
Donald Trump to Invent Trade Deals for Countries That Refuse to Negotiate
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump may unilaterally decide the tariff rates that countries will face if they fail to strike a deal by the end of the 90-day pause on reciprocal duties, according to the White House.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt commented on the imminent end to the pause announced on April 9. Leavitt said that the July 9 deadline was "not critical" and could be extended, before stating that Trump may decide on the rates applied to each country's imports himself.
"The president can simply provide these countries with a deal if they refuse to make us one by the deadline," Leavitt said. "And that means the president can pick a reciprocal tariff rate that he believes is advantageous for the United States and for the American worker."
Newsweek reached out to the Commerce Department and the U.S. Trade Representative's Office via email for comment.
Why It Matters
Since the pause on reciprocal tariffs was placed, only days after Trump unveiled them on April 2, the administration has been working to solidify deals with its most critical trading partners. However, besides one with the United Kingdom and a preliminary set of agreements with China, the White House has yet to confirm any major trade deals, raising questions about the administration's next steps once the pause ends.
What To Know
On April 2, Trump imposed country-specific duties on dozens of America's top trading partners, alongside a 10 percent global baseline rate, to address historic trade imbalances that he said had "devastated our industrial base and put our national security at risk."
The reciprocal rates included a 46 percent tariff on Vietnam, in response to what the administration calculated as Vietnam's 90 percent duty on U.S. imports, alongside a 34 percent rate for China and 20 percent for the European Union.
Trump's decision to suspend these new tariffs on April 9 was met with elation from abroad, as many countries voiced their desire to strike a deal with the U.S. within the 90-day window. The White House framed the move as a real-world demonstration of Trump's "art of the deal."
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in April that "more than 75" nations had approached the administration to negotiate a trade agreement more favorable to the U.S. in the hopes of reducing their reciprocal tariff rates.
President Donald Trump arrives at Huis ten Bosch Palace for a dinner during the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 24, 2025.
President Donald Trump arrives at Huis ten Bosch Palace for a dinner during the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 24, 2025.
PatrickHowever, in the months that have followed, only a deal with the U.K. has been cemented.
Trump and administration officials said this week that the U.S. and China have also struck a deal. Beijing confirmed on Friday that the two sides have finalized details of the trade framework first discussed during a meeting between representatives in Geneva, Switzerland.
In May, Bessent stated that countries that failed to reach a deal with the U.S. would see their tariffs revert to the rates announced on Liberation Day, telling CNN, "If you do not negotiate in good faith, you will ratchet back up to your April 2 level."
Earlier this month, Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee that there were 18 "important" trading partners with which the U.S. was primarily focused on reaching a deal. He added that, in the case of those, such as the EU, who are "negotiating in good faith," the deadline could be extended beyond this date before their tariffs revert to the April 2 levels.
What People Are Saying
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, speaking at a press conference following an EU Summit in Brussels, said she was analyzing the latest trade proposals from the U.S. and that the EU is "ready for a deal."
"At the same time, we are preparing for the possibility that no satisfactory agreement is reached," she said. "And we will defend the European interest as needed. In short, all options remain on the table."
President Donald Trump, during an event at the White House this week, said the U.S. was "not going to make deals with everybody."
"Some we're just going to send them a letter and say thank you very much, you're going to pay 25, 35, 45 percent, that's the easy way to do it."
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Bloomberg on Thursday: "We'll announce some deals, but basically the deals we're going to announce are the ones that are sort of the head of the class, the structural spot in the line, and then all the other countries will fit behind those categories."
What Happens Next
The Trump administration has a few days left before the end of the pause and is likely to fall short of its previously promised goal of "90 deals in 90 days." However, as Leavitt said on Thursday, the president retains the choice to extend this deadline.
Lutnick said that the "top ten deals" would be announced by July 9, and that these would inform how other agreements would be set up, explaining that "you'll have South American deals, African deals—it'll all be structured and set up."
"Those who have deals will have deals, and everybody else who's been negotiating with us will get a response from us and then go into that package, and on July 9 we'll move forward," he said. "As the president said, if people want to come back and negotiate further, they're entitled to. But that tariff rate will be set, and off we'll go."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
19 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump loses latest bid to get Central Park Five defamation lawsuit tossed
A federal judge on Friday dealt another blow to President Donald Trump's efforts to throw out a defamation lawsuit against him filed by plaintiffs formerly known as the Central Park Five. U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone said that Pennsylvania's Anti-SLAPP law, designed to protect defendants from lawsuits targeting protected speech, does not apply in federal court, rejecting Trump's motion to dismiss the case. "The only issue before the Court is whether Plaintiffs' claims for defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED") can survive given Pennsylvania's Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, otherwise known as its Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation Statute," Beetlestone wrote in a 13-page filing. "Pennsylvania's Anti-SLAPP Statute (a state law) does not apply here, in federal court," she wrote in the filing, adding: "Accordingly, Defendant's Motion shall be denied." Five men who as teenagers were wrongfully convicted in the so-called Central Park Five jogger rape case sued Trump in October, accusing the then-Republican presidential nominee of defaming them. They cited a number of statements Trump made during his Sept. 10 presidential debate against former Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing him of falsely stating that the men killed somebody and pled guilty to the crime. "These statements are demonstrably false," they wrote in their filing against Trump. The five men — Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray and Korey Wise — spent years in prison for the rape and assault of a white female jogger, a crime they were later exonerated of and did not commit. Trump has tried to dismiss the defamation lawsuit against him, but has not been successful. Judge Beetlestone in April also threw out Trump's motion to dismiss the case against him in a different filing.


New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘60 Minutes' Kamala Harris interview at center of Trump lawsuit runs afoul of Cronkite-era CBS guidelines
The infamous '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris that sparked President Donald Trump's $20 billion 'election interference' lawsuit conflicted with Walter Cronkite-era CBS News guidelines. Cronkite, who was the face of 'CBS Evening News' from 1962 to 1981, was the premier anchorman of America's golden age of network news. In 1976, at the height of Cronkite's reign as 'the most trusted man in America,' CBS News president Richard Salant penned a 76-page document outlining CBS News standards. Advertisement Page 58 is focused on editing and suggests the '60 Minutes' interview at the center of Trump's lawsuit against CBS News would have been frowned upon during the Cronkite era. 'The objective of the editing process is to produce a clear and succinct statement which reflects fairly, honestly and without distortion what was seen and heard by our reporters, cameras and microphones,' Salant wrote in the 1976 document, which has come to the attention of the Trump legal team. Trump's lawsuit alleges CBS News deceitfully edited an exchange Harris had with '60 Minutes' correspondent Bill Whitaker, who asked her why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn't 'listening' to the Biden administration. Harris was criticized for the 'word salad' answer that aired in a preview clip of the interview on 'Face the Nation.' 3 60 Minutes election special, Bill Whitaker asks Vice President Kamala Harris how she'll fund her economic plan and how she'd get it through Congress. 60 Minutes / CBS Advertisement However, when the same question aired during a primetime special on the network, she gave a different, more concise response. Critics at the time accused CBS News of editing her answer to shield the Democratic nominee from further backlash leading up to Election Day. The raw transcript and footage released earlier this year by the FCC showed that both sets of Harris' comments came from the same lengthy response, but CBS News had aired only the first half of her response in the 'Face the Nation' preview clip and aired the second half during the primetime special. 3 Trump's lawsuit alleges CBS News deceitfully edited an exchange Harris had with '60 Minutes' correspondent Bill Whitaker. 60 Minutes / CBS CBS News, which has denied any wrongdoing and stands by the broadcast and its reporting, did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital when asked if the Cronkite-era standards have changed. Advertisement 'If more than one excerpt from a speech or statement is included in a documentary broadcast, the order of their inclusion in the broadcast will be the same as the order of their inclusion in the speech or statement, unless the broadcast specifically indicates otherwise,' Salant wrote in the 1976 CBS News Standards guide. When Cronkite died in 2009 at age 92, his Associated Press obituary said the famed anchor 'valued accuracy, objectivity and understated compassion' and 'always aimed to be fair and professional in his judgments' regardless of personal views on a topic. 3 Photograph of Walter Cronkite in the year 1950, doing the 6 o'clock news at WTOP-TV in Washington, D.C., taken from the book 'A Reporter's Life'. 12.18.96 Two polls pronounced Cronkite the 'most trusted man in America': a 1972 'trust index' survey in which he finished No. 1, about 15 points higher than leading politicians, and a 1974 survey in which people chose him as the most trusted television newscaster, according to the AP. Advertisement Salant, who was running CBS News when '60 Minutes' was launched, was lauded by The New York Times when he died in 1993. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! 'He was credited with raising professional standards and expanding news programming at CBS,' the Times wrote. CBS News, along with parent company Paramount, are currently in mediation with hopes of settling with Trump. The mediator recently proposed the network end the president's $20 billion lawsuit with a $20 million settlement, according to the Wall Street Journal. Last month, Trump rejected Paramount's $15 million settlement offer as he sought at least a $25 million payout as well as an apology. According to the Wall Street Journal, Paramount 'isn't prepared' to give one.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett announces $6 billion in donations to five foundations
NEW YORK (AP) — Famed investor Warren Buffett is donating $6 billion worth of his company's stock to five foundations, bringing the total he has given to them since 2006 to roughly $60 billion, based on their value when received. Buffett said late Friday that the shares of Berkshire Hathaway will be delivered on Monday. Berkshire Hathaway owns Geico, Dairy Queen and a range of other businesses, and Buffett is donating nearly 12.4 million of the Class B shares of its stock. Those shares have a lower and easier-to-digest price tag than the company's original Class A shares, and each of the B shares was worth $485.68 at their most recent close on Friday. The largest tranche is going to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, which will receive 9.4 million shares. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation will receive 943,384 shares, and the Sherwood Foundation, Howard G. Buffett Foundation and NoVo Foundation will each receive 660,366 shares. Buffett made waves a year ago when he said he plans to cut off donations to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation after his death and let his three children decide how to distribute the rest of his fortune. Berkshire Hathaway's Class B stock has climbed 19.1% over the last 12 months, topping the broad U.S. stock market's return of 14.1%, including dividends. Buffett is famous on Wall Street for buying companies at good prices and being more conservative when prices look too high. The bargain-hunting approach has helped him amass a fortune worth about $145 billion, with basically all of it in Berkshire Hathaway's stock. 'Nothing extraordinary has occurred at Berkshire; a very long runway, simple and generally sound decisions, the American tailwind and compounding effects produced my current wealth,' Buffett said in a statement. 'My will provides that about 99½% of my estate is destined for philanthropic usage.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data