US port fee fails to deter major shippers from Chinese shipyards
While a US port fee targeting ships linked to China has made some vessel buyers hesitant, major shipping companies – including Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), the world's largest – are opting to continue working with Chinese shipyards, saying their competitiveness cannot be easily matched in the short term.
Despite the United States' determination to challenge China's dominance in global shipbuilding, MSC senior vice-president Marie-Caroline Laurent told the Nor-Shipping Forum in Oslo this week that the port fee would not be a barrier to ordering more vessels from China, the shipping news outlet TradeWinds reported.
She said it was good to see the US trying to revive shipbuilding activity, but 'we will need new vessels with the energy transition'.'Those ships today are built to a large extent in China,'
Laurent said. 'They have the competence, they have the capability, and this is where today we will still continue building our vessels.'
The International Maritime Organisation wants the global shipping industry to achieve net-zero emissions in the next 25 years or so. In response, companies are increasingly investing in decarbonisation technologies – such as green fuels – leading to a notable rise in new ship orders in recent years.
Laurent said any revival of America's shipbuilding sector would not happen overnight, and realising that ambition would require state subsidies and the retention of some strategic assets.
'So this is an interesting conversation to have, also with the US administration,' she said. 'Whether that will change our overall strategy in terms of shipbuilding – probably not at this stage.' MSC, which has its headquarters in Geneva, has vessels under construction at several major Chinese shipyards, including Zhoushan Changhong International Shipyard, Guangzhou Shipyard International and Hengli Heavy Industries.It is not the only shipowner saying that Chinese shipyards are irreplaceable in the near future.
In response to media reports suggesting that major Japanese shipping company Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) would suspend orders for LNG carriers from China, the company said at the end of last month that it would consider both Chinese and South Korean shipyards.
'Taking the current geopolitical circumstances into account, the company will exercise prudent judgment in selecting shipyards for any new LNG carrier orders,' it said.
'There is only a limited number of shipyards in the world capable of building high-quality LNG carriers to provide stable LNG transportation, and Chinese shipyards are an important partner to ensure diversification and flexibility in procurement sources.' Geopolitical tensions have dampened new vessel orders this year. New orders for vessels with a compensated gross tonnage of 12.6 million were placed in the first four months of the year – down 48 per cent year on year – shipping data provider Clarksons Research said last week.
China secured 54 per cent of those orders, followed by South Korea with 22 per cent.
Recent US trade policies and global tariff actions had 'prompted our customers to adopt a wait-and-see approach, pushing back their ordering decisions', Ren Letian, the chairman of China's largest private shipbuilder, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, said when the Singapore-listed company released its first-quarter earnings late last month.
By May 22, Yangzijiang had recorded US$290 million in new vessel orders this year – around 5 per cent of its annual target.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Vietnam strikes US tariff deal, but risks Beijing backlash
Agencies Vietnam's newly announced trade deal with the U.S. averts the most punishing of President Donald Trump's 'reciprocal' levies, but analysts warned it could lead to a fresh standoff between Washington and Beijing. The Southeast Asian nation has the third-biggest trade surplus with the U.S. of any country after China and Mexico, and was targeted with one of the highest rates in the U.S. president's 'Liberation Day' tariff blitz on April 2. The deal announced Wednesday is the first full pact Trump has sealed with an Asian nation, and analysts say it may give a glimpse of the template Washington will use with other countries still scrambling for accords. The 46% tariff rate, which was due to take effect next week, has been averted, with Vietnam set to face a minimum 20% levy in return for opening its market to U.S. products, including cars. But a 40% tariff will hit goods passing through the country to circumvent steeper trade barriers – a practice called 'transshipping.' Washington has accused Hanoi of relabeling Chinese goods to skirt its tariffs, but raw materials from the world's number two economy are the lifeblood of Vietnam's manufacturing industries. 'From a global perspective, perhaps the most interesting point is that this deal again seems in large part to be about China,' said Capital Economics. It said the terms on transshipment 'will be seen as a provocation in Beijing, particularly if similar conditions are included in any other deals agreed over the coming days.' Shares in clothing companies and sports equipment manufacturers – which have a large footprint in Vietnam – rose on news of the deal in New York. But they later declined sharply as details were released. 'This is a much better outcome than a flat 46% tariff, but I wouldn't celebrate just yet,' said Hanoi-based Dan Martin of Asian business advisory firm Dezan Shira & Associates. 'Everything now depends on how the U.S. decides to interpret and enforce the idea of transshipment,' he added. 'If the U.S. takes a broader view and starts questioning products that use foreign parts, even when value is genuinely added in Vietnam, it could end up affecting a lot of companies that are playing by the rules.' Vietnam's government said in a statement late on Wednesday that under the deal, the country had promised 'preferential market access for U.S. goods, including large-engine cars.' But the statement gave scant detail about the transshipment arrangements in the deal, which Trump announced on his Truth Social platform. Bloomberg Economics forecast Vietnam could lose a quarter of its exports to the U.S. in the medium term, endangering more than 2% of its gross domestic product (GDP) as a result of the agreement. Uncertainty over how transshipping will be 'defined or enforced' is likely to have diplomatic repercussions, said Bloomberg Economics expert Rana Sajedi. 'The looming question now is how China will respond,' she said. 'Beijing has made clear that it would respond to deals that came at the expense of Chinese interests.' And on Thursday, China warned against trade deals that 'hurt third parties.' 'China has always advocated that all parties resolve economic and trade differences through equal dialogue and consultation,' Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said. 'At the same time, relevant negotiations and agreements should not target or harm the interests of third parties,' she said. The U.S. deal with Vietnam comes less than a week before Trump's self-imposed July 9 deadline for steeper tariffs on U.S. trade partners to take effect if agreements are not reached. Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro has called Vietnam a 'colony of China,' saying that one-third of Vietnamese products are, in fact, relabeled Chinese goods. Beijing's commerce ministry said on Thursday it had 'always firmly opposed' U.S. tariffs. 'China's position is consistent,' He Yongqian, spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce, told a briefing. 'We are happy to see all parties resolve economic and trade differences with the United States through equal consultations, but we firmly oppose any party reaching a deal at the expense of China's interests,' she said.
Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Analysis shows Trump's tariffs would cost US employers $82.3 bn
Agencies An analysis finds a critical group of U.S. employers would face a direct cost of $82.3 billion from President Donald Trump's current tariff plans, a sum that could potentially be managed through price hikes, layoffs, hiring freezes or lower profit margins. The analysis by the JPMorganChase Institute is among the first to measure the direct costs created by the import taxes on businesses with $10 million to $1 billion in annual revenue, a category including roughly a third of private-sector U.S. workers. These companies are more dependent than other businesses on imports from China, India and Thailand — and the retail and wholesale sectors would be especially vulnerable to the import taxes being levied by the Republican president. The findings show clear trade-offs from Trump's import taxes, contradicting his claims foreign manufacturers would absorb the costs of the tariffs instead of U.S. companies that rely on imports. While the tariffs launched under Trump have yet to boost overall inflation, large companies such as Amazon, Costco, Walmart and Williams-Sonoma delayed the potential reckoning by building up their inventories before the taxes could be imposed. The analysis comes just ahead of the July 9 deadline by Trump to formally set the tariff rates on goods from dozens of countries. Trump imposed that deadline after the financial markets panicked in response to his April tariff announcements, prompting him to schedule a 90-day negotiating period when most imports faced a 10% baseline tariff. China, Mexico and Canada face higher rates, and there are separate 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Had the initial April 2 tariffs stayed in place, the companies in the JPMorganChase Institute analysis would've faced additional direct costs of $187.6 billion. Under the current rates, the $82.3 billion would be equivalent on average to $2,080 per employee, or 3.1% of the average annual payroll. Those averages include firms that don't import goods and those that do. Asked Tuesday how trade talks are faring, Trump said simply: 'Everything's going well.' The president has indicated he'll set tariff rates given the logistical challenge of negotiating with so many nations. As the 90-day period comes to a close, only the United Kingdom has signed a trade framework with the Trump administration. Trump announced Wednesday he'd reached a deal with Vietnam, while India has signaled it's close to agreeing on a trade framework. Trump said on his social media site Vietnam will pay the U.S. a 20% tariff on all goods sent 'into our Territory' and a 40% tariff on any transshipping, which usually means exports that come from China but pass through Vietnam to dodge tariffs on Chinese goods. In return, Vietnam will grant the U.S. 'TOTAL ACCESS' to its market for trade, Trump said, meaning 'we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff.' He added he thinks SUVs 'will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam.' There's a growing body of evidence suggesting more inflation could surface. The investment bank Goldman Sachs said in a report it expects companies to pass 60% of their tariff costs onto consumers. The Atlanta Federal Reserve has used its survey of businesses' inflation expectations to say companies could on average pass along roughly half their costs from a 10% tariff or a 25% tariff without reducing consumer demand. The JPMorganChase Institute findings suggest the tariffs could cause some domestic manufacturers to strengthen their roles as suppliers of goods. But it noted companies need to plan for a range of possible outcomes and wholesalers and retailers already operate on such low profit margins they might need to spread the tariffs' costs to their customers. The outlook for tariffs remains highly uncertain. Trump had stopped negotiations with Canada, only to restart them after the country dropped its plan to tax digital services. He similarly on Monday threatened more tariffs on Japan unless it buys more rice from the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends' on Tuesday the concessions from the trade talks have impressed career officials at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and other agencies. The treasury secretary said the Trump administration plans to discuss the contours of trade deals next week, prioritizing the tax cuts package passed on Tuesday by the Republican majority in the Senate. Trump has set a Friday deadline for passage of the multitrillion-dollar package, the costs of which the president hopes to offset with tariff revenues.
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Big US auto makers report sales jump on pre-tariff demand
Agencies Several leading automakers including Detroit giants General Motors and Ford reported increased US car sales in the second quarter on Tuesday as consumers fast-forwarded purchases ahead of US tariffs. Sales were particularly brisk early in the quarter as expectations of US President Donald Trump's coming tariffs dominated the news. Besides the US companies, Japanese automakers Toyota and Honda and South Korean brands Kia and Hyundai all reported increased sales compared with the 2024 stretch. 'They were able to capitalize on the tariff-induced fear and that drove sales, especially in the early part of the quarter,' said Garrett Nelson, equity analyst at CFRA Research. While the auto industry has been near the center of Trump's efforts to reset global trade, consumers have yet to see significant price increases due to tariffs. That is because companies have relied on existing inventories that include vehicles imported before tariffs took effect. Prices are expected to rise more in the second half of 2025, but market demand and supply forces could constrain such hikes, analysts said. GM notched a 7.3 percent rise in vehicle deliveries to 746,588 behind a continued solid performance in pickup trucks and SUVs, as well as good sales of models geared towards customers seeking affordable vehicles. These include the Chevrolet Equinox and Chevrolet Trax, a lower-priced vehicle imported from South Korea. Ford, meanwhile, scored a 14.2 percent jump in sales to 612,095, reflecting the boon from a popular program that offered customers employee pricing on many models. Most of Ford's leading vehicles saw higher sales, including the best-selling pickup F-series, as well as the Ford Explorer SUV. While Ford had lower sales of its all-electric F-150 Lightning Truck and the Mustang Mach-E, it reported a jump in hybrid vehicle sales. Higher sales had been expected for both companies, but the increases were slightly more than projected by analysts at At Toyota, sales jumped 7.2 percent to 666,470 autos, with double digit gains in several vehicles, including the Toyota Camry sedan and the Toyota Tacoma pickup truck. Honda, Kia and Hyundai reported quarterly sales increases of between five and 10 percent.—AFP But Nissan reported a 6.5 percent drop in quarterly sales to 221,441, while Jeep-owner Stellantis was projected by Edmunds to have a 12.8 percent drop to just over 300,000 vehicles. The United States imposed 25 percent tariffs on imported finished cars in early April. The Trump administration also enacted a 25 percent tariff on imported auto parts in early May, although White House officials allowed a two-year grace period and stipulated that automakers would not face duplicative tariffs due to a 25 percent levy on imported steel and aluminum. While retail car prices have not risen significantly, analysts at Cox Automotive last week pointed to a recent ebbing in dealer incentives as evidence of a somewhat tighter market. Cox Automotive Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke has projected an eight percent rise in prices due to tariffs, adding that 'we don't think consumers or fleet buyers are able and willing to accept that added cost,' he said at a briefing last week. Smoke predicted that uncertainty about the economy and whether the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates could lead many buyers to defer purchases. Nelson said automakers have to be 'very careful' with price hikes. 'Things have cooled off from where they were at the beginning of the quarter,' he said. 'Everything we're seeing suggests that consumers are still very price sensitive.'
