logo
Chile, Peru anxiously await word on Trump's proposed 50% copper tariff

Chile, Peru anxiously await word on Trump's proposed 50% copper tariff

UPI3 days ago
A miner looks out onto section of the El Teniente mine -- the world's largest underground copper mine -- in Rancagua, about 80 miles south of Santiago, Chile. File Photo by Mario Rui/EPA
July 9 (UPI) -- U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of a proposed 50% tariff on copper imports has raised concerns in Chile and Peru, which together account for nearly 40% of global copper production.
Copper prices in New York rose an average of 12% after the news, potentially boosting short-term revenues. But analysts warn that if the tariff goes into effect, U.S. demand could drop, pushing prices down and cutting into producer earnings.
The proposal was met with caution in both South American countries, as the economic impact could affect trade balances and fiscal stability.
Chile could be hit hardest -- its copper makes up 35.7% of total U.S. copper imports. In Peru, the immediate effect is expected to be more limited, with the U.S. accounting for just 2.4% of its copper exports.
Although the United States is not the primary destination for Chilean copper, Chile exported about $6.3 billion worth to the The United States in 2024, accounting for 12.8% of its total copper exports.
Chile's state-owned mining company, Codelco, has launched an internal review to assess how the tariff could affect its operations and trade strategy.
"It's still unclear whether the tariff will apply to all copper products or if exceptions will be made for countries like ours," Codelco Chairman Máximo Pacheco said.
A potential drop in copper exports to the United States would reduce foreign currency earnings and tax revenue at a time when Chile having faced a fiscal deficit of 2.9% of gross domestic product in 2024 and public debt climbing to 42%, according to Manuel Viera, president of the Chilean Mining Chamber.
"If the U.S. stops being a profitable destination, Chile will need to find alternative markets. Even though Chile exports globally, a sharp increase in U.S. prices could lead to oversupply elsewhere, pushing prices down," said Jorge Montes, a mining law expert.
The uncertainty surrounding the proposed tariff could discourage new investment in Chile's mining sector, said Humberto García, president of the Chilean Institute of Public Policy.
"If mining companies scale back operations or pause projects, that could have a negative impact on both direct and indirect employment in a sector that drives the economy across several regions of the country," he said.
In Peru, the direct impact would likely be more limited. In 2024, the country exported about $705 million in copper to the United States. However, higher-value shipments could take a bigger hit, with about $900 million in cathodes and wire sent to the United States, Peru's second-largest market.
"It's not yet clear if the tariff would target only raw copper or also include manufactured goods," said Rafael Zacnich, head of economic studies at ComexPerú. He noted that previous cases have included exemptions for countries like Canada and Mexico.
"If they're excluded and we're not, we'll be pushed out of the market," he told the Peruvian daily Gestión.
Experts say global demand for copper is unlikely to slow despite U.S. protectionism, meaning Peru could redirect exports to other markets. Still, government officials and trade groups -- including ComexPerú -- have called for action to secure an exemption for Peru under its free trade agreement with the United States.
Chile remains the world's top copper producer, and the metal is its leading export, totaling $50.86 billion in 2024, according to the Central Bank. Peru ranks third globally, with copper accounting for nearly 30% of its exports, totaling $23.45 billion last year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Donald Trump Broke His Social Security Vow -- and It May Be the Best Thing That's Happened to Retirees
President Donald Trump Broke His Social Security Vow -- and It May Be the Best Thing That's Happened to Retirees

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

President Donald Trump Broke His Social Security Vow -- and It May Be the Best Thing That's Happened to Retirees

President Donald Trump pledged to end the tax on Social Security benefits prior to and following his election. However, Trump's flagship tax and spending law excluded this popular proposal for two very good reasons. Even though the tax on benefits isn't going anywhere, retirees who needed the biggest boost were helped out by the One Big Beautiful Bill. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › In May, Social Security retired-worker benefits made history. For the first time in the nine-decade history of the program, the average monthly check for retired workers topped $2,000. While this is a relatively modest monthly sum, Social Security income is indispensable for most retirees. National pollster Gallup has surveyed retirees annually for 24 years to gauge how important their monthly payout is from America's leading social program. In April 2025, a combined 86% responded that it represented a "major" or "minor" income source, which is in line with the 80% to 90% of respondents in prior surveys who have needed Social Security income, in some capacity, to make ends meet. Nothing bears more importance to retirees than knowing how much they'll receive each month from Social Security -- and arguably nothing excited these beneficiaries more than President Donald Trump's vow to remove the hated tax on the program's benefits. But with his "One Big Beautiful Bill" now signed into law, retirees have come to the realization that the president broke his promise. Ironically, however, this might be the best thing that has happened to retired beneficiaries. In 1983, with the asset reserves of Social Security's trust funds nearly exhausted, a bipartisan Congress passed the Social Security Amendments of 1983, which President Ronald Reagan signed into law. They gradually increased the payroll tax and full retirement age for working Americans and introduced the now-hated tax on the program's benefits. Beginning in 1984, up to half of benefits could be exposed to federal taxation if provisional income (defined as adjusted gross income + tax-free interest + one-half of benefits) topped $25,000 for single filers and $32,000 for couples filing jointly. A decade later, a second tax tier was added that exposed up to 85% of benefits in instances where provisional income surpassed $34,000 and $44,000 for single and married filers, respectively. What's made taxing Social Security benefits such a sensitive subject is that these income thresholds, which were introduced decades ago, haven't once been adjusted for inflation. Taxing benefits was expected to affect around 10% of all senior households in the mid-1980s. Today, it's applicable to approximately half of all senior households. During Donald Trump's presidential campaign, he proclaimed in all caps on Truth Social, "Seniors should not pay tax on Social Security." This was a sentiment that he reiterated at a town hall event months after his inauguration. Based on the overwhelming popularity among existing beneficiaries of eliminating the tax on benefits, the expectation was for Trump's budget bill to follow through on his campaign and post-election vow. But this didn't happen for two very good reasons. The prominent issue with Trump's popular proposal is that it would have financially crippled Social Security. The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund (OASI), which is responsible for paying retired workers and survivor beneficiaries each month, is an estimated eight years away from exhausting its asset reserves. Though the OASI fund doesn't require a cent in asset reserves to continue doling out payments, the existing payout schedule is at risk of being slashed by 23% for retired workers and survivors come 2033. If the president's proposal was somehow signed into law and the tax on Social Security benefits was eliminated, it would have removed one of the program's three sources of funding and expedited the timeline to the depletion of OASI asset reserves. More than likely, it would have also widened how much benefits would need to be cut to sustain payouts through 2099. The other reason eliminating the tax on benefits was shelved has to do with politics. Whereas most tax and spending provisions in what is now Trump's flagship law could be dealt with through a process known as reconciliation (where a simple majority of votes in the House and Senate determines passage), amending the Social Security Act can't be done through reconciliation. It requires 60 votes in the Senate, which would necessitate bipartisan cooperation given that Republicans hold only 53 seats in the upper house of Congress. Instead of holding up the budget bill or risking defeat, the "no tax on Social Security" provision was left out. On the surface, the prospect of still having to pay tax on some portion of Social Security benefits probably isn't sitting well with retirees -- especially with President Trump pledging to remove this disliked tax on a number of occasions. But when push comes to shove, Trump bailing on his Social Security vow may actually be the best possible news for retirees on two fronts. To begin with, abandoning the "no tax on Social Security" provision ensures the OASI asset reserves won't be exhausted demonstrably faster than they're currently projected to. While doing nothing isn't the right answer for Social Security, eliminating the tax on benefits was unequivocally the wrong answer with regard to the financial health of the program. However, the real victory for retirees is the provision that replaced this vow to eliminate the tax on benefits. Trump's flagship tax and spending law offers a number of tax breaks, including no tax on overtime or tips for select workers from 2025 through 2028, as well as a quadrupling in the deduction for state and local tax (SALT) from $10,000 to $40,000 through 2029. But the highlight of Trump's newly signed law is the beefed-up standard deduction for seniors age 65 and above from 2025 through 2028. Retirees will receive an added $6,000 standard deduction -- or $12,000 (combined) when filing jointly -- if their adjusted gross income (AGI) is less than $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 if filing jointly. A 6% phase-out begins above these income thresholds, with single filers and married couples with AGIs above $175,000 and $250,000, respectively, not eligible for this added deduction. Removing the tax on benefits would have specifically aided middle- and high-earning recipients who are currently paying tax on some portion of their benefits. Meanwhile, the temporary deduction boost from the One Big Beautiful Bill is aimed at reducing tax liability for low- and middle-income beneficiaries. In other words, this provision helps the retirees more likely to need a financial boost. Ultimately, this is the best possible outcome for a majority of Social Security retirees. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. President Donald Trump Broke His Social Security Vow -- and It May Be the Best Thing That's Happened to Retirees was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

A US-Only TikTok Replacement App Could Be Coming. What We Know So Far
A US-Only TikTok Replacement App Could Be Coming. What We Know So Far

CNET

time38 minutes ago

  • CNET

A US-Only TikTok Replacement App Could Be Coming. What We Know So Far

A new US-only version of TikTok is being developed by the vertical video app's owner ByteDance, and will replace the current version of TikTok ahead of a September deadline for the Chinese company to divest ownership in the US, according to a report this week by The Information. The new app, codenamed "M2," would launch on Sept. 5 and would require users in the US to switch from the existing app to the new one, the report said, citing anonymous sources. US President Donald Trump recently extended a deadline for the owner to sell its US-based TikTok assets by Sept. 17. Earlier this month, Trump said he found a buyer for the company, which he called a group of "very, very wealthy people." The administration has continued to extend deadlines for TikTok to remain operational since January when it was shut down for less than 24 hours. The company reportedly has 170 million users in the US. A representative for TikTok did not respond to a request for comment. According to The Information, the reason for the new app version is also due to an Apple App Store restriction that does not allow multiple versions of an app for different regions to appear in the same listing. What this means for you If the report is accurate, it would mean that at the very least, anybody who uses the TikTok mobile app would eventually be required to migrate to a new US-centric version. But there's likely to be a lengthy grace period, according to The Information's sources: the old app may not disappear completely until March 2026, giving TikTok users six months to make the transition. Still, it could be disruptive for those whose business or brand relies on the platform. "Anytime there is a migration or a major feature revamp on any network, it certainly creates work and worry," said Jennie Smythe, an author and founder and CEO of Girlilla Marketing, which has worked with clients including Willie Nelson, Terry Crews and Iliza Shlesinger. "There are concerns that audiences will also make the move and if the migration will be worth the effort," Smythe told CNET in an email. "The bigger concern besides the migration are the features and data that will be available to us in the creator economy as well as the audience restrictions (i.e. is our content/audience also restricted to US only?)." It's unclear if the new app would include any other major changes or improvements over the existing app or if it would restrict or filter viewing content from other regions in ways that differ from the current version.

Trump to use presidential authority to send weapons to Ukraine, sources say
Trump to use presidential authority to send weapons to Ukraine, sources say

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump to use presidential authority to send weapons to Ukraine, sources say

By Mike Stone WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump for the first time since returning to office will send weapons to Kyiv under a presidential power frequently used by his predecessor, two sources familiar with the decision said on Thursday, a move suggesting new interest by the president in defending Ukraine. More than three years after Russia's invasion of its neighbor, Trump's team will identify arms from U.S. stockpiles to send to Ukraine under the Presidential Drawdown Authority, the sources said, with one saying they could be worth around $300 million. Trump on Tuesday said the U.S. would send more weapons to Ukraine to help the country defend itself against intensifying Russian advances. The package could include defensive Patriot missiles and offensive medium-range rockets, but a decision on the exact equipment has not been made, the sources said. One of the people said this would happen at a meeting on Thursday. So far, the Trump administration has only sent weapons authorized by former President Joe Biden, who was a staunch supporter of Kyiv. Presidential Drawdown Authority allows the president to draw from weapons stocks to help allies in an emergency. The Pentagon and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Republican president's stance on defending Ukraine has been inconsistent. At times he has criticized U.S. spending and spoken favorably of Russia but also sometimes has voiced support for Kyiv and disparaged the Kremlin. The U.S. has $3.86 billion worth of Presidential Drawdown Authority for Ukraine remaining. The last drawdown was a $500 million award by Biden on January 9. Ukraine's top priorities are Patriot missile interceptors and GMLRS mobile rocket artillery which may be included in the package. The weapons could be on the front lines within days because stocks are positioned in Europe. The Trump administration this month halted shipments of some critical weapons that were approved by Biden but some of those shipments have resumed. Congress has approved nearly $175 billion of aid and military assistance for Ukraine and allied nations in the nearly 3-1/2 years since Russia's full-scale invasion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store