between the Left and the Right, should Amit Shah push for the exclusion of English that Jyoti Basu, who was the sixth and longest–serving chief minister of West Bengal from 1977 to 2000, implemented during his tenure? Also read: English is now code for 'Khan Market Gang'. BJP is fighting a phantom enemy Bengal's lost years In 1983, barely six years after coming to power, the Left Front government under Jyoti Basu banned the teaching of English till Class 6. The government justified the ban by citing a recommendation of the Himangshu Bimal Mazumdar Commission constituted during the Congress government in 1975 that had said that the teaching of two languages to children till Class 6 would be 'tortuous and unscientific'. The Left had also justified the move by saying that one of the primary intentions of abolishing English was to increase enrolment of students in primary classes in state-aided schools in rural districts. Increasing the success rate in Madhyamik (Class 10 board examination conducted by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education) was another motive behind keeping English teaching out of state-aided schools. As the move robbed a generation of students of English proficiency, even global media sat up and took notice. 'The Marxist government in India's eastern state of West Bengal has decided to drop English as a compulsory language for primary students despite protests from intellectuals. Writers and poets have taken to the streets and courted arrest to protest the decision that English will not be taught until fifth grade in government schools and government-supported institutions,' The New York Times wrote on 5 April 1981. Outside West Bengal, in Uttar Pradesh, English had become not just a language, but a goddess, with a two-feet tall bronze statue modelled after the Statue of Liberty. Few members of the Dalit community in Banka village had begun to worship this goddess of the English language, which they believed would let them climb up the socio-economic ladder. 'She is the symbol of Dalit renaissance,' Dalit activist and writer Chandra Bhan Prasad, who had come up with the idea of the goddess of English, had told BBC. 'In her left hand, she holds a book which is the constitution of India which gave Dalits equal rights. She stands on top of a computer which means we will use English to rise up the ladder and become free for ever,' he had argued. The English language, thus, is not just a means to improve job prospects, but a vehicle for social mobility for India's traditionally disadvantaged social blocks. In West Bengal, it would take Basu's successor, Buddhadeb Bhattacharya, to undo his blunder and reintroduce English into primary schools in 2007. But who could have compensated for the lost years of Bengali job seekers without English proficiency. What Jyoti Basu had done to a generation of Bengalis, Amit Shah should not do to Indians. Deep Halder is an author and journalist. He tweets @deepscribble. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
