
A Doctor's Plea From a Nation Asleep on Brain Disease
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
As a physician who once treated pain, I now endure the unimaginable. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has left me quadriplegic, dependent on a tracheostomy to breathe and a feeding tube to eat. Diagnosed at 35, my career ended abruptly. My family's story reveals the scale of the coming storm—my father battles Alzheimer's, my uncle succumbed to Parkinson's, and my grandmother to Lewy body dementia. We are not outliers; we represent a silent epidemic. Neurodegenerative diseases are surging, yet our nation slumbers, unaware of the devastation ahead.
The public's complacency is by design, built on a statistical illusion. ALS, fatal since 1869, exemplifies this peril. With a median survival of 2-3 years, it strikes about 1 in 300 people in their lifetime, which predicts that over 1 million people now alive in the U.S. will succumb to ALS. Yet, under federal law, it is labeled "rare" because that definition is based on prevalence—a static snapshot of how many people are living with a disease at one time. Because ALS kills its victims so quickly, the number of living patients stays below the 200,000-person "rare" threshold. Its very lethality ensures it is never treated like the mainstream public health crisis it is. This paradox obscures a terrifying forecast: a projected 69 percent global increase in ALS cases by 2040.
This illusion of rarity perpetuates a deadly inaction that extends to all brain diseases. Alzheimer's already affects over 7 million Americans and is projected to strike nearly 13 million by 2050, costing our economy $384 billion in 2025—and projected to nearly $1 trillion annually by mid-century.
Exterior view of the headquarters of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Exterior view of the headquarters of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Getty Images
The failure to confront this crisis stems from a Tale of Two Agencies within the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 2017, Congress established the Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE), a dynamic hub that has revolutionized cancer treatment, accounting for 85 percent of all accelerated approvals in the last decade. This success is the result of focused will and resources; National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for cancer has topped $7.2 billion, compared to $2.8 billion for neuroscience.
Neurology has no such center. Lacking an institutional home, it is fragmented, slow, and characterized by a risk aversion unthinkable in oncology. This disparity persists because of the tragic nature of these diseases. In the 1980s, ACT UP activists staged "die-ins" to force a reluctant government to fight AIDS. Patients with ALS, Huntington's, or Alzheimer's cannot mount a similar protest—we are physically silenced and immobilized, unable to "seize the FDA." This vulnerability places a unique moral obligation on our leaders to act proactively on behalf of the voiceless.
The new FDA leadership now arrives with bold promises of change, posing a question that haunts everyone touched by an untreatable neurological disease: Will this time be different? Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. vows to "sweep away barriers" and to "figure out new ways ... of accelerating approvals for drugs and treatments that treat rare diseases." FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has several times asked why it takes 10 years for a drug to get to market and proposes a "conditional approval" pathway based on a "plausible mechanism." Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Director Vinay Prasad promised to "take action at the first sign of promise for rare diseases."
For the ALS community, these words are now a crisis of credibility. In a disease that has a median survival of 2-3 years, we are asking for regulatory flexibility for a treatment that began its Phase 1 trial in 2011 and was granted FDA Fast Track designation in 2014. As a petitioner on the July 3 citizens' petition for a stem cell therapy known as NurOwn, my community has presented the FDA with a clear test. Ultimately, we are seeking accelerated approval based on new, unprecedented survival data from an expanded access program—data that exceeds the extension of survival of many approved cancer therapies. But the initial request is simpler: invite the sponsor to resubmit its application for a full review. Ours is a request for due process to give a voice to the voiceless—the lowest possible bar for the Trump administration to demonstrate its promised flexibility.
A clear, bipartisan solution has already failed once. The Neuroscience Center of Excellence Act, introduced in 2021 to replicate oncology's success for brain disease, stalled in committee. It is time for our leaders to find the political will that has been so catastrophically absent.
Congress must immediately revive and pass the Neuroscience Center of Excellence Act. The FDA, in turn, must match its leaders' promises with action by granting our petition a review. The science is poised for breakthroughs, but it is being shackled by a broken system.
For those of us on a deadline, this is not a policy debate. It is a death sentence. Awaken now, before this silent storm engulfs us all. The voiceless can't wait.
Dr. Shahriar Minokadeh, a former anesthesiologist trained at Johns Hopkins and pain management at UC San Diego, types via an eye-gaze device.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Processed Food May Raise Lung Cancer Chances—Scientists
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new large-scale study has found that people who consume higher amounts of ultra-processed foods (UPF) face a significantly increased risk of developing lung cancer. Published in the medical journal Thorax, researchers from Chongqing University in China analyzed the dietary patterns of over 100,000 adults and found that those with the highest intake of UPF had a 41 percent greater chance of being diagnosed with the disease. Newsweek contacted the American Lung Association for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Processed food has already been linked to numerous chronic health conditions, including obesity, heart disease, and diabetes. This new research adds lung cancer to the growing list of serious health concerns associated with the modern industrial diet. With UPF making up a substantial portion of many people's daily intake, the findings raise urgent public health questions about food quality, regulation, and long-term health outcomes. Stock image of a selection of ultra-processed-foods. Stock image of a selection of To Know The study drew on data from the U.S. Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, following more than 100,000 adults aged between 55 and 74 over a period of 12 years. Among participants, those in the highest quartile of UPF intake faced a markedly higher risk of developing lung cancer, even after researchers adjusted for smoking, socioeconomic status, and other lifestyle factors. UPF in the study included packaged snacks, instant noodles, sweetened beverages, processed meats, frozen meals, and industrial baked goods. Notably, the increased risk applied to both major forms of the disease, non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC). The researchers found that even after accounting for smoking, which remains the leading cause of lung cancer, diet remained an independent risk factor. The study concluded that higher consumption of UPF is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, NSCLC, and SCLC. Although additional research in other populations and settings is warranted, these findings suggest the health benefits of limiting intake. Public health experts have long warned that UPF, while convenient and inexpensive, carry long-term health risks that are often underestimated. Critics point out that these foods are not only nutrient-poor, but often high in sugar, sodium, and additives that may interfere with normal metabolic and immune functions. BMJ Group, publisher of the British Medical Journal, noted that as this is an observational study, "no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect," with researchers unable to factor in smoking intensity, which may have been influential. "In addition, dietary information was collected only once, so couldn't account for changes over time, and the number of cancer diagnoses was small." Although the study was observational and cannot confirm a direct cause-and-effect relationship, researchers said the strength of the association warrants serious attention. Some experts, however, cautioned against drawing firm conclusions from observational data alone, urging further research to explore underlying mechanisms. What People Are Saying Kevin McConway, emeritus professor of applied statistics at The Open University, per Science Media Center: "It's yet another of a class of studies about ultra-processed foods that, in my view, are doing nothing much to advance what is known about associations between the consumption of UPFs and human health. "I'm well aware that studies with other kinds of methodology are going on—I just wish that researchers would concentrate more on those other types of research, instead of repeatedly cranking the handle of doing studies like this one." What Happens Next The study may intensify calls for clearer food labeling, public education campaigns, and stronger policy action to reduce the dominance of UPF in the global food supply. Future studies could examine specific ingredients and production processes to determine what aspects of UPF may contribute most to cancer risk. In the meantime, health authorities are likely to renew efforts to promote diets based on minimally processed, whole foods—such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean proteins—as a way to reduce cancer and other chronic disease risks.


Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Millions Told To Wear Loose Clothes As Heat Risks 'Lethal Temperatures'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Heat-related alerts were in effect for parts of five states as of early Sunday, with the National Weather Service (NWS) advising residents in affected areas to take steps to reduce the health impact of extreme temperatures. Why It Matters The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that extreme heat can lead to heat-related illnesses, especially for older adults, young children, and individuals with chronic medical conditions. Symptoms can include heavy sweating, muscle cramps, dizziness, and nausea. The agency reports that extreme heat is responsible for over 700 deaths in the U.S. each year. Moreover, rising temperatures can worsen ground-level ozone pollution, potentially compounding existing health risks. A lifeguard keeps watch as people try to stay cool at the beach at Coney Island in Brooklyn as the region experiences another heatwave on July 30, 2025, in New York City. A lifeguard keeps watch as people try to stay cool at the beach at Coney Island in Brooklyn as the region experiences another heatwave on July 30, 2025, in New York To Know Extreme heat warnings, issued by the NWS when "extremely dangerous heat conditions are expected or occurring" spanned southern Arizona and the Grand Canyon, as well as southeast California. The agency said that "dangerously hot conditions," with afternoon temperatures up to 117 degrees would be possible in the Sonoran Desert National Monument, Aguila Valley, Tonopah Desert, Gila Bend, Cave Creek/New River, Fountain Hills/East Mesa, Superior, Northwest Pinal County, West Pinal County, and Apache Junction/Gold Canyon "Take extra precautions if you work or spend time outside. When possible, reschedule strenuous activities to early morning or evening," the NWS advised. "Know the signs and symptoms of heat exhaustion and heat stroke. Wear lightweight and loose-fitting clothing when possible and drink plenty of water." Elsewhere, less severe heat advisories were in effect for southern Florida, as well as southeast and far west Texas. In Texas, Inland Calhoun, Inland Kleberg, Inland Nueces, Inland Refugio, Inland San Patricio, Jim Wells, and Victoria Counties were expected to see heat index values—which reflect how hot it feels when both humidity and temperature are considered—of 110 to 114 degrees, according to an advisory that was in effect until 7 p.m. CDT Sunday. In Florida, portions of the south, southeast and southwest could expect heat index values up to 109, according to the agency. An extreme heat watch had also been issued for the Colorado River Valley and the Lake Mead area, in Nevada, where the NWS cautioned that high temperatures up to well into the triple digits would be possible later in the week. What People Are Saying AccuWeather meteorologist Brandon Buckingham told Newsweek: "The Desert Southwest will experience the highest temperatures across the nation, with places like Phoenix and Yuma, Arizona, and Palm Springs, California, approaching 115 degrees this afternoon. This translates to high temperatures that are 6-10 degrees above average highs." The National Weather Service said in some extreme heat warnings: "Do not leave young children and pets in unattended vehicles. Car interiors will reach lethal temperatures in a matter of minutes." The National Weather Service forecast office Phoenix said on X, formerly Twitter, Saturday: "As of 3:50 p.m. MST, Phoenix Sky Harbor has reached a record high temperature of 114 degrees for today's date. This breaks the previous record of 113 degrees last set in 2011." NWS Miami, Florida said on X, Sunday: "Heat Advisory again today as heat index values reach 105 degrees or higher across much of SoFlo. Showers and thunderstorms will again favor the Lake region with prevailing SSE winds." What Happens Next At the time of writing, the latest extreme heat warning was in force until 8 p.m. MST on Friday. Regular forecast updates are issued by the NWS on its website and social media channels.


Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Gen Z Woman Wakes Up Terrified After Vital Organ Shuts Down Overnight
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A woman who spent years searching for answers has opened up about the rare condition that caused her bladder to stop working overnight. Ever since she can remember, Remy-Jade Rider has experienced frequent urinary tract infections (UTIs). She told Newsweek that they started when she was only 3 years old and they occurred monthly. By the time she reached 15, they started "getting more painful" and increased in frequency. Rider, of Essex, in the U.K., was often told by doctors that they didn't know what was wrong and nothing further could be done. She thought she would have to make peace with the lack of answers, but, in November 2022, everything changed. "I was in hospital being treated for a kidney infection from a UTI, and I woke up in the morning to discover I could not wee," Rider said. "I was really scared as I was trying to wee, but nothing came out." When a nurse asked Rider how long it had been since emptying her bladder, she couldn't even remember. It was likely over 24 hours, and a scan showed that it was retaining around 1.8 liters. Remy-Jade Rider talks about her condition while applying makeup. Remy-Jade Rider talks about her condition while applying makeup. @remyjadex / TikTok It felt like there was "a blockage," and no matter how hard Rider tried, nothing happened. She was kept in hospital for over a week and sent home with a catheter because she was still unable to empty her bladder. "They kept taking it out to see if I could wee, but it was always unsuccessful so they would insert another one," Rider continued. Rider was transferred to the urology department where she underwent a urodynamics test (observing how well the bladder stores and releases urine), a flexible cystoscopy (inserting a camera to check for abnormalities), a CT scan, pelvic neurophysiology, and a urethral pressure profile. Test after test came back clear, and the search for a diagnosis went on. During that time, Rider was in and out of hospital with UTIs that got progressively worse. Finally Getting a Diagnosis In April 2023, Rider was transferred to a larger hospital in London. It was there that she was asked if she had ever heard of Fowler's Syndrome, as she showed all the signs for it. Fowler's Syndrome is a rare cause of chronic urinary retention among young women. It was first described in 1985, caused by the sphincter's failure to relax and allow urine to pass, according to the Bladder and Bowel Community. Women with the condition don't experience the normal sensation of urinary urgency that comes with a full bladder. It is not known why Fowler's Syndrome occurs, but board-certified urologist Dr. Scott D. Miller told Newsweek that it is like a "physiological traffic jam" where signals sent between the brain and bladder aren't connecting. "The bladder muscle, which normally contracts to push urine out, stays inactive. At the same time, the sphincter muscle at the bladder opening may paradoxically remain tight—like a gate that won't open, even when pressure builds," said Miller, medical director of Wellstar Urology. It can be a devastating condition and, just like Rider, women are often dismissed or told it is a psychological problem. But Miller said that Fowler's Syndrome "deserves real attention," and diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. "The psychological toll of long-term catheterization, infections, or being dismissed can be profound. Fowler's Syndrome isn't just a bladder problem—it's a diagnostic blind spot. But, with growing awareness and modern treatments, we're now seeing women get their lives back," Miller said. Rider was diagnosed with Fowler's Syndrome in July 2023, which was a long time coming. Part of her was glad to have a diagnosis, but it was also a realization that this would be something she was "going to have for life." Rider had a suprapubic catheter fitted, going directly into her bladder below the navel. As there is nothing going into her urethra, it means Rider could still wee naturally if she is able. This gave her some quality of life again, but, by late 2024, doctors were still looking at long-term options and suggested a sacral nerve stimulator. The concept is "similar to a pacemaker," whereby electrical impulses are sent to the nerves controlling bladder function. Rider told Newsweek: "The first surgery is the trial phase where they place the lead into the sacral nerve with a wire coming out of your back. You wear a belt around your waist, the lead goes into a battery device, and the belt holds this device in a pocket. "The trial lasts around four weeks, and you wait to see if you can wee without a catheter. As I was able to wee, we went ahead with the second surgery." However, by the time Rider awoke from the second surgery, once again she found herself unable to wee. Her doctors are still trying to figure out why. The Online Response Throughout her experience, Rider often felt alone and like she couldn't tell people what she was going through. It is always going to be part of her, so it felt important to share details of her journey on TikTok (@remyjadex). To her surprise, the video documenting her diagnosis went viral with almost 100,000 views and over 4,000 likes at the time of writing. Rider said she hopes that speaking openly about Fowler's Syndrome will raise awareness and inspire other women to advocate for themselves. She said: "I wanted others to know they're not alone and to educate girls whose doctors say they don't know what's wrong. I was really nervous about posting it; however, I got so many messages from girls thanking me. "It's also amazing to know I'm not alone. It makes it that little bit less scary to hear positive stories about how people live their life the best they can with this horrible illness," Rider added. Is there a health issue that's worrying you? Let us know via health@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.