Jaishankar likely to be in China next week, first visit since LAC standoff
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is expected to host the meeting which will be attended by counterparts from Pakistan, Iran and Russia among others.
This will be Jaishankar's first visit to China since the start of the military standoff along the Line of Actual Control in eastern Ladakh in May 2020.
The meeting of the Foreign Ministers will also set the stage for the SCO Leaders' Summit in Tianjin, which is expected to be held early September.
Jaishankar's visit follows visits by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and NSA Ajit Doval, who had travelled to China in the last week of June for SCO meetings.
While these discussions are taking place in multilateral meetings, they assume significance in the bilateral context.
Delhi and Beijing have been working towards normalising their bilateral relationship, but India's Operation Sindoor against China's ally Pakistan brought out divergences in the relationship.
In recent days, Indian Army officers have publicly accused China of complicity in Pakistani military strikes against India in the wake of Operation Sindoor. Lt General Rahul R Singh, Deputy Chief of Army Staff (Capability Development and Sustenance), said Beijing provided 'live inputs' to Pakistan on Indian operational deployment even when talks were underway between the Indian and Pakistani Directors General of Military Operations regarding cessation of hostilities.
Naming Pakistan, China and Turkey as the 'three adversaries' India faced on its 'one border' in the north, Lt Gen Singh said China provided 'all possible support', treated the northern border as a 'live lab' to test its weapons supplied to Pakistan, and had followed its '36 stratagems', hoping to kill the adversary with 'a borrowed knife', and to 'use the neighbour to cause pain'.
This was the strongest indictment of Beijing's involvement in the military confrontation between India and Pakistan in May.
In the last week of June, eight months after the disengagement of troops at the LAC in eastern Ladakh, Rajnath Singh told his Chinese counterpart Admiral Dong Jun that there was need for a 'structured roadmap of permanent engagement and de-escalation'. He called for a 'permanent solution of border demarcation'.
In his talks on the sidelines of the meeting of SCO Defence Ministers in Qingdao, Singh underlined the need for 'bridging the trust deficit created after the 2020 border standoff, by taking action on ground'.
The SCO Defence Ministers failed to issue a joint statement after Singh declined to sign the draft statement which omitted a reference to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in J&K.
So, Jaishankar's visit will be a challenging task for New Delhi. China is the host of the SCO Leaders' Summit in Tianjin which will be hosted by President Xi Jinping.
Doval had travelled to Beijing in December last year when India and China agreed on a set of 'six consensus' including resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, trans-border river cooperation and Nathula border trade. This was announced by the two sides following talks in Beijing between Doval and Wang Yi — they are also the Special Representatives (SRs).
The two sides have taken some steps including the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, currently underway. The two sides are also talking to each other about resuming direct flights and are looking to ease visa curbs for Chinese nationals and sharing data on transnational rivers like the Brahmaputra.
The two sides also agreed to jointly make preparations for the 24th Special Representatives' Meeting on the China-India Boundary Question.
Sources said the Indian side is working towards engaging the Chinese side with 'eyes wide open' because the border situation is still not normal. About 50,000-60,000 troops are still deployed on either side of the LAC.
Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ulfa-I claims 3 cadres dead in drone strikes on Myanmar camps; Army denies
1 2 Guwahati: The banned insurgent group, United Liberation Front of Asom-Independent (Ulfa-I), claimed that three of its cadres were killed in a targeted drone attack in at least three waves on its mobile camps in Myanmar's Sagaing region near the India-Myanmar border by the Indian Army early Sunday morning. The Ulfa-I said between 2am and 4am, over 150 drones of Indian Army, manufactured in Israel and France, struck several mobile camps of Ulfa-I, and Revolutionary People's Front (RPF), the political wing of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) of Manipur along the India-Myanmar international border region between Longwa (Nagaland) and Pangsau Pass (Arunachal Pradesh). The group claimed that attack resulted in the death of senior Ulfa-I leader Nayan Asom and injuries to 19 other members. In a subsequent statement, it claimed that two more senior leaders — Ganesh Asom and Pradip Asom — were killed in a second wave of attack during Nayan Asom's funeral rites. The Indian Army has officially denied involvement in the alleged drone stricks. Defence ministry PRO Lt Col Mahendra Rawat told TOI in Guwahati, "There are no inputs with the Indian Army on such operation." In another statement later, Ulfa-I dismissed the Indian Army's denial, saying people in Arunachal Pradesh's border area are witness to the three waves of drone attacks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Assam's chief minister and state police also denied any involvement or knowledge of operations, stating that further clarity is expected as more information surfaces. A security source confirmed that there were losses of life at the Ulfa-I camp in Myanmar, but it emphasised that, given the current crisis in Myanmar — where the military junta is embroiled in a widespread civil war with numerous ethnic armed groups and insurgents — the cause of the incident could be internal to Myanmar itself. "The ongoing civil war in Myanmar has led to frequent clashes, shifting alliances, and a general breakdown of state control in many areas, particularly near international borders. In this environment, attacks on insurgent camps — including those used by Ulfa-I — could plausibly originate from Myanmar's own ethnic armed organisations or even from the Myanmar military, rather than from Indian forces," the source said. Since the late 1980s and 1990s, Indian insurgent groups began establishing camps in Myanmar's border areas to escape Indian security operations. The porous border and ongoing conflict have made the region a hotspot for cross-border militant activity. Indian security agencies have expressed concern over the use of Myanmar's territory by insurgents for launching attacks in northeast India. There have been previous instances of Indian military action or alleged cross-border strikes, but official confirmation is rare and often denied by both Indian and Myanmar authorities. Ulfa's main camps are reportedly in the dense forests of Sagaing, with key bases at Waktham Basti, Hoyat Basti, and Hakiyot (opposite Longding district, Arunachal Pradesh). Some camps are said to be near the Pangmi Naga area and along the China-Myanmar border. Manipur-based groups, including PLA, KYKL, and PREPAK, also operate from these areas. The NSCN-K(YA) faction has set up its headquarters and camps in Naga-inhabited regions of Sagaing, often within a 6 to 10 km radius of other Indian groups camps. These camps have been used continuously, with their locations shifting in response to military pressure. The Sagaing region and Naga-inhabited areas of Myanmar remain the primary strongholds for these Indian insurgent groups, often with support or tolerance from local armed factions or, at times, the Myanmar military. The ongoing civil war in Myanmar has further complicated the security landscape, with insurgent groups sometimes shifting allegiances or moving camps to avoid detection or attacks.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bengal woman made to leave Assam after NRC plea rejected
Kolkata: A 52-year-old woman from Cooch Behar, who moved to Assam in 1991 after marrying a man from the state, has been forced to return after her plea to be included in NRC was rejected, Bengal migrant welfare board chairperson and Rajya Sabha MP Samirul Islam said on Sunday. Arati Das said her father had been a Bengal govt schoolteacher since 1968 and she was born and raised in Cooch Behar. However, her plea — as well as that of her sister-in-law — to be included in NRC was rejected by the foreigners tribunal. "I was extremely depressed when I was first asked to leave Assam in 2019 or face consequences. But I have learnt to live with it," she told Trinamool netas, who visited her home and assured her of legal help. Islam posted on X: "Ghosh, a 52-year-old woman and permanent resident of Jhaukuti village in Cooch Behar's Boxirhat, belongs to a family that has lived there for generations. The only 'fault' of the Ghosh family was marrying their daughter into a family in Assam. The anti-Bengali Assam govt then labelled Arati a foreigner or infiltrator and removed her name from the NRC list. As a result, she had to leave her 'sasural' (in-laws' house) and return to Cooch Behar. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Arati Ghosh is one of many examples of being harassed in Assam because their applications to include their names in the NRC were rejected." You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata State finance minister Chandrima Bhattacharya said: "She spent her life in Cooch Behar, with her parents, as an Indian citizen. She got married to an Assam resident... When they learnt that she was Bengali, they struck her name off the NRC (register). She is now living here in terror. Even her sister-in-law, who is in Alipurduar, has met the same fate. What is this crime being perpetrated against women? Is marrying an Assamese a crime in India? Will it lead to losing Indian citizenship?"
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Time is apt to restore J&K's Statehood
When one travels from Srinagar to Uri, the Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) Lieutenant Governor (LG)'s overhaul of the region's challenging terrain is perceptible. His bureaucrats outline his main accomplishments: first, efficient transportation networks have facilitated better access to services, and tourism; and second, civilian killings and militant recruitment have considerably declined. The locals agree. Industrialists say the elimination of separatist infrastructure has allowed businesses to thrive. A section of the people appear to have moved on from the separatist discourse, but they do not explicitly admit it. They fear this would deflect from Kashmir's political questions, especially the need for a plausible political trajectory which remains elusive as New Delhi delays restoration of J&K's Statehood. Political uncertainty culminating in political premonition serves nobody's interest. It needs to be replaced by an optimistic vision for the future, drawing from compassionate terms of engagement between New Delhi and J&K. Handing over full executive powers to J&K's elected government is the first step. The Supreme Court (SC) in December 2023 recommended the restoration of J&K's Statehood but did not specify a deadline. Now is the apt time. Among many reasons is the urgency to not fritter the democratic participation that Kashmir Valley witnessed in last year's Assembly elections. A population reckoning with bureaucratic rule wanted to empower a regional leader. The people reposed faith in Omar Abdullah's capacity for calibrated navigation, hoping the National Conference (NC) would negotiate a respectable arrangement for J&K, at the least Statehood. New Delhi ought to engage with and empower a Chief Minister elected with a historic mandate. It is advisable to also engage with other regional players, especially former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti and emerging young leaders such as Waheed Parra. The mainstream leaders' secular politics is Indian democracy's asset. Trying to scupper them by facilitating political proxies will be preposterous. Mr. Abdullah has shown political sagacity by repairing ties with New Delhi. But over a podcast recently, he lamented that he is unable to get work done as he has little authority over the officials. His presence merely as a custodian of status quo is causing dissatisfaction among the voters. It has also earned him accusations of pusillanimity, including from elements within his party, who are publicly advocating a more confrontationist course, significantly expanding their personal appeal. Mr. Abdullah could also animate his constituency with lofty sound-bytes, but he understands a collision course with New Delhi will not help J&K's case. Sources say Mr. Abdullah is hopeful that Statehood will be restored in August. Acknowledging the people's will even when the Union government has the power to perpetuate the LG's hegemony will generate far more political optimism than economic implements could alone. Only twice in history has Kashmir witnessed relative peace: from 1948 to 1952 when Jawaharlal Nehru empowered Sheikh Abdullah to effect social and economic overhaul; and from 1975 to 1984, following the Indira-Sheikh Accord to when Indira Gandhi toppled Farooq Abdullah's government. Clearly, 'peace' is contingent on harmonious relations between New Delhi and the State government. Recently, a daily in Kashmir reported that restoration of Statehood will be followed by fresh elections, as the previous elections were meant for a Union Territory. This created a furore in Srinagar. It is unlikely that there will be another Assembly election. But the lack of a political roadmap built on consensus is deepening public apprehension. Particularly alarming is the regional divide between Kashmir Valley and Jammu. An example of it was the mob violence in Jammu against a Kashmiri man accused of stealing. Such incidents underline the urgency of setting up a State Human Rights Commission and the SC-recommended Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In the foreseeable future, the BJP will remain the predominant force in Jammu, and the NC in Kashmir. The NC made a noble gesture by anointing its lone Hindu MLA, Surinder Choudhary, from Rajouri as the Deputy Chief Minister. It is the BJP's turn to reciprocate. Infiltration in Poonch and Rajouri is alarming. There is hardly time for procrastination. Anando Bhakto reports on Kashmir and national politics
