As Mamata govt reinstates 74 castes in Bengal OBC list, why BJP says Hindus deprived
Importantly, of the 140 communities currently recommended by the commission for inclusion under OBC categories, 79 belong to Muslim communities and 61 to non-Muslim groups—highlighting that, in terms of sheer numerical representation, the majority of recognised OBC sub-castes in West Bengal remain Muslim.advertisementThis religious composition has become a flashpoint in the political discourse, with the Opposition BJP alleging that the OBC policy has been meddled with to appease Muslims. In fact, this was the point of contention that led to the cancellation of the previous OBC list.In her address, Mamata pushed back against what she called a 'baseless' campaign. 'A section is trying to spread the falsehood that our government is giving reservation on the basis of religion. This is completely untrue. The OBC list is not—and will not be—prepared on religious grounds,' she said.The WBCBC conducted fresh surveys following a May 2024 Calcutta High Court judgment, which struck down the inclusion of 109 castes in the OBC list, citing procedural lapses. These inclusions, made since 2010 under the previous Left Front government and continued under Trinamool Congress (TMC) rule, were invalidated as they did not meet judicial standards for evidence-based backwardness. The ruling was a significant setback to the state government's affirmative action framework.Mamata clarified that the state government has challenged the high court ruling in the Supreme Court and, with the apex court's permission, resumed the process of inclusion based on new data. 'The Supreme Court gave us three months to prepare a fresh list. The commission carried out field-level socio-economic surveys, and based on that, we compiled a revised list of 140 communities—49 in Category A (more backward) and 91 in Category B (less backward),' Mamata said.advertisementDetailing the ongoing work, Mamata said surveys were underway for another 50 communities. According to sources, among these 50, 41 are very small in terms of population size, seven are newly applying classes, and two are undergoing re-survey. The chief minister said the aim was to complete the process before the Supreme Court's deadline.She also emphasised the empirical and scientific nature of the methodology. 'The WBCBC has done a meticulous job. We categorised communities into OBC-A and OBC-B based on the depth of backwardness. The more deprived sections have been placed in Category A, which is entitled to 10 per cent reservation. Those relatively less backward are in Category B, which has 7 per cent reservation,' Mamata explained.The revalidation of OBC status, she added, is critical for restarting halted recruitment processes in various government departments and educational institutions. 'As soon as the list is finalised, we can move ahead with pending recruitments,' she told the legislative assembly.However, the Opposition, particularly the BJP, was quick to push back. Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari attempted to respond to Mamata's statement, but assembly speaker Biman Banerjee adjourned the House before he could speak, prompting BJP legislators to erupt in protest.advertisement'The chief minister was unwilling to take questions from the Opposition. The ruling party essentially fled the House because they know Hindus are being deprived. We will continue our fight for justice,' Adhikari told the media outside the assembly.Accusing the state government of communalising the reservation process, he said: 'I challenge the chief minister to publish the full list of the newly added castes. Let people see for themselves how many are from Hindu backgrounds and how many are Muslim. The BJP will be a party to the case in the Supreme Court, which is scheduled for hearing on July 15, and we will defend the interests of Hindu backward communities.'The state government maintains that all documentation, data and evidence used in determining eligibility have been placed before the assembly. 'This process has followed all legal and procedural norms. Religion has no role here,' Mamata reiterated.The political stakes are high. With the 2026 assembly polls looming, the TMC's recalibration of OBC classifications and the BJP's sharp counteroffensive point to a deepening battle over identity, welfare and the arithmetic of electoral mobilisation. For now, the debate is likely to intensify both in the courtroom and on the campaign trail.advertisementWhile, there would still be questions from BJP lawmakers regarding the authenticity of the list—since the majority of the classes classified so far are still Muslims—the WBCBC claims to have followed due process. 'There is evidence that proves that all these Muslim communities live in poverty and are extremely backward,' a source in the government said.Subscribe to India Today Magazine
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
Turning Fear Into Faith: Truth Behind Bhopal's 'Hindu Exodus' Claim
Bhopal: On the morning of July 24, the narrow, crowded alleys of Bhopal's Banganga area suddenly turned into a theatre of chants and colour. Saffron flags fluttered, loudspeakers echoed with cries of "Jai Shri Ram," and amidst the spiritual fervour, a disturbing claim began doing the rounds: that Hindu families were fleeing the area, allegedly harassed by their Muslim neighbours. Some Hindu outfits claimed an exodus was underway and that Hindus were being forced to abandon their homes, but as an NDTV team reached the ground the next day, the truth was far more layered and far removed from the noise. What remained in the streets was a tense silence. The loudspeakers were gone, the saffron flags removed, but the unease lingered. The air carried a weight not of religious strife, but of fear and confusion. What emerged was not a story of communal hatred, but of a personal dispute that had been cleverly repackaged as a religious flashpoint. Radha Yadav, a resident, had put up a poster on her house that read: "Due to harassment by Muslims, this house is for sale." That poster had since disappeared, but the fear in her voice hadn't. She alleged that on July 21, a group of boys vandalised vehicles parked near her house. When she tried to record a video, she says she was hit on the hand, and her son was also assaulted. Her nightly ordeal, she claims, included a crowd of boys gathering outside, abusing her family, issuing threats, and even staging bizarre late-night celebrations like cutting cakes. She said complaints to the police and the Chief Minister's helpline went unanswered and it was then, in frustration and fear, that she posted the sign announcing her intent to sell the house. Her sister, Shanti Kanaujia, who lives next door, shared similar allegations. She claimed that when she protested against the harassment, she was physically attacked. The police, she says, didn't help, and instead, she was blamed, and the sister of one of the accused filed a counter-complaint. "We were the ones assaulted, and they made it look like we were the attackers," she said. Residents in the rest of the locality told a different story. They called it a personal feud, not a communal issue. Deepak Singh, a local, said, "This is not about religion. There have always been flags during Moharram, and now there are saffron flags too and we've coexisted peacefully." Others echoed this sentiment. Arman Khan said that if you parked a car or even passed by Radha's home, she would abuse and threaten to call the police. people who had grown up in the neighbourhood said in one voice: "This is not our fight. Someone is creating this atmosphere." "This locality has never had a communal atmosphere," said Saif Ahmed. "We celebrate festivals together. The Moharram procession starts from a Hindu's house, and the Durga idol is installed near a Muslim's home." Rahul Solanki, a lifelong resident, added, "I've seen Moharram and Holi celebrated here together. There was never any tension; this has been manufactured." Residents like Sheela Raikwar believe that certain organisations are exploiting a personal feud for communal mileage. "They come, shout slogans for 10 minutes, stick posters, create news, and leave," she said. "This is not a Hindu-Muslim issue. It's a private matter, being politicised." The police have now registered an FIR against two individuals based on Shanti's complaint. But there have been no arrests so far. Importantly, the police confirmed that no official complaint of migration due to religious harassment had been received. The so-called protest, they said, had no prior permission and seemed to be a spontaneous political stunt. "We received information from the Banganga area about a scuffle and exchange of abuses between two communities. An FIR has been registered and legal action is underway. However, no arrests have been made so far. No official complaint was submitted to the police station regarding any alleged migration due to harassment by Muslims. The protest that took place did not have prior permission; we were only informed about it," senior police officer Ankita Khatarkar said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
40 minutes ago
- First Post
Yunus's Bangladesh has become a Pakistani client state
Bangladesh and Pakistan have agreed to implement visa-free travel for each other's diplomats and official passport holders—an unprecedented policy shift that marks the most explicit sign yet of Dhaka's growing closeness to Islamabad read more In a move that has raised alarm across Bharat, Bangladesh and Pakistan have agreed to implement visa-free travel for each other's diplomats and official passport holders. This policy shift marks the most explicit sign yet of Dhaka's growing closeness to Islamabad, following the sudden and opaque ouster of Sheikh Hasina in August 2024. Framed officially as a gesture of 'Muslim brotherhood' and 'regional solidarity', this development has far deeper—and darker—implications, especially for Bharat. To those familiar with Bangladesh's liberation struggle, the deal reeks of strategic capitulation and ideological drift. After all, this is the same Pakistan whose military committed unspeakable atrocities in 1971, the very trauma that gave birth to Bangladesh. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The symbolism is unmistakable: Post-Hasina Bangladesh is behaving like a Pakistani client state, seduced back into the orbit of the regime it broke free from five decades ago. And this isn't without precedent. Mujib's Dangerous Playbook What we are witnessing today echoes a disheartening chapter in Bangladesh's formative years. Just two years after leading a bloody struggle for independence, 'Bangabandhu' Sheikh Mujibur Rahman began realigning with Islamabad—a move that stunned Dhaka and Delhi alike. In 1974, Mujib gave a state welcome to Pakistani Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, offering him more honours than were extended to Bharat's President, VV Giri, who had visited Dhaka only days earlier. President Giri's reception was deliberately subdued—overshadowed by preparations for Bhutto's visit—leaving even Bangladeshis puzzled. This contrast wasn't merely accidental. It was a shift in the ideological direction of the state. Mujib's fiery Bengali nationalism began to give way to pan-Islamic overtones. Post-independence, his speeches, once invoking unity among Bengalis, started leaning heavily on Bangladesh's Muslim identity. The man who had once declared, 'I am a human being first, then a Bengali, and then a Muslim,' had reversed that order—signalling a fundamental redefinition of the country's soul. The Aeroplane That Said It All Nothing illustrated Mujib's post-liberation hypocrisy better than the aircraft controversy surrounding his return from Pakistani captivity. Bharat had fought a brutal war and negotiated his release. It had even arranged its own aircraft to fly him home. Yet Mujib chose a British Royal Air Force (RAF) Comet instead. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The British celebrated it as a diplomatic coup, with Rae Britten, the British deputy high commissioner in Dhaka, terming it a 'considerable prestige'. New Delhi was deeply slighted. The row exposed Mujib's desire to downplay Bharat's foundational role in Bangladesh's freedom—and to elevate the West and Islamic powers as future allies. The disregard didn't stop there. At a strategically important railway bridge inauguration shortly afterward—an infrastructure project executed in record time by Bharat's engineers with liberal assistance from New Delhi—Mujib thanked the British for financial support but made no mention of its neighbouring country. He then left by helicopter, inviting only British High Commissioner Sir Arthur Gold aboard. Subimal Dutt, Bharat's distinguished former foreign secretary and ambassador, was left to travel back in a crowded, non-VIP carriage, without food or official courtesy. Author Manash Ghosh, who was then reporting from Dhaka for The Statesman, writes about Subimal Dutt's plight in Mujib's Blunders, one of the best books to come out in recent times. 'No food or water was served to him during the four-hour return journey. He (Dutt) was seen frequently dozing off and his head falling and resting on the shoulders of his co-passengers, who repeatedly woke him up, and he with folded hands sought their forgiveness. 'I go to bed early, hence the problem,' he had gone on to explain embarrassingly,' Ghosh adds. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Mujib's actions were seen as a calculated distancing from Bharat. After all, Subimal Dutt had played a great role in the reconstruction of Bangladesh post-liberation. Today's visa-free agreement with Pakistan carries the same symbolic weight—a statement of ideological realignment. The Return of US-Pakistan Influence Since Sheikh Hasina's ouster, Bangladesh's new administration has moved swiftly to rehabilitate pro-Pakistani forces, many of them linked historically to Jamaat-e-Islami and other Islamist outfits banned by the previous dispensation. While this is being spun as 'democratic pluralism', it is, in reality, a deliberate erasure of the 1971 war consensus that built Bangladesh as a secular, pluralistic republic. The rollback has been quietly orchestrated by Washington, which had long viewed Hasina as an obstacle to its Indo-Pacific strategy. Her refusal to lease St Martin's Island for a US naval base in the Bay of Bengal infuriated American policymakers. Enter Donald Lu, a US State Department official with a dubious reputation for regime change, and Ambassador Peter Haas, whose fingerprints are all over Dhaka's recent political recalibration. Just as the CIA played a silent role in the events leading to Mujib's assassination in 1975, today's developments bear the mark of Washington-Islamabad collusion. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lessons from Mujib's Fall History offers a chilling warning. Mujib's appeasement of Pakistan and alienation of Bharat didn't save him—they isolated him. And now Mohammed Yunus, the economist-turned-administrator propped up by Western and Pakistani interests, is repeating the same fatal mistakes. Yunus weaponised anti-Bharat rhetoric, aided by the Pakistani ISI and the American deep state, to unseat Hasina. But nearly a year later, his administration is floundering amid economic chaos and rising insecurity. Minorities are being terrorised. And the middle class is losing hope amid a declining economy and rising joblessness. Having nothing to show, Yunus is now resorting to Islamist appeasement: invoking jihadist nostalgia, deepening ties with Islamabad, and empowering religious extremists. But as Mujib's downfall proves, this path leads to disaster. Sooner or later, he too will be consumed by the very fire he has ignited. Conclusion Bangladesh stands at a perilous juncture. It can choose ideological amnesia—forgetting war crimes, surrendering to foreign meddling, and embracing Islamist reactionism. Or, it can choose memory, justice, and sovereignty, rooted in the blood sacrifice of 1971 and anchored by Bharat's principled friendship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The choice now lies with the people of Bangladesh. They must confront the Islamist virus that re-emerges with intermittent regularity. This ideology returned for the first time just a couple of years after independence. And now, half a century later, it once again threatens to devour the republic from within. One hopes this is only a passing cloud. If not, Bangladesh risks walking the path to perdition—abandoning its secular foundations, its democratic promise, and the very spirit of its liberation war. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Lok Sabha To First Take Up Motion To Remove Justice Yashwant Verma": Kiren Rijiju
Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju stated that the motion to remove Justice Yashwant Verma, who remains in trouble after burnt wads of cash were recovered from his residence following a fire incident, will be moved in Lok Sabha first, as per the rules. He said that the removal of Justice Verma should be a joint decision. "The motion for the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma will be raised in the Lok Sabha, and then subsequently, it will be concurred by the Rajya Sabha. All political parties have agreed that the removal of Justice Yashwant Verma has to be a joint call," Rijiju told reporters here. He emphasised that initiating the impeachment process of Justice Verma was a collective responsibility of the Parliament, not just the government alone. "We have been making efforts in relation to the matter of Justice Yashwant Verma. We have clearly stated that it is not only the government's efforts, but the entire Parliament is responsible for addressing the issue of corruption in the judiciary and removing judges from the Supreme Court or High Court. We should not be divided on this issue," the Union Minister said. The centre is working to form a committee to probe allegations levelled against Justice Yashwant Verma, government sources said on July 23. This comes after Rijiju stated that signatures of over 100 MPs have been collected for the impeachment process against Justice Verma, who is currently under scrutiny following the discovery of burnt cash at his residence. "The signature (collection) is underway, and it has crossed 100 already," Rijiju said while responding to a question about the status of the requisite signatures of MPs for the impeachment exercise against Justice Verma. When asked about whether the Parliament will take up the issue in this monsoon session scheduled to start on July 21, the Union Minister had said, "In the Justice Varma case, the process will be undertaken together by all parties. This is not the move by the government alone." "I can't comment on any business in terms of priority until and unless the matter is passed by the BAC (Business Advisory Committee) with the approval of the chair. It is difficult to make an announcement outside," he added. On July 21, Members of Parliament submitted a memorandum to the Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to remove High Court Justice Yashwant Varma in connection with the cash discovery row. A total of 145 Lok Sabha members signed the impeachment motion against Justice Varma under Articles 124, 217, and 218 of the from various parties, including the Congress, TDP, JDU, JDS, Jan Sena Party, AGP, SS (Shinde), LJSP, SKP, and CPM, signed the memorandum. Notable signatories include MPs Anurag Singh Thakur, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, Rajiv Pratap Rudy, PP Chaudhary, Supriya Sule, KC Venugopal, and others. Earlier, the sources had informed about the formation of a committee that is likely to include a judge of the Supreme Court, a chief justice from any of the High Courts and a distinguished jurist. The notices for the removal of Justice Varma were given on the first day of the monsoon session of Parliament.
