Dharavi: Mumbai's hidden recycling powerhouse – DW – 07/29/2025
In the heart of Mumbai lies Dharavi, often labeled as Asia's largest slum—yet its economy tells a different story. Generating nearly a billion euros annually, the area thrives on resilience and resourcefulness. Alleyways hum with small-scale enterprises, many fueled by plastic recycling. With 60% of Mumbai's plastic waste passing through Dharavi, the informal settlement prevents the city from becoming overwhelmed by garbage. India overall generates more plastic wastethan any other country worldwide. And it's not just plastic, thousands earn their living sorting paper, bottles, packaging, and electronics—keeping the city clean while eking out a modest income.
♻️ A Lifeline Without Safety Nets
Despite its economic contributions, Dharavi's recycling workforce remains vulnerable. Collectors like Lakshmi separate trash day in and day out, often suffering from health issues as a result of direct contact with waste. Most of the 600 tons of daily refuse processed here is sorted with little to no protective gear. Dealers like Mohammad Irfan manage operations to collect and sort hundreds of kilos of waste daily, to be sold for recycling. Still, the workers pay a heavy price—physically and financially—for keeping Mumbai from drowning in waste.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
This video summary was created by AI from the original DW script. It was edited by a journalist before publication.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
28 minutes ago
- DW
Elon Musk's Tesla ordered to pay $243 million over crash – DW – 08/02/2025
A Florida jury found a Tesla vehicle and its Autopilot software responsible for a fatal crash in the Florida Keys in 2019. The electric vehicle company, helmed by CEO Elon Musk, plans to appeal the decision. A jury in Miami on Friday said Tesla was liable in a 2019 fatal crash in the Florida Keys, and ordered the electric vehicle firm to pay $243 million (€209 million) to the family of a deceased victim and her injured boyfriend. In 2019, a driver in a Tesla Model S went through an intersection and drove into a couple who were standing next to their parked Chevrolet Tahoe. Naibel Benavides Leon, who was 22 years old, was killed in the crash, with her boyfriend Dillion Angulo heavily injured in the collision. The jury said Tesla is partly responsible for the death because its Autopilot technology failed. "Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," Brett Schreiber, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said after the verdict. Musk, the world's richest person, is Tesla's CEO and largest shareholder. Schreiber said the order "represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries." Tesla will have to pay $200 million in punitive damages, along with 33% ($43 million) of the $129 million in compensatory damages. The driver of the Tesla was looking for his phone after it had fallen to the floor of the vehicle, when the fatal crash occurred. The court argued that the Autopilot system should have been disabled once the driver was distracted. The driver allegedly did not receive any alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tesla plans to appeal the verdict, and has said the driver is solely responsible for the crash. "Today's verdict is wrong," the electric vehicle company said, while saying it "only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology." Tesla has said that drivers who are using the Autopilot still need to be fully attentive while driving and to keep their hands on the steering wheel. "Autopilot is a driver assistance system that is intended to be used only with a fully attentive driver," Tesla said on its website. "It does not turn Tesla into a fully autonomous vehicle." Tesla stock plunged 1.83% on the NASDAQ after the Miami verdict. It's the first time Tesla was hit with damages after a trial over its vehicles' Autopilot functions, with earlier suits having been dismissed or resolved outside the courtroom.
DW
11 hours ago
- DW
How Trump's high tariffs against Brazil could backfire – DW – 08/01/2025
Brazil will pay as much as 50% tariffs on goods exported to the United States. But experts say the tariffs, along with sanctions on a Brazilian judge, indicate this isn't about economics but about Trump's politics. The newly announced tariffs by the US government on Brazilian imports, as well as Washington's move to sanction Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes "for serious human rights abuse," has caused a strong reaction in Brazil. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has condemned American interference in the Brazilian legal system, calling it "unacceptable." The political motivation behind these measures undermines Brazil's sovereignty and threatens the relationship between the two countries, Lula said. From August 6, the US will impose tariffs of 50% on Brazilian imports into America. Somewhat surprisingly, around 700 Brazilian products were exempted. But experts have said this still puts the average tariff on Brazilian goods at around 30%. The European Union and Japan are only paying 15% tariffs. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The US government, under President Donald Trump, has justified its new global tariffs by blaming a bilateral trade imbalance. The Trump administration has also given the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro as an explanation for the punitive tariffs. Judge de Moraes is presiding over the trial of Bolsonaro, who is accused of masterminding a plot to stay in power despite his 2022 election defeat. The personal sanctions on de Moraes come under the US' Magnitsky Act, which allows the American government to sanction foreign government officials worldwide for human rights offenses. Among other things, de Moraes could see any assets he has in the US frozen. The US government had already prevented de Moraes and other Brazilian Supreme Court judges from entering the country. "The Magnitsky Act was previously used against the US' enemies but it always used to have a basis in human rights," said Demetrio Magnoli, a sociologist and foreign affairs columnist in Brazil. "But by using it for the first time against a judge in a democracy, Trump is shattering the human rights foundations of this law." As for the high tariffs, Magnoli told DW it's not unusual for Trump to use tariffs as a weapon in his trade war and deal-making. "But in the case of Brazil, he is using both tariffs and the Magnitsky Act for political and ideological reasons," the commentator noted. "A unique case worldwide and a direct attack on a democratic country and a US ally." Judge de Moraes has been seen as a nuisance by American right wingers since he ordered social media platform, X (formerly Twitter) blocked for several weeks in late 2024. De Moraes demanded that user accounts that violated Brazilian law be removed, part of an attempt to crack down on anti-democratic, far-right voices. Billionaire Elon Musk, the owner of X, tried to get around the court-ordered block and called for de Moraes to be impeached. But de Moraes actually became a target for Trump earlier than that, because of Bolsonaro. In late 2022, the former president was accused of planning a coup against his successor, Lula, something that could carry a sentence of up to 40 years in prison. Bolsonaro and his co-defendants have disputed this charge, and Trump has described it as "a witch hunt." De Moraes has also investigated Bolsonaro for, among other things, manufacturing disinformation and has convicted Bolsonaro's supporters for storming the government district in Brasilia in January 2023. As a result, the judge has been celebrated as a defender of democracy in Brazil, particularly by those on the left. But perhaps because of the parallels to Trump's own past — his supporters also stormed government buildings in January 2021, and Trump previously insisted the 2020 election was "stolen" from him — de Moraes' actions have been like a red rag to Brazil's bullish right wingers, and now also to Trump supporters. However, Guilherme Casaroes, a professor at the Sao Paulo School of Business Administration at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, sees a bright side. The fact that, contrary to his initial announcement two weeks ago, Trump is allowing numerous tariff exemptions means that Brazil did well in negotiations with the US, he said. "But it also clearly shows that Trump's motivation is not so much commercial and more political," said Casaroes. "Especially because Brazil actually has a trade deficit with the US." The expert believes there are three key factors influencing Trump's attack on Brazil. Firstly, the country's closer ties with China, which makes Brazil a battleground in the geopolitical conflict between the US and China. Secondly, this fight is ideological: Trump wants to be seen supporting his allies around the world. That includes Bolsonaro. And thirdly, the economic interests of US tech giants: "They don't want social media regulation," said Casaroes. In Brazil, Trump's onslaught has triggered Brazilian nationalism, especially on social media. That's fair, said sociologist and political commentator Celso Rocha de Barros. He described what he calls the "American intervention against the Brazilian Supreme Court" as "unacceptable imperialist aggression" and insisted that in the future, Brazil must "negotiate economic agreements without giving an inch on democratic and political issues." Rocha de Barros believes de Moraes is actually looking stronger after this episode. Even Supreme Court justices who felt more favorably about Bolsonaro don't want to be giving anybody the impression that they support foreign intervention in their own court, he said. But Demetrio Magnoli believes the US' attacks on de Moraes could actually find favor with parts of the Brazilian population. Many locals are unhappy with their Supreme Court, he pointed out. This is partially because what some think are the judges' too-high salaries, but it's also because of the high penalties meted out to what Magnoli called "the useful idiots of the Bolsonaro camp," those who participated in the January 2023 rioting. Some Brazilians also believe de Moraes became too powerful during the trial against Bolsonaro. In other ways, Trump's attacks actually offers the Brazilian president an opportunity. Lula is polling badly, but if he manages to convince the Brazilian parliament to help an economy badly hit by Trump's tariffs, he might become more popular again. And that would be the opposite of what the US leader was hoping for, Magnoli said.
DW
15 hours ago
- DW
Trump tariffs: Where do we stand after new levies unveiled – DW – 08/01/2025
Just hours before an Aug. 1 deadline expired, US President Donald Trump imposed sweeping new tariffs on imports from global trading partners, escalating an aggressive trade policy aimed at reducing the US trade deficit. In his election campaign, Donald Trump once said that "tariff is the most beautiful word in the dictionary." Now, after six months in office, the US president is eager to turn his very specific vision of global trade into reality. With a move that shocked both politics and business across the world, Trump announced on April 2 that he would impose a "baseline tariff" of 10% on all goods imported to the United States. In addition, goods from about 60 other trade partners would face so-called reciprocal tariffs that were even higher and meant as payback for the unfair trade policies of what Trump called "the worst offenders." However, on July 31 Trump signed an executive order again imposing new, and even higher tariffs on scores of countries, citing emergency powers he said he is using to shrink the country's trade deficits with many of its trade partners. The executive order lays out rates to be applied against nearly 70 countries, ranging from 10% to 41% for goods transshipped through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties. In a minor reprieve that opens the door to further negotiations, the White House said the measures will take effect next week for most countries. The order came after a flurry of tariff-related activity in previous weeks that saw some countries strike more favorable terms for trade with the July 27, the US and the European Union agreed that European goods imported to the US would face a 15% baseline tariff. This includes the EU's crucial automobile sector, which had been subject to a 25% levy since Trump took office earlier in January. By contrast, the EU will charge US firms no duties at all, and has pledged to buy US energy worth $750 billion (€656 billion), as well as make investments in the US of around $600 billion, according to the White House. The agreement, which still needs to be signed off by all 27 EU members, has already come under strong criticism. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said this week the EU had capitulated, describing Sunday as a "dark day." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The United Kingdom was the first country to strike a trade deal with Washington in May. British products will be subject to a 10% base rate, with exceptions for some industries. The UK is still negotiating exemptions for its steel and aluminium products from the 25% rate in force. In return, the UK had to open its market further to US ethanol and beef. Under a deal struck in July, Japan's exports to the US will be taxed at 15%, including automobiles, an industry accounting for 30% of Japanese exports to the US in 2024. Tariffs of 50% on Japanese steel and aluminium will continue to apply and the White House said that under the deal, Japan would make an unspecified $550 billion investments in the US. With regard to South Korea, recent negotiations have resulted in a 15% baseline tariff on all imports from that country — down from a threatened 25% for one of the US's top-10 trading partner and key Asian ally. Trump said Wednesday that South Korea had also agreed to invest $350 billion in US projects and to purchase $100 billion of liquefied natural gas and other energy products. Furthermore, South Korea will accept American products, including automobiles and agricultural goods into its markets and impose no import duties on them, he added. Washington has also concluded trade deals with the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia and Pakistan. Products from the Philippines — a major exporter of high-tech items and apparel — will face a 19% levy. Vietnam was able to lower a threatened reciprocal tariff of 49% under a deal reached in early July. A main exporter of clothing and shoes to the US, Vietnam will see its shipments subject to a 20% tariff. Indonesian exports to the US will be taxed at 19% and, according to Washington, nearly all US goods will be able to enter Indonesia tariff-free. Pakistan, which was facing a potential 29% tariff under Trump's April 2 announcement, said Thursday it had struck a deal that would result in lower tariffs, as well as an agreement in which Washington would help develop the country's oil reserves. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video China — the world's second-largest economy — is a special case. Washington and Beijing had raised tariffs on each other's goods to more than 100% before temporarily lowering rates for a 90-day period. That pause is set to end on August 12. China has taken an aggressive stance in response to Trump's brief threat of imposing a 145% levy on imports, retaliating with tariffs of its own on US goods and blocking the sale of vital rare earth minerals and components used by American defense and high-tech manufacturers. Countries without bilateral trade agreements will soon face reciprocal tariffs ranging from 25% to 50%, with a baseline of 15% to 20% for any not making a deal. Among the tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39% duty. The Swiss government said Friday it would negotiate to avoid the higher levy, which will potentially hammer its key pharmaceutical industry. The new rate is up from the 31% previously threatened. Brazil is one of the few major economies to run a trade deficit with the United States, meaning Brazil imports more from the US than it exports to the country. Nevertheless, the US president has threatened to impose a 50% tariff on Brazil's products because of political differences. Trump called a current trial against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro a "witch hunt," and has demanded the release of the ultraconservative politician. Brazil's current president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has in turn called Trump an "emperor" and said he didn't fear publicly criticizing Trump. India, meanwhile, has drawn Trump's ire for its huge trade surplus with the US and its trade ties with Russia. As a result, Trump announced on Wednesday that he would impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods, plus an additional "penalty" because of India's purchase of Russian oil that helps Moscow finance its war in Ukraine. On his Truth Social platform, Trump also wrote that India "is our friend," but added its tariffs on US products "are far too high." Canada and Mexico — two of the US' biggest trading partners — haven't been spared Trump's tariff threats either, even though trade between the three neighbors is governed by the US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement, negotiated during Trump's first term in office. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to raise current tariffs on Mexico from 25% to 30% starting on Aug. 1, saying President Claudia Sheinbaum's government hadn't done enough to help secure their shared border. Many goods certified under the USMCA free-trade pact, however, have remained exempt. On Thursday, the US president extended Mexico's current rates for 90 days to allow more time for trade negotiations. "The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border, Trump said in a Truth Social post, following a call with Sheinbaum. On Thursday, the US president singled out Canada for a separate tariff hike raising levies for goods from the country fom 25% to 35% starting on Aug. 1. Trump also warned of more trade consequences for Canada after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state. Trump's order also cited Canada's failure to "cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs" as well as its "retaliation" against his measures. In March, Washington already imposed a 25% tariff on Canadian cars and auto parts, adding a 50% levy on steel and aluminium imports in June.
