Syria unveils new national emblem as part of sweeping identity overhaul
Unveiled during a ceremony in Damascus on Thursday, the new emblem reimagines the iconic Syrian golden eagle with symbolic elements representing the country's history, geography and post-conflict aspirations, the Syrian Arab News Agency reported.
The redesign forms the centerpiece of a wider national branding effort aimed at redefining Syria's image at home and abroad.
The eagle has long held significance in Syrian history, appearing in early Islamic military symbolism, notably in the 7th-century Battle of Thaniyat Al-Uqab, and later as part of the 1945 emblem of Syria.
The new design retains this historic continuity but shifts its meaning, and the combative shield clutched by previous iterations of the eagle has been removed.
Instead, the emblem now features the eagle topped by three stars representing the people symbolically placed above the state.
The redesigned wings are outstretched, balanced rather than aggressive, with seven feathers each to represent Syria's 14 governorates.
The tail carries five feathers symbolizing the country's major geographical regions: north, south, east, west, and central Syria — a nod to national unity and inclusivity, SANA reported.
Officials described the design as a 'visual political covenant,' aimed at linking the unity of land with the unity of national decision-making.
'The people, whose ambitions embrace the stars of the sky, are now guarded by a state that protects and enables them,' said a statement accompanying the launch. 'In return, their survival and participation ensure the renaissance of the state.'
The emblem is designed to signal historical continuity with the original post-independence design of 1945, while also representing the vision of a modern Syrian state born from the will of its people, SANA said.
Officials said the elevation of the stars above the eagle was intended to reflect the empowerment and liberation of the people, and the transition from a combative state to a more civic-minded one.
The symbolism also reinforces Syria's territorial integrity, with all regions and governorates represented equally. The design, they said, reflects a new national pact, one that defines the relationship between the state and its citizens based on mutual responsibility and shared aspirations.
The new emblem is also intended as a symbolic end to Syria's past as a security-driven state, replacing a legacy of repression with one of reconstruction and citizen empowerment.
President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, who has positioned his administration as one of reform and renewal, described the change as emblematic of 'a government emanating from the people and serving them.'
The visual identity was developed entirely by Syrian artists and designers, including visual artist Khaled Al-Asali, in a deliberate effort to ground the new identity in local heritage and creativity.
Officials said that the process was intended not only as a rebranding exercise but as a reflection of Syria's cultural and civilizational legacy — and its future potential.
Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shaibani, speaking at the event, framed the launch as part of a broader transformation in Syrian governance and diplomacy.
'In every encounter, we carried a new face of Syria,' he said. 'Our efforts brought Syria back to the international stage — not as a delayed hope, but as a present reality.'
He said the country was now rejecting the 'deteriorated reality' inherited from decades of authoritarian rule, and described the new emblem as a symbol of Syria's emergence as a state that 'guards' and empowers its people, rather than controlling them.
Al-Shaibani concluded his remarks by calling the moment 'a cultural death' for the former regime's narrative.
'What we need today is a national spirit that reclaims the scattered pieces of our Syrian identity, that is the starting point for building the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Syria's reintegration highlights deepening intra-Arab ties
Morocco and Syria in May announced they would reestablish diplomatic relations and reopen their respective embassies in Damascus and Rabat — a symbolic but powerful signal of Syria's reintegration into the Arab world. The move, which comes ahead of a potential visit to Morocco by Syrian leader Ahmad Al-Sharaa, represents a key step forward in Arab unity after years of fragmentation. Damascus' isolation started with the outbreak of civil war in 2011 and was further deepened by Syria's alignment with Tehran. These developments left the country diplomatically estranged from much of the Arab world. The Assad regime's actions resulted in Syria's exclusion from the Arab League, making it a regional outlier for years. That started to change with Syria's readmission to the Arab League in 2023, an important, albeit largely symbolic, first step. The real shift came with the fall of Bashar Assad, which paved the way for a new era under Al-Sharaa's leadership. Since taking power, Al-Sharaa has adopted a clear diplomatic strategy to restore Syria's standing in the Arab region. This direction is not new for Syria, a country long regarded as a key champion of pan-Arabism. Arab nationalism and pan-Arabist ideology were born in Syria during the late Ottoman Empire, with influential figures such as Rashid Rida and Michel Aflaq, among many others, playing a foundational role in promoting Arab unity and independence from both Ottoman and European colonial power. Today, that legacy continues under Al-Sharaa's leadership. He has embraced a nationalist narrative built on unity and trust. 'Syria will not be used to attack or destabilize any Arab or Gulf country,' he declared, calling on regional partners to help rebuild the country 'as part of the Arab world.' Al-Sharaa's first priority was clear: reestablish Syria's legitimacy on the Arab stage. In February, he made his first official foreign visit to Riyadh, meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The agenda included the lifting of economic sanctions, the return of refugees and counterterrorism coordination. This was a strategic move, as Saudi Arabia's engagement signaled to the other Gulf states that Syria was serious about distancing itself from past alliances and forging a new, Arab-centric direction. Since taking power, Al-Sharaa has adopted a clear diplomatic strategy to restore Syria's standing in the Arab region. Zaid M. Belbagi Al-Sharaa's diplomacy extended quickly to Qatar and the UAE, where talks centered on reconstruction and long-term regional cooperation. The following month, Syria presented its reform agenda. In Jordan, agreements and talks focused on enhancing border security and joint efforts to combat the illicit captagon trade, which is a growing concern for both Amman and Riyadh. Syria also regained membership of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and Kuwait announced the imminent reopening of its embassy in Damascus. Beyond high-level visits and embassies reopening, deeper forms of collaboration are also emerging, particularly in reconstruction and infrastructure. In May, Syria and Jordan agreed to form a Higher Coordination Council, marking a significant new phase in their bilateral relations. The deal includes plans to review the 1987 Yarmouk River agreement, reinvigorate joint water committees and explore regional energy integration. Jordan and Syria are also reviving electricity grid links and Qatar has confirmed the supply of 2 million cubic meters of natural gas per day through Jordan, boosting Syrian power generation by 400 megawatts with the aim of doubling its electricity supply. Added to this is the deal of the year for Damascus: a $7 billion agreement with a consortium of companies from the US, Qatar and Turkiye that aims to overhaul Syria's shattered energy and electricity sector. Renewed cooperation and deepening engagement with countries across the region is producing tangible outcomes for Syria. Zaid M. Belbagi The economic impact is already visible. In the first quarter of 2025, 88 contracts were signed for the Syrian-Jordanian free zone at Jaber-Nasib, with more than 800 investors awaiting approval. Daily truck traffic at the border has tripled and Syria's exports to Jordan hit $23.7 million in February alone, a notable increase from just $5.4 million the year before. The growing number of diplomatic visits and expanding trade relations between Syria and countries in the region reflect a broader consensus among Arab states: the time has come to reengage Syria. Al-Sharaa's openness to strengthening ties with the Gulf states, particularly in terms of trade and energy, signals a shift toward deeper integration between the Levant and the Gulf Cooperation Council, as well as more broadly across the Middle East. What began as cautious diplomatic overtures are now materializing into concrete outcomes, paving the way for a better future for Syria. The lifting of American and European sanctions has already enabled the financing of new projects, which are vital to enable the success of the country's reconstruction plan. Besides, with the active support of key Arab states, international organizations are returning to Syria. Saudi Arabia and Qatar have stepped in to repay Syria's $15.5 million debt to the World Bank and to help cover part of the salaries of Syrian civil servants. This renewed cooperation and deepening engagement with countries across the region is producing tangible outcomes for Syria. Al-Sharaa's government is not only reopening embassies and conducting diplomatic visits, but also actively reopening Syria to the region, driven by shared interests in stability, trade and reconstruction. As such, Syria's reintegration stands as a clear indicator of a deepening Arab rapprochement, one that is expected to result in more concrete returns, shaping promising geopolitical alignments and reinforcing ties among Arab states.
Asharq Al-Awsat
6 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Lebanon to Seek US Guarantees in Response to Proposal
Lebanon plans to seek assurances from Washington on the implementation of any future deal involving Hezbollah's disarmament, Lebanese political sources told Asharq Al-Awsat, ahead of a visit by US envoy to Beirut Tom Barrack early next week. The question of US guarantees tops Lebanon's concerns, which are shared not only by Hezbollah but also by the Lebanese state, the sources said. The issue is central to the discussions of a tripartite Lebanese committee that includes representatives of President Joseph Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, meeting regularly at the presidential palace to draft a unified response to a US proposal. In parallel, the Quintet group - comprising the US, France, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Qatar - met at the US embassy in Beirut to discuss the situation, local media reported. Saudi Ambassador Walid Bukhari was absent from the talks, reportedly due to travel. According to the sources, Barrack's visit is not solely to receive Lebanon's response to the US proposal, but also to hold further consultations with the country's top leaders. The US paper outlines a phased plan prioritizing the disarmament of Hezbollah, delineation of Lebanon's land border with Syria, and the implementation of long-delayed financial, economic, and administrative reforms. 'Lebanon views the proposal as the basis for negotiations, not a surrender document,' the sources said, noting that the primary demand to be raised will be related to binding US guarantees. They cited the bitter experience that followed the previous ceasefire deal, after which Israel allegedly continued attacks, held on to five disputed points in southern Lebanon, and hindered the return of displaced residents—all while international aid for reconstruction failed to materialize. 'The committee is meeting almost daily,' one source said. 'There is consensus on the need for an Israeli withdrawal from occupied points and an end to violations as a prerequisite for any deal. These are sovereign principles Lebanon will not abandon.' Despite Hezbollah's public resistance to disarmament, sources described the group's current stance as 'constructive.' Hezbollah is said to be engaging in discussions through the state's official channels, with party officials expressing concern over the absence of international guarantees and the risk of being sidelined politically once it gives up its arms. 'There are internal concerns that Hezbollah could be pushed out of political life, especially after talks around electoral law reforms,' one source said. These fears are compounded by delays in international aid, reconstruction plans, and continued Israeli violations—issues that have persisted since the ceasefire in November. On Wednesday night, Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem reiterated the party's rejection of 'any threat of force or foreign meddling,' and insisted that Hezbollah would not 'surrender land or weapons to the Israeli enemy' or compromise on its rights. Qassem also accused Israel of violating the ceasefire more than 3,700 times, while the international community 'watches silently, calling only for concessions.' He said Hezbollah would continue to resist, as it has done for decades. A senior Hezbollah lawmaker said the group remains open to cooperating on strengthening the Lebanese state and restoring its authority across the country—provided Israel withdraws from disputed southern points and halts its ongoing violations. MP Ali Fayyad, a member of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, said the group 'has consistently shown a positive willingness to cooperate in all matters related to state-building, institutional reform, and improving operational capacities to help achieve the desired stability.' Speaking on Thursday, Fayyad added: 'This includes supporting the state in extending its authority over all Lebanese territory and enabling it to carry out all its duties—chief among them the protection and defense of the people and sovereignty.' However, he warned, 'None of this will be possible unless national efforts unite to achieve a key condition: Israel must withdraw from the five occupied positions it still holds, end its continued violations, and respect Lebanese sovereignty.' Fayyad's comments came amid a broader debate on the future of Hezbollah's weapons and its role within the state. Opposition lawmaker Fadi Karam from the Lebanese Forces party slammed Hezbollah's rhetoric in a post on X. Addressing Hezbollah's Qassem, he wrote: 'Your weapons have destroyed Lebanon and continue to give Israel an excuse to remain on our land. You've tied Lebanon to Iran. And now you claim that handing over your weapons to the Lebanese Army means handing them to Israel? That's delusional and only exposes Lebanon to new wars.' The statements reflect widening divisions over Hezbollah's future role and the path toward national sovereignty and stability, as Lebanon grapples with US-led proposals aimed at de-escalating tensions and launching long-delayed reforms.
Asharq Al-Awsat
7 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
IAEA Pulls Inspectors from Iran as Standoff over Access Drags on
The UN nuclear watchdog said on Friday it had pulled its last remaining inspectors from Iran as a standoff over their return to the country's nuclear facilities bombed by the United States and Israel deepens. Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in a 12-day war three weeks ago. The International Atomic Energy Agency's inspectors have not been able to inspect Iran's facilities since then, even though IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said that is his top priority. Iran's parliament has now passed a law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until the safety of its nuclear facilities can be guaranteed. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency's inspectors will be able to return to Iran. "An IAEA team of inspectors today safely departed from Iran to return to the Agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict," the IAEA said on X. According to Reuters, diplomats said the number of IAEA inspectors in Iran was reduced to a handful after the June 13 start of the war. Some have also expressed concern about the inspectors' safety since the end of the conflict, given fierce criticism of the agency by Iranian officials and Iranian media. Iran has accused the agency of effectively paving the way for the bombings by issuing a damning report on May 31 that led to a resolution by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said he stands by the report. He has denied it provided diplomatic cover for military action. IAEA WANTS TALKS Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Thursday Iran remained committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). "(Grossi) reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible," the IAEA said. The US and Israeli military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran's three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what has happened to much of Iran's nine tons of enriched uranium, especially the more than 400 kg enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade. That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. Iran says its aims are entirely peaceful but Western powers say there is no civil justification for enriching to such a high level, and the IAEA says no country has done so without developing the atom bomb. As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its enriched uranium, which normally is closely monitored by the IAEA, the body that enforces the NPT and verifies countries' declarations. But the bombing of Iran's facilities has now muddied the waters. "We cannot afford that .... the inspection regime is interrupted," Grossi told a press conference in Vienna last week.
