Slovakia maintains veto on new EU sanctions against Russia
The veto was reaffirmed during a meeting of ambassadors in Brussels, where the sanctions were put on the table for approval and once again blocked, diplomatic sources told Euronews.
The package, which is ready to go after weeks of negotiations, targets Russia's financial and energy sectors, including the Nord Stream pipelines. A move to lower the price cap on Russian crude oil is uncertain to succeed due to the White House's reluctance.
The diplomatic impasse came as Moscow launched a new record-breaking barrage of drones and missiles against Ukrainian cities, injecting a new sense of urgency among member states to tighten the screws on the Kremlin's high-intensity war machine.
Slovakia has no objection to the economic restrictions per se; its opposition relates to an entirely different matter: the proposed phase-out of all Russian fossil fuels by the end of 2027.
The European Commission unveiled the roadmap in May and presented the draft legislation in June, based on gradual bans on short-term and long-term gas contracts.
As a landlocked country, Slovakia has vociferously protested the plan, warning it will raise prices for consumers, weaken competitiveness and endanger energy security.
Since the phase-out is subject to a qualified majority, Bratislava has resorted to sanctions, which require unanimity, to extract concessions from Brussels.
During an EU summit last month, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico posted a video message with demands for financial compensation, without naming a concrete number.
"This will harm us, unless an agreement is reached with the European Commission that would compensate us for all the damage this proposal might cause," Fico said.
The prime minister said his country risked facing a lawsuit from Gazprom, Russia's gas monopoly, worth between €16 and €20 billion due to the termination of its long-term contract, which runs until 2034. The Commission argues the gas bans will act as "force majeure" in court and shield governments and companies against damages.
From Brussels to Bratislava
Fico's ultimatum sped up bilateral talks between Brussels and Bratislava.
Last week, the Commission sent an expert mission to Slovakia to meet with representatives from the government, industry and the energy sector. The discussion focused on possible avenues to diversify the country's energy mix away from Russia, strengthen connections to neighbouring countries and mitigate price volatility.
Denisa Saková, Slovakia's deputy prime minister and minister for the economy, struck a positive note, hailing the meeting as an "important step forward towards finding solutions" and promising to continue a "constructive approach" with the Commission.
But neither side indicated a breakthrough had been reached, prolonging the suspense.
It is unclear if Fico's demand for financial compensation remains on the table and how relevant it is for the negotiations. The EU budget is notoriously strained and has little space to accommodate out-of-the-blue requests.
Mindful of this, Brussels has so far refrained from pledging any fresh money.
"We're not negotiating on specific new subsidies or anything like that, but we are helping to make sure that the supply of both oil and gas for Slovakia (…) will be steady," Dan Jørgensen, the European Commissioner for Energy, said last week in Aarhus, Denmark.
"I understand why Slovakia is worried, and we are doing everything we can to help," he went on. "We are convinced that we can, also by working with neighbouring countries, find solutions so that there will certainly not be any security supply problems, but also that we can keep the prices down."
Diplomats are still hopeful that a compromise can be reached in the coming days. A new meeting of ambassadors is scheduled for Friday in anticipation of a meeting of foreign affairs ministers on Tuesday next week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
The limits of Trump's tariff strategy
The "Liberation Day" proclaimed by Donald Trump on April 2 is turning into Groundhog Day. His trade policy, which was supposed to impose prohibitive tariffs on countries unwilling to sign deals favorable to the United States, has struggled to reach a resolution, keeping the global economy shrouded in uncertainty. His bombastic announcements in the spring sparked a bout of panic on the bond market, forcing him to grant his trading partners a 90-day grace period. When the ultimatum expired on Wednesday, July 9, the US administration, having failed to secure as many bilateral agreements as it had hoped, decided to set a new date of August 1, accompanied by threats of additional tariffs on some 20 countries as well as on copper, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Although repeated postponements and shifting terms have undermined the credibility of Trump's strategy, these vacillations have not surprised many observers. The US administration has appeared divided on how to proceed, running up against the complexity of a process it had underestimated. After promising that the president would secure "90 deals in 90 days," only three agreements have been signed at this stage: with the United Kingdom, Vietnam and China. While traditional trade agreements typically run to hundreds of pages and take years to negotiate, Trump settled for a document just a few pages long with the UK, full of promises yet to be fulfilled. With Vietnam, no text has been published and the details of the deal have not been released. As for China, it was Xi Jinping who turned the balance of power in his favor by forcing his counterpart to back down in order to reach a very fragile truce. Devalued word The European Union may be close to finalizing an agreement, but negotiators have struggled to secure immediate tariff relief and a commitment not to introduce new measures. What guarantees does Trump offer that in three or nine months' time he will not double down under some pretext or demand further concessions? This is the crux of the problem with his approach: By blowing up the framework of multilateralism and international law and replacing it with strong-arm tactics, the word of the US has lost its value. "The deals are mostly my deal to them [the signatory countries]," admitted Trump, who brandishes tariffs according to his moods and obsessions, with little regard for economic rationale. He has even considered imposing 50% tariffs on Brazil, accusing it of charging his political ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro, with attempting a coup d'état. International trade has been plunged into a worrying maelstrom. In the midst of a fresh bout of confusion, the US administration has been trying to project strength while avoiding another financial panic. But as increasingly chaotic announcements pile up and deadlines are pushed further out, the risk is merely postponed. The day these threats are actually carried out, the market's reaction could be as violent as it was in April. For now, the stock market is betting that "Trump always chickens out." But for how long?
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Von der Leyen's EU Commission faces judgement in Strasbourg Parliament
As the European Parliament prepares on Thursday to vote on a motion of censure against European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the political fallout could be significant - regardless of the outcome, with the motion reigniting concerns about her leadership style, lack of transparency and political positioning. The far-right-led motion of no-confidence will go to a roll call vote around midday on Thursday, with von der Leyen's and the entire Commission's future put to the test in the confidence vote. Ursula von der Leyen appeared to secure more votes protecting her from censure on Wednesday, as Socialists pledged support for the Commission President in exchange for assurances on the EU budget, including the European Social Fund. But how many MEPs will support the motion, and how many will abstain? Follow the vote and reactions with our reporters on the ground in Strasbourg and throughout Europe.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Georgia faces European Parliament's criticism over rule of law
The European Parliament approved this Wednesday one of the strongest-worded documents in the history of enlargement: the progress report on Georgia's accession process. With 490 votes in favour and 147 against, EU lawmakers deplored "the backsliding of the rule of law as well as the growing Russian influence on the ruling party, Georgian Dream, led by billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili.' This is the first report on Georgia as an EU candidate country, based on the European Commission's technical and political assessments from 2023 and 2024. The document adopted in the Strasbourg hemicycle stressed the lack of legitimacy of what it calls 'the self-proclaimed authorities established by the Georgian Dream party following the rigged parliamentary elections of 26 October 2024." Tobias Cremer, a German MEP from the Socialist and Democrats (S&D) group, has been one of the principal authors of the report. 'We see rigged elections last year in the parliamentary elections and since then we've seen ever more brutal clampdowns and crackdowns on peaceful protesters,' Cremer told Euronews. EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos praised the European Parliament's report on Georgia on Tuesday evening. "What we are witnessing in Georgia is far from anything we expect from a candidate country, Georgian democratic foundations are being eroded by the day when Georgian Dream party launched a crack down on pro-EU opposition and civil society', she said. Unconvenient neighborhood Last autumn's elections sparked a wave of more than six months of anti-government protests in Georgia. One of the first voices to denounce the alleged electoral fraud was the president of Georgia, Salomé Zourabichvili. 'They (the Georgian Dream officials) have not been recognised by the political forces in the country because no opposition party has recognised them as winning these partly rigged elections, and nobody has entered the parliament. So it's one party and an illegitimate parliament', Zourabichvili told Euronews in December last year. The European Parliament is also highly concerned by the wave of detentions carried out by the Georgian authorities against journalists and some members of the opposition. At least six opposition figures were arrested by the authorities in recent months. On 24 June, politician Giorgi Vashadze of the centrist Strategy Aghmashenebeli party was sentenced to eight months in prison for refusing to testify in an official probe that Georgian Dream's critics call an act of political revenge. The day before, three other opposition figures were handed comparable sentences after refusing to cooperate with the same parliamentary inquiry investigating alleged wrongdoings by the government of former President Mikhail Saakashvili, who is still in prison. Georgian Dream Secretary General Kakha Kaladze dismissed allegations that any of the arrests had been politically motivated, saying politicians aren't exempt from the law. "I think we all know very well why these people are detained. They broke the law, they didn't appear at the commission. The status of a politician or any other person cannot be an incentive to break the law," he said. Both the EU and NATO are deeply concerned about the growing Russian intrusions in the South Caucasus region. Russia has increased its pressure on Azerbaijan, deployed more troops in Armenia, while in Georgia, it has carried out political and media interference, the European Parliament claims. 'What this report clearly shows is that the Georgian Dream government seems to be playing out the Russian playbook of disinformation, manipulation and intimidation, and that is really not going towards the membership of the European Union', said Cremer. Russian troops attacked Georgia in August 2008, just three months after a crucial NATO summit in Bucharest that welcomed Tbilisi and Kyiv's aspirations to open membership talks. The Russian army occupied South Ossetia and Abkhazia within a few weeks. These two regions are still under Moscow's control. Since the 2008 war, the Georgian government has had to find a balance between the EU aspirations of almost 80% of its population and the understanding of the strategic priorities of its northern neighbour, Russia, especially after it started its all-out war against Ukraine in early 2022. In fact, despite its EU candidacy, Tbilisi has not aligned with EU sanctions against Russia. In 2024, the Georgian parliament passed the foreign agents law, a legislative measure that significantly restricted the activities of foreign-funded NGOs in the country. 'I want to see Georgia in the European Union. I think it's very clear there's one aggressor in this equation, and that aggressor is sitting in the Kremlin. And we also understand that this is the reason why Moscow is so aggressive, not just in Ukraine but also in the Caucasus, and also within our own democracies,' said Cremer. Full EU membership by 2030 remains Tbilisi's goal Georgia applied for membership in March 2022 with Ukraine and Moldova, and received the candidacy in December 2023. Only some months later, growing concerns and disagreements between the EU and the Georgian government prompted the two sides to freeze the enlargement process. As a result, the financial support from the European Peace Facility, worth €30 million, was suspended in 2024, and no support is planned for this year. However, Georgia's First Deputy Prime Minister Levan Davitashvili told Euronews in May that the Tbilisi government's target is full-fledged membership by 2030. 'We understand it's a long process, but we are fully focused on implementing this significant reform, and we are still loyal to this reform, and this process goes in a very active way,' said Davitashvili. Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze's participation in the 6th Summit of the European Political Community (EPC) in Tirana on 16 May marked a thaw in the strained relations between Tbilisi and the European Union, after both parties hit pause on the South Caucasus country's EU accession talks. On that occasion, Kobakhidze told journalists that 'there was a period of limited communication (between Georgia and the EU) and it seems our European partners were eager to restore ties with Georgia.' The Georgian prime minister told Euronews in May that his country plays a 'vital role for Europe". 'Everyone should recognise Georgia's strategic importance for Europe, especially for the eurozone. Our role in the region is significant, and that's why the need for dialogue with Georgian leaders is increasingly acknowledged,' he said.
